As Nietzsche noted the Liberal is the otherside of the Christian coin. The Christian Priest in disguse.
" As to the literal meaning [of Christianity], what could be clearer than the unity of mankind in Genesis and that all men are descended from the same man? And as to the spirit of Christianity, has not its distinctive characteristic been to want to abolish all the distinctions of race.... and to create one human species of which all of its members could perfect themselves and become like one another. How could this spirit, according to widely-held ideas of common sense, be reconciled with a historical doctrine that creates distinct races, unequal ones, made more or less to understand, judge, act, and this as a consequence of a certain original disposition that cannot change and invincibly restricts the perfection of some of these? Christianity was inclined to make brothers and equals of all men."
Alexis de Tocqueville
Note this the exact core same doctrine of Liberalism and Communism. Which are nothing more then atheistic Christianity. With Christianity being Theistic Communism.
Liberalism is Christianity without the Christ
William Gayley Simpson's Which Way Western Man?
Revilo Oliver
Quote:
The other apostates I have mentioned, and many that are now forgotten, together
with almost all of the anti-Christians of recent centuries, exemplify the
operation of what may be called the law of cultural residues. In all civilized
societies, when a long-established and generally accepted belief is found to be
incredible, good minds abandon it, but they commonly retain derivative beliefs
that were originally deduced from the creed they have rejected and logically
must depend on it. Thus it happened that modern enemies of Christianity rejected
the mythology, but uncritically retained faith in the social and ethical
superstitions derived from it a faith which they oddly call rational but hold
with a religious fervor.
They laugh at the silly story about Adam and his spare rib, but they continue to
believe in a "human race" descended from a single pair of ancestors and hence in
a "brotherhood of man." They speak of "all mankind," giving to the term an
unctuous and mystic meaning with which they do not invest corresponding terms,
such as "all marsupials" or "all ungulates." They prate about the "rights of
man," although a moment's thought should suffice to show that, in the absence of
a decree from a supernatural monarch, there can be no rights other than those
which the citizens of a stable and homogeneous society have, by covenant or
established custom, bestowed on themselves; and that while the citizens may show
kindness to aliens, slaves, and dogs, such beings obviously can have no rights.
They do not believe that one-third of a god became incarnate in the most squalid
region on earth to associate with illiterate peasants, harangue the rabble of a
barbarian race, and magically exalt the ignorant and uncouth to "make folly of
the wisdom of this world," so that "the last shall be first" that they do not
believe, but they cling to the morbid hatred of superiority that makes
Christians dote on whatever is lowly, inferior, irrational, debased, deformed,
and degenerate.
They gabble about the "sanctity of human life" especially the vilest forms of
it without reflecting that it takes a god creator to make something sacred.
And they frantically agitate for a universal "equality" that can be attained
only by reducing all human beings to the level of the lowest, evidently unaware
that they are merely echoing the Christians' oft-expressed yearning to become
sheep (the most stupid of all mammals) herded by a good shepherd, which is
implicit in all the tales of the New Testament, although most bluntly expressed
in another gospel, which reports Jesus as promising that after he has tortured
and butchered the more civilized populations of the earth, there will be a
Resurrection, and his ovine pets will pop out of their graves, all of the same
age, all of the same sex, all of the same stature, and all having
indistinguishable features, so that they will be as identical as the bees in a
swarm.[2]
Although the "Liberal" and Marxist cults have doctrinal differences as great as
those that separate Lutherans from Baptists, they are basically the same
superstition, and whether or not we should call them religions depends on
whether we restrict the word to belief in supernatural persons or extend it to
include all forms of blind faith based on emotional excitement instead of
observed facts and reason. When those "atheistic" cults scream out their hatred
of "Fascists" and "Nazis," they obviously must believe that those wicked persons
are possessed of the Devil and should therefore be converted or exterminated to
promote holiness and love. And when they see "racists," who impiously substitute
fact and reason for unthinking faith in approved fairy stories, their lust to
extirpate evil is as great as that of the Christian mob that dragged the fair
and too intelligent Hypatia from her carriage and lovingly used oyster shells to
scrape the flesh from her bones while she was still alive.
With very few exceptions, the anti-Christians, no doubt unwittingly, retained in
their minds a large part of Christian doctrine, and they even revived the most
poisonous elements of the primitive Bolshevism of Antiquity, which had been
attenuated or held in abeyance by the established churches in the great days of
Christendom. And today, professed atheists do not think it odd that, on all
social questions, they are in substantial agreement with the howling dervishes
and evangelical shamans who, subsidized with lavish publicity by the Organized
Jewry who control the boob-tubes and other means of communication, greedily
participate in the current drive to reduce Americans to total imbecility with
every kind of irrational hoax.
