Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

Tutankhamun's Great-Grandmother Found to Have Blonde Hair

Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
224
Tutankhamun's Great-Grandmother Found to Have Blonde Hair
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=60353

1222111d11d1d.jpg


From The Daily Star:
Egyptian noblewoman Tjuyu – who is believed to have died in 1375 BC – is most widely known as being the great-grandmother of legendary pharaoh Tutankhamun.

Her tomb was found in 1905 -- 18 years before Tut's -- but it has rarely been opened.

In Channel 5 documentary The Nile: Egypt's Great River, historian Bettany Hughes was given the chance to witness such an occasion at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.

[...] The presenter then notices something strange, the "strawberry-blonde" hair of the mummified body.

More from Ancient Origins:
This somewhat bizarre phenomena was explained away by Egyptologist Ikram [on Channel 5] who said that it is unclear how her hair got to be this color, saying "We're not 100% sure [if that is her original hair ]."

One of the reasons offered for the color of hair is the use of 'natrons' in the mummification processes . This naturally occurring mixture of 'sodium carbonate decahydrate', which was also an ancient household insecticide , was primarily used for making leather and to bleach clothing. This implies Tjuyu's true hair color might have been deliberately lightened to give it a blonde-look or may have occurred accidentally through mummification.

Blond Egyptians

In the last section when I referred to "the vast majority of other Ancient Egyptian mummies" having dark brown hair, well, I chose those words very carefully because according to Dr. Janet Davey from the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia, some ancient Egyptians were naturally blond and sometimes red haired .

An article recently published by The Sydney Morning Herald explains that most researchers claim different colors of the mummy hair resulted from the chemical interactions in the mummification process itself (natrons). However, Dr. Davey undertook a series of "innovative experiments" covering "16 hair samples from Egyptian people " in the salty ash for 40 days. Guess what? Not a single change in hair color was observed.
More from The Independent in 2018, "Tomb secrets: The FBI cracks the DNA code on an ancient Egyptian mummy":
Loreille's examination also showed that Djehutynakht's DNA carried clues to another mystery. For centuries, archaeologists and historians have debated the origins of the ancient Egyptians and how closely related they were to modern people living in North Africa. To the researchers' surprise, the governor's mitochondrial DNA indicated his ancestry on his mother's side, or haplogroup, was Eurasian.

"No one will ever believe us," Loreille recalls telling her colleague Jodi Irwin. "There's a European haplogroup in an ancient mummy."

Irwin, the supervisory biologist at the FBI's DNA support unit, had similar concerns. To verify the results, they sent a portion of the tooth to a Harvard lab, and then to the Department of Homeland Security, for further sequencing.

Then last year as the FBI scientists worked to confirm their results, another group affiliated with the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Germany reported the first successful extraction of ancient DNA from Egyptian mummies. Their results showed that their ancient Egyptian samples were closer to modern Middle Eastern and European samples than to modern Egyptians, who have more sub-Saharan African ancestry.
 
Wow, that preservation and embalming keeps hair from degrading!

I think a lot of people don't consider the Daily Star to be very reputable.

Also searching for the headline online, there aren't any major papers and agencies 'covering' the story.

https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2508
https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=11965
 
This is interesting and to be expected, but it makes one wonder if the particular news article is true. We know this for a fact, but this is extra evidence, and are we sure if it's true beyond any doubt? As in verified? What Fancy said is correct here.
 
I don't know if the article its true. But can't hair be preserved trough embalming? I mean.. animal embalming do preserves animal hair.
 
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/ancient-egyptians-europeans-related-claims-a7763866.html

Ancient Egyptians more closely related to Europeans than modern Egyptians, scientists claim

However Egyptologist says he is 'particularly suspicious of any statement that may have the unintended consequences of asserting – yet again from a northern European or North American perspective – that there’s a discontinuity' between ancient and modern populations

Ian JohnstonScience Correspondent @montaukianTuesday 30 May 2017 17:24 


Sarcophagus of Tadja, found at the Abusir el-Meleq archaeological site ( bpk/Aegyptisches Museum und Papyrussammlung, SMB/Sandra Steiss )

Scientists who managed to obtain full genome sequences of Ancient Egyptians for the first time have concluded the people of the pharaohs were more closely related to modern Europeans and inhabitants of the Near East rather than present-day Egyptians.

But the claims sparked suspicion from one leading Egyptologist, who questioned whether genetic analysis could justify such a sweeping statement and pointed to a long history of spurious attempts to separate ancient Egyptians from the modern-day population.

The mummies were taken from a single archaeological site on the River Nile, Abusir el-Meleq, which was inhabited from 3,250BC to 700AD and was home to a cult of Osiris, the god of the dead, making it a good place to be buried.


A complete genome sequence was obtained for three mummies and mitochondrial DNA, which is passed through the female line, was obtained from 90 individuals. They were dated to between about 1,400BC and 400AD.

The researchers, writing in the journal Nature Communications, admitted their sample “may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt”.


Nevertheless, they concluded the mummified people were “distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples”.

“Our analyses reveal that ancient Egyptians shared more ancestry with Near Easterners than present-day Egyptians,” they wrote.


And they added: “We find that ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Neolithic and Bronze Age samples in the Levant, as well as to Neolithic Anatolian and European populations. 

“When comparing this pattern with modern Egyptians, we find that the ancient Egyptians are more closely related to all modern and ancient European populations that we tested, likely due to the additional African component in the modern population.”

In contrast to the changes between the ancient and modern period, the researchers, from Cambridge University and institutions in Germany, Poland and Australia, found the genetic make-up of the mummies was remarkably constant despite the arrival of the Romans and other foreign powers.

Dr Wolfgang Haak, group leader at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, said: “The genetics of the Abusir el-Meleq community did not undergo any major shifts during the 1,300-year timespan we studied, suggesting that the population remained genetically relatively unaffected by foreign conquest and rule.”


However Professor Stephen Quirke, an Egyptologist at University College London, expressed caution about the researchers’ broader claims. 

“There has been this very strong attempt throughout the history of Egyptology to disassociate ancient Egyptians from the modern population,” he said.

“I’m particularly suspicious of any statement that may have the unintended consequences of asserting – yet again from a northern European or North American perspective – that there’s a discontinuity there.


"When we are discussing it, we have to be much more sensitive to how these kinds of statements are read outside where we are at the moment.”

Professor Quirke added that he felt “we are not yet anywhere near” being able to make “very drastic conclusions” about the tens of millions of people living in Egypt.

While there have been a number of influxes of people from outside Egypt, he suggested that the impact could sometimes be over-stated.

For example, Professor Quirke said many thousands of soldiers had taken part in the Arab Invasion of Egypt in the 7th century, but they were still vastly outnumbered by the resident population of about six million.


"When we are discussing it, we have to be much more sensitive to how these kinds of statements are read outside where we are at the moment.”

So when someone said that allah was allegedly woven into Viking garment with cunic form it was immediately pushed in the mainstream news without a single one questioning it. This was easily debunked and shown the lady pushing this merely added stuff to make it look like "allah". When it comes to the blatant truth of white people in ancient Egypt then they have to heavily scrutinize and maybe even explain away the obvious. Why? Because we they need to be sensitive as to how the public will take it in which is Yehubor talk for what Lydia posted above. These cuck professors or (((professors))) need to go somewhere else with their nonsense and stop pushing their false narratives.
 

Official Temple of Zeus Links

Back
Top