The future is Asian

[HPS Lydia]

Everything said here is mainly of a speculatory nature.

What I write is not speculation. It is from years of working with the Gods and understanding things of a higher nature, on a higher level.

As for how they will be subhuman, I mean actual subhuman. Missing vital components that make a human. The soul and mind will be lacking.

 

[Larissa666]

The entire story is most likely fake.

No, a 'pregnancy robot' wasn't developed in China as option for surrogacy

The story circulated with various AI-generated images purporting to illustrate the invention.

www.snopes.com

(I know Snopes has reputation of leftist bias, but what other body out there is dedicated to checking stuff posted online and researching it? If you know of any let me know.)

But the discussion is thoughtful regardless, maybe one day this really becomes possible.

 

[Yurei]

The entire story is most likely fake.

No, a 'pregnancy robot' wasn't developed in China as option for surrogacy

The story circulated with various AI-generated images purporting to illustrate the invention.

www.snopes.com

(I know Snopes has reputation of leftist bias, but what other body out there is dedicated to checking stuff posted online and researching it? If you know of any let me know.)

But the discussion is thoughtful regardless, maybe one day this really becomes possible.

Snopes is Jewish. I wouldn't trust it.

 

[Yurei]

This is just as retarded and anti life as the "bone marrow baby" idea that feminists promoted a few years back.

 

[Pammy]

I’m simply going to need evidence that artificial wombs aren’t good for proper gestation. Everything said here is mainly of a speculatory nature. Perhaps there is a way to properly gestate a baby artificially.

I don’t know the mechanics of it, but I do know that babies love to be held by their mothers because they can hear their mom’s heartbeat and feel at home, just like when they were in the womb. They can recognize their dad’s voice if he spoke to them often before birth. Babies develop food preferences depending on what their mother ate during pregnancy. They are affected by everything their mother goes through. If she was stressed, the baby is more likely to have higher cortisol levels. There is the epigenetic side of it too, time in the womb will prepare the baby for the world they will be facing. If mom is worried about war/hunger/cold, the baby’s body may adapt by developing stress responses, metabolism, and survival strategies suited for a harsh environment.

As for enemy support of it, they support it for different reasons than I do. It’s not really about equality, it’s about solving the population crisis, caused by jewish feminists in the first place.

Equality is not the reason, it is the justification. How and why did you think they caused the population crisis, excluding the dispossession of regular people? They claimed childbearing is the origin of women's oppression, not religion or anything else. By connecting childbearing to bad things women went through, they succeded in making fertility an undesired thing for women. Eliminating biological gender difference is the ultimate goal. Before even knowing jews produced the argument, with shock and horror I thought ''Is this what happened to others who fell to the enemy like Greys?'' at the first time I heard of this.

Government incentives won’t fix this crisis, cause it was caused by psychological warfare and social conditioning. Millions of women were convinced to not have children cause it’s “oppressive”, they weren’t forced or paid to have no children. Men too were conditioned in other ways. They’re not going to be paid to have them either. Jewish conditioning for most Gentiles appears to be permanent, so this technology may be the thing that’ll produce more bodies for Whites and East Asians in the future.

Government incentives can only make reproduce people who shouldn't reproduce. As long as children are a liability, not an asset like in the past, making it a less of a liability won't fix it. It stays a liability. The fix is not giving out pocket money but making it possible for young couples who want children to own homes and be financially stable. Only then will responsible people have more children.

Conditioning is not permanent. Spiritual warfare will be mirrored in the material world. If some bloodlines were cut before this happens, like sterilized trans people, it is not very different from any other war that people fell before they had a chance to produce offspring.

Time will tell if this technology is a good thing or not. If it turns out not to be I’ll change my mind.

I can imagine. It will be adopted in some groups. People will be born from artificial wombs. Time has passed, the difference is established. Some people does not want to be associated with artificial-borns. They protest for racism and discrimination.

 

[AFODO]

I don't know why you insist on defending greyification especially against our HPS, you can do this in other communities where this is acceptable.

 

[Epiphany]

I don't know why you insist on defending greyification especially against our HPS, you can do this in other communities where this is acceptable.

He is still new, he has a bit of a materialistic mindset still. He's not aware yet of the spiritual ramifications of unnatural births. Give him time, be reasonable. His heart is in the right place but his mind has to catch up to it.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

I don't know why you insist on defending greyification especially against our HPS, you can do this in other communities where this is acceptable.

