I think you need a second round, so that you learn to be humble. Witness how one is aligned with truth, even if 1000 people are arguing against him, it means nothing.
This, if skimmed, will look bs, if someone reads it, its
IMPOSSIBLE to not get convinced.
argumentum ad hominem
Congratulations you have lost the debate.
Argumentum ad hominem
argumentum ad hominem
Congratulations you have lost the debate.
Argumentum ad hominem
Do not assume things, you can say you did not curse me. Do not assume things about others. Literally the Priest just some time ago disapproved messages of a Zevist wanting to curse. So do not act like this does not exist. I also do not mean it will happen, but a person may try doing it. But it will
FAIL.
Look:
So next time please stop assuming things, talk about yourself and how you will never curse another Zevist. But do not assume others by definition meet same standard.
You do understand what a synchronicity means i believe, that was it. I understand how the moderation process happens. Strange how in some threads you take synchronicities and signs as spiritual, and in others you have purely materialistic opinions. If i say it is a synchronicity it is one. I am the judge of my experiences, you cannot tell someone this is synchronicity or is not one. The person having it is the one who decides, you can only guide, not give definitive answers.
@Hidden Warrior [SG]
I keep saying i am a new member in each reply, you keep mentioning i am hot supreme authority, this is telling in psychology.
That is your opinion, you can be wrong. And you are not elite, know that. And you affirmed it not me, you are not a Priest ( taste how you reply to me so you understand why i tell you this is not the correct way.)
You are an SG, you are not elite as you said.
It does not work like that, you cannot say its false and it becomes false, you need to tell why. Since HPS lydia liked your first comment, i will go into it, i am going part by part wait.
You seem to not understand, if your idea is right its right, if its wrong, mentioning HPZM will not make of the idea right.
You repeated this twice so i believe you think you found some loophole.
When i talk to someone and we debate girls psychology for example. And he tells me lets take example of your sister. And i tell him to not mention her. This is not weakness. Its just that this will make me bring his mother to the conversation too. And he wont be able to handle it while i can handle the abyss. I think you got my idea.
Argumentum ad hominem
Yes i am a victim. Now answer the idea and stop the personal attacks. I have no weakness, do not think you will call me victim or something and i will be offended. talk about the idea do not talk about me.
Argumentum ad hominem
i will put it simple to you so that you understand.
I will give an example so that it serves as a way of teaching you,
the clergy, do they ALL say that they are Zevists in real life, and tell the truth about their true beliefs ?
NO
Thats dishonest, so yes the clergy are not fully honest in life.
Did HPS pythia say always the truth?
NO
Saying the truth = never making mistake.
Making mistakes= not always telling the truth.
Indifferent to honesty and loyalty. Those are different virtues, we analyse one by one.
For example, you ask someone 8*7, he says 64 because he really thinks its 64, so he is honest, but did he say the
TRUTH?
NO
honesty and the truth are two different things.
Also, let me give more simple example.
You have on your pocket your wallet and your phone in a hidden pocket.
someone asks you something about HPZM that should not be shared. And also this person puts you under pressure, you cannot say i dont want to answer.
Will you say you dont know ? => loyal but dishonest in this situation.
Or will you tell him? => honest but not loyal.
This is not theory, people in real life, can out of nowhere clinge to honesty, and say i do not care i should say it, or same but to loyalty.
If a friend of yours cheats on his wife, and you are in good terms with his wife, will you tell her because you are ´honest’. Or will you not tell because you are ´loyal’ to your friend.
I am keeping very simple examples since in bigger examples you will make of it discussion about other things.
Lets say i cheat on my wife with a girl. And it should be between us. By ´Loyalty’ she should never disclose that. But also out of nowhere she can also say ´no i feel bad for her i need to be honest and its question of ethics’ and tell my wife.
Real life situations are not as simple as you put them, honest or not honest, loyal or not loyal etc. Real life situations, if you have been in any. Are complex.
A person literally can do great harm and think he did great deeds.
I will give a last example, really if you do not understand this i will give up.
A true seeker trying to know true religions, he did his best and ended up in enemy religion as is attacking ToZ and being loyal to his religion.
This person is acting from real virtues, honesty, honor, and loyalty.
but his ignorance made him use those in benefit of the enemy.
So wisdom is what determines if the virtues will align with Maat or Izfet.
You will not be naturally aligned with Maat just because you acted from a virtue.
One last example,
Zevists disrespected and attacked so much reptiliens and greys before. Was this out of malice ? Or were they virtuous and acting from virtue, only wanting to spread Zevism and fighting enemy?
Ignorance made Zevists aligned with izfet in this specific topic. ( i am not saying ALL zevists. But the ones who blamed or/and slandered reptiliens or/and grays endessly)
And now after the thread of the High Priest, after ignorance has been removed, those same zevist will tend to be more aligned with Maat in this topic.
This alien example is the cherry on top, and proves how come people can be virtuous and align with Izfet out of ignorance.
SAME FOR RACE, WERE SOME ZEVISTS THINKING SOME RACE IS HATED BY GODS YES OR NO? YES !! GO SEE WHERE THAT FALLS IN CURES AND PATHOLOGIES.HOW COME THOSE ZEVISTS GUIDED BY VIRTUE ALIGN WITH IZFET IN THIS MATTER? => IGNORANCE. LACK OF DATA.
Now we go back to your reply and we see how its a mistake:
Zevists in relation to aliens were acting from virtues that are aligned with Maat.
And yet the act itself was aligned with Izfet.
Same thing with what happened with race.
IF AN ACT COMES FROM A VIRTUE IT DOES NOT MEAN THE ACT ITSELF IS ALIGNED WITH MAAT.
ἐπίκληση στην αυθεντία (epiklisi stin afentia)
I will give an example so that you understand this. I dislike so much mentioning High Priests, disliked doing above and dislike doing now. But i will do it just to give you an example you can understand.
Here the High Priest judged the message based on its content. Me myself i was not fully trusting it, and the High Priest did not dismissed it because i am a new member or because i am doubting the ´message ´ i got. But instead engaged with the content. Which is what truly matters.
This is what i tried explaining to you all above.
And at this point i do not understand even if you understand the Sermons of the High Priest.
He literally said that we should judge an individual by:
So the ‘Outfit’ be it a reptilian outfit, or a grey look, or specific human races. It does not matter.
You cannot say an idea of reptilien is bs just because he is a reptilien.
And same goes for all.
This goes to the extent that even advanced people, are to be judged that way.
Alexander the great, Aristotle, Marcus Aurelius etc..
All can be wrong. Its not that every single thing they say should be the truth.
Also, a kid can be right, its not because he is a kid we should dismiss all his opinions. I am not saying kids are wise, i am saying everyone should be judged purely on content.
So when one reads something, he should read without letting the outfit cloud his perception