Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

I have failed my wife.

This is an extremely mild form of cheating; they have children and a family, and he confessed right away and didn't have affairs on the side.

I have both cheated and been cheated on in life, I would say no, this isn't mild and we shouldn't down play it.

I just hope there is a positive resolution for our fellow Zevist in some form, even if that's not reconciliation.
 
I think you need a second round, so that you learn to be humble. Witness how one is aligned with truth, even if 1000 people are arguing against him, it means nothing.

This, if skimmed, will look bs, if someone reads it, its IMPOSSIBLE to not get convinced.
Keep trolling. You are only turning yourself into the joke, as you have done on your previous account names.
argumentum ad hominem

Congratulations you have lost the debate.

Argumentum ad hominem

Another GoldenWings account?

Ah well, at least people will see what miserable wretch one can become if they resort to just trolling, and not actually improving themselves :)
argumentum ad hominem

Congratulations you have lost the debate.

Argumentum ad hominem
No one cursed you,
Do not assume things, you can say you did not curse me. Do not assume things about others. Literally the Priest just some time ago disapproved messages of a Zevist wanting to curse. So do not act like this does not exist. I also do not mean it will happen, but a person may try doing it. But it will FAIL.

Look:
I disproved your posts because you threatened a person on the forum with curses, cussed at them, repeatedly.
So next time please stop assuming things, talk about yourself and how you will never curse another Zevist. But do not assume others by definition meet same standard.
and messages are approved by moderator, and usually in a batch.
You do understand what a synchronicity means i believe, that was it. I understand how the moderation process happens. Strange how in some threads you take synchronicities and signs as spiritual, and in others you have purely materialistic opinions. If i say it is a synchronicity it is one. I am the judge of my experiences, you cannot tell someone this is synchronicity or is not one. The person having it is the one who decides, you can only guide, not give definitive answers.

@Hidden Warrior [SG]

You are not HP.

You are not a supreme authority
I keep saying i am a new member in each reply, you keep mentioning i am hot supreme authority, this is telling in psychology.

You just keep affirming again and again whatever comes to your mind like they are 100% true facts, which are not.
That is your opinion, you can be wrong. And you are not elite, know that. And you affirmed it not me, you are not a Priest ( taste how you reply to me so you understand why i tell you this is not the correct way.)

The Elite are our High Priest, High Priestess, and Priest.
You are an SG, you are not elite as you said.

Here again trying to push you ideas as an absolute truth.
It does not work like that, you cannot say its false and it becomes false, you need to tell why. Since HPS lydia liked your first comment, i will go into it, i am going part by part wait.
I will bring High Priest Zevios Metathronos and the Clergy in my replies every time I want.
You seem to not understand, if your idea is right its right, if its wrong, mentioning HPZM will not make of the idea right.

You repeated this twice so i believe you think you found some loophole.

When i talk to someone and we debate girls psychology for example. And he tells me lets take example of your sister. And i tell him to not mention her. This is not weakness. Its just that this will make me bring his mother to the conversation too. And he wont be able to handle it while i can handle the abyss. I think you got my idea.
this is confirmed by your victim behavior after being confronted about your ideas.
Argumentum ad hominem

Yes i am a victim. Now answer the idea and stop the personal attacks. I have no weakness, do not think you will call me victim or something and i will be offended. talk about the idea do not talk about me.

Argumentum ad hominem
Do you think that being 100% honest about something is aligned with Izeft only because you are analyzing how normal people react to a person being 100% honest?
High Priest Zevios Metathronos and all the Clergy have been honest all these 20 years, telling the straight Truth over and over on multiple topics. There have been people who have called them crazy, lunatics, and worse. Does it mean that they are aligned with Izfet only because they have been straight to the point, and people didn't believe them?

i will put it simple to you so that you understand.

I will give an example so that it serves as a way of teaching you,

the clergy, do they ALL say that they are Zevists in real life, and tell the truth about their true beliefs ?

NO

Thats dishonest, so yes the clergy are not fully honest in life.

Did HPS pythia say always the truth?

NO

Saying the truth = never making mistake.

Making mistakes= not always telling the truth.

Indifferent to honesty and loyalty. Those are different virtues, we analyse one by one.

For example, you ask someone 8*7, he says 64 because he really thinks its 64, so he is honest, but did he say the TRUTH? NO

honesty and the truth are two different things.

Also, let me give more simple example.