I did say I oppose transhumanism. I have a strong aversion to merging man and machine. I’ll recant my position on this because of HPS Lydia’s comments on the matter. I want humanity to evolve and develop, not decline. I just saw this as a great way to solve the low birth rate problem. Men and women should have children the natural way, not in this unnatural fashion. Hopefully the anti-natalist paradigm shifts and I’m already seeing signs of that. I did also say natural births were preferable to artificial wombs but since the latter are absolutely detrimental, i’ll oppose the concept then entirely.

Yes I have a cynical, semi-materialistic determinist view. I’m not ashamed of it and see it as a realist way of seeing things. This includes factoring in the spiritual dimension of reality.

 

[SSinHeartandSoul]

Overtime this will fix the birth rate. I expect this to be mass produced and exported to South Korea and Japan over the next few years.

If you want to "fix" the birth rates there is not a whole lot that needs to be done, its one of the easiest solutions there is actually. The only thing that needs to be done is putting humanity back into their natural habitat, the way we live today is very unnatural. Unnatural living conditions will cause unnatural behaviors like not wanting kids / not wanting a partner on a massive scale, how can you care for someone else when you are barely able take care of yourself under those conditions after all?

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

I don’t know the mechanics of it, but I do know that babies love to be held by their mothers because they can hear their mom’s heartbeat and feel at home, just like when they were in the womb. They can recognize their dad’s voice if he spoke to them often before birth. Babies develop food preferences depending on what their mother ate during pregnancy. They are affected by everything their mother goes through. If she was stressed, the baby is more likely to have higher cortisol levels. There is the epigenetic side of it too, time in the womb will prepare the baby for the world they will be facing. If mom is worried about war/hunger/cold, the baby’s body may adapt by developing stress responses, metabolism, and survival strategies suited for a harsh environment.

Equality is not the reason, it is the justification. How and why did you think they caused the population crisis, excluding the dispossession of regular people? They claimed childbearing is the origin of women's oppression, not religion or anything else. By connecting childbearing to bad things women went through, they succeded in making fertility an undesired thing for women. Eliminating biological gender difference is the ultimate goal. Before even knowing jews produced the argument, with shock and horror I thought ''Is this what happened to others who fell to the enemy like Greys?'' at the first time I heard of this.


Government incentives can only make reproduce people who shouldn't reproduce. As long as children are a liability, not an asset like in the past, making it a less of a liability won't fix it. It stays a liability. The fix is not giving out pocket money but making it possible for young couples who want children to own homes and be financially stable. Only then will responsible people have more children.

Conditioning is not permanent. Spiritual warfare will be mirrored in the material world. If some bloodlines were cut before this happens, like sterilized trans people, it is not very different from any other war that people fell before they had a chance to produce offspring.


I can imagine. It will be adopted in some groups. People will be born from artificial wombs. Time has passed, the difference is established. Some people does not want to be associated with artificial-borns. They protest for racism and discrimination.

The reason for most of the higher IQ people not having children, or not having as many as they want to have, is mostly for economic reasons. They know what they can afford or not afford, and they are planning what it would cost to raise another child. It is mostly the lower IQ people who don't think about this at all and have 10 children that they aren't able to provide for.

Things like child tax credits would help. But what is most important is to fix the economy. Allow people to have good jobs that pay good money, and decrease inflation. Stop having the governments waste trillions of dollars on corrupt fake bullshit. When the economy is good, there will be many more children.

 

[FancyMancy]

Depends on how it’s used.

The enemy won't go straight in to having it happen quickly. It prefers to normalise things first, so any opposers are spoken-over, rather than overspoken, and the supporters push it along, people become used to it enough, any other steps that I am not privy to know until it comes out, then greyification be implemented.

 

[FancyMancy]

Nobody can do nature better than nature herself.

I strongly disagree with that statement. Humans have done things better than nature in many things. Our intellect is exactly why we’re above all the other animals.

Nature’s products were billions of years of throwing things on the wall and seeing what sticks. 99% of all speices that have ever lived are extinct. Any human with that failure rate would be called a disaster.

And where exactly do you think that intelligence came from? Where do you think the Gods came from? Was it not nature? Tell me where you think it came from if not nature.

One of my thoughts is "man-made objects are still Natural" because - as you said - Nature made Man. "I am the Universe experiencing itself." Nature makes Man, Man makes objects; therefore, Nature makes objects. Without Nature, no Man and no objects would exist. Nature makes germs and Nature makes the Sun which can kill. It's a matter of choice about objects being used - how they, including technology, are used, and by whom. I would add "and for what purpose" but that is obvious when it comes to the jew...

