The enemy has long made it difficult for artists and musicians to make a decent living.
Then now, non-stupid people realise; rather, actually it's not realising; it's merely noticing, and it can be noticing at a quick glance - they realise that rubbish is not art. Even I notice it, and I'm not very good with art. So while it's always been difficult for artists to make money so they can live on it, people can see the rubbish that is being made now, and then they might dislike art as a whole, unknowingly and psychologically, mocking it, etc.
We have all heard the stereotype of the starving artist, the starving musician. And if any money was to be made, the enemy would take as much for themselves as possible.
Working for an agency, who steals your money. One could (try to) make their own agency, but then they'd need... money first off to do that! At least it seems to be a bit easier with social media and the Internet now, but then there is still so much rubbish on there, and it is overwhelming with all of the bombardment of adverts and posts and stupid 'likes' on stupid, irrelevant nonsense...
In older times one had to be a renown artist to get their art in a museum; these days, one simply has to produce hideous, shocking, or weird art and it ends up on display.
Believe it or don't, Reginald Dwight (Elton John) said, either genuinely or as part of being a celebrity figure, something along the lines of that in the past, one could keep trying to do good music/make an album, but these days (this was several years ago now that I saw it, but I don't know when it was recorded) you hardly get any chances, and said something like there's no love of music anymore. Notice how many older bands are still going, probably going around on tours, but newer ones have broken-up already.
Look at the art which sells the most money: scribbles on canvas, or a photo of a can of soup, or some strange sculpture.
There is a... strange, shall we say, sculpture I am guessing you might be referring to (if not, then I still make these points here), which is related to Jeffrey Dahmer (who I mention in another thread that I should be posting soon). It cannot possibly be a coincidence. The sculpture, and what Dahmer did, are too similar. This is the Yehubor's love of "art". It's like a busybody going into your home and trying to take over, telling you how to do things in your home which are different than what you have been doing already, and which you are very much against, which you dislike, hate and are disgusted/horrified by, and the busybody doing it anyway in your own home, against your permission and also knowledge. (Oh, and that reminds me of the love of Race-mixing the Yehubor is promoting...)
If it is a coincidence, and not a cohencidence, about the sculpture (even if you're not referring to that one) then I'd be rather surprised. It's also related to Podesta, etc. The same pose, as in that "art" sculpture, is actually also in the Exorcist 3, believe it or don't... Of course, if you are not referring to this same sculpture, then OK, but the points still stand.
Neptune also rules confusion, and the enemy takes advantage of this combined with how the world is these days, overly left-brained and easy to manipulate through constructed rhetoric and speech/writing which can be misleading and influence people to agree that yes, smearing feces onto a canvas is indeed art, and why bother learning the techniques of how to use paintbrushes when you have your hand to smear it around.
I saw a programme on TV years ago. It was either about Children specifically, or it was about autism and it included Children in the programme. One young autistic Boy was shown in a bath and behaving however, and his mum said that once, she went into the bathroom and he had smeared faeces all over. With his countenance and behaviour that the programme showed, I could imagine the big grin on his face while doing that, just like it was a normal, everyday part of his behaviour. This is a depiction of the Yehubor - either literal or figurative/symbolic faeces, smeared around what shouldn't have faeces, Yehubor shit (pun not intended) smeared on, nor merely have it anywhere near.
Why bother to create lovely architecture with intricate details when an overly-large blank outer wall with not even a window is more âinnovativeâ?
After my reply above, I was inspired, by your OP which I had not read fully yet, to seek more "art". What you say here is not a joke. You are being literal and directly true, despite maybe not referring to the exact thing I am. At the risk of overusing the word - literally blank, just in colour, with no actual meaning nor expression whatsoever. Oh, and did I say how much they are... "worth"?! Millions. I also am not joking. Oh... and look at the name of one of them - "roth"something-or-other. (See the latest post in the thread I linked to in my reply just above.)
In the above portrait, note the misty background bringing the subject to clear focus, and note the details of the lace, pearl bracelets, fingernails, shimmer of the gown, feathers in the hat, shadowing, and the subtle shades of pink in the hat and sash.
That also reminds me of a picture I shared before, in my rants and raves, and also genuine information, about Race-mixing. The picture I am referring to is the one which says "White people can't dance" and shows... twerking on a chair, and then shows a ballerina with the text "Oh, really?". Also "urban dance", of stomping and shaking the arms like a chicken, is dance only if you're 5 years old. From what I have seen - and again, I'm not well-versed in the Arts, even I can tell - there is no grace nor beauty to it. If you'll excuse the phrase, I refer to Gordon Ramsay, when he was in a Kitchen Nightmares episode, "Love it, don't fuck it". I say in not-very-artistic-understanding that the stomping, chicken-arm-waving, twerking on chairs is fucking. Yeah, that's nice when you think you might need it... but the gracious, beautiful movements of ballet is love-making, which is also extremely important.
