This forum is the Reddit of Satanism

[FancyMancy]

Is Reddit... like... bad or something?

 

[94n]

Alex, what websites do you frequent the most?

 

[Jack]

....

This mostly comes down to parenting. Children aren't really taught values like mutual respect, emotional control ,courage, and humbleness. The parents themselves are at the emotional level of a child. These little kids are so egotistical and vain they really believe that the world revolves around them.

 

[FancyMancy]

In a way, it actually is.

We discuss what works, and help newbies that are trying to advance.


You are no SS, and I do not pity you. May your ignorance be your downfall, and the pain you bring upon yourself last through your next lives, should you remain a fool.

In that case, these forums are the Quora of Satanism, as well, then.

Is Reddit... like... bad or something?

Hahahahahahhaahhah.

Oh. Thanks for the detailed explanation.

 

[JoS Forum Contributions]

This is not the Daily Shitter.

 

[Shannon]

If he is such a troll, why not just ban him and be done with it? Are you still giving him the benefit if the doubt?

 

[SdD]

If he is such a troll, why not just ban him and be done with it? Are you still giving him the benefit if the doubt?

I understand his idea, even though I disagree!!

 

[High Priest Zevios Metathronos]

If he is such a troll, why not just ban him and be done with it? Are you still giving him the benefit if the doubt?

Frankly, many of his otherwise emotionally inflammatory comments, are based on facts by standards of what we call reality. Many of his points I have seen in posts do not reflect lies [unmoderated ones], but rather, misplaced manners which are typical in the common crowds of many which people are interested.

These people are falsely instructed to express them in a pointless way.

I have approved other inflammatory issues from Black people before, which could equally be called trolling. Where are the questions on that one?

I presume nowhere. It's either fair for everybody or fair for nobody.

The Daily Shitter has malformed many people's minds of which many people can be good people inherently, and this is the reality of it.

 

[Shannon]

If he is such a troll, why not just ban him and be done with it? Are you still giving him the benefit if the doubt?

Frankly, many of his otherwise emotionally inflammatory comments, are based on facts by standards of what we call reality. Many of his points I have seen in posts do not reflect lies [unmoderated ones], but rather, misplaced manners which are typical in the common crowds of many which people are interested.

These people are falsely instructed to express them in a pointless way.

I have approved other inflammatory issues from Black people before, which could equally be called trolling. Where are the questions on that one?

I presume nowhere. It's either fair for everybody or fair for nobody.

The Daily Shitter has malformed many people's minds of which many people can be good people inherently, and this is the reality of it.

First I'd like to state, that because the nature of texts, they can come off as unemotional or aggressive or probing. My question to you on the banning was simply that, an honest question which I truly was curious about because you have mentioned more than once that this person is a troll and despite everyone trying to be polite and tone a down a bit with his mannerisms, and explain the situation, you doing it more than once to him and he still doesnt have slight of the intelligence or the care to try a bit.

I totally understand the venting aspect and being able to freely do so, so need to go over that again but in Alex's case, he seems he doesnt care. You're handling that anyway.

Secondly, what do you mean "presume nowhere"?

I have not seen any posts from blacks that where of the same degree as the things that some of the white gentiles have posted. The only thing I have seen is that post from Cowboy from that thread. You know which one I am talking about.

I stated on the thread publicly and to him personally that he should have NOT said that, fyi. The only reason he said that comment because of what Aquarius said which honestly wasn't all that neccessary. I have not seen any black gentile here use racial slurs against white gentiles like the white gentiles have used here. And if they did, I haven't seen them. I don't read every single post on the forum. We dont even get much black gentiles posting on the forums anyway.

And if I do see that kind of talk from black gentiles I would say something because I am not a hypocrite and I just hate racial slurs, rude comments and any kind of degenerate behaviour from anyone. So before you start on with that, I'm just going to make sure you understand that.

