I need a second opinion on my deleted post here...
(
https://ancient-forums.com/threads/...se-damage-of-race-mixing.305521/#post-1182928)
I think this post not going through for the reason the mod said was a mistake. If its not, then Im leaving immediately and wont be returning.
** No, I don't have a copy of what was deleted.
_____
I didn't choose to join some cult of personality when I joined this forum. It doesn't matter how advanced you are, or even if you have 200+IQ you're not always going to be right about everything. If you cant admit that, then you're not wise as far as Im concerned.
Greetings and thank you for expressing how you feel about the topic. However, I have to show you in a logical and verifiable manner to the best of my ability, how your feelings or observations are actually not the full view of what is actually going on.
You do not have images for me in your house, but to use the argument that respect or positive bonds of trust created after 16 years of consistency, being constantly judged (my words are judged everyday), verified by everyone for accuracy (people think, reason out, conclude, deny or accept) and so forth is "cult of personality" is essentially errant. When it concerns "personality cults" one does not have to be judged, to be verified or wrong, it's just huge amount of emotional propaganda that takes place [media apparatus and related] to remove the essence of free will in order to make the cult.
Valid loyalty, trust, bonds of love or friendship, or acclaim that was given to people based on their judgement and our bonds, are because these exist and not because of construction of "personality cult". This is in this case, in my view, unrelated to the situation at hand. If certain also people recognize the utility, value or something else in a person (or if they do not) is something that is judgement reliant. Objective and realistic positioning of anything or "myself", has not occurred because of emotional prep-talk but because of realistic outcomes in the existence of this place.
It might seem like a small thing to you, but its an absolute deal breaker for me. It's "insinuating" that people that don't agree with something you say cant be advanced.
Truth is something sacred and it needs to be protected with reasonable scrutiny. We cant just call something "truth" because X person said it is, it needs to be provable or disprovable. If its not probable, its an opinion. If we cant meet intellectually here, then I need to leave this place. Simple as.
Nobody was ever disallowed of proving or disproving anything. Again, this is more of an emotional argument that implies two points: That everything must be questioned (even if correct or incorrect; which points me to "I felt like it" rather than the objective truth seeking you hold sacred. Second point, that if people know you say the truth others are undervalued also in their judgement [refer to my first paragraph] of being "victims of a personality cult" and not a brotherhood based on an organic healthy bond that was constructed in a very long timeframe.
I am not "beyond error" but when something has a minimal error margin, it's important to recognize this and not emotionally dismiss it. The argument that this somehow has to do with the truth, or with the reactive tendency to "argue" something or "doubt it" (perfectly fine, but not always accurate), is not helping elevate the truth.
_____
Regardless, I'm taking a break from here. This community is great on the surface, but dig a few inches deeper and you get stuff like this. Whatever community problem that requires the crutch of "advanced people are never wrong" narrative is a lethal cancer.
You can't just replace a large amount of the work of HP Maxine and say she never made any mistakes on things. Making mistakes is normal, people make them all the time, it's even a good thing to make mistakes in some cases. Perfection isn't practical. If you hold yourself to an absolute perfect standard, you'll never produce anything at all. Yes calling something that is "good enough" to be perfect is conceptually problematic. We all agree that terminology and technicality matters... right?
HPS Maxine has done few if any mistakes, and based on her time, she has done what was best. It's not a mistake to have pending updates or things that must be done. Nobody ever claimed to be "error free", but to use the argument of "you are not error free" for personality invalidation, is also in itself an emotionally based and non realistic approach. As for wanting to leave because of this, you are of course free to do this; personality cults would have barred you from leaving; likely on a death contract or something. Here none of this exists.
Is the TOZ perfect? No. That's a good thing, because it leaves room for continued growth and evolution. Presumed "perfection", like when a species adequately evolves to their environment and isn't challenged to develop further, like perhaps crocodiles can be considered, is a sort of stasis. Humanity has gotten as far as it has on a macro level because of our imperfections, and our need to overcome complex challenges. On an individual micro level, we're likely Zevists because we didn't fit into conventional society perfectly. If you were born perfect without your quirks, without the challenges along the way that you faced somewhere up until now, you wouldn't be reading this. You would be like a crocodile who has stayed the same mostly for the last 55 million years.
Alright and what does it mean that it's not perfect? It's constantly advancing and moving toward a perfection; perfection is a path and not a constant. But it's aeons higher comparable to many things around us in the world. Imperfections, mistakes and whatever else, has always been acceptable in this community. As about large arguments of crocodiles and 55 million years; these are relevant in nature of course, but not a viable basis to judge the ToZ. I think my reply might help you to understand where the ToZ is, where I stand (as I am the target of the post) and understand where feelings reside and where likely, maybe there could be misperception.
