how will buying homes or renting work in a National Socialist Society

[Crystallized Mushroom]

just like the title says how different will it be compared to the current capitalist model for buying houses and rent will renting a 1 bedroom still require living form paycheck to paycheck, will it require a skill and not a job even though someone has to clean streets and bathrooms or will everyone be required to get a skill like mechanic or electrician or something how will this stuff look in the Fourth Reich?

also whats your opinions on the eviction moratorium going on in the United States?

 

[Crystallized Mushroom]

so is this an unpopular question or something i asked this cause in the past HPHoodedCobra Replied to a comment i made about whether financial Rituals would make housing and rent cheaper and Cobra replied but the post never showed up.

 

[Crystallized Mushroom]

is this a worthless question?

 

[Lunar Dance 666]

is this a worthless question?

No but I think the answer is "we don't know".

I do agree that prices of houses / living space should be under law governed, with limits installed.

 

[SouthernWhiteGentile]

Rentals properties should remain in the hands of the government and private citizens only no (((banking firm))) like blackrock should be able to buy up all of the property up and gouge it restrictions will be put in place to ensure that this does not happen.

 

[FancyMancy]

I can remember asking a question ages ago. I forgot what it was, but the reply I got was that in WW2 regime/Zevism society, what we need is free but what we want can be bartered/haggled for. Maybe I took it too literally - or maybe not. I think we'd still work for our food in a field, for example, or do favours for the food preparers or pay them back in other ways. I would think at first, rents and things would be done properly, so we can afford a nice home to live in, but once the World grows up a bit, why would we need to either pay someone else so we can live in our own home, or force someone else to pay us for them to live in their own home?

This is capitalism at the moment, which the eventual end of is communism, after people get fed-up and create a backlash (I can remember being told before); in WW2 regime, it wouldn't be capitalist/commjewnist. If I am not mistaken, then Humans are the only species who pay someone - or (((something))) - else repeatedly so we can live in our own nest, burrow, cave, fold, den... That's either in rent or in mortgage (or death-gauge, you might say), both of which amount to a pretty penny (and see my other posts where I say that we are taxed greatly, so we actually have only a small percentage of any money we earn). Even if there are other species which do 'pay' others to live in their own homes, Humans are still sentient and intelligent...

Eventually, when the World has matured, then we would not need rent and death-gauges. We'd have Magick workings, and then when we advance further, we'd have Will, to manifest things so we wouldn't "need" money. I'd expect money to die-out before the free/bartering/haggling system comes into existence properly, though. Metals of money can be melted down and worn as jewellery or used for decoration/ornaments, etc., or as tools, machinery, etc.

Does anyone wonder why gold is used as the all-important material in Fort Knox (Depository), the Bank of England, etc., while the Sun and our Solar Chakra are gold, and with the philosopher's stone (Magnum Opus, etc. work) turning base metals (unempowered, dirty, closed Chakras) into gold (Chakras being cleaned, open and empowered wonderfully), for our immortality?! That we can do so much more in abilities, than what we could do with mere materials?!

 

[स त न म]

After that come rules that depend on the level of market freedom that the government wants, for example if there's a limit to how many houses/land a person can own ecc Or how big and decent an appartment must be to be able to rent it out.

If there were limits to the land one can own they would most likely extended to people who have families or important people like the Zevism.

But a limit by the govt on the amount of land/houses one can own doesn't sound like a free state at all. It kinda sounds the opposite. Shouldn't the people have the freedom to own whatever they want however much they want?

I understand that important people would be compensated with bigger houses etc and I also understand that people can't be on the streets and govt should provide housing for such but people should still be able own any amount of whatever they want right? Ofc not at the expense of a family of 5 living in a one bedroom home cause their are no homes left because someone owns 5000 of the 4-bed apartments. But if the population is living comfortably then individuals should have the right to own however much land they want right?

But then there's another problem related to this: What if, for example, a couple living in a one bed apt, have children, say 4 of them. Even if all the population is settled appropriately according to family needs, the needs can change at any time, within a matter of nine months in this case. Then would the state offer an appropriate accommodation for the said family? If the state needs more housing and decides to buy some housing from say a real estate company then the state will compensate the owner of the said housing right (I mean ofc if the govt just takes it then it'll be like a totalitarian psuedo-communism, right?).

So in a sense there'll always be an exchange of some sort. If not money then some sort of barter system at least, much like fancymancy said. People would need to compensate others because no matter how much we evolve, there will be some commodities which would be easier to obtain by "paying" others than making them yourself. Like if someone wants to buy a laptop. Much easier to "buy" it from someone who makes laptops than make it yourself no matter how much we evolve.

So if there is indeed an exchange of goods/services/compensation for commodities then the amount of land/houses a person can own would depend on the compensation they can provide wouldn't it? Maybe the state will set some min compensation which must be provided to own land/houses/other things?

Am I making sense or am I just inadvertently spouting capitalism?

I guess I'm not sure about these because my own lack of understanding about WW2 regime.

 

[Aquarius]

After that come rules that depend on the level of market freedom that the government wants, for example if there's a limit to how many houses/land a person can own ecc Or how big and decent an appartment must be to be able to rent it out.

If there were limits to the land one can own they would most likely extended to people who have families or important people like the Zevism.

But a limit by the govt on the amount of land/houses one can own doesn't sound like a free state at all. It kinda sounds the opposite. Shouldn't the people have the freedom to own whatever they want however much they want?

I understand that important people would be compensated with bigger houses etc and I also understand that people can't be on the streets and govt should provide housing for such but people should still be able own any amount of whatever they want right? Ofc not at the expense of a family of 5 living in a one bedroom home cause their are no homes left because someone owns 5000 of the 4-bed apartments. But if the population is living comfortably then individuals should have the right to own however much land they want right?

But then there's another problem related to this: What if, for example, a couple living in a one bed apt, have children, say 4 of them. Even if all the population is settled appropriately according to family needs, the needs can change at any time, within a matter of nine months in this case. Then would the state offer an appropriate accommodation for the said family? If the state needs more housing and decides to buy some housing from say a real estate company then the state will compensate the owner of the said housing right (I mean ofc if the govt just takes it then it'll be like a totalitarian psuedo-communism, right?).