 

[FancyMancy]

I’m simply going to need evidence that artificial wombs aren’t good for proper gestation. Everything said here is mainly of a speculatory nature.

Sorry, but you just contradicted yourself. "I need evidence of claims. My claim is that you just guess." Prove it.

Now a gentler reply to you - how much of Spiritual Satanism-cum-Zevism have you practiced? Which workings, which meditations? How much advancement have you made and where? That's a rhetorical question, but if one advances in things, then they can learn things. People - including those who know nothing about Spiritual Satanism/Zevism - have unconscious, unexplainable understanding and realisation - intuitions, which are real and true and correct. Yes, of course, anything can be ignored and dismissed with any particular groups of words. "Intuition is just coincidence." Prove it. Not everything can be explained by and with logic, Mr Spock.

 

[FancyMancy]

I cannot imagine the curse it would be to be born a child of no mother.
Gods willing no Zevist is ever incarnated into such a wretched existence, I would rather grow up in a cartel controlled slum to a mother who loves me than whatever the fuck this is.

Conversely, a strong Zevist Soul might be able to survive such a thing, and have the correct disposition to speak out against it after he/she grows up. That might also put it in a good light, "Look - he/she was born from a robot, an abomination of Nature, but now he/she is fine and a strong person". Anton LaVey was put into an inferior (jew) body for correct reasons...

 

[FancyMancy]

Awful is the world for the most dangerous and suicidal type of voter in any white or formerly white country. AWFL, affluent white female liberals.


The only thing that I am is love, and I have the highest love for our people and especially for our women. But they need to stop trying to kill all of us by voting for our extinction. It is like the man is driving the car on the highway, and the woman keeps trying to reach over to pull on the steering wheel and make them crash into a tree.

They need another option, a better to vote for. They don't have such decent option in politics, by the looks of it.

 

[Henu the Great]

Conversely, a strong Zevist Soul might be able to survive such a thing, and have the correct disposition to speak out against it after he/she grows up. That might also put it in a good light, "Look - he/she was born from a robot, an abomination of Nature, but now he/she is fine and a strong person". Anton LaVey was put into an inferior (jew) body for correct reasons...

Sure, but one would have a crippled existence by doing so.

 

[FancyMancy]

I am lucky that we have our family here to help and teach people, and provide a location for smart women and men to come here and work to help our people.

Again I am reminded about something in my siggie - the schism of people. I wasn't being prophetic (which is actually lyrics from a song). I just realised it to be about to happen more, and more obviously, than before.

 

[FancyMancy]

The entire story is most likely fake.

No, a 'pregnancy robot' wasn't developed in China as option for surrogacy

The story circulated with various AI-generated images purporting to illustrate the invention.

www.snopes.com

(I know Snopes has reputation of leftist bias, but what other body out there is dedicated to checking stuff posted online and researching it? If you know of any let me know.)

But the discussion is thoughtful regardless, maybe one day this really becomes possible.

If this is fake, then I refer to an opinion of mine - the jew puts things out to test how Humans react and behave, so it has information of how to proceed. Similarly, surveys and reviews, etc., work. It's big data/data mining.

 

[FancyMancy]

Sure, but one would have a crippled existence by doing so.

In short - yeah, I couldn't argue against that.

In long - I would like to try and think positively about it - "A strong-enough Zevist Soul would be OK, if not fine", but I can't. I didn't articulate it as well as how @HPS Lydia said it, and also in the quote about her, but being in the womb is being within Mum's Soul, which Baby connects with. When 2 people orgasm together, their Souls and Energies mingle; Baby in the womb, and Mother, mingle. Even if I try to not argue but just imagine "a strong-enough Zevist Soul would be OK, if not fine" I still can't with realising Mum and Babies' Souls being so vitally-important; and then what HPS Lydia said and another of her quotes which @Pammy shared, and also about what Pammy said, that was so interesting, but then reading further and coming to the part about if Mum is worried about things, Baby develops accordingly, was something I never considered and was really amazed by that. So trying to argue imagine that a strong Zevist Soul would not be fine but merely OK in a robot "womb", I cannot.

Everyone should realise, remember, and bear in-mind - "womb" = "matrix"; "matrix" = "womb". Also "Matric-" being "Mother". The jew wants the "womb" to be technology, wants technology to be "womb" instead. Remember, "god" - the jew - told us that Mary, and underaged girl, consented to being impregnated.