You have on your pocket your wallet and your phone in a hidden pocket.

someone asks you something about HPZM that should not be shared. And also this person puts you under pressure, you cannot say i dont want to answer.

Will you say you dont know ? => loyal but dishonest in this situation.

Or will you tell him? => honest but not loyal.

This is not theory, people in real life, can out of nowhere clinge to honesty, and say i do not care i should say it, or same but to loyalty.

If a friend of yours cheats on his wife, and you are in good terms with his wife, will you tell her because you are ´honest’. Or will you not tell because you are ´loyal’ to your friend.

I am keeping very simple examples since in bigger examples you will make of it discussion about other things.

Lets say i cheat on my wife with a girl. And it should be between us. By ´Loyalty’ she should never disclose that. But also out of nowhere she can also say ´no i feel bad for her i need to be honest and its question of ethics’ and tell my wife.

Real life situations are not as simple as you put them, honest or not honest, loyal or not loyal etc. Real life situations, if you have been in any. Are complex.

A person literally can do great harm and think he did great deeds.

I will give a last example, really if you do not understand this i will give up.

A true seeker trying to know true religions, he did his best and ended up in enemy religion as is attacking ToZ and being loyal to his religion.

This person is acting from real virtues, honesty, honor, and loyalty.

but his ignorance made him use those in benefit of the enemy.

So wisdom is what determines if the virtues will align with Maat or Izfet.

You will not be naturally aligned with Maat just because you acted from a virtue.

One last example,

Zevists disrespected and attacked so much reptiliens and greys before. Was this out of malice ? Or were they virtuous and acting from virtue, only wanting to spread Zevism and fighting enemy?

Ignorance made Zevists aligned with izfet in this specific topic. ( i am not saying ALL zevists. But the ones who blamed or/and slandered reptiliens or/and grays endessly)

And now after the thread of the High Priest, after ignorance has been removed, those same zevist will tend to be more aligned with Maat in this topic.

This alien example is the cherry on top, and proves how come people can be virtuous and align with Izfet out of ignorance.


SAME FOR RACE, WERE SOME ZEVISTS THINKING SOME RACE IS HATED BY GODS YES OR NO? YES !! GO SEE WHERE THAT FALLS IN CURES AND PATHOLOGIES.HOW COME THOSE ZEVISTS GUIDED BY VIRTUE ALIGN WITH IZFET IN THIS MATTER? => IGNORANCE. LACK OF DATA.


Now we go back to your reply and we see how its a mistake:
among the Ten Pathologies, where does it fall, being 100% honest? Truth is truth; if people are not able to handle it, it is not a problem if Divine Laws.
Zevists in relation to aliens were acting from virtues that are aligned with Maat.

And yet the act itself was aligned with Izfet.

Same thing with what happened with race.

IF AN ACT COMES FROM A VIRTUE IT DOES NOT MEAN THE ACT ITSELF IS ALIGNED WITH MAAT.

ἐπίκληση στην αυθεντία (epiklisi stin afentia)


I will give an example so that you understand this. I dislike so much mentioning High Priests, disliked doing above and dislike doing now. But i will do it just to give you an example you can understand.

This "Message" you received is correct: They can't be assed with human nonsense.
Here the High Priest judged the message based on its content. Me myself i was not fully trusting it, and the High Priest did not dismissed it because i am a new member or because i am doubting the ´message ´ i got. But instead engaged with the content. Which is what truly matters.

This is what i tried explaining to you all above.

And at this point i do not understand even if you understand the Sermons of the High Priest.

He literally said that we should judge an individual by:
Final analysis is:

1. Anyone can give birth to Izfet
2. Anyone can follow it
3. Anyone can promote it
4. Anyone can destroy if they get caught in the vortex
5. There is nobody guilty or innocent, but based on their actions [as individuals]
6. Individuals or anyone, do not account for the "crimes of the mob" in any historic interval.
7. The Gods see the bill and the account of each entity, not of collectives. They rank based on individual merits.
So the ‘Outfit’ be it a reptilian outfit, or a grey look, or specific human races. It does not matter.

You cannot say an idea of reptilien is bs just because he is a reptilien.
And same goes for all.

This goes to the extent that even advanced people, are to be judged that way.

Alexander the great, Aristotle, Marcus Aurelius etc..

All can be wrong. Its not that every single thing they say should be the truth.