So in a sense there'll always be an exchange of some sort. If not money then some sort of barter system at least, much like fancymancy said. People would need to compensate others because no matter how much we evolve, there will be some commodities which would be easier to obtain by "paying" others than making them yourself. Like if someone wants to buy a laptop. Much easier to "buy" it from someone who makes laptops than make it yourself no matter how much we evolve.

So if there is indeed an exchange of goods/services/compensation for commodities then the amount of land/houses a person can own would depend on the compensation they can provide wouldn't it? Maybe the state will set some min compensation which must be provided to own land/houses/other things?

Am I making sense or am I just inadvertently spouting capitalism?

I guess I'm not sure about these because my own lack of understanding about WW2 regime.

I'm just speculating, and I'd rather not get in a speculation discussion since I have no tangible facts about this.

 

[darkmonkey666]

just like the title says how different will it be compared to the current capitalist model for buying houses and rent will renting a 1 bedroom still require living form paycheck to paycheck, will it require a skill and not a job even though someone has to clean streets and bathrooms or will everyone be required to get a skill like mechanic or electrician or something how will this stuff look in the Fourth Reich?

also whats your opinions on the eviction moratorium going on in the United States?

There has never been a final version of the national socialist society. But basically figure of the past banished the yehuborim and made his own bank and the mark was based on manufacturing power and supported by land expansion instead of exportation.

So he gave low to no interest home loans to young Germans who got married and gave mothers benefits of 1000 marks a month for a woman with 2 children and 2000 marks a Month for women with 4 children.

figure of the past personally was an economic and political purist. It will likely never happen again under the same circumstances, because economics changes based upon what kind of labor needs done. Building, farming, fabricating, mining, milling, machining, computing, networking, communication, maintainance etc etc. The kind of jobs we have now are totally different than the ones we had back then. And the population is much larger all around. So that needs taken into account aswell.

Basically every man was sent to die in the front lines, every woman was sent to work in the factory, and every child was sent to daycare. It's exactly what we did in the US under the 14 year dictatorship they nationalized, we nationalized. Truly capitalism and nationalism are casually interchangeable and have been since the federal government was formed. only when ethno nationalism is introduced it s evil and wrong xD

WW2 regime is the same as capitalism except Government officials have full oversight on big monopolies like real estate, natural resources, manufacturing, travel, and banking.
Society works identically but the government supervises to protect the rights of the consumer and the worker, to keep prices down and to direct trade with other nations on a national level when needed.
To avoid things like the Japanese selling a game console to every family in America and then buying all our real estate and charging too much for rent and causing 1000% inflation In 30 years

Do I have any sources for this? No
I am talking out of my ass.

Seriously tho having a free market economy is like taking everyone in the country to a swingers bar except the guys go home and wealthy foreigners keep all the women. It's basically international cuckoldry.

I like to call the free market the slave market. It doesn't work. It simply allows unrestrained exploitation and parasiteism on the masses and for a few people (mostly yehuborim or Potential people of the Gods who have a very corrupt brutalist attitude needed to exploit others and make it to the top in this system like Trump) to own almost everything.

 

[Stormblood]

I am not sure. What I can say is that the property market, both rents and sales, has grown disproportionately compared to wages. At the very least, it needs to be brought back in line. This could mean cutting rents and sales prices by a minimum of 90%. Also, in some countries there needs to be a reform in regards to housing quality. It is unacceptable to have things like thin walls, drains that get clogged up easily, weak toilet flushing, the lack of bidets and similar in bathrooms, poor ventilation architecture, etc. The thing about prices being based on location is also ridiculous and to be abolished, in my opinion.

As for the size of house, it would be normal that it would depend on how many people live in the house. Crumped housing should not exist. It would be unacceptable, for example, to have 7 people with only one washing machine. There should be a washing machine and a bathroom (complete of everything) for every 2/3 people without exception. Better yet would be ensuite bathrooms and a guest bathroom. Each bedroom and any other room should not be a claustrophobic hole, and parking slots certainly shouldn't be price at £100 a month. Energy efficiency ratings should be at least B and so on.

I also think energy sources should either be owned by the state or have their prices capped, as speculation is too much. Water, electricity, gas, etc. These are all necessities and speculating on necessities is jooish, not human. I was surprised by how much utilities and council tax cost in Britain. It's disgusting. A council tax shouldn't even exist, since the property belongs to its owner, not to the state. It's extortion just like inheritance taxes.

Many things should be capped. Train tickets, for example. I don't understand how they can charge 5x here compared to Italy when:
:arrow: wages are not even 2x higher, let alone 5x higher
:arrow: cleanliness is not 5x better (or any good at all in all 5 private companies there are in the area)
:arrow: WiFi is dodgy
:arrow: most trains don't even have power sockets
:arrow: some services are not that good, sometimes not even running past a certain time unless it's to bigger cities like London, Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Liverpool, etc.

The entire market needs an overhaul so deep and huge that it will need to be destroyed and rebuilt anew from the ashes, which is why the current crisis will work in our favour in the long run.

Don't even let me start on the rules of renting here, with several landlords and agents acting all high and mighty:

:arrow: taking only employed people or students, no matter whether you have proof that you can pay either way and a guarantor
:arrow: obsessing with guarantors being only 'UK'-based
:arrow: having shitty, crumped accommodations for obnoxious prices
:arrow: false advertising
:arrow: requesting a physical viewing immediately, neglecting all the questions you ask to make sure the place is worth it and ignoring requests for a virtual viewing.

Capitalism has ruined the planet as much as communism.

 

[Stormblood]

From the Dalton edition of Mein Kampf: 25 point program at the end of Vol.1.

17. We demand agrarian reform in accordance with our national
requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without
compensation of any land needed for the common good. We demand the
abolition of basis rents, and the prohibition of all land speculation.

Does this mean the real estate market will be without rental properties, or that the real estate market won't exist at all anymore?

 

[Gearshift]

Capitalism has ruined the planet as much as communism.

It's funny but I've come to the conclusion that here in the U.S. money is inflated 20-30 times. I recall a video from 2013 or was it 2015 from Dr. William Luther Pierce. And he stated that the 24 million dollars given to Yehubor's leader kaballist Lenin is akin to about 443ish million dollars. Nikolai Tesla would have received about 25 million dollars(or 2013/2015 500ish million) from the potential person of the Gods bankers who were killed in the Titanic which caused the FedRes Act whereby the JNWO is pictured with rabbis all over the place.

