ΑΝΑΣΤΑΣΙΣ
New member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2026
- Messages
- 48
Thank you High Priest !
In my entire life, I have never operated within a system without holding a stance against the majority, including those deemed ‘the most important’ in that system. I even paid the price many times for opposing these groups. What are easy tasks for some became difficult for me simply because I stood against everyone. The problem is both horizontal and vertical it is not only about the leaders or the most powerful members.
What has always enraged me is that, when I take a stance against these groups, even the weaker members often benefit from it, and yet they either stay neutral which I can accept, as they are weak or, worse, they watch and hope for my downfall in front of their ‘masters’. That has never happened, and it never will. I only observe how corrupted a person can be: losing yet hoping another, fighting for their own benefit, fails too a true display of cuckoldry.
From my experience, the reason groups or even their leaders end up unworthy of true respect is human motivation itself. Even in groups led by skilled people, if decisions become personal rather than impersonal, everything falls into disorder. For a group to be genuinely praiseworthy, whether in politics or any aspect of life, the individuals whose words carry weight must be deeply conscious, aware, and wise. Unfortunately, in this age, such people are exceedingly rare.
The larger the group, the greater the likelihood of disappointment. For a group to succeed, the top members must be carefully chosen; even a few misaligned individuals can destabilize the entire structure. I see this not as a failure of humans being unconscious, but as a scarcity of those capable of true leadership.
A General who is competent dramatically increases the chances of victory. A General who seeks only pleasure and ignores the well-being of their companions will fail, regardless of the army provided.
From early on, I have been deliberate in valuing and nurturing those who possess the spark of greatness. Such people are now so rare that I treat them as sacred. Throughout history, all flags, parties, and groups are, at best, partial manifestations of truth, revealed to those who then attempt to make it tangible according to their understanding and circumstances.
Even in the best cases, the truth is only a fragment made manifest, never complete. Those who praise these groups often discover things that surprise or disappoint them, because they placed the group on a pedestal. The reality is that the group may have simply done its best, and what is discovered is the truth filtered by circumstances and events; the group performed to the utmost of its ability.
The problem is that successors of these groups almost always take the filtered truth of their predecessors and add their own interpretations as a new layer, twisting it according to personal taste. Over time, these layers accumulate, and the original essence of the truth becomes corrupted, leaving only fragments.
Many religions failed in this very way, branching endlessly and often fighting among themselves. True guidance, however, requires transmitting the truth as it has been revealed, without imposing personal preference. This is exactly what you do differently: instead of adding layers, you remove them, revealing more of the truth and preserving its original power and clarity. By introducing new information and deeper understanding, you elevate what was already revealed rather than distort it.
This is why I am genuinely glad about the choice you made. By stripping away layers instead of adding to them, truth is glorified, revealed, and preserved. The future looks bright!
In my entire life, I have never operated within a system without holding a stance against the majority, including those deemed ‘the most important’ in that system. I even paid the price many times for opposing these groups. What are easy tasks for some became difficult for me simply because I stood against everyone. The problem is both horizontal and vertical it is not only about the leaders or the most powerful members.
What has always enraged me is that, when I take a stance against these groups, even the weaker members often benefit from it, and yet they either stay neutral which I can accept, as they are weak or, worse, they watch and hope for my downfall in front of their ‘masters’. That has never happened, and it never will. I only observe how corrupted a person can be: losing yet hoping another, fighting for their own benefit, fails too a true display of cuckoldry.
From my experience, the reason groups or even their leaders end up unworthy of true respect is human motivation itself. Even in groups led by skilled people, if decisions become personal rather than impersonal, everything falls into disorder. For a group to be genuinely praiseworthy, whether in politics or any aspect of life, the individuals whose words carry weight must be deeply conscious, aware, and wise. Unfortunately, in this age, such people are exceedingly rare.
The larger the group, the greater the likelihood of disappointment. For a group to succeed, the top members must be carefully chosen; even a few misaligned individuals can destabilize the entire structure. I see this not as a failure of humans being unconscious, but as a scarcity of those capable of true leadership.
A General who is competent dramatically increases the chances of victory. A General who seeks only pleasure and ignores the well-being of their companions will fail, regardless of the army provided.
From early on, I have been deliberate in valuing and nurturing those who possess the spark of greatness. Such people are now so rare that I treat them as sacred. Throughout history, all flags, parties, and groups are, at best, partial manifestations of truth, revealed to those who then attempt to make it tangible according to their understanding and circumstances.
Even in the best cases, the truth is only a fragment made manifest, never complete. Those who praise these groups often discover things that surprise or disappoint them, because they placed the group on a pedestal. The reality is that the group may have simply done its best, and what is discovered is the truth filtered by circumstances and events; the group performed to the utmost of its ability.
The problem is that successors of these groups almost always take the filtered truth of their predecessors and add their own interpretations as a new layer, twisting it according to personal taste. Over time, these layers accumulate, and the original essence of the truth becomes corrupted, leaving only fragments.
Many religions failed in this very way, branching endlessly and often fighting among themselves. True guidance, however, requires transmitting the truth as it has been revealed, without imposing personal preference. This is exactly what you do differently: instead of adding layers, you remove them, revealing more of the truth and preserving its original power and clarity. By introducing new information and deeper understanding, you elevate what was already revealed rather than distort it.
This is why I am genuinely glad about the choice you made. By stripping away layers instead of adding to them, truth is glorified, revealed, and preserved. The future looks bright!
![Daemontech [NG]](/data/avatars/m/24/24901.jpg?1752584631){kind=avatar}
![Daemontech [NG]](/data/avatars/s/24/24901.jpg?1752584631){kind=avatar}