I like refinement, and I know its not always about being refined and polite but thats just me. I wouldnt even approve racial slurs and horrible talk about whites from a black gentile if they said it. I just dont appreciate any of that language. I know a weakness of mine is not tolerating rudeness from anyine, but thats something I am working on.

So just letting you know before you keep claiming I am being unfair, immature, etc, etc.

 

[Powstanie Pogańskie]

If he is such a troll, why not just ban him and be done with it? Are you still giving him the benefit if the doubt?

Frankly, many of his otherwise emotionally inflammatory comments, are based on facts by standards of what we call reality. Many of his points I have seen in posts do not reflect lies [unmoderated ones], but rather, misplaced manners which are typical in the common crowds of many which people are interested.

These people are falsely instructed to express them in a pointless way.

I have approved other inflammatory issues from Black people before, which could equally be called trolling. Where are the questions on that one?

I presume nowhere. It's either fair for everybody or fair for nobody.

The Daily Shitter has malformed many people's minds of which many people can be good people inherently, and this is the reality of it.

First I'd like to state, that because the nature of texts, they can come off as unemotional or aggressive or probing. My question to you on the banning was simply that, an honest question which I truly was curious about because you have mentioned more than once that this person is a troll and despite everyone trying to be polite and tone a down a bit with his mannerisms, and explain the situation, you doing it more than once to him and he still doesnt have slight of the intelligence or the care to try a bit.

I totally understand the venting aspect and being able to freely do so, so need to go over that again but in Alex's case, he seems he doesnt care. You're handling that anyway.

Secondly, what do you mean "presume nowhere"?

I have not seen any posts from blacks that where of the same degree as the things that some of the white gentiles have posted. The only thing I have seen is that post from Cowboy from that thread. You know which one I am talking about.

I stated on the thread publicly and to him personally that he should have NOT said that, fyi. The only reason he said that comment because of what Aquarius said which honestly wasn't all that neccessary. I have not seen any black gentile here use racial slurs against white gentiles like the white gentiles have used here. And if they did, I haven't seen them. I don't read every single post on the forum. We dont even get much black gentiles posting on the forums anyway.

And if I do see that kind of talk from black gentiles I would say something because I am not a hypocrite and I just hate racial slurs, rude comments and any kind of degenerate behaviour from anyone. So before you start on with that, I'm just going to make sure you understand that.

I like refinement, and I know its not always about being refined and polite but thats just me. I wouldnt even approve racial slurs and horrible talk about whites from a black gentile if they said it. I just dont appreciate any of that language. I know a weakness of mine is not tolerating rudeness from anyine, but thats something I am working on.

So just letting you know before you keep claiming I am being unfair, immature, etc, etc.

My confusion on this, and I think this is in part where HPS Shannon's own question came from, is why this particular post was approved when this one is just outright bait to get the responses he essentially received, instead of his other posts that may have been more substantive. Inflammatory, emotional and incorrect they'll certainly still be, but I've seen it often where trolling posts try to establish some bullshit point and the resultant rebuttals lead to good information for newer people who might actually consider the troll's point.

Of course it's just as well that I'd see his unapproved posts and discover they're all equally inane so this one was just the lucky draw. This one just struck me as particularly pointless.

 

[ShadowTheRaven]

This is not the Daily Shitter.

Is that an insult to the Daily Mail, or the Daily Wire?

 

[Νίκος]

Hps Shannon and HP Hooded Cobra you know that by wasting your precious time talking to/for trolls you actually give them excalty what they want; attention.

 

[curio]

If he is such a troll, why not just ban him and be done with it? Are you still giving him the benefit if the doubt?

Frankly, many of his otherwise emotionally inflammatory comments, are based on facts by standards of what we call reality. Many of his points I have seen in posts do not reflect lies [unmoderated ones], but rather, misplaced manners which are typical in the common crowds of many which people are interested.

These people are falsely instructed to express them in a pointless way.

I have approved other inflammatory issues from Black people before, which could equally be called trolling. Where are the questions on that one?