If this is the case prices need to be remodulated to reflect things. For example a Geforce 1060Ti card from about 3 or 4 years ago back in 2015-2016 or so sold for about 180-200 dollars. That same card now as it's a mining card and many 1060Tis were made funny enough in some cases resells for 400-500-600 dollars or more. So notice how it's not just inflation driving things but lack luster manufacture and anti-Autarky production.

If we assume most if not all things are inflated 20-30 times their value. Then for all intents and purposes that same card in 2015-2016 should have sold for about 6-9 dollars obviously that's very low so maybe 15-20 dollars or so. Funny the electronics industry is a deflationary system it always becomes cheaper even many PCBs and capacitors become cheaper. But the costs increase for consumers. For example a non-RGB LED RAM sticks sell for 150-200 but if you add 10-15 cents of LEDs you can resale it for 250-300. Like the old joke from about 3-4 years ago when LED was everywhere they spend less than 5-10 cents on LEDs to ramp up the price 40-50 bucks.

For example an Apple smartphone even with Apple tax is over a thousand dollars. That phone plus the manufacture would resale for about 140 dollars. Remod the price to about 150-160 or so. It's like guns they hold their value and are deflationary if people had access to guns it's like I want a pistol sells for about 45 dollars rather than 300ish. Again there are some industries that deflationary by themselves and others are not. For example in Libya under Ghaddafi 40 loafs of breads were like 0.12 cents or a liter of gas was 0.15 cents.

Even rich products like a Lambo or Ferrari would be more in line with things and with regulation of economy. Stupid things like paying Ferrari 10,000 dollars for an Italian flag colored sticker for your Ferrari doesn't exist. Or charging 5,000 dollars plus 800 dollars for replacing a Lamborghini brake disk pad. In other words sure a multi-million dollar super/hyper sports car would be out of reach for some and many would avoid it as the car serves no purpose for a family man. But enough with the hijinks of robbing the rich as well cause "Muh shekelberging" rich people serve a purpose in helping their nation like Vanderbuilts back in the early 1900s with trains and multi-state companies. Maybe have a Lambo or Ferrari sell for several hundred thousand or maybe put so much money into the Ferrari it actually sells for millions. Another possibility make these rich companies like Konnisegg or Ferrari expand into the lower markets and use their tremendous wealth along with the cheapness of raw materia for construction mass produce Ferrari cars that are meant for the population.

In other words multi-faceted companies that do so much. Not all companies want to expand to other markets but basically there is so much wealth that companies expand into other markets. Like recently Intel expanding into the GPU market again for the 3 or 4th time in their history to compete with Nvidia and AMD. In other words expand to their own market or expand to new markets and be a multi-sided company. Not all will do it as there is risk. But without the shekelberging and shekelsteining processes mankind would improve at rapid paces.

The thing is that it's not just inflation by market value but EVERYTHING gets inflated. Capitalism is good if it's the German WW2 regime capitalism. C.C. or Controlled Capitalism as Historyreviewed states in Bitchute. I prefer calling it Regulated Capitalism.

For example the Government has the right to interfere in the private market. Trump was doing this with diabetic products before Biden removed it and caused diabetic products to spike in price.

In an WW2 regime system for example things are so cheap. That's akin to the person who went up to figure of the past and stated "figure of the past how do you get away with giving away so much money" figure of the past replies "The secret is in 10 years more is collected from taxes".

As for borrowing money you borrow from the citizens with MEFO(FEDER) Dollars or Bonds. You pay the citizen 4% when they return the bond for their money. figure of the past borrowed money from anyone who wished to get a MEFO Bond. A person putting down about 200,000 dollars would receive about 4-8 thousand dollars back from the 4%. Other things that are interesting are LYB, MYB, and HYB low-, medium- and high- yield bonds 3.5%, 7.5% and 14.5% like in the book Jekyll Island. The HYB market was gutted by fake news and fake lobbying to congress. Then the HYB were collected at pennies on the dollar and the market speculators made fortunes more on top of their fortune.

Sounds silly what I state and perhaps many people will assume the obvious as humanity grows things get more expensive. Quite the opposite things should get cheaper. In a Fiat system an AIDA can be created Anti-Inflation/Deflation Act. 1$ = 1$ as for force multpliers like Tax(like HP.Cobra stated in one sermon you COULD put 0 taxes for income tax or up to 3%) for example a person making about 15,000 dollars a year pays about 800-900 or so dollars in income tax. Some people state income tax should be eliminated at least at the individual level due to America using Excise taxes for about 150 years before the advent of the I.R.S. on the business level. So for 150 years people never paid taxes from income.

Other things like for example the Small business market needs to be exploded massively. Like WW2 regime Capitalism chain stores are banned. Drive competition and drive innovation through small business as WW2 regime is extremely small business friendly.

I've come up with some statments on force multiplers like Labor, Goods, Services, Infrastructure, Taxes(when properly done), Cryptocurrencies(I can see issues with free market speculation but maybe controlled crypto), Precious Metals, E.O.T.M.O.E.(Exchange of the Medium of Exchange)there's probably one or two other things I don't recall from theorycrafting some WW2 regime economy. But all I know is money is meant to grow in value over time. Fiat you can make the argument of having AIDA force the money to work. But there's also a non-Fiat system I guess you could use precious metals or have a bill/metal system. It does beg the question if prices are kept low and controlled if we can avoid using bills so people are paying with precious metals. I can see digital as a way but unfortunately it's too easy to create communism with communists around.

Another issue I see is Schwab's Great Reset. In a variable system like Unregulated Capitalism that is impossible to reset. But for WW2 regime Capitalism you can reset. There is probably never a reason to reset but if anything happens just in case just hit the reset button.

In reality it's a complex thing. Most people would freak out at how affordable things can be. Even Universal Healthcare seems like a joke. For all intents and purposes either nationalize all medical or leave it to the private market so a Hospital instead of charging 1200 dollars for those new transparent plastic casts that are more and more become better than plaster casts which become infected with bacteria and smells and might produce fungal growth. Could for for like 18 bucks. IF the money is sound and the hospital says you need a liver transplant due to health issue and the surgery is 530 dollars most people would jump on that.