" As to the literal meaning [of Christianity], what could be clearer than the unity of mankind in Genesis and that all men are descended from the same man? And as to the spirit of Christianity, has not its distinctive characteristic been to want to abolish all the distinctions of race.... and to create one human species of which all of its members could perfect themselves and become like one another. How could this spirit, according to widely-held ideas of common sense, be reconciled with a historical doctrine that creates distinct races, unequal ones, made more or less to understand, judge, act, and this as a consequence of a certain original disposition that cannot change and invincibly restricts the perfection of some of these? Christianity was inclined to make brothers and equals of all men."
Alexis de Tocqueville
Note this the exact core same doctrine of Liberalism and Communism. Which are nothing more then atheistic Christianity. With Christianity being Theistic Communism.
Liberalism is Christianity without the Christ
William Gayley Simpson's Which Way Western Man?
Revilo Oliver
Quote:
The other apostates I have mentioned, and many that are now forgotten, together
with almost all of the anti-Christians of recent centuries, exemplify the
operation of what may be called the law of cultural residues. In all civilized
societies, when a long-established and generally accepted belief is found to be
incredible, good minds abandon it, but they commonly retain derivative beliefs
that were originally deduced from the creed they have rejected and logically
must depend on it. Thus it happened that modern enemies of Christianity rejected
the mythology, but uncritically retained faith in the social and ethical
superstitions derived from it a faith which they oddly call rational but hold
with a religious fervor.
They laugh at the silly story about Adam and his spare rib, but they continue to
believe in a "human race" descended from a single pair of ancestors and hence in
a "brotherhood of man." They speak of "all mankind," giving to the term an
unctuous and mystic meaning with which they do not invest corresponding terms,
such as "all marsupials" or "all ungulates." They prate about the "rights of
man," although a moment's thought should suffice to show that, in the absence of
a decree from a supernatural monarch, there can be no rights other than those
which the citizens of a stable and homogeneous society have, by covenant or
established custom, bestowed on themselves; and that while the citizens may show
kindness to aliens, slaves, and dogs, such beings obviously can have no rights.
They do not believe that one-third of a god became incarnate in the most squalid
region on earth to associate with illiterate peasants, harangue the rabble of a
barbarian race, and magically exalt the ignorant and uncouth to "make folly of
the wisdom of this world," so that "the last shall be first" that they do not
believe, but they cling to the morbid hatred of superiority that makes
Christians dote on whatever is lowly, inferior, irrational, debased, deformed,
and degenerate.
They gabble about the "sanctity of human life" especially the vilest forms of
it without reflecting that it takes a god creator to make something sacred.
And they frantically agitate for a universal "equality" that can be attained
only by reducing all human beings to the level of the lowest, evidently unaware
that they are merely echoing the Christians' oft-expressed yearning to become
sheep (the most stupid of all mammals) herded by a good shepherd, which is
implicit in all the tales of the New Testament, although most bluntly expressed
in another gospel, which reports Jesus as promising that after he has tortured
and butchered the more civilized populations of the earth, there will be a
Resurrection, and his ovine pets will pop out of their graves, all of the same
age, all of the same sex, all of the same stature, and all having
indistinguishable features, so that they will be as identical as the bees in a
swarm.[2]
Although the "Liberal" and Marxist cults have doctrinal differences as great as
those that separate Lutherans from Baptists, they are basically the same
superstition, and whether or not we should call them religions depends on
whether we restrict the word to belief in supernatural persons or extend it to
include all forms of blind faith based on emotional excitement instead of
observed facts and reason. When those "atheistic" cults scream out their hatred
of "Fascists" and "Nazis," they obviously must believe that those wicked persons
are possessed of the Devil and should therefore be converted or exterminated to
promote holiness and love. And when they see "racists," who impiously substitute
fact and reason for unthinking faith in approved fairy stories, their lust to
extirpate evil is as great as that of the Christian mob that dragged the fair
and too intelligent Hypatia from her carriage and lovingly used oyster shells to
scrape the flesh from her bones while she was still alive.
With very few exceptions, the anti-Christians, no doubt unwittingly, retained in
their minds a large part of Christian doctrine, and they even revived the most
poisonous elements of the primitive Bolshevism of Antiquity, which had been
attenuated or held in abeyance by the established churches in the great days of
Christendom. And today, professed atheists do not think it odd that, on all
social questions, they are in substantial agreement with the howling dervishes
and evangelical shamans who, subsidized with lavish publicity by the Organized
Jewry who control the boob-tubes and other means of communication, greedily
participate in the current drive to reduce Americans to total imbecility with
every kind of irrational hoax.