We've all seen the Matrix films, haven't we not? The pod where Neo wakes up in. The actual name of the film franchise is the Womb. Think about that.

 

[Pammy]

what Pammy said, that was so interesting

Another very interesting thing is breast milk is personalized in real time. If the baby is sick, it contains more antibodies and immune cells. When it is sleeping time, the milk contains higher levels of melatonin to help baby sleep.

Epigenetic changes may or may not be favorable for the baby. It is no good if the baby is exposed to stress hormones during the most part of the pregnancy and have to battle with chronical stress throughout their life because of this. Since you find it interesting, although it is in Turkish, I will refer to this post which was excerpts of It Didn't Start with You by Mark Wolynn and criticisim of the over-represantation of jews like Rachel Yehuda in epigenetics. Someone in the replies recommended Joe Dispenza on the subject.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Another very interesting thing is breast milk is personalized in real time. If the baby is sick, it contains more antibodies and immune cells. When it is sleeping time, the milk contains higher levels of melatonin to help baby sleep.

Epigenetic changes may or may not be favorable for the baby. It is no good if the baby is exposed to stress hormones during the most part of the pregnancy and have to battle with chronical stress throughout their life because of this. Since you find it interesting, although it is in Turkish, I will refer to this post which was excerpts of It Didn't Start with You by Mark Wolynn and criticisim of the over-represantation of jews like Rachel Yehuda in epigenetics. Someone in the replies recommended Joe Dispenza on the subject.

Yes I heard about that about the milk.

 

[Disciple of the Serpent]

‘Pregnancy robots’ could give birth to human children in revolutionary breakthrough — and a game-changer for infertile couples

If all goes according to plan, the prototype will make its debut next year.

nypost.com

What will basically happen here is the richer men will be able to buy the eggs and raise them in these robots. Overtime this will fix the birth rate. I expect this to be mass produced and exported to South Korea and Japan over the next few years.

East Asia’s future is secure. Whether this will be adopted in Europe and the US is left to be seen. Anti-natalist misanthropic faggots get another punch in the gut, imo this one’s fatal.

A baby need to be inside the mother womb and be connected to her phisically.
The whole thing is very symbolic and natural. Replacing this with a machine doesn't look good at all.

 

[Disciple of the Serpent]

This will not solve the problem of low birthrates, because babies born like this will be subhuman. You are completely disregarding spirituality, humans needs to be born the normal way in order to be human.

We want humans to be born, not subhumans.

Good Evening High Priestess!

I was wondering if this will be a third type of human, I remeber something said by HP, I don't remember where, but it involved machines or some future technology.

 

[Disciple of the Serpent]

Satan On The Creation Of Man, Immortality And The "Transhumanist" Agenda

Many months ago, I have asked Satan in regards to this "Transhumanist" agenda. At some point many years ago I found this confusing due to lower understanding, despite of understanding something was inherently wrong with this as any person with a soul should. This also involves the agenda of...

www.ancient-forums.com

May be useful to re-read.

 

[FancyMancy]

Another very interesting thing is breast milk is personalized in real time. If the baby is sick, it contains more antibodies and immune cells. When it is sleeping time, the milk contains higher levels of melatonin to help baby sleep.

Epigenetic changes may or may not be favorable for the baby. It is no good if the baby is exposed to stress hormones during the most part of the pregnancy and have to battle with chronical stress throughout their life because of this. Since you find it interesting, although it is in Turkish, I will refer to this post which was excerpts of It Didn't Start with You by Mark Wolynn and criticisim of the over-represantation of jews like Rachel Yehuda in epigenetics. Someone in the replies recommended Joe Dispenza on the subject.

Thanks. I'll have to try and go through that, and no offence but (and I am a bit ashamed or embarrassed to not know about it but) it seems like I'm being gaslit with being told how Mum's Body regulates hormones in the milk for Baby. It doesn't seem real. I'm not saying it's not, it's just... like... (forgive me for using this as an example) a christian thinking they know what Spirituality is, but then coming here and learning about things they had absolutely no idea whatsoever about. I have heard of epigenetics before a few times, not many times, but I can't believe that I didn't know about (or if I learnt it years ago, then forgot entirely) Mum regulating milk Naturally for Baby, despite Baby being born, a separate, individual person.