So in essence if the market that is WW2 regime Capitalism is so cheap and affordable even a American worker that makes 300-400 bucks a month can afford it. It begs the question why there needs to be communistic over-micromanagement. It's one thing to regulate it's another to micromanage every aspect down to the point it's akin to private security companies that hassle people for simply asking them a question. Like a friend of mines who did a delivery he talks to the security guard asking him where the front desk is as the lady in the rear of the building wasn't too sure. And the security guard starts hassling him with information like "Why do you want to know" "Who ordered you here" "Why are you here" etc.etc. my friend just left pretending to answer a text message and walked around the building to find the hidden front entrance and did his job.

It gets to the point capitalism becomes communism they create jobs for the sake of creating jobs. In a proper spiritual society some people need to follow the spiritual side and maybe even avoid work and focus full time on spirituality and taking care of themselves. I'm not trying to state a lazy or worthless person but someone who really delves deep and a job would keep them from spirituality.

I'm probably gonna get told I'm wrong by some professional capitalist and economists but WW2 regime capitalism was so destroyed that we don't know the extent of a proper financial society. The fact of the matter is like figure of the past encountering Feder market speculation, currency speculation, and international speculation ruin the World especially with calculated and created from the ground up i.e. it's meant to happen after a while on bubbles and crashes.

It seems in simplest term like figure of the past states in Dalton's Mein Kampf. The reason why we are called revolutionaries is because the parliamentarians don't do their job while we WW2 regime are willing to do the job which they were elected to do so.

I believe WW2 regime capitalism or any WW2 regime economic system whether there would even be an improvement of it kinda like Pinochet in Chile with his principles. Funny enough it was a system that simply does the right thing. Even the poorest are living it up because it's meant to financially raise the power of the citizens.

In simplest terms "I care for my people regardless of creed or financial level". Simply run a civilization properly and not a communist party crashing down everything simply because the Yehubor hate everyone and everything.

It's doing the right thing. Like I theorized before potential person of the Gods economics works on the microverse of reality. In other words micro economics a social volkish economy whereby everyone gets their fair share both in materia and financial compensation in the medium of exchanges of goods, services, or anything needed by a person/persons.

It's simply run a civilization properly to improve mankind.

From the Dalton edition of Mein Kampf: 25 point program at the end of Vol.1.

17. We demand agrarian reform in accordance with our national
requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without
compensation of any land needed for the common good. We demand the
abolition of basis rents, and the prohibition of all land speculation.

Does this mean the real estate market will be without rental properties, or that the real estate market won't exist at all anymore?

For the life of me I don't know what it means. Even reading the dictionary of Basis doesn't infer much data. The fact of the matter is this property is WW2 regime specific in their time. My guess is it's akin to the U.S. back during 1776-1820s. People KNEW about finances were pushed financial information in books and documents until about the 1820s when the old generation died and pushed Fiat currency which is legal tender but not lawful money. If you look at The Creature from Jekyll Island: A second look at the Federal Reserve. Gold at about 347.58g is lawful constitutional money. Fiat is against U.S. law, constitution, and principle.

Funny by the time the Revolutionary war ended we had 550 million dollars in debt from Fiat and people complained about high prices.

 

[Stormblood]

The thing is that it's not just inflation by market value but EVERYTHING gets inflated. Capitalism is good if it's the German WW2 regime capitalism. C.C. or Controlled Capitalism as Historyreviewed states in Bitchute. I prefer calling it Regulated Capitalism.

That is not capitalism. Remember one of the statements about WW2 regime: it was socialist only in its opposition to capitalism. When talking about concepts like capitalism, we need to look at how they are carried out in society. In other words, the fruit of the tree, not the ideas codified by Yehubor on encyclopaedias and books, which do not accurately portray the reality of it.

WW2 regime economy is an entirely different system from both capitalism and communism. It is how economy is supposed to be run, on humanitarianism and meritocracy, instead of profit and other methods.

The worst thing is that kids studying economics in schools and universities are taught that inflation is normal and impossible to avoid. They are basically brainwashed and keep reiterating the same vicious circle that fucked up our economy in the first place. The very concept of supply and demand that you hinted at earlier is outrageous. Like you stated, it should be the other way around: the higher the demand, the lower the price. Still, I also recognise another school of thought: mass production leads to a lot of waste and should be abandoned in favour of tailor-made products. People need to have patience and get things done properly in a bespoke manner. It is the same concept as short attention span and instant gratification that promote no real growth, only degeneration and impairments.

 

[Gearshift]

The thing is that it's not just inflation by market value but EVERYTHING gets inflated. Capitalism is good if it's the German WW2 regime capitalism. C.C. or Controlled Capitalism as Historyreviewed states in Bitchute. I prefer calling it Regulated Capitalism.

That is not capitalism. Remember one of the statements about WW2 regime: it was socialist only in its opposition to capitalism. When talking about concepts like capitalism, we need to look at how they are carried out in society. In other words, the fruit of the tree, not the ideas codified by Yehubor on encyclopaedias and books, which do not accurately portray the reality of it.

WW2 regime economy is an entirely different system from both capitalism and communism. It is how economy is supposed to be run, on humanitarianism and meritocracy, instead of profit and other methods.

The worst thing is that kids studying economics in schools and universities are taught that inflation is normal and impossible to avoid. They are basically brainwashed and keep reiterating the same vicious circle that fucked up our economy in the first place. The very concept of supply and demand that you hinted at earlier is outrageous. Like you stated, it should be the other way around: the higher the demand, the lower the price. Still, I also recognise another school of thought: mass production leads to a lot of waste and should be abandoned in favour of tailor-made products. People need to have patience and get things done properly in a bespoke manner. It is the same concept as short attention span and instant gratification that promote no real growth, only degeneration and impairments.

Well from Historyreviewed he simply called it a Controlled Capitalism. Probably the WW2 regime language was muddled and destroyed so we don't know the economic name maybe Working Socialism but even that sounds silly and made up.

What your talking about is the German Institute of Business Booklet. It's called Directing Economy, besides pushing jobs to people for example say lawyers a very overcrowded profession as everyone wants to make tens if not hundreds of corrupt money an hour for their lawyer services. Well funny enough that job will be restricted and other jobs will be pushed into the market to open up other markets.

In Directing economy it isn't free market of massive production and over production but it's not a planned economy. Planned economy we need 30,000 tons of toilet paper but the population grows and requires 50,000 tons. Free market make 70,000 tons the U.S. only needs 30,000 tons and the rest either speculate it to make higher money or sell it in the international market or bomb lower markets and other companies in up and coming nations and wreck their Autarky toilet industry by over marketing and price bombing their own toilet paper companies with our excess toilet papers.