I presume nowhere. It's either fair for everybody or fair for nobody.

The Daily Shitter has malformed many people's minds of which many people can be good people inherently, and this is the reality of it.

First I'd like to state, that because the nature of texts, they can come off as unemotional or aggressive or probing. My question to you on the banning was simply that, an honest question which I truly was curious about because you have mentioned more than once that this person is a troll and despite everyone trying to be polite and tone a down a bit with his mannerisms, and explain the situation, you doing it more than once to him and he still doesnt have slight of the intelligence or the care to try a bit.

I totally understand the venting aspect and being able to freely do so, so need to go over that again but in Alex's case, he seems he doesnt care. You're handling that anyway.

Secondly, what do you mean "presume nowhere"?

I have not seen any posts from blacks that where of the same degree as the things that some of the white gentiles have posted. The only thing I have seen is that post from Cowboy from that thread. You know which one I am talking about.

I stated on the thread publicly and to him personally that he should have NOT said that, fyi. The only reason he said that comment because of what Aquarius said which honestly wasn't all that neccessary. I have not seen any black gentile here use racial slurs against white gentiles like the white gentiles have used here. And if they did, I haven't seen them. I don't read every single post on the forum. We dont even get much black gentiles posting on the forums anyway.

And if I do see that kind of talk from black gentiles I would say something because I am not a hypocrite and I just hate racial slurs, rude comments and any kind of degenerate behaviour from anyone. So before you start on with that, I'm just going to make sure you understand that.

I like refinement, and I know its not always about being refined and polite but thats just me. I wouldnt even approve racial slurs and horrible talk about whites from a black gentile if they said it. I just dont appreciate any of that language. I know a weakness of mine is not tolerating rudeness from anyine, but thats something I am working on.

So just letting you know before you keep claiming I am being unfair, immature, etc, etc.

You wouldn't see "racial slurs against whites" because there aren't any effective ones that are overt. The disparaging remarks that are used against the white race are covert. And it would be easy for you to say that you don't see your kind disparaging whites because you admit that you would disapprove the post if you saw it, which also makes it easy for one to act as if your side is the victim(because derogatory posts against whites wouldn't show up but the reverse would), along with the fact that there are no explicit derogatory words for the white race in the same vein of nigger. Keywords: explicit, overt.

Plus, there are far fewer blacks, like you said, and the fact that racial tensions are more pressing for and affect aware whites far more than blacks on any level makes it understandable why this would happen in the first place and why it appears as if "waycism" is more common against blacks. Even though nonblack people here don't have issue with proper SS blacks and ones that stick to their own but with the scum of the race that's dumped on our streets.

When asians express contempt for white men that go to asia for sex tourism and take asian wives, I don't get offended because I know they're talking about the absolute goys of my race. It bothers me too that they don't stick to their own. But I don't hate on asians or try to crybully them into submission when they express pain and anger over the actions of the low-consciousness members of my race. They have every right to feel and express those emotions, just like I and anyone else does.

Mind, I'm not saying any of this is your intention or fault, nor is it necessarily directed at you specifically, as I'm sure your heart is in the right place when it comes down to it. I'm just saying that this is how things could appear, especially if moderation isn't consistent and people here don't use their intuition. HPHC has a good sense of fairness and optics in this regard.

There aren't really any words that make whites chimp out the way nigger does to blacks(but only when a non black says it). Nazi? We're all nazis here. Redneck? That's more often recieved as a term of endearment, only really seen an insult by the people who use it with that intention. Some may make up overtly racist words against whites but it's usually just a modification of words associated with blacks and have no power except to amuse. Ironically, nigger has more effect on whites than actual insults against whites.

The words that non whites use to disparage and manipulate whites are covert and empowered by (((the system))). They have plausible deniability and are used to cover up dishonest and anti white intentions. I'm sure you and many others here are very familiar with them. Colonialist. Racist. Imperialist. Western/er(used in context of blameshifting). Nazi. Even capitalist seems to have racial undertones against whites, but I wouldn't bank as much on this one.