I'm trying to think whether or not I did know, but I can't seem to recall anything, so either I forgot or I never knew about it. I did know about the symbiotic relationship between Mum and Baby in the womb, though; Baby can give-off hormones or cells to Mum - which can, again like you said, be both good or bad... but about the milk - wow. Mind blown (and I never say "mind blown"). Oh - and this is Nature. This is Natural. Not cold, beatless/heartless, soulless empty plastic and metal. I think there's a reason Nature is given the affectionate and very-well-deserved Name and Title Mother Nature.

Now I have learnt another reason why the jew hates Females. Without which, the offspring would be living dead zombies. That's what the jew needs. That's what it fantasises about.

(I did a tiny bit of checking.) Even fat content in Mum's milk changes, depending on if separate, individual Baby is hungry or full; Mum can detect that. I don't want to soil this with stupid emoticons, but the blank stare and blank blinking emoticons might fit here.

You know, there are some things that you just cannot - can not - believe, and this is one of them. It's beyond fascinating. Usually, my height of interest and learning is fascination, not 'beyond fascination' and not 'mind-blowing', but this is beyond fascinating and mind-blowing. It's like when someone is so utterly ridiculously stupid that you simply cannot understand, nor believe, that they are being so, and you might think that you're dreaming because it's so surreal and... just not real - but the opposite of that, about good things.

single chuckle to self Hm. I just developed a new dislike and hatred against the jew. A new realisation about how it is beyond contemptible. Its misogynism, and general hatred against Humans, reached a new height of my knowledge and new depth of learning and what I'm understanding now. SMH...

 

[Pammy]

but I can't believe that I didn't know about (or if I learnt it years ago, then forgot entirely) Mum regulating milk Naturally for Baby, despite Baby being born, a separate, individual person.

Yes, it is very interesting. Forgive me for copy-pasting the following part a little bit as I don't know the details of how it happens and fancy science terms:

When the baby nurses, small amounts of saliva pass into the mother’s breast, carrying chemical signals about the baby’s health. The mother’s body can detect these signals and adjust the composition of her milk accordingly, for example by increasing antibodies if the baby is fighting an infection. Breast milk also changes with the time of day, containing more cortisol in the morning to help the baby wake up and more melatonin at night to support sleep.

If a baby is born prematurely, the mother’s milk is different from that of a mother who gave birth at term. Premature milk naturally contains higher levels of proteins, immune factors, and certain nutrients that support rapid growth and organ development. As the baby grows and catches up developmentally, the milk gradually shifts in composition to meet the changing needs.

As for the epigenetic changes, it is not exactly like evolution. DNA sequence does not change. It is the regulatory process, maybe we can call it programming, of which genes will be activated. We have the DNA of our ancestors, right? Not every characteristic shows in every single offspring, but it continues to be passed down. Epigenetics is the study of changes in gene activity that do not involve alterations to the DNA sequence itself. It is about which gene will be expressed. Epigenetic changes may occur in the womb or after birth, throughout life. If an epigenetic change happens, it may be passed down to the next generation.

The most intense and critical epigenetic changes occur in the womb.

I didn't took the book I mentioned in the previous reply seriously at first because I knew its name from new-age spiritualists talking about reincarnation but when a certified psychologist also reccommended it, I finally read it. It is very interesting if you can ignore the jewish influence.

 

[Pammy]

...

I may have caused confusion by not clearly separating the milk thing from epigenetic changes. They are two different interesting phenomena. Epigenetic mechanisms do not directly alter the composition of breast milk(?).

 

[FancyMancy]

I may have caused confusion by not clearly separating the milk thing from epigenetic changes. They are two different interesting phenomena. Epigenetic mechanisms do not directly alter the composition of breast milk(?).

I just did a quick bit of checking, not proper research. Thanks for posting it!

 

[Pammy]

The only thing that I am is love, and I have the highest love for our people and especially for our women. But they need to stop trying to kill all of us by voting for our extinction.

I thought I did, but it seems I forgot to quote this. Voting behavior is rarely rational. Political scientists study this and maybe 1/10 of the voters exhibit something similar to rational voting behavior (weighing costs and benefits, comparing party platforms, and choosing the option that serves their interests, switching parties according to what serves their best interests) in the USA and Europe.

Most of the voters rely on social identification while deciding who to vote. Both women and men are very tribal, however, I'll dare suggesting women are more tribal, well maybe not more tribal. Women are more sensitive to social exclusion (anthropoligsts say that's because they and their children would most definitely die if they were expelled), cooperation and keeping the peace are more important than their personal gains while men are more competitive. These don't apply to everyone of course.

