14Alex88 said:
This keeps getting claimed here and it comes across as the reverse of the black supremacist nonsense that white people were an experiment gone wrong by a black scientist :x .
Where is the objective, non-biased evidence for any of these claims? Is it in multiple sources? How and why is it considered true?
The claim that all non whites on Earth were directly created is actually something HoodedCobra disagreed with the last time I mentioned it, he said there are some peoples indigenous to the Earth. The central claim is that Asians and Blacks were created by the Gods, but not necessarily every single 'non white' group of people.
If you want to see a general summary of the site's worldview on the origin and actions of the Gods and their history, look at this article:
https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=182
Mageson tends to cite sources, but given that they're all books, most likely those ones are behind a paywall due to how capitalism works which effectively means most people would just have to trust that the citation is accurate if they don't want to spend money. Let it just suffice to say that no source you look up is ever going to be seen as official in the mainstream. Nonetheless, yes there are multiple sources on many of the Important Articles here about the past.
I don't know if there is an article answering your specific question about non whites. The article I listed offers evidence in favor of non white cultures like those in China and Japan being linked to the Satanism promoted here, like the claim that Sonten from Japanese religion is another phrasing of Satan. Or the fact that the Inca claimed to have been taught civilization by a White-looking God named Quetzlcoatl and this influenced the name they called Whites when the Spaniards arrived, and the same type of thing in several other cultures.
One important claim here in Mageson's article is that Whites are supposedly the first people to exist on the world, something the Yezidi's are supposed to have said. But Cobra's claim that others are indigenous seems to contradict this.
One indirect piece of evidence that would indicate nonwhites are also created is that they along with whites supposedly have a gene which produces telomerase when activated in their cells, just like in the sex cells. Supposedly there have been studies proving that humans can activate this gene and achieve anti-aging effects as a result. If only Whites were created, then these results would only be showing up in Whites, but given that it is mainstream sources finding this gene can be activated and they would certainly mention it if somehow only Whites were affected, that implies nonwhites were also created. Assuming said anti-aging gene existing in normal cells is actually a result of gene editing by the Gods, this would be the logical implication.
This is the first article I found on the Telomerase subject:
https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=17494&p=65280&hilit=telomerase#p65280
The cited source is once again a book called Human by Design, but that's really to be expected. Generally, in our capitalist culture, effective information spread is very inhibited in nature, the fact that all this data is being catalogued here is a serious improvement over the norm. Generally a few implications would be that the transitional fossils needed to show Blacks or Asians and so on slowly evolved from apes are supposed to be lacking according to this book, and that humanity in general appeared on Earth far too quickly for normal evolution to explain.
Hopefully both these sources are of some help.
