Blitzkreig [JG said:
" post_id=318176 time=1642842477 user_id=21286]…
If I may, Blitzkreig. Jrvan and I may appear to some as if we’re suggesting we all turn rogue just because we can, but that’s not the case. There’s a reason he presents this in a harsh and chaotic way, and it’s so that people don’t continue to be ignorant of the side of reality that most get sheltered from or refuse to acknowledge because they don’t want to accept that reality is like that.
We’re not advocating people to add chaos to the chaos, just to not be afraid of it. It’s silly to think we can live in unrefined moral bubbles and not be effected by reality. As seen in the world, no amount of what other’s believe is right or wrong changes how energies manifest, or how people exercise their will. You could be an upstanding moral person and do a lot of good in the world and still go through incredible suffering and harm just because of being unprotected from planetary influence. If you have no one to protect you and lack the strength or power to protect yourself, no matter how good of a person you are, you will still be subjected to harm. Being morally upstanding doesn’t guarantee you a safe and comfortable passage in life, and automatically punishes those who hurt you, it’s not a shield against negatives. If you’re lucky with natal placements you may somewhat reduce how much negativity you face by being “good” because you’re not doing things on your own end to place yourself in negative or harmful situations, but that doesn’t do much in the grand scheme of things.
In a perfect world, powerful people of the same civilization and race would naturally protect and help those who can’t do so themselves in a given situation, and teach them what they can do to provide themselves as much personal protection and power as they can manage such as with magick, yoga, AoP’s and aura cleaning, martial arts etc - but we don’t live in such a world. Our own countries are divided and most people don’t have any care for even just the people who live next door, nor care about you as an individual.
Energy doesn’t have reason, and people activate their will positively or negatively. We see it as rather pointless and limiting to go around and implement restrictive moral codes on everyone because you believe certain things are wrong or are afraid of someone doing certain things to you. All that does is deny people the ability to follow their natures or advance past a certain level, and limits the options a person has for any given situation that might require one to be "immoral" in order to survive or save someone. A key part of our perspective that others don’t get is that
everyone has a will and everyone can activate it as their nature tells them to do so.
One guy will act in his way and another will act in their way depending on the influence of their charts. Joe over there might decide to randomly attack someone just because he can and the victim can’t fend him off alone. Bob over here sees this but he doesn’t tolerate such a thing and has the strength to stop Joe, so he might choose to step in and do something about it. But Bob could also decide he doesn’t feel capable enough of stopping Joe without getting seriously harmed or killed himself, and either 1) walks away, 2) decides to risk his life, or 3) chooses to call another for help (won’t guarantee they’ll help in time to save the person though).
Is Bob more or less morally wrong for making one decision over another? Most would argue yes, many might say he’s morally wrong if he’s choose to let that person get hurt and do nothing about it. Few people will actually analyse deeper why they feel that way and come up with an answer that isn’t auto recorded in their brains. Instead of two or potentially more lives being attacked or destroyed, only one life may have been. Bob could have risked himself potentially preventing harm from coming to that person but that may have resulted in more deaths and the attacker getting away anyway. What if Bob is only a young boy and there’s no one around or doesn’t have a phone to call police?
Why is only one option automatically perceived to be the correct thing to do (stop the attacker) and all others condemn you as immoral and a bad person, instead of all-and-none of them at the same time? Without advanced spirituality, psychic ability, and foresight, you won’t know which action is the best to take and you can only do what you feel you can do regardless of it’s right or wrong in any given moment. Life doesn’t keep it black and white with easy answers. It makes inherent right/wrong and moral absolutism utterly useless and even harmful for innocent or weaker people.
Where some people will follow their nature to harm anyone they feel like harming, others will follow theirs to bring judgement and justice on such people when they cross certain lines, and there will be some who simply don’t care either way, or are unable or too scared to interfere. Laws are made by people who have the power to influence the wills of others and implement said laws over them, and if their nature directs them to do so, create laws that at least save little more than half of occurring incidents while operating within such limited knowledge.
Laws, common moral, and what actions will be punished or rewarded in a given society cannot be made by people who are not strong willed and are willing to influence others. For people to even follow another’s ideas and agree with them, you have to be powerful enough to present and enact these laws, and the power to reinforce them continuously in your society. You will either have people who wish and desire to use that power to create a thriving and safe civilization, while others will use it to bring everything to communistic ruin.
For these reasons and others we discard inherent and absolute morality, and decide to take every situation individually using not a preset of morals to decide if it is wrong or right to make certain actions but act simply on our best judgement and our personal level of what we can/can’t and are willing to do or not do. If one asked us why we committed a specific action we would be able to provide a more truthful answer than default to a lazy brain response such as “it was the right/wrong thing to do” or “just because”.
The more spiritual one becomes the better their judgement to catalyse the best outcome in different situations can be made. One won’t need such heavy reliance on pre-set morals to make decisions, and you would be able to make better decisions with that judgement than someone who continues to follow strict morals codes set by others.
We are taught that lying is wrong, and yet here we are instructed to lie if necessary to avoid potentially being harmed by a without or our identity discovered by enemies. We are taught harming someone is wrong, and yet we are instructed to never take abuse as SS. We are taught that wanting or having money and power is wrong, and yet we are instructed to elevate ourselves in society and gain wealth because wealth and power are both required to live fulfilling and healthy lives. The kinds of morals that are instructed under Satanism is very different from what we have been taught our whole lives to think is right or wrong, and that’s because these teachings don’t come from other humans. As it stands what we know to be right and wrong is little more than a concept made up by people who turned this into a nonspiritual world, and those who continue to use that pre-set code and attempt to force others to abide by it have yet to wake back up to spirituality.
Yes, we seek personal freedom because we see how shackled people have become by following these nonspiritual morals. The lesson we want others to understand is that you should discover for yourself what kind of person you are. How would you think, feel, act, and behave when you’re not bound by the silent fears of adhering to what other’s tell you is the right or wrong thing to do? Do you truly have enough wisdom to know what is inappropriate or appropriate in different situations, if not, what are the gaps in your knowledge, experience, and advancement that you need to fill in order to make better judgements? What are you willing to do or not do? What can you tolerate or refuse to? What are your strengths and weaknesses, and how can you safely work with them to uplift yourself and people you care about?
You can’t really answer these kinds of questions honestly and with truth if you still let withouts define your morals. It’s a way of developing the ability to think for yourself and go over everything you’ve been taught with a finer comb and a wiser mind to discover what is purely dross within your thinking, and discover things you didn’t know about yourself.
I’m not in disagreement with you of what you have written in your comment. Yours stands on its own as is.