Politically, women's tribe is ''redefined'' for them to identify with immigrants and not their kin. That's the core issue. Women are willing to sacrifice for their tribe but their tribe is not actually their tribe. Whoever grouped women's rights with minority rights and refugee rights, then positioned it against national interests or in the exact opposite, grouping christian misogynistic beliefs with nationalism and positioning it against women's rights, is to blame. All of this is very stupid. ''I can't vote for christians to ban abortion and make women lose rights even if I get molested by a foreigner, so be this my sacrifice.''

Voting behavior is not rational, it is tribal and white women's tribe is redefined on purpose. This is for the USA. Again, these not apply to everyone. Many white women vote for nationalist parties across the globe. I'm just saying this because of the voting tendency you mentioned. They are pushing women to vote for more immigration by tying it to not losing women's rights.

Each country should be studied separately. UK people voted for Brexit to stop immigration from poorer European countries, their leaders answered by importing more brown people. Nobody voted for letting Syrians into Turkey, so-called nationalist party teamed with islamists to make it happen. Does it even matter what we vote? Disillusionment with democracy, political scientists call it.

 

[FancyMancy]

Does it even matter what we vote?

A quote attributed, possibly falsely, to Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) -

If voting made a difference, they wouldn't let us do it.

Whether or not the attribution is correct, the point still stands and is a good one.

Disillusionment with democracy, political scientists call it.

Democracy is the freedom to vote for our own dick-tators. Some say democracy is the freedom to vote for those who will screw you, so again, dick-tators. It's as if the (((enemy))) reckons it owns Earth and Her Inhabitants, and reckons it can put things in place that seem to be good or merely OK, but clearly are not, after Humans fight back; the jew doesn't give us 100% of our demands (as if we "need" to get our things from it), but gives a smaller amount and changes them just enough so it seems like some of our demands are met and so it seems like those are met as we demanded them, but they are neither met nor as we demanded them. Like we demand a 2kg apple crumble but it gives us a 1.75kg pear crackle (imagine that however you think it might be) and it says "It's still fruit and it still crunches!", and leaves it at that, and since we had to compromise because it won't "entertain us" further, then that is a wedge in to opening things much wider away from what we actually demand. In supply and demand, the jew tries to use all manner of tricks and psychology and advertising and "education" and lip service in politics, etc., etc., etc. to make us think that the smaller pear crackle is better for us - and it charges us more for that than how much the 2kg apple crumble would have cost because it reckons it can put a premium on things. Not just in cash/money, as well.

 

[Pammy]

A quote attributed, possibly falsely, to Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens) -

If voting made a difference, they wouldn't let us do it.

Whether or not the attribution is correct, the point still stands and is a good one.


Democracy is the freedom to vote for our own dick-tators. Some say democracy is the freedom to vote for those who will screw you, so again, dick-tators. It's as if the (((enemy))) reckons it owns Earth and Her Inhabitants, and reckons it can put things in place that seem to be good or merely OK, but clearly are not, after Humans fight back; the jew doesn't give us 100% of our demands (as if we "need" to get our things from it), but gives a smaller amount and changes them just enough so it seems like some of our demands are met and so it seems like those are met as we demanded them, but they are neither met nor as we demanded them. Like we demand a 2kg apple crumble but it gives us a 1.75kg pear crackle (imagine that however you think it might be) and it says "It's still fruit and it still crunches!", and leaves it at that, and since we had to compromise because it won't "entertain us" further, then that is a wedge in to opening things much wider away from what we actually demand. In supply and demand, the jew tries to use all manner of tricks and psychology and advertising and "education" and lip service in politics, etc., etc., etc. to make us think that the smaller pear crackle is better for us - and it charges us more for that than how much the 2kg apple crumble would have cost because it reckons it can put a premium on things. Not just in cash/money, as well.

Yes, but nuanced. The Nazi Party was the largest party in the parliament, proportionally to their votes. They came into power democratically. In order to ensure this will never happen again, jews had to find ways to police democracy. Of course, criticism of democracy such as the ''Tyranny of the Majority'' of French aristocrat and diplomat Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835–40) has been around for a long time. What if 51% is convinced that red haired women are witches, will they be allowed to burn them because they are the majority? What if 51% convinced that Zevists are evil, can they confiscate our property and exile us? No, the majority vote is not the most important thing. In constitutional democracies, individual rights and freedoms such as the right to life, freedom of religion and conscience, freedom of thought and expression, access to education, healthcare, work, housing, and information are protected under the rule of law, the separation of powers, and an independent judiciary. Constitutional democracy is supposed to protect our rights even from the majority. Of course, this protection depends on a strong constitution and the rule of law, and it is also important which law is applied. Not Islamic law or inquisition law, obviously. Anyways I'm rambling.