Also, a kid can be right, its not because he is a kid we should dismiss all his opinions. I am not saying kids are wise, i am saying everyone should be judged purely on content.

So when one reads something, he should read without letting the outfit cloud his perception
 
Mod caan you please reject above reply, very sorry for disturbance. The Gods react to slander disrespect and arrogance with silence. I should model the Gods. Also i mentioned HPS Pythia above in a way i dislike i just was pushed into it. So please can you reject. Thank you 🫴🏻❤️
 
I have no weakness, do not think you will call me victim or something and i will be offended. talk about the idea do not talk about me.
No weakness? I see that you are already a fully developed being without weaknesses.
i will put it simple to you so that you understand.
Thank you for your magnanimity. I will learn from you now and on.
I will give an example so that it serves as a way of teaching you,

the clergy, do they ALL say that they are Zevists in real life, and tell the truth about their true beliefs ?

NO

Thats dishonest, so yes the clergy are not fully honest in life.

Did HPS pythia say always the truth?

NO

Saying the truth = never making mistake.

Making mistakes= not always telling the truth.

Indifferent to honesty and loyalty. Those are different virtues, we analyse one by one.
Not saying something doesn't mean being dishonest. People have hidden their religion for security and privacy, which doesn't mean they are dishonest. Being dishonest means you are actively lying.
Thus, the two big "NO" you wrote above are completely wrong, based on false assumptions. And you are taking these false assumptions and calling Lady Pythia and the Clergy dishonest (thus liars) to try to sustain your opinion.
We don't tolerate such attacks on the Clergy.
 
I think you need a second round, so that you learn to be humble. Witness how one is aligned with truth, even if 1000 people are arguing against him, it means nothing.

This, if skimmed, will look bs, if someone reads it, its IMPOSSIBLE to not get convinced.

argumentum ad hominem

Congratulations you have lost the debate.

Argumentum ad hominem


argumentum ad hominem

Congratulations you have lost the debate.

Argumentum ad hominem

Do not assume things, you can say you did not curse me. Do not assume things about others. Literally the Priest just some time ago disapproved messages of a Zevist wanting to curse. So do not act like this does not exist. I also do not mean it will happen, but a person may try doing it. But it will FAIL.

Look:

So next time please stop assuming things, talk about yourself and how you will never curse another Zevist. But do not assume others by definition meet same standard.

You do understand what a synchronicity means i believe, that was it. I understand how the moderation process happens. Strange how in some threads you take synchronicities and signs as spiritual, and in others you have purely materialistic opinions. If i say it is a synchronicity it is one. I am the judge of my experiences, you cannot tell someone this is synchronicity or is not one. The person having it is the one who decides, you can only guide, not give definitive answers.

@Hidden Warrior [SG]




I keep saying i am a new member in each reply, you keep mentioning i am hot supreme authority, this is telling in psychology.


That is your opinion, you can be wrong. And you are not elite, know that. And you affirmed it not me, you are not a Priest ( taste how you reply to me so you understand why i tell you this is not the correct way.)


You are an SG, you are not elite as you said.


It does not work like that, you cannot say its false and it becomes false, you need to tell why. Since HPS lydia liked your first comment, i will go into it, i am going part by part wait.

You seem to not understand, if your idea is right its right, if its wrong, mentioning HPZM will not make of the idea right.

You repeated this twice so i believe you think you found some loophole.

When i talk to someone and we debate girls psychology for example. And he tells me lets take example of your sister. And i tell him to not mention her. This is not weakness. Its just that this will make me bring his mother to the conversation too. And he wont be able to handle it while i can handle the abyss. I think you got my idea.

Argumentum ad hominem

Yes i am a victim. Now answer the idea and stop the personal attacks. I have no weakness, do not think you will call me victim or something and i will be offended. talk about the idea do not talk about me.

Argumentum ad hominem


i will put it simple to you so that you understand.

I will give an example so that it serves as a way of teaching you,

the clergy, do they ALL say that they are Zevists in real life, and tell the truth about their true beliefs ?

NO

Thats dishonest, so yes the clergy are not fully honest in life.

Did HPS pythia say always the truth?

NO

Saying the truth = never making mistake.

Making mistakes= not always telling the truth.

Indifferent to honesty and loyalty. Those are different virtues, we analyse one by one.

For example, you ask someone 8*7, he says 64 because he really thinks its 64, so he is honest, but did he say the TRUTH? NO

honesty and the truth are two different things.