If we truly strive to become like the Gods, then we need to maintain the sacredness of truth. When we cheapen the value of truth by not verifying what we believe in, we set ourselves up for failure.
Alright, we do. And of course this is the point. The repetition of this is a central point, but it already occurs. As thus your questions etc are being answered. In a personality cult you would have disappeared in a dark night for questioning. I believe acute measurement of your claims has to characterize the argument here.
It's fine to have assumptions, it's fine to be wrong. Again, it's even good to be wrong sometimes.
Of course it is. Also, if some people are "wrong" in regard to advancement or their claims, are they not allowed? Of course. What does responding to this mean, based on verified things or actual information or actual experience? Actually it's help and articulation of the understanding of the person. There is no corrective punishment penalty otherwise, but we also might not have to all sit and listen to kool-aid theories about self purported advanced people or whatever. Advancement in existence manifests in certain undeniable metrics; it's not claims based.
It is problematic if you tell someone you never make mistakes and to trust you in making decisions for them. It's problematic to gaslight people into saying things like "when you're advanced, you'll understand", as if every advanced person fits into a neat cookie cutter shape. "Every advanced person has to have this opinion, everyone who disagrees is spiritually retarded".
The fact that a heart surgeon is "mostly errorless" or has 5 out of 1000 operations in dead versus saved, does not mean that the surgeon is invalidated. Similar situations occur when it comes to anything, including situations here. No it's not problematic to trust in this case, it's smart, accelerating, many times life saving. What is a problem is to not articulate why this occurs and to do it blindly. There is no gaslighting when a surgeon tells you "when you understand more about surgery, you will understand how that operates and how you can be saved". Advancement again is a defacto situation and not an emotional based one. To be angry about this and/or see it as wrong is existentially invalid.
Yes, you will understand when you advance even my responses better or what you experience now. Yes, I was also not liking this response when it was given by my father to me when I was 11 years old and assumed I knew better than him, yes, many decades later I saw it was the correct response; because actually as you said, we grow and we create our judgement as we go. Nothing bad here whatsoever. What's bad in this, considering you speak earlier about the acceptance of making mistakes, self evaluation and advancement? Nothing. If this is problematic how do your own arguments stand about errors, being fine to evolve, and related?
Also, in how "I make decisions for you", what kinds of decisions I have made for you? Your boyfriend? The food you eat? What you wear? What you write? There are few if any objective situations where I make decisions for others in the strict sense of the world.
Guidance and/or being with them to encounter things, ie, fighting life alongside them, does not mean "I make decisions for them". I make decisions for the ToZ and alignments with these arise from the evaluative processes by people. I retain acts to act on this, as this was given to be based on judgement and not because of a discord vote or something.
If you can't prove what you say, then don't tell people it's true. If you can't prove it, chances are they can't disprove it and it'll be a critical flaw in their spiritual advancement. Verify everything before you form a belief you interpret as being "true". If you do this, you'll thank yourself later. Build your spiritual knowledge on a shitty foundation, and you'll have to eventually knock it over and tear the whole thing out and start again from scratch. If you want to ever get as far as Godhood, your tower needs to be incredibly stable to ever reach that high. You'll make plenty of mistakes on your own, you don't need anyone helping you make them for you...
I think based on this and of course upon agreeing with this, that you do not understand the function of many things yet. This message is more about "I will tell daddy I am independent and have my own judgement" than an objective argument on what I do, in the end, very tragically wrong.
There is nothing negative in what I tell you here also, it's purely just an observation with positive feeling on my side.
Verify everything before you form a belief you interpret as being "true". If you do this, you'll thank yourself later. Build your spiritual knowledge on a shitty foundation, and you'll have to eventually knock it over and tear the whole thing out and start again from scratch. If you want to ever get as far as Godhood, your tower needs to be incredibly stable to ever reach that high. You'll make plenty of mistakes on your own, you don't need anyone helping you make them for you...
Am I proposing this as anything other than my opinion? No. If anyone disagrees with me here, and they can actually make a good argument, I'd happily listen to that feedback. Why? Because I know I'm not perfect, and I'm humble to admit I'm not, and I strive for more.
And your opinion plus your request is heard and accepted. I hope extra information contained here makes you see the matter more broadly (which you don't have to in the end of the day).
Speaking of verification, I think after my response it would be great if you could verify what you write here and if it's fundamentally correct about my functions. I know the generalized talk about when one needs to cast some doubt, express "thought independence" and to be a critical thinker, but it's important also to be this especially if one wants to extol truth. The central point remains evaluation; but I am not beyond that evaluation either.
Lastly, the fact one does this and speaks about the buzzwords does not always mean they make an elaborate check on the actual things they claim to do.
Still in the topic I have to tell you that I have seen certain arguments and I did my earnest to answer them. I appreciate you sharing how you feel about the situation and if my response is helpful, I will be glad. Thanks.