Point being there is no exact explicit analogue to a term like nigger for whites and we normally don't flip out over implicit ones, which are also deniable by nature, so of course people "don't see" discrimination and unfairness against whites where there very well could be.


On a side note I think it's ridiculous that people let words like nigger, faggot and what have you affect them so much, and give them so much power, especially if you consider the context that these words cane up and are used. Nigger came from the Latin word for black, so if you think about it blacks are getting offended at being called... black. The sense that I know it to be used is to refer to the low class, criminal "gangsta nigga" blacks, so unless you're one of those or identify with them then I don't see why you'd be bothered.

Fag never even had anything to do with homos until like the 20th century, when gays were assimilated into support of the Yehubor through marxist movements. Best friend I ever had was gay and used fag liberally and playfully. He was aware of what the LGBT was about. It felt freeing not to have to walk on eggshells around him.

Outlawing things over muh feefees empowers them and can keep underlying issues from coming up to awareness and being processed. It's good that we're allowed to talk about sensitive issues here.

 

[FancyMancy]

In that case, these forums are the Quora of Satanism, as well, then.

It used to be the "Yahoo Answers" of Satanism before Yahoo decided to go full retard. I never liked the Yahoo e-group layout anyway.

Same.

 

[Shannon]

Frankly, many of his otherwise emotionally inflammatory comments, are based on facts by standards of what we call reality. Many of his points I have seen in posts do not reflect lies [unmoderated ones], but rather, misplaced manners which are typical in the common crowds of many which people are interested.

These people are falsely instructed to express them in a pointless way.

I have approved other inflammatory issues from Black people before, which could equally be called trolling. Where are the questions on that one?

I presume nowhere. It's either fair for everybody or fair for nobody.

The Daily Shitter has malformed many people's minds of which many people can be good people inherently, and this is the reality of it.

First I'd like to state, that because the nature of texts, they can come off as unemotional or aggressive or probing. My question to you on the banning was simply that, an honest question which I truly was curious about because you have mentioned more than once that this person is a troll and despite everyone trying to be polite and tone a down a bit with his mannerisms, and explain the situation, you doing it more than once to him and he still doesnt have slight of the intelligence or the care to try a bit.

I totally understand the venting aspect and being able to freely do so, so need to go over that again but in Alex's case, he seems he doesnt care. You're handling that anyway.

Secondly, what do you mean "presume nowhere"?

I have not seen any posts from blacks that where of the same degree as the things that some of the white gentiles have posted. The only thing I have seen is that post from Cowboy from that thread. You know which one I am talking about.

I stated on the thread publicly and to him personally that he should have NOT said that, fyi. The only reason he said that comment because of what Aquarius said which honestly wasn't all that neccessary. I have not seen any black gentile here use racial slurs against white gentiles like the white gentiles have used here. And if they did, I haven't seen them. I don't read every single post on the forum. We dont even get much black gentiles posting on the forums anyway.

And if I do see that kind of talk from black gentiles I would say something because I am not a hypocrite and I just hate racial slurs, rude comments and any kind of degenerate behaviour from anyone. So before you start on with that, I'm just going to make sure you understand that.

I like refinement, and I know its not always about being refined and polite but thats just me. I wouldnt even approve racial slurs and horrible talk about whites from a black gentile if they said it. I just dont appreciate any of that language. I know a weakness of mine is not tolerating rudeness from anyine, but thats something I am working on.

So just letting you know before you keep claiming I am being unfair, immature, etc, etc.

You wouldn't see "racial slurs against whites" because there aren't any effective ones that are overt. The disparaging remarks that are used against the white race are covert. And it would be easy for you to say that you don't see your kind disparaging whites because you admit that you would disapprove the post if you saw it, which also makes it easy for one to act as if your side is the victim(because derogatory posts against whites wouldn't show up but the reverse would), along with the fact that there are no explicit derogatory words for the white race in the same vein of nigger. Keywords: explicit, overt.