In a Directing Economy it's akin to Starcraft. A professional gamer uses the least amount of resources to build their economy. Same thing here, for example say the WW2 regime calculates we need 30,000 they might produce 31 or 32 thousand tons of toilet paper. Make enough toilet paper to handle a growth but not low enough it's planned economy nor high enough it's over production and your just mass producing for the sake of producing.

Try and research "German Institute of Business Booklet" translated by Terramare corporation. Dailystormer had an article quoting some parts. But there is a person on here who has a mega account that details the economic booklet. It's a 7-10 page booklet takes less than 20 minutes to read.

It basically explains WW2 regime = Directing Economy through various institutes set up by the Government with private company data as well as Government research they create the least amount of maximized products to provide to the nation reducing excess and mass production but also manipulate the market for example summer foods or winter foods or for example a person consuming high fat diet is at risk of becoming fat so they should be advised to eat more lean. Basically the language is very complex in the booklet. Because even IF it's simple to read without WW2 regime economic study and process. It's hard to gauge a proper understanding without being WW2 regime from that era i.e. German history and dates leading up to the National Socialists and the National Socialist themselves.

In the end Stormblood your absolutely correct in your assessment. "What IS National Socialist economy?"

Even if we derive high theoretical it ain't what was put in practice and theorized by THEM decades ago. Especially reading Dalton edition of Mein Kampf and reaching the second volume reaching the part of their economy. I'm sure even this isn't enough sure Mein Kampf is the main book but it's not the theories nor practice nor development generated by people. I'm sure even back then people had such an assurance from the National Socialists into WW2 regime and their Applied Socialism. That some people might have said "If we do this, this, and that; is that not communism or socialism or capitalism or is it Anti-NatSoc?

I'm sure many people had to go back to the drawing board to understand what WW2 regime is as it's economic principles are far different as you put it. We don't even have the name of the economy as it was destroyed. Sure SOCIALISM with Nationalism but it's not that quite simple. Even Spengler isn't WW2 regime and his principles were deemed okay by WW2 regime after they educated themselves on his aspects and viewed that Spengler was much into helping Germany in his own way.

I think in the end like HP.Cobra stated in the sermon and I'll reiterate again as I posted before "I care for my People, Race, and Nation regardless of creed or financial levels".

 

[Crystallized Mushroom]

I can remember asking a question ages ago. I forgot what it was, but the reply I got was that in WW2 regime/Zevism society, what we need is free but what we want can be bartered/haggled for. Maybe I took it too literally - or maybe not. I think we'd still work for our food in a field, for example, or do favours for the food preparers or pay them back in other ways. I would think at first, rents and things would be done properly, so we can afford a nice home to live in, but once the World grows up a bit, why would we need to either pay someone else so we can live in our own home, or force someone else to pay us for them to live in their own home?

This is capitalism at the moment, which the eventual end of is communism, after people get fed-up and create a backlash (I can remember being told before); in WW2 regime, it wouldn't be capitalist/commjewnist. If I am not mistaken, then Humans are the only species who pay someone - or (((something))) - else repeatedly so we can live in our own nest, burrow, cave, fold, den... That's either in rent or in mortgage (or death-gauge, you might say), both of which amount to a pretty penny (and see my other posts where I say that we are taxed greatly, so we actually have only a small percentage of any money we earn). Even if there are other species which do 'pay' others to live in their own homes, Humans are still sentient and intelligent...

Eventually, when the World has matured, then we would not need rent and death-gauges. We'd have Magick workings, and then when we advance further, we'd have Will, to manifest things so we wouldn't "need" money. I'd expect money to die-out before the free/bartering/haggling system comes into existence properly, though. Metals of money can be melted down and worn as jewellery or used for decoration/ornaments, etc., or as tools, machinery, etc.

Does anyone wonder why gold is used as the all-important material in Fort Knox (Depository), the Bank of England, etc., while the Sun and our Solar Chakra are gold, and with the philosopher's stone (Magnum Opus, etc. work) turning base metals (unempowered, dirty, closed Chakras) into gold (Chakras being cleaned, open and empowered wonderfully), for our immortality?! That we can do so much more in abilities, than what we could do with mere materials?!

how will what we need become free wouldn't that be slavery to the ones providing maybe at least give a service in return?

 

[gnome]

Also, it seems the areas where they are the majority have the highest crime rates, as well as the most litter, differently from white, middle-class areas that are usually clean.

In Britain they occupied the older terraced houses which are roomier than the new hobbit houses being built. In most cases this will be paid for by the government, and allows for lots of children. Once they're old enough, they can all work and have close-knit families, in even larger houses. These families form businesses that take short cuts and offers services to white people who find their price tag attractive. These short cuts are those that you mentioned. As a result, white services are being undercut, eventually will go out of business - along with white middle class areas! It's not a nice thing to witness!

I had one the other day try and get me to sign a contract whilst I was making a significant purchase. The contract contradicted a couple of things that he had said. "Yeah don't worry about it", "Don't think too much" and "I'm giving you my word". :| Bloody idiot, they are ruining British society.

Best to pay that bit extra and support our own...

 

[Dahaarkan]

The old system was based on old technologies, abilities, knowledge and understanding. The foundational racial understanding and natural understanding would be carried to the next system, which will be more able to allow other things. It's like updating system software.

The system of the WW2 regime in Germany was 1920's. Production, machinery, science, everything was at the level that it was before. These things proceed and advance. The latest advancements produce also changes in the system.

For example, advanced robotics or more advanced agriculture, would affect also the ideas in regards to working, ownership etc. The idea of deflationary currency which was instated by Bitcoin, would affect the idea of how workers should be paid and so on.

Advancements will always affect us and we go layer by layer. I don't think Germany would have had the face it was forced to engage in during the War in order to defend itself after winning. That was a temporary shifting of affairs in order to defend one's self from extinction and stop the enemy.

The idea in WW2 regime Germany was that every person should own land and a house, and not be forced to have rents and landlords. At least this was the ideal goal.

It couldn't really be implemented fully back then either, but instead of today where 80% of people live on rent, the inverse was desired, to have around 80% of people NOT living on rent or in debt. These people later save and store money and so on, and their productivity is higher because they are free. With this, a Nation becomes richer and people get attached to the place of their residence too.

The idea here was that people should have self sufficiency, and this was related also to family life. There were hardly big tractors to do major lifting at this time, therefore, farming and family were two major constituents for state survival.