As has been said many times - people want quick results and immediate pleasure. There is hardly any depth to it. It's shallow and empty. It's raw and ready. Again, sometimes that might be OK,
if necessary, but not always - and in "art", I - even I, who is quite ignorant of appreciating art, and I wish I could appreciate it more, including in simple beauty of many varieties of flower and all their blooms - notice that it is emotionless and quick and nothing. Sorry for the sexual analogy continuation, and these graphical terms, but the "art" is like someone needing to 'bash one out', or 'fap'; they might do that for years and never have proper, decent love and connection and depth; whereas Art, I put with a capital A, is like what I think a member said regarding Music (as opposed to "music") - it speaks to us in ways we cannot express in words. There are so many levels and depths and meanings to it.
I may sound like I know what I am talking about here, and I might sound quite knowledgeable about these things, but I really don't and I really am not. These, what I say here, are just what I can tell, on the surface. I wonder how much more words
cannot say, deeper down, if I really, truly appreciated Art.
The first painting in this post (âWanderer Above the Sea of Fogâ) invokes a sense of adventure in the natural rugged beauty of nature, and a sense of wonder of what is out there hidden in the mist.
Looking at it again, it does. Another way to explain what I am trying to say here, is using Rockstar (the computer game company). When I refer to "art" here, I refer to the GTA games. When I refer to Art here, I refer to Read Dead Redemption 2. Yeah, they're silly games, but RDR2 is leaps and bounds ahead of, so much better than the GTAs. The reason, I think, I am referring to this is because at the beginning of RDR2, the player is up some snowy mountains, and then who knows where the story will lead, and what might happen... Depending on one's investment in the story, it might be emotional and sad, when it draws you in, and betrayal and loss and unstoppable change, while it itself is not exactly quality and decent, being outlaws... So "art" is GTA, whereas Art is RDR2.
In the second painting, by Hitler, note how the human-made architecture is in harmony with the natural surroundings. Interestingly, Neuschwanstein castle was built in honor of Wagner, a favorite musician of Hitlerâs; and it inspired Walt Disney, a known anti-semite, in his logo for Disney.
This post is dedicated to Satan, Hitler, and my GD, who have all reminded me to appreciate real art and true beauty.
In an artistic expression (if I may, and if I dare to try) - if the randomness of entropy were left long enough, then sooner or later, Nature Herself would create such a beautiful not-Man-made, rather Naturally-occurring building, as that. Not literally, of course, and unfortunately, but the castle just fits so well together with the surroundings.
I don't appreciate art as much as some real, actual art appreciators do, but it's still obvious what is art and what is not. What you said, HPS Lydia, reminds me
yet again that it is psychological. As you said, (paraphrasing) if you wallow in nothing but crap, then that's what you know.
The
cookie-cutter clutter which the Yehubor has made, that the Yehubor is trying to make culture, is damaging Psychologically as well as Mentally and Spiritually. If we want to be of and in and around Nature, we have to
pay shekels for our own Natural Beauty, our own Nature. If we want to build things, we have to pay shekels for land to build on it - and then we still need "permission" ("you will own nothing, and be happy"). We get money just to give it back and not own anything. Flat land is cheaper and urban; Natural contours and foliage, despite being Natural and costing nothing because it grows itself, costs us a lot if we want to live on a hill, in the countryside or by the seaside, etc. In varying amounts, these things have been around for hundreds, thousands, millions or billions of years, and we have to pay some
thing for the "privilege" of not owning our own buildings on them; for the "privilege" of not being in, among, with and of them. We have to pay shekels for
our own Nature. Some
thing comes here from far away and tricks us into paying it for our own stuff... Such extortion...
Then it comes out in "art". The faecal mess I want to call "fart" but that sounds too silly (along the lines of "Krap" or "K-rap" (crap rap) and "whyPhone" because I ask why idiots be idiotic wasting money on "crApple" tech that they don't want nor need). Like I said in my
copper, silver and gold coins analogy (open your browser's search function and search for
To add to my copper/silver/gold coin analogy and also expand the quote just above it) - if we keep putting crap in, eventually that is what will be there - crap in, crap out. Whatever we are increases, for good or for bad. The Yehubor knows that. The Yehubor takes advantage of us with it. The Yehubor exploits us with it.
Also - excuse my language to you! Sorry! Also if you have read down this far, genuinely, then bravo! Lol.