Also, let me give more simple example.

You have on your pocket your wallet and your phone in a hidden pocket.

someone asks you something about HPZM that should not be shared. And also this person puts you under pressure, you cannot say i dont want to answer.

Will you say you dont know ? => loyal but dishonest in this situation.

Or will you tell him? => honest but not loyal.

This is not theory, people in real life, can out of nowhere clinge to honesty, and say i do not care i should say it, or same but to loyalty.

If a friend of yours cheats on his wife, and you are in good terms with his wife, will you tell her because you are ´honest’. Or will you not tell because you are ´loyal’ to your friend.

I am keeping very simple examples since in bigger examples you will make of it discussion about other things.

Lets say i cheat on my wife with a girl. And it should be between us. By ´Loyalty’ she should never disclose that. But also out of nowhere she can also say ´no i feel bad for her i need to be honest and its question of ethics’ and tell my wife.

Real life situations are not as simple as you put them, honest or not honest, loyal or not loyal etc. Real life situations, if you have been in any. Are complex.

A person literally can do great harm and think he did great deeds.

I will give a last example, really if you do not understand this i will give up.

A true seeker trying to know true religions, he did his best and ended up in enemy religion as is attacking ToZ and being loyal to his religion.

This person is acting from real virtues, honesty, honor, and loyalty.

but his ignorance made him use those in benefit of the enemy.

So wisdom is what determines if the virtues will align with Maat or Izfet.

You will not be naturally aligned with Maat just because you acted from a virtue.

One last example,

Zevists disrespected and attacked so much reptiliens and greys before. Was this out of malice ? Or were they virtuous and acting from virtue, only wanting to spread Zevism and fighting enemy?

Ignorance made Zevists aligned with izfet in this specific topic. ( i am not saying ALL zevists. But the ones who blamed or/and slandered reptiliens or/and grays endessly)

And now after the thread of the High Priest, after ignorance has been removed, those same zevist will tend to be more aligned with Maat in this topic.

This alien example is the cherry on top, and proves how come people can be virtuous and align with Izfet out of ignorance.


SAME FOR RACE, WERE SOME ZEVISTS THINKING SOME RACE IS HATED BY GODS YES OR NO? YES !! GO SEE WHERE THAT FALLS IN CURES AND PATHOLOGIES.HOW COME THOSE ZEVISTS GUIDED BY VIRTUE ALIGN WITH IZFET IN THIS MATTER? => IGNORANCE. LACK OF DATA.


Now we go back to your reply and we see how its a mistake:

Zevists in relation to aliens were acting from virtues that are aligned with Maat.

And yet the act itself was aligned with Izfet.

Same thing with what happened with race.

IF AN ACT COMES FROM A VIRTUE IT DOES NOT MEAN THE ACT ITSELF IS ALIGNED WITH MAAT.

ἐπίκληση στην αυθεντία (epiklisi stin afentia)


I will give an example so that you understand this. I dislike so much mentioning High Priests, disliked doing above and dislike doing now. But i will do it just to give you an example you can understand.


Here the High Priest judged the message based on its content. Me myself i was not fully trusting it, and the High Priest did not dismissed it because i am a new member or because i am doubting the ´message ´ i got. But instead engaged with the content. Which is what truly matters.

This is what i tried explaining to you all above.

And at this point i do not understand even if you understand the Sermons of the High Priest.

He literally said that we should judge an individual by:

So the ‘Outfit’ be it a reptilian outfit, or a grey look, or specific human races. It does not matter.

You cannot say an idea of reptilien is bs just because he is a reptilien.
And same goes for all.

This goes to the extent that even advanced people, are to be judged that way.

Alexander the great, Aristotle, Marcus Aurelius etc..

All can be wrong. Its not that every single thing they say should be the truth.

Also, a kid can be right, its not because he is a kid we should dismiss all his opinions. I am not saying kids are wise, i am saying everyone should be judged purely on content.

So when one reads something, he should read without letting the outfit cloud his perception
What a retarded animal.

Yes, this is the same troll with many different names who keeps coming back. You can see it speaks with the same voice, the same energy, the same soul. The same thing happens every time. It is not capable of communicating like a functional human, especially since it is purposefully trying to create izfet, confusion, and lies. It tries to hide its lies unnoticed within a message by using AI, but that does not work.