It's the core ideals that need to be understood from the WW2 regime not people hoping for a system to be stuck on that one as if we live in the 1920's. We no longer do. We are 100 years later. And in 200 years from now, things will be even more different. People may literally be living on parallel dimensions if the enemy allows us to advance technologically and spiritually. Then everything will progressively change from the rules we have now.

Landlords and rents have a bad reputation because obviously, many landlords are abusive and seek to exploit desperate people. But I believe providing housing for rent is an important service to the people, especially workers.

Having a home is well and good but people move. And homes do not. If you get a great opportunity for a job you really want to try, or have the chance to pursue a project or business you've always wanted, but such opportunities are far far away from your home, are you really going to sell it and buy a completely new home in this new location?


No, you are going to rent a place because it's far easier and cheaper for the short term projects or job contracts. So you're always going to need rental properties. The thing is it needs to be affordable and fair, this is not always the fault of the landlord, mind you. The price of rent will be proportional to the mortgage payments the landlord (if they are in debt) must pay to the bank, and they must get a reasonable return on their investment.

This is why the state providing reasonable loans would solve this. Landlords could easily make affordable and cheap housing while still getting a return on their investment and profiting. Everybody wins.

 

[Stormblood]

Landlords and rents have a bad reputation because obviously, many landlords are abusive and seek to exploit desperate people. But I believe providing housing for rent is an important service to the people, especially workers.

Having a home is well and good but people move. And homes do not. If you get a great opportunity for a job you really want to try, or have the chance to pursue a project or business you've always wanted, but such opportunities are far far away from your home, are you really going to sell it and buy a completely new home in this new location?


No, you are going to rent a place because it's far easier and cheaper for the short term projects or job contracts. So you're always going to need rental properties. The thing is it needs to be affordable and fair, this is not always the fault of the landlord, mind you. The price of rent will be proportional to the mortgage payments the landlord (if they are in debt) must pay to the bank, and they must get a reasonable return on their investment.

This is why the state providing reasonable loans would solve this. Landlords could easily make affordable and cheap housing while still getting a return on their investment and profiting. Everybody wins.

One should not need a loan/mortgage to buy a house. That line of thought, in my opinion, is still aligned to destructive capitalistic 'growth' (I'd say decay) of the housing market in comparison to wages. As such, prices should be cut by at least 90-95% and money should be forcefully seized from banks to repay any existing mortgages. From banks and anyone who speculated too much on a necessity of life.

You should see what most people actually do when they own land or homes. Especially in places away from busy cities, often you see lots and lots of homes in a state of disrepair or ruin. Because the owners don't care and simply let them rot. This will be inflated even further if housing becomes so affordable that anybody can buy several homes. And if renting is no longer required or profitable no one will bother and simply have dozens of empty homes gathering dust and spider webs.

You would be jumping headfirst into a hellscape where anybody can afford a home, and yet there are none available. And no one rents them out because there's no point, or, seeing the extreme shortage of available housing, take advantage of people by charging what few homes are available with extravagant rents.

So what do you do then, start punishing people who invest in real estate to prevent that? Then no one will want to own homes in fear of the wrath of the state. And you're back at square one with everyone living off rents anyway.

You people are on a path to possible future administration and you need to begin to consider the logistics of your ideas. If most of you were to seize power today you would collapse your nations in a week.

Also forcefully seizing capital from banks will have you being crucified by your own people. Do you know what happens if a bank goes bankrupt and the state seizes all of it's capital?

What happens is you destroy the lives of everybody who had their wealth stored in that bank.

I think there is still a lot of closed-mindedness and brainwashing in your mindset.

First of all, you shouldn't need the incentive of a high rent to keep your house in good shape. Otherwise, you are too immature to own a home, and should be someone else's dependant without legal capacity. All of your belongings are to be kept in good shape. Didn't your parents teach you that? The state is not at fault if people don't have the maturity to take good care of their own property. It's the owners' fault.

Secondly, banks own their own money too, not just other people's capital, which should not be allowed since the owners are mostly Yehubor and racial traitors. Instead, a Zevism state would have a central, national bank that keeps people's money in a way that cannot be abused or lost. For any investment, the owner of the money should first agree to their money being invested and secondly for them to be managed by someone else. Best thing would be to learn to manage your own investment and trading portfolios, or a trusted family/clan member do it, rather than entrusting them to a stranger. It is a highly unlikely in an entire clan there's nobody with financial aptitude.

If I seized power today, the issue would be with enemy-owned countries unfairly declaring war to my country, because I would actually implement policies that promote growth at all levels, rather licking enemy feet and committing high treason left and right.

The things you may have read on this forum written by me are not only a partial picture but also only viable if you get out of a profit-oriented mindset, and put people's welfare first, which is what that organs of the state are there for originally. Rulers are at the service of their nation, not the other way around. Also, a nation is not run by one man only but several people and that happens for a reason: multiple talents, knowledge and wisdom combined.

Another thing to keep in mind is that policy-making and implementation take time. They do not become effective overnight. Familiarise yourself with Herr figure of the past's manifesto, then make it more contemporary without losing its spirit. Your comments come from prediction models heavily influenced by enemy bias. Can you not think of alternative ways to make humans great again without feeding into programmes that only create more and more poverty? Everything as it is now, it is 99.9% rotten. It is not salvageable, so it needs to be incinerated and from its ashes we will rebuild something that actually works, which is why we are leading toward to dark period of destruction that will not be stopped, only mitigated.

 

[Gearshift]

Also forcefully seizing capital from banks will have you being crucified by your own people. Do you know what happens if a bank goes bankrupt and the state seizes all of it's capital?

What happens is you destroy the lives of everybody who had their wealth stored in that bank.

You do realize no bank posses "wealth". There is not a single bank in these United States nor any country in a Rothschild owned central bank that posses ANY wealth for that matter.

An example from The creature of Jekyll Island: A second look at the Federal Reserve. There was a bank in the Wild West somewhere deep in Texas a wildcatter bank. Funny they loaned out nearly 390,000 dollars worth of loans. Their collateral to bank it absolutely nothing but less than 1% of 1%. In total the bank loaned not just 390,000 dollars but did it all with only $86.73 worth of money.