Jews learned their lessons when people elected the Nazis through democracy. Yes, democracy has been criticized since the Athenians invented it. Socrates criticizes democracy in Plato's Republic. However, jews do it to arm themselves with more tools. Austrian jew Karl Hopper's The Paradox of Tolerance (1945) ''Democracy should not tolerate the ones who will not be tolerant to others (others=jews here)'' and German jew Karl Loewenstein's Militant Democracy (1937). This is rather complicated. Militant democracy is good when it is employed to prevent muslims from forming political parties even though it defies people's right to freedom of expression and get elected, however, Militant Democracy is not good when it is employed by jews to eliminate their enemies from democratic elections. I actually explained this in greater detail in Democracy, Deliberative Democracy, and Ad Hominem. If I had a nickel for every time I referred you to Turkish forum, I'd have 2 nickels, which isn't a lot but it's weird it happened twice in the same thread. Sorry about that.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Pammy is being very educational and interesting in this topic.

 

[THE WISE ONE]

In the West immigrants will self remigrate after the system has collapsed and the economy, hardlines ethnic separations will be made out both whites and non whites., in the white areas and with their own laws made they will keep out the non whites, as a parasite doesn't produce anything only take they drench in their own shit and disease will spread in their enclaves and due to lack of food water medicine, and thinking do they want to die slowly here or is it better leave and return to their own countries.

So do not worry we will win.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

In the West immigrants will self remigrate after the system has collapsed and the economy, hardlines ethnic separations will be made out both whites and non whites., in the white areas and with their own laws made they will keep out the non whites, as a parasite doesn't produce anything only take they drench in their own shit and disease will spread in their enclaves and due to lack of food water medicine, and thinking do they want to die slowly here or is it better leave and return to their own countries.

So do not worry we will win.

You're completely ignoring the militaries and technologies, both of which the enemy have strong control over (but perhaps not total? idk).

If everything collapses the states won't just disappear, they'll enforce martial law, and depending on who's in charge, that could to a full on communist, technocratic state, and once they recover from the collapse they can restart importing more people in, under a more tightly controlled system. I don't think collapse is the saviour you think it is.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

You're completely ignoring the militaries and technologies, both of which the enemy have strong control over (but perhaps not total? idk).

If everything collapses the states won't just disappear, they'll enforce martial law, and depending on who's in charge, that could to a full on communist, technocratic state, and once they recover from the collapse they can restart importing more people in, under a more tightly controlled system. I don't think collapse is the saviour you think it is.

In European countries where the citizens have no weapons, they're completely at the mercy of the military. In the US it's a different story, for now.

 

[Henu the Great]

In European countries where the citizens have no weapons, they're completely at the mercy of the military. In the US it's a different story, for now.

In Europe, civilian armaments are highly regulated, but not nonexistent. There are several EU states with quite a lot of civilian armaments, such as Switzerland, Czechia, Finland... Then there are numerous states with a lot of illicit arms, and then there is this ongoing Ukraine conflict, from where arms have spread across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Besides, the military is other people, meaning, our spiritual efforts affect them too, to our benefit, I may add.

You're completely ignoring the militaries and technologies, both of which the enemy have strong control over (but perhaps not total? idk).

If everything collapses the states won't just disappear, they'll enforce martial law, and depending on who's in charge, that could to a full on communist, technocratic state, and once they recover from the collapse they can restart importing more people in, under a more tightly controlled system. I don't think collapse is the saviour you think it is.

Public confidence is decreasing and will collapse around 2032. This, combined with the rise of awareness thanks to our spiritual efforts, means that the scenarios you have laid out are unlikely to occur.

 

[FancyMancy]

Yes, but nuanced. The Nazi Party was the largest party in the parliament, proportionally to their votes. They came into power democratically. In order to ensure this will never happen again, jews had to find ways to police democracy. Of course, criticism of democracy such as the ''Tyranny of the Majority'' of French aristocrat and diplomat Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America (1835–40) has been around for a long time. What if 51% is convinced that red haired women are witches, will they be allowed to burn them because they are the majority? What if 51% convinced that Zevists are evil, can they confiscate our property and exile us? No, the majority vote is not the most important thing. In constitutional democracies, individual rights and freedoms such as the right to life, freedom of religion and conscience, freedom of thought and expression, access to education, healthcare, work, housing, and information are protected under the rule of law, the separation of powers, and an independent judiciary. Constitutional democracy is supposed to protect our rights even from the majority. Of course, this protection depends on a strong constitution and the rule of law, and it is also important which law is applied. Not Islamic law or inquisition law, obviously. Anyways I'm rambling.