Keep coming back with a new name every 2 weeks. Keep speaking with the same voice with the same bad energy and the same unhealthy soul. You are only making us laugh. You are only wasting your own time yehubor.
 
What a retarded animal.
Thank you.

Dear clergy, you see this is an old member, and he cannot engage in debate respectfully, please when you see a new member rant, keep this in mind, if an old member cannot have basic self control, how can we expect this from new members? I kindly suggest just being bit more easy on new members, since you see the above.

As for me i accept restrictions etc.. i will never ever question :
-why?
-how?
-or generally complain
I am offering this for benefit of new members, since they get triggered by members like olgerdo and end up with a rant.

I displayed my power with proof above, olgerdo could not stand the light of knowledge, and it is with great pride and humble attitude, and High Ethics that i am standing in this reply 🫴🏻❤️

He violated rules,

disrespected clergy, for not caring about the rules

gave bad example to other members,

And more..

@Ol argedco luciftias i will teach you, i said above that i do not believe you absorb Sermons of High Priests, look:
And at this point i do not understand even if you understand the Sermons of the High Priest.
And you confirmed it again,

The High Priest posted this, i invite you to check it:

Thread 'On Noble Speech, Good Conduct, and Reverence to the Gods, against Αισχρολογία (Vulgar Speech)'
https://ancient-forums.com/threads/...ods-against-Αισχρολογία-vulgar-speech.307658/

What a retarded animal.

Yes, this is the same troll with many different names who keeps coming back. You can see it speaks with the same voice, the same energy, the same soul. The same thing happens every time. It is not capable of communicating like a functional human, especially since it is purposefully trying to create izfet, confusion, and lies. It tries to hide its lies unnoticed within a message by using AI, but that does not work.


Keep coming back with a new name every 2 weeks. Keep speaking with the same voice with the same bad energy and the same unhealthy soul. You are only making us laugh. You are only wasting your own time yehubor.
argumentum ad hominem

it is by respect and loyalty to the High Priest, to the entire clergy, and to make my Guardian God Proud, and to make God Zeus and all Gods witness how great i am, and show them that i am a real Sage, and by respect to the temple that i refuse in engaging in actions that are not noble.

Do not attack my character, i will not engage.

argumentum ad hominem

Hail God Zeus and all the Gods❤️


O son of Kuntī, declare it boldly that My devotee never perishes

Now, i will kindly reply to you, Dear Senior Guardian,

No weakness? I see that you are already a fully developed being without weaknesses.
argumentum ad hominem

Please, Senior Guardian. Engage with main idea. Do not discuss or/and attack character.

argumentum ad hominem
Thank you for your magnanimity. I will learn from you now and on.
argumentum ad hominem

Please, Senior Guardian. Engage with main idea. Do not discuss or/and attack character.

argumentum ad hominem
Not saying something doesn't mean being dishonest. People have hidden their religion for security and privacy, which doesn't mean they are dishonest. Being dishonest means you are actively lying.
Thus, the two big "NO" you wrote above are completely wrong, based on false assumptions. And you are taking these false assumptions and calling Lady Pythia and the Clergy dishonest (thus liars) to try to sustain your opinion.
We don't tolerate such attacks on the Clergy.
Kindly Senior Guardian,

a person is zevist, says he is not zevist.

Is this true statement yes or no.

NO = DISHONEST.

Are you trying to say when one is not zevist and he says he is zevist, this is being honest?

You literally ruined the word. You just use it the way you want. Thats not how it works.

Each word has a definition. The use of the word should conform to the definition you give it.

This is like, if i get angry and say no i was happy, because the anger is justified.

Anger, justified or not its anger.

Dishonesty justified or not is dishonesty.

Otherwise if you just keep using word for opposite of what it means, then how can we even communicate ? You can tell me you are not something and instead mean opposite. How can i at this point communicate with you.

You literally want to make anger be called happiness if justified.

i believe you felt your mistake, so what you do, instead of admiting you made a mistake, and being humble, you are trying to bend definitions of things as obvious as ´Honesty’ just so that it conforms to what you said.

Honesty has an independent definition,

otherwise we will start playing with words here. I tell you something and when you answer, i tell you that i meant opposite. Because i was happy , and when i am happy, my statements means opposite of what it seems to mean.

If someone is dishonest under any condition, be it strategic or because of weakness or wisdom or whatever. This is still called dishonest.