In the book ANY bank that accepts FDIC insurance IS a nationalized bank. Every single bank in the U.S. is Nationalized AND Private at the same time. A true national bank would eliminate all fees in regards to transaction fees. Why pay for transactions when the bank belongs to the state. In the book Griffith does state as an optional payment banks COULD charge an insurance fee so you pay a bit per week or per month and you back the capital of everyone with an insurance fee. Since FDIC insurance is merely a bailout in FACT many banks should crash and burn.

For example back in 1976 a California company and man created one of the greatest bonds system ever implement. Far superior than LYB, MYB: Low/Medium yield bonds. No A High-Yield Bond. LYB: 3.5%, MYB: 7.4%, HYB 14.5%. During the early 1980s the banks in the Ohio/Michigan area were using HYB to back their financial exchanges and loans. Funny enough they were making a killing, the HYB where a huge hit it continued to grow as a matter of fact it was the cryptocurrency of it's era. It was a killer invention and day by day it was growing like crazy not just bond trades but bond buying and selling. Banks were making a killing.

Unfortunately a bank gangster element wasn't very happy. So they spread FUD and fearmongering, they hijacked the movement through MSM judenpresse non-sense. They lobbied to congress saying this stuff is gonna bankrupt the banks and the banks need to stop playing with people's money. And finally shut it down through a law banning ANY bank in these U.S. to posses any bonds of High-Yield. They had to quickly sell the HYB tanking the price the elites come with insider information they created a panic crash the price and buy it all for pennies on the dollar. Then they wait a few weeks, months or years and boom millions, tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions of dollars into the elites pocket.

If you truly believe we posses wealth from our legal but not lawful currency then your very deluded individual. Everyone = a bum. We truly do not posses any wealth our money has been devalued over 99% of it's quality. Everyone is OBSESSED with owning hard and soft capital to back up our wealth. Funny that's not what should happen. If market speculation, currency speculation, and international speculation could be eliminated some people would be happy just sitting in their money.

It's up to the person and the education system to teach IF you want upwards mobility. For example Juan the Amerixican(American Mexican) is fine working 8 hours a day making 2000 bucks a month doing landscaping with a successful company. Does he complain that his money is being held in check with value. Nope! not at all. But then we have his son, Juan's son wants capital and wants to drive a fancier car and posses higher wealth. Even bring wealth down and give some to his father. On top of that Juan's son wants to educate himself and go higher.

Well first his father's capital is secure he works his money maintains 100% value and is even force multiplied by various factors of the nation. His father says he saved since Juan's son was 2 or 3 years old a HYB CD for financial gains. His Son in essence doesn't just posses free education basically because all expenses paid with say 4-8 thousand dollars for University but Juan is received hundreds of dollars extra in free money for University students even successful in acquiring a payment where he receives a 1,000 dollars a month for simply going to University. But Juan's son wants more he wants to be a big money baller. So he uses crypto and bonds exchange to gain a passive income of several thousand dollars a week.

So while Juan might not care much about money and simply does his job cause he is good at it. Maybe not 100% passionate but enough of a passion to work with Nature. Juan's son the other end wants capital. And both need to realize their nation ensures 100% financial buying power plus force multiplied financial power as well. Juan always knows his money is 100% and Juan's Son knows with 100% buying power + force multiplication tools he is guaranteed to make a lot of money and even if he makes little money a few tens if not a few hundred. It takes large losses or large purchases to eat through the money.

In essence the rich, yehuborim, and elites don't realize by helping your nation and gaining power to the citizens they in turn enrich the rich and at the same time while enriching themselves, they also enrich the masses i.e. upward mobility not just for citizens but for the rich themselves. Almost like the American Middle/Rich classes they guard the nation. I believe it was HP.Cobra who mentioned Middle and Rich are keeping this country from collapsing into a Communist swamp. One of the New Testament Comissar Christ's rants on the rich and how heaven is for the poor.

UNFORTUNATELY we deal with yehuborim and brainwashed bourgeoisie that like figure of the past put it fuck up a nation. The richer elements might be useless for political movements, a movement should always put the volk or masses as it's force. But the higher the rich get the more useless they become especially with a Yehuborim element parading communism as hot shit central. The rich have a strong voice but often misguided and a crashing the system mentality ESPECIALLY with silly judeo-bolshevism non-sense.

At Dharkaan you DO realize our wealth is nothing more than a few numbers on a computer. Even the bills of money a fractionally reserved lended. Do you not realize the FRL is one of the most retarded a fucktardic bullshit of invention. It was built from the ground up to strip the wealth of a nation slowly by being so massive and so behind the scenes at the same time money is bled dry over time.

Remember on Capitalism and our banking system. It was either made in such a haphazard way that eventually it breaks down. OR more precisely it was built from the ground up to crash and burn over time through panics, crises, and bubbles to destroy Nation-State AND control the Government to legally but not lawfully enforce this most deadly of parasites.

As a matter of fact the Constitution of the United States forbids legal tender the Founding Fathers declared FIAT currency verbotten(Forbidden). In the U.S. we are supposed to use gold corrupt money as a matter of fact for some strange and unknown reason probably something akin to the Dinar/Franc/Gold of other nations. The Constitution of the U.S. states only 347.58g gold coins are the Medium of Exchange ONLY any other thing is illegal not just by the laws of the financial system but by the Constitution itself. INFACT it's unlawful to use legal tender every citizen in America is breaking the law 24/7/365 every transaction occurring in the U.S. is a violation of the Constitutions lawful money properties.

Banks don't need to have their wealth seized or "Frozen" like the Japanese during WW2. One of the reasons Pearl was attacked was the Japanese dignitaries received word their account for transactions in the U.S. were "Frozen: read stolen". So we stole their wealth and ONE of the many reasons for why they hit the Harbor.

Same for Ghaddafi, no external debts, only internal debts but funny enough Ghaddafi's Libya was of the richest if not the richest nation in the entire World. They possessed so much money and were a very unique economic system akin to figure of the past's Germany they possessed 150 billion dollars in profit so their nation was in the Green. Ghaddfi literally evolved Libya into a proper Arabio-African nation, like literally he single-handedly evolved Libya until the yehuborim sicked the U.S. lapdog cause "Muh Petro dollar". Funny now China is on for the Petro-Yuan and the U.S. can't do shit to China. IF Libya was more militaristic and more in line like Iran. I think the U.S. would have thought twice about creating B'nai Barry's Benghazi is a conspiracy bullshit.