Plus, there are far fewer blacks, like you said, and the fact that racial tensions are more pressing for and affect aware whites far more than blacks on any level makes it understandable why this would happen in the first place and why it appears as if "waycism" is more common against blacks. Even though nonblack people here don't have issue with proper SS blacks and ones that stick to their own but with the scum of the race that's dumped on our streets.

When asians express contempt for white men that go to asia for sex tourism and take asian wives, I don't get offended because I know they're talking about the absolute goys of my race. It bothers me too that they don't stick to their own. But I don't hate on asians or try to crybully them into submission when they express pain and anger over the actions of the low-consciousness members of my race. They have every right to feel and express those emotions, just like I and anyone else does.

Mind, I'm not saying any of this is your intention or fault, nor is it necessarily directed at you specifically, as I'm sure your heart is in the right place when it comes down to it. I'm just saying that this is how things could appear, especially if moderation isn't consistent and people here don't use their intuition. HPHC has a good sense of fairness and optics in this regard.

There aren't really any words that make whites chimp out the way nigger does to blacks(but only when a non black says it). Nazi? We're all nazis here. Redneck? That's more often recieved as a term of endearment, only really seen an insult by the people who use it with that intention. Some may make up overtly racist words against whites but it's usually just a modification of words associated with blacks and have no power except to amuse. Ironically, nigger has more effect on whites than actual insults against whites.

The words that non whites use to disparage and manipulate whites are covert and empowered by (((the system))). They have plausible deniability and are used to cover up dishonest and anti white intentions. I'm sure you and many others here are very familiar with them. Colonialist. Racist. Imperialist. Western/er(used in context of blameshifting). Nazi. Even capitalist seems to have racial undertones against whites, but I wouldn't bank as much on this one.

Point being there is no exact explicit analogue to a term like nigger for whites and we normally don't flip out over implicit ones, which are also deniable by nature, so of course people "don't see" discrimination and unfairness against whites where there very well could be.


On a side note I think it's ridiculous that people let words like nigger, faggot and what have you affect them so much, and give them so much power, especially if you consider the context that these words cane up and are used. Nigger came from the Latin word for black, so if you think about it blacks are getting offended at being called... black. The sense that I know it to be used is to refer to the low class, criminal "gangsta nigga" blacks, so unless you're one of those or identify with them then I don't see why you'd be bothered.

Fag never even had anything to do with homos until like the 20th century, when gays were assimilated into support of the Yehubor through marxist movements. Best friend I ever had was gay and used fag liberally and playfully. He was aware of what the LGBT was about. It felt freeing not to have to walk on eggshells around him.

Outlawing things over muh feefees empowers them and can keep underlying issues from coming up to awareness and being processed. It's good that we're allowed to talk about sensitive issues here.

I understand what you are saying, Curio and I already explained how I personally dont like any kind of slurs, and I am not talking about your standard words like "Nazi" and "Alt righter", etc, etc. I'm talking about other names I have heard whites being called that were just distateful despite it hurting you guys or not but not going to go there. I know that desiring refinement and detesting crudeness can be a weakness of mine, but that's how it is and I am working it out. I know that about myself.

I'm also not falling for the conflacted black victimization thing either. Both sides have their fault. And the comments that are not "overt" I would set straight as well because we both know the truth about the situation, that's why we are here.

HP HC and my self just have different styles. If someone who was just new here, was continually rude and constantly posting things despite being told to tone it down for sake of respect, and they kept doing it and joking about it, yes I would ban them. Because despite it all, if you can't even pull yourself together and try to be even alittle polite, then yes I would do that. If they are serious, then they can create another account and come back when they have a better attitude.

And there is a reason why I am stuck on certain things being said, as there are other things I wanted to keep intact. I already discussed it privately with HP HC.

Anyway, I will end it there. Thank you.