People have hidden their religion for security and privacy, which doesn't mean they are dishonest. Being dishonest means you are actively lying.

Ok if i get angry and its justified, it means i am being happy not angry.

Lets mess the whole language, just so that you do not admit you are wrong.

Keep changing now definitions of words as simple as honesty and such.

Being dishonest means you are actively lying.

From where you got this definition, kindly SG

Saying something, opposite of obvious truth that one knows = Dishonest. Act by act.

If i have my phone in my left pocket and i say its my right, this is being dishonest.

I think a kid can answer that,

I am Zevist, you ask me are you Zevist, i say No.

Is this a truth or the opposite of truth.

=> opposite of truth.

Ok this is definition of dishonest.

Dear Senior Guardian, i do not know if i seem a joke to you, but i am talking seriously, so i am expecting specific and precise use of words. So that we can have a proper conversation, and if i am wrong i will say it, and i believe if you are wrong you will say it, Gods communicate through multiple means, what if they want you to understand something through me ? I am not saying this is the case, i am just presenting you cases where knowledge can come from places you do not expect. And i see no problem with that. I personally have no ego, if now i see a flaw in my understanding i will instantly correct it, whats else is there to do ? Keep carrying the flaw ? Or acting like if i am right while i see clearly im wrong?

Thus, the two big "NO" you wrote above are completely wrong, based on false assumptions. And you are taking these false assumptions and calling Lady Pythia and the Clergy dishonest (thus liars) to try to sustain your opinion.
We don't tolerate such attacks on the Clergy.
You still INSIST in playing the who will get the High Priests on his side game, and who will get corrected by clergy first.

I am not interested in playing that.

My focus is not on the public, nor on the clergy currently.

I am debating with you the ideas. This is my focus.

also, now i am sure either consciously or unconsciously, your way of debating is positioning me against the High Priests. So its more about how to ruin my relationship with them, rather than the ideas. And i hope i am wrong, since this looks bad by the way.

I will descend to that arena and play by your rules, just to show you how this is aligned with Izfet in my opinion ( i am talking about putting Clergy and High Priests in front line, to give weight to ideas and try to intimidate the other member), and to show you that i can do it all.

I wished we could have a high level debate, but you drag this down, i will answer the call, and the below does not represent me, even if it will land hard. I do not like this, i will start:

What you did in this message is the peak attack one can deliver to High Priestess Pythia and this is UNACCEPTABLE.

You are framing it like she never does mistake and by consequence putting her on a pedestal.

Members will find HPZM correcting her and will think he is betraying her.

This is an attack to our High Priest.

Second, you are playing her on a pedestal, thats very serious attack,

Members will later discover she did mistakes, and they will be very disappointed, so the whole image will crumble, because their respect will be based on idolizing instead of the truth. There nothing that will make members undermine the True Level the High Priestess achieved, than this behavior.

Third,

Your idea is peak enemy religion idea, [the prophets NEVER make mistakes]

and then people search a little bit they find those were humans and get shocked and quit religion because of it. And their whole belief and sense of reverence and trust goes to zero and they feel betrayed.

You are trying to frame the High Priestess in a branding that fits only enemy religions.

And i do not see if there is a bigger attack than this. Given the consequences of it.


This is 30% of the message, i left 70% in notes, since i dislike that way of debating, even if i am good at it.

Please know when i refuse to engage in such behavior, it is really because my ethics are way higher than this. Its never because of weakness.

If you want us to debate, we debate without mentioning High Priests.
ἐπίκληση στην αυθεντία (epiklisi stin afentia)

Finally, know Senior Guardian, that i have no personal issue with you, we are just debating ideas, this SHOULD NEVER be source of conflict.

You are a Senior Guardian right ? And i am just a new member, so view me as a kid.

You did not insult me, you were respectful, i value this above everything else.
 
Hello everyone.

This brings me great shame to post this.

A few weeks ago I cheated on my wife of 10 years (married for 2, 2 children, highschool sweethearts).

I was drinking with friends, at the height of the night I went to a massage parlour and received a "happy ending".

I immediately called my wife, crying, hyperventilating at what I had done.

She told me just to come home safely, I did and we spoke about it.

She is currently back in our home country with our children to have space.

She has told me the relationship is effectively over.

I've always struggled with a porn addiction, lusting over women and always having wandering eyes. I was emotionally abusive (I never intended to hurt her). I made her feel inadequate, like she was the problem due to having a low libido.