 

[Dahaarkan]

One should not need a loan/mortgage to buy a house. That line of thought, in my opinion, is still aligned to destructive capitalistic 'growth' (I'd say decay) of the housing market in comparison to wages. As such, prices should be cut by at least 90-95% and money should be forcefully seized from banks to repay any existing mortgages. From banks and anyone who speculated too much on a necessity of life.

You should see what most people actually do when they own land or homes. Especially in places away from busy cities, often you see lots and lots of homes in a state of disrepair or ruin. Because the owners don't care and simply let them rot. This will be inflated even further if housing becomes so affordable that anybody can buy several homes. And if renting is no longer required or profitable no one will bother and simply have dozens of empty homes gathering dust and spider webs.

You would be jumping headfirst into a hellscape where anybody can afford a home, and yet there are none available. And no one rents them out because there's no point, or, seeing the extreme shortage of available housing, take advantage of people by charging what few homes are available with extravagant rents.

So what do you do then, start punishing people who invest in real estate to prevent that? Then no one will want to own homes in fear of the wrath of the state. And you're back at square one with everyone living off rents anyway.

You people are on a path to possible future administration and you need to begin to consider the logistics of your ideas. If most of you were to seize power today you would collapse your nations in a week.

Also forcefully seizing capital from banks will have you being crucified by your own people. Do you know what happens if a bank goes bankrupt and the state seizes all of it's capital?

What happens is you destroy the lives of everybody who had their wealth stored in that bank.

I think there is still a lot of closed-mindedness and brainwashing in your mindset.

First of all, you shouldn't need the incentive of a high rent to keep your house in good shape. Otherwise, you are too immature to own a home, and should be someone else's dependant without legal capacity. All of your belongings are to be kept in good shape. Didn't your parents teach you that? The state is not at fault if people don't have the maturity to take good care of their own property. It's the owners' fault.

Secondly, banks own their own money too, not just other people's capital, which should not be allowed since the owners are mostly Yehubor and racial traitors. Instead, a Zevism state would have a central, national bank that keeps people's money in a way that cannot be abused or lost. For any investment, the owner of the money should first agree to their money being invested and secondly for them to be managed by someone else. Best thing would be to learn to manage your own investment and trading portfolios, or a trusted family/clan member do it, rather than entrusting them to a stranger. It is a highly unlikely in an entire clan there's nobody with financial aptitude.

If I seized power today, the issue would be with enemy-owned countries unfairly declaring war to my country, because I would actually implement policies that promote growth at all levels, rather licking enemy feet and committing high treason left and right.

The things you may have read on this forum written by me are not only a partial picture but also only viable if you get out of a profit-oriented mindset, and put people's welfare first, which is what that organs of the state are there for originally. Rulers are at the service of their nation, not the other way around. Also, a nation is not run by one man only but several people and that happens for a reason: multiple talents, knowledge and wisdom combined.

Another thing to keep in mind is that policy-making and implementation take time. They do not become effective overnight. Familiarise yourself with Herr figure of the past's manifesto, then make it more contemporary without losing its spirit. Your comments come from prediction models heavily influenced by enemy bias. Can you not think of alternative ways to make humans great again without feeding into programmes that only create more and more poverty? Everything as it is now, it is 99.9% rotten. It is not salvageable, so it needs to be incinerated and from its ashes we will rebuild something that actually works, which is why we are leading toward to dark period of destruction that will not be stopped, only mitigated.

You can have people's necessities taken care of without attempting drastic overhauls of what is already in place. Homelessness is a fabricated problem that requires no major intervention from the state beyond funding housing for families and individuals in need.

Making housing excessively affordable will create major problems after a few generations. People should not be allowed to simply buy and own dozens of homes and lock the doors while there are families who need to be sheltered. The necessity of going into debt to buy homes incentivizes owners to rent these out to other people who need homes.

Why are rental properties bad exactly. How is someone going into debt to buy a property, fixing it up and then providing housing for families for rent an evil thing. The issue with mortgages and rents is numbers are excessively inflated, as debt interests are too high, and there are Yehuborim investors buying too many homes to fuck up the market. Remove the yehuborim and this will simply fall into place and normalize.


My comments come from simply understanding facts and human psychology. If you make it possible to buy a house for € 5.000,00, you will have people buying properties like psychopaths to lock the doors and create housing shortage, and then sell them again at extravagant prices.

You tell me I'm close minded but you are incapable of putting yourself in other's shoes and understanding the full consequences of such drastic action. Imagine you spend decades of your life building, maintaining and renting homes and overnight you lose everything because some misguided soul decided that now homes are to lose 99% of their value.

Your life's work instantly destroyed like this. When the issue can so easily be resolved by proper welfare systems funding housing for families in need. We've talked about this already. Governments have no issue funding housing for terrorists and social parasites. So funding housing for families in need would not be an issue either.


You also did not understand the point of housing being in disrepair. This isn't a theory or an idea, it's a fact. In rural areas especially, many people inherit homes in a state of disrepair and simply let them decay until they are totally ruined. Because they are either too lazy or too poor to maintain them. Would it not be better to have a landlord be able to buy, repair and maintain them, and rent the place?

Than to simply have an otherwise perfectly good home in ruins?

 

[Dahaarkan]

Resources and work have a cost and with our current development, what you have asked for is not possible but will be when we are more advanced. It will be possible with robots, from the work they will do and the resources they will get and manage, 80% of the profit will be for humans while 20% for their livelihood.

It will never be possible. Because unlike electricity, food etc, which can be essentially infinitely created, housing requires land and land is FINITE. Which means that the housing that does exist must be maintained and made available to the people.

If housing becomes so extremely affordable, people will end up buying lots of homes. Which in the long run will create shortages and problems. Because if you want to move to another city, why rent a house when you can just buy a new one, right?

And now you have two houses, and you're not going to sell your old one because you might want to one day go back, and housing is so cheap you won't make any profits from selling it anyway. Over a lifetime, how many homes do you end up owning for yourself only.

And in 3 generations your family owns dozens of houses while other families cannot even find a home to live in. Because no one's selling (because its so cheap it's not profitable). Again, housing is not as simple as food and such. Because housing is FINITE. And handing it out basically for free means you'll eventually run out. And you end up with an even bigger homelessness problem than before.


Mortgage debt forces owners to open their doors to house families through rent, as they need that rent to cover the debt. Therefore they cannot buy dozens of homes and lock the doors. Solving the issue above.