Jews learned their lessons when people elected the Nazis through democracy. Yes, democracy has been criticized since the Athenians invented it. Socrates criticizes democracy in Plato's Republic. However, jews do it to arm themselves with more tools. Austrian jew Karl Hopper's The Paradox of Tolerance (1945) ''Democracy should not tolerate the ones who will not be tolerant to others (others=jews here)'' and German jew Karl Loewenstein's Militant Democracy (1937). This is rather complicated. Militant democracy is good when it is employed to prevent muslims from forming political parties even though it defies people's right to freedom of expression and get elected, however, Militant Democracy is not good when it is employed by jews to eliminate their enemies from democratic elections. I actually explained this in greater detail in Democracy, Deliberative Democracy, and Ad Hominem. If I had a nickel for every time I referred you to Turkish forum, I'd have 2 nickels, which isn't a lot but it's weird it happened twice in the same thread. Sorry about that.

I realise that it is important to differentiate meaning, when saying "democracy" as a political system and saying "democracy" as that which is actually democratic. They don't seem to be the same - and that, of course, was done on purpose. I refer again to "New Labour". If Labour is Labour, then it is for what it is for, so "new" doesn't work. It's like a denomination of the Labour party; it's still Labour, so "new" means nothing.

As for 51% voting not winning for all things absolutely, and "Constitutional democracy is supposed to protect our rights even from the majority.", we are glad that we live in a more secular World, in more secular Societies, because if we didn't, then it's obvious the majority rule would deny, reject, counter and delete constitutional protections. It's only recognised by people. If society changes radically back to xianity, or changes radically to islam (either way, jewish), then without the Gods and Goddesses and any Champion on Earth to help us, I have zero doubt democracy and constitutional protections would no longer be recognised; therefore, they would be deleted and people being burnt at the stake for making a magnet move a piece of metal under a piece of paper would return. No doubt whatsoever.

I wouldn't be able to give you any nickels, but I might be able to give you some nickel. I'm from the UK, so... you can have... erm... How much is 2 nickels? 20 cents? So I'd have to give you 15 pence. I can't promise that I will go through your 2 (so far!) posts in Turkish any time soon. It's on my "To Do(? Eventually?!)" list, lol.

 

[FancyMancy]

In the West immigrants will self remigrate after the system has collapsed and the economy, hardlines ethnic separations will be made out both whites and non whites., in the white areas and with their own laws made they will keep out the non whites, as a parasite doesn't produce anything only take they drench in their own shit and disease will spread in their enclaves and due to lack of food water medicine, and thinking do they want to die slowly here or is it better leave and return to their own countries.

So do not worry we will win.

That which used to be Warrior Class has been weakened and deleted. It is "illegal" and "wrong" to defend one's own now. Can anyone understand that? Self-preservation is "wrong". Self-preservation is "illegal". We have to rely on jew-installed so-called "systems" and groups to "protect" us and "defend" us, etc. from the christian hell it is and has been creating for us to burn in. Having non-Whites playing for TeamGB? Hm. MtF trans playing in Women's sports? That doesn't work, though! Non-Whites in the British Armed Forces? That makes no sense to me. Maybe if they are helping to preserve our own Whitehood in our White Country and accept and understand that that's what they're doing and genuinely willing to help, then maybe; but then in the future, our Pride will be less, because we didn't do it ourselves... but then it is Humans versus the jew, so protocols are enacted as an when required. Once Blacks and Asians realise Whitey is not evil, the jew is - and that the jew is not White - then we'll all be on firm ground and better footing. One does not put salt in a cake where the recipe calls for sugar; salt goes on other foods. Races can be near each other but not mix. The jew is the stirrer, the one stirring-up shit.

As for that video - I haven't watched it. Like I said just above, I can't promise that I will.

 

[Henu the Great]

That which used to be Warrior Class has been weakened and deleted. It is "illegal" and "wrong" to defend one's own now.

Here I would suggest looking further than your police forces which are perhaps the most subverted in the world. For example, the British SAS is one of the best in the world. There is law enforcement, fire departments, and other related departments where the Warrior archetype is at its finest.