I'm not asking for sympathy.

I don't want to be that man anymore, I'm seeking therapy to address a lot of deep seated issues from my childhood that resulted in severe attachment issues.

I can only move on and try be better, for my kids.

I'm actually not really sure what I'm seeking here, I don't care if you all berate me and tell me what a POS I am, I know.

I fell straight into the goyim trap.
Sounds like a very private and personal matter; all speculation in the universe cannot learn the gigantic lessons this holds for you.
 
What a retarded animal.
I feel sadness seing this, ( i am serious not trolling, seriously, not mocking or something)

Because i feel now how its bad to be falsely disrespected,

the Gods faced this a lot,

the High Priests faced this,

the innocent reptiliens and greys faced this.

Etc..

This is really too bad for everyone having the ability to feel compassion,

i feel compassion for everyone who has been falsely disrespected and attacked before,

and i will make sure to never attack or disrespect someone because of ignorance, be it a person or an entity. I will do my best.

I already mentally apologized to the entire Cosmos for every single attack/disrespect i did before out of ignorance.
 
Maybe I'm wrong, but in my opinion, revealing this betrayal is worse than committing it in the first place.

Let me explain. There are different levels of fault possible in this kind of situation. I'll list them here from least to most serious, according to my view.

Level 0 — The man in the post realizes he no longer has a sexual relationship with his wife, that he's attracted to other women. He faces the situation honestly, tells his wife, and only then sleeps with other women. (Fault level: zero)

Level 1 — The man finds himself in a situation where he gives in and sleeps with another woman. Afterwards, he carefully reflects on what happened — asking himself things like: Did I simply act on impulse? Do I still love my wife? After doing this inner work on his own, he decides how to take responsibility for his actions.

Level 2 — Maximum fault, which is exactly what this man did: he sleeps with another woman, then immediately — without bearing the weight of his actions alone even for a moment — confesses to his wife. In doing so, he effectively offloads and redistributes the burden of guilt, inflicting a great deal of pain on her in the process.

Maybe my mindset is off, but I'm genuinely disappointed that among dozen of comments, many people saw his honesty as something positive.

To me, it's the gravest mistake of all because of the timing. It simply shifts the guilt and the pain onto the other person.
Then again, maybe I'm the one thinking about this the wrong way.
 
Do not assume things, you can say you did not curse me. Do not assume things about others. Literally the Priest just some time ago disapproved messages of a Zevist wanting to curse. So do not act like this does not exist. I also do not mean it will happen, but a person may try doing it. But it will FAIL.
I do not need to assume when I can understand the difference between you fucking bitch, and a magickal curse which has not occurred. You mentioned having a siddhi, which you obviously do not have, but if you did, this would be glaringly obvious to you.

You are simply another bullshitter. You bullshit here, and bullshit in private. Go ahead, make our day with your bullshit Beauty "100% honesty is isfet".
 
I feel sadness seing this, ( i am serious not trolling, seriously, not mocking or something)

Because i feel now how its bad to be falsely disrespected,

the Gods faced this a lot,

the High Priests faced this,

the innocent reptiliens and greys faced this.

Etc..

This is really too bad for everyone having the ability to feel compassion,

i feel compassion for everyone who has been falsely disrespected and attacked before,

and i will make sure to never attack or disrespect someone because of ignorance, be it a person or an entity. I will do my best.

I already mentally apologized to the entire Cosmos for every single attack/disrespect i did before out of ignorance.
If I am wrong, I'm sorry. I hope that I am wrong. But you look the same as the guy who keeps coming here to try to start arguments and confusion.
 
@Beauty You are really running out of steam on this bullshittery.
Argumentum ad hominem

you have lost the debate, if you can debate, debate the idea, if you attack character = you lost.

Argumentum ad hominem

If I am wrong, I'm sorry. I hope that I am wrong. But you look the same as the guy who keeps coming here to try to start arguments and confusion.
This is why i explained above, and i gave example with the noble way the High Priest approach messages with,

when you see a message, engage with content, you choose to engage with the outfit

But you look the same
It is not about looks, looks are but an outfit, bypass that and judge based on the content.

You have been forgiven. No worries.

I do not need to assume when I can understand the difference between you fucking bitch,
Argumentum ad hominem

Please engage with main idea, do not attack character.

