Before these changes, which I have no issue with, I am very glad that our scope of what we deem unsuitable for this place got bigger, and yehuborim encompasses all, so before these changes, we got taught that Jevvs are fundamentally evil. Their souls are different, or they got created by Corrupted Beings, etc., etc., and obviously, our clergy and High Priest was asked before why, for an example, figure of the past kept this Bloch guy safe or why he had same hebrews around him.
High Priest Zevios Metathronos states here that there was no actual acceptance, figure of the past didn't actually accepted them.
(I was going to quote his post, but this thread got removed, no issues.)
https://ancient-forums.com/threads/WW2-laws-half-yehuborim-white-yehuborim.18245/#post-70159
Anyways, we are now being told that figure of the past did accept them, as they were not yehuborim. So was our High Priest Zevios Metathronos at that time also didn't know this? And there is nothing wrong with this, of course, we all improve and learn new things, many thanks to our clergy, and especially our High Priest and High Priestess.
Another question, since there is no actual thing as jevvish race, then there is no race-mixing? So a middle eastern from this particular tribe and a "gentile" middle eastern can be together?
And since politics aren't allowed in ToZ from now on, which again I have no problem with, I am just wondering if we can't talk about Lord figure of the past, as he was a politician, wouldn't this entail the removal of some politicians that are on the Zevic Personalities section? For example, as far as I know,
@Sonne [NG] is writing an article to Zevic Personalities section about the founder of modern Republic of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, which I will be delighted to read all of it. He truly was a heroic Zevic personality, but he was a politician as well. No different than Lord figure of the past. He was a Nationalist, and there are some people in Turkey that are against him because, well, he involved in some events that made him bad through the eyes of these people. Here is the link to the event, it's a so called "massacre", which is nothing but distortion and lies.
en.wikipedia.org
So, if we are not allowed to talk about Lord figure of the past because some demographics think of him as evil and can make them scared, which would cause them to be distant towards our Temple, why is this particular situation different from Atatürk, for example? My understanding might be lacking here but well I am here to learn.
Is the only difference one won the war and the other didn't? Or that one is more popular and well know than the other?
Also, as far as I know, Lord figure of the past and his top officials had plans to slowly ditch out xianity after the war. If he didn't "lose" the war, I think we would see monumental spiritual awakening, but we can only speculate now... But wouldn't saying Lord figure of the past's Germany was very low on spirituality, which is true, a little bit undermine their possible future vision.
I am just here to ask these questions that were bugging my mind. I hope my questions are of value.