Argumentum ad hominem
and a magickal curse which has not occurred. You mentioned having a siddhi, which you obviously do not have, but if you did, this would be glaringly obvious to you.
Argumentum ad hominem

Please engage with main idea, do not attack character.

Argumentum ad hominem
You are simply another bullshitter. You bullshit here, and bullshit in private. Go ahead, make our day with your bullshit Beauty "100% honesty is isfet".
Argumentum ad hominem

Please engage with main idea, do not attack character.

Argumentum ad hominem

Because this will be looked at like a weakness, and it will look like if i cannot reply to that, i will reply, but keep in mind, you did not engage with main idea.

I will reply to your message part by part.
I do not need to assume when I can understand the difference between you fucking bitch, and a magickal curse which has not occurred.
This is what i said, read it:
On my side i forgive in case ( 0.1% probability ) someone tried doing something
I said 0.1% probability, and you are framing it like if i said i was cursed.

And i said ‘someone 0.1% probability, TRIED

I CANNOT BE CURSED
, i said TRIED
fucking bitch
Did you insult me here ? If its the case, Know that nothing affects me. Engage with idea. Do not attack character.

You mentioned having a siddhi, which you obviously do not have, but if you did, this would be glaringly obvious to you.

I explained before this was an auxesis αὔξησις
Google what does auxesis mean.

I did not mean literally i had a Siddhi , it was auxesis.

And i explained this before, look:

I did not mean it is a Siddhi, its just a way of talking

it was an auxesis: ancient greek word αὔξησις
Now lets continue,

You are simply another bullshitter. You bullshit here,
you cannot say ‘bs’ and the idea magically turns into bs, if you do not say why, and a strong and logical why,

The idea will stand like a mountain.
and bullshit in private.
This is what i sent you in private:

[
By the way, You replied to me too much lately to the point i saw you in dream last night, not sure since i did not recall well, i did not see you clearly or similar but i recall you appeared in the dream even if i have doubts now

I was telling members : download everything on ToZ, soon everything will become paid,

And you told me: no thats not true, this will stay free, also recalled in dream when it was said the Gods too want that.

That was it. I almost shared this in reply, but i believe dreams should not be shared publicly,

Not a significant dream, but i think its beautiful]

I do not know if this inflated your ego or what, its just a dream and i just wanted to share it with you since you was in it.

This was not some idea i sent you to debate.

bullshit Beauty "100% honesty is isfet".
You mentioned the word ‘BS’ 4 times in 3 lines.

This did not weaken the idea, you just prove you CANNOT argue against it.

the Idea:

WHEN SOMEONE ACTS FROM A VIRTUE, IT DOES NOT MEAN THE ACT ITSELF IS ALIGNED WITH MAAT, IGNORANCE AND WISDOM PLAY BIG ROLE, ONE CAN ACT FROM VIRTUE AND BECAUSE OF IGNORANCE END UP WITH AN ACT ALIGNED WITH IZFET. AND HONESTY IS A THING, WHILE TRUTH IS ANOTHER.
Please refer to earlier replies to avoid confusion.
 
I do not need to assume when I can understand the difference between you fucking bitch, and a magickal curse which has not occurred. You mentioned having a siddhi, which you obviously do not have, but if you did, this would be glaringly obvious to you.

You are simply another bullshitter. You bullshit here, and bullshit in private. Go ahead, make our day with your bullshit Beauty "100% honesty is isfet".
First i was almost going to praise you publicly, to say that you better than others in the fact you do not go too much, and at worst stay on the border line, i wrote the reply and for some reason just deleted it, and i am glad i did since now your reply disappointed me.

I believe i am over estimating people, and underestimating myself.

A thing needs to be explained,

Many now know things that previously HPS Pythia did mistake on.

Does this mean they are more advanced than her ?

If you do an advanced technique or know something valuable,

All credit to HPZM.

What is a technique? Or knowledge?

HPZM does all the work and you sit, read and apply and follow instructions mostly.

True advancement is another thing, just look how you all are stuck with ego, how come with all the techniques you still stuck with the ego?

Meditate on this.

[ the credit goes to HPZM, HPS Pythia for all the work she done before and i revere her SO MUCH for that. HPL Lydia, and all other clergy members; and members who participated in all this in a direct or indirect way.
Just so that it does not look above as dismissing other peoples efforts. ]
 

Official Temple of Zeus Links

Back
Top