The normalization of Genital Mutilation

[Pumpkin671]

But also, anyone who struggles with this fact shouldn’t and shouldn’t try any strange false promises likely sold by Jews to “grow it back” or create the false image of a part being there. It’s best to have self acceptance over it and understand that you’re not limited by it and are fully capable of having a just as great relationship and sex life regardless.

My dick is like that as well, and I fucking love it. Idk what issues ppl have with that. It is also more hygienic. (And for me honestly looks better)

I have known those who have struggled with a really tight foreskin where they struggled to get fully erect. It was sad to see and I can understand the move to remove it in those particular situations. I myself am fairly happy the way mine is, self acceptance is important, but sad that it was not up to us to decide on our own. Not sure about being cut making the penis more hygienic, I see the foreskin as a protective barrier and allows the head (glan) to create liquids that make it more sensitive and act as an lubricant during intercourse.

 

[Pumpkin671]

Objectively wrong.

I don’t have the 4skin and I’ve never had it before so I think I’m right. And I prefer guys with 4skin but that’s a bit hard to come by in the JU-SA.

Vert hard to come by, only a few times have I been with one.

 

[Pumpkin671]

I was circumcised at birth due to ignorant tradition. I lived a perfectly happy sex life and I've never let it get my self esteem or confidence down. It hasn't limited me physically or mentally whatsoever, but...
I see it as a slave mark of the jew after realizing them for what they are. I was indifferent about it until learning of the reason for it.

I see it the same, a sick mark left by ignorance of those that watched over me. Jewish bullshit and lies.

 

[Blitzkreig [SG]]

My dick is like that as well, and I fucking love it. Idk what issues ppl have with that. It is also more hygienic. (And for me honestly looks better)

It harms the baby boy and creates major trauma in the soul. It's our natural body being mutilated against our will. A circumcised penis also is uncomfortable for the vagina during intercourse compared to a foreskin which is natural and feels better for the woman.

It's not more hygienic. Please don't propagate the lies of the enemy. This disgusting jewish practice of circumcision needs to be banned forever.

I am not praising it, just saying that my body is perfect as it is lol.
And this didn’t not traumatised me.

There is no sense in feeling bad about what happened in the past. I think you have the right idea in this regard.

However, the circumcision itself, besides being derived from the enemy, does cause a traumatic experience for babies, due to the level of pain inflicted on such a sensitive part of the part, and its result on a baby's brain. It is basically torture, and for what reason?

Personally, I don't care either way about the look or anything. I don't plan to "regrow" my foreskin either or anything else. However, I would never want this to happen to anyone else, for the above reason. It's just needless negative karma.

 

[SonOfFreya]

The custom of circumcision originated in Ancient Egypt, it is not necessarily that Jewish shit

 

[Aquarius]

The custom of circumcision originated in Ancient Egypt, it is not necessarily that Jewish shit

No it didn't. It's a jewish practice.
It's a common jewish tactic to say that enemy things were and are from us.

 

[Pumpkin671]

The custom of circumcision originated in Ancient Egypt, it is not necessarily that Jewish shit

I vaguely remember that.

 

[SagittarianMage]

It's a method of the jew to mark all goyim as slaves and to subconsciously program them to associate pain as a way to stop development and self improvement. Alot of people won't even do something simple out of fear of pain or fatigue.
An amount of pain is always necessary to overcome in order to achieve a higher level of development, whether it be weight lifting, running, academics, etc.
I feel it is the jews way to get gentiles to lay down and be unwilling to accept pain as a part of self empowerment in any form. After the pain is overcome, it becomes easier and eventually painless.
It's also a way to openly torture and do Gods know what with the foreskin on the sly.
Any excuse to have some negativity and suffering energies to leech off of really.

 

[Pumpkin671]

Looking further into it, he is right. Genital Mutilation was done at that time

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/
“ The earliest Egyptian mummies (1300 BCE) were circumcised and wall paintings in Egypt show that it was customary several thousand years earlier than that”

https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/94448
“‘The Origin of Circumcision’ by W.D. Dunsmuir and E.M. Gordon, gives a broader exploration of circumcision as it got incorporated into culture and religion.”

“The authors explain that circumcision started as a dehumanizing practice by Egyptians on slaves they got captured from other areas. This was also used to identify their status in society.”

“Others believe that circumcision arose as a mark of defilement or slavery. In ancient Egypt captured warriors were always mutilated before being condemned to slavery.”

But take what you find to be factual.

 

[SonOfFreya]

The custom of circumcision originated in Ancient Egypt, it is not necessarily that Jewish shit

The High Priest has explained that the original practice had nothing to do with removing the foreskin. I would have to look for the post, but if I find it later then I'll link it here on this thread. Unless someone else feels inclined to post it first.

It will be fine if you can find the post Jrvan. Thank you

 

[Pumpkin671]

Looking further into it, he is right. Genital Mutilation was done at that time

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/
“ The earliest Egyptian mummies (1300 BCE) were circumcised and wall paintings in Egypt show that it was customary several thousand years earlier than that”

https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/94448
“‘The Origin of Circumcision’ by W.D. Dunsmuir and E.M. Gordon, gives a broader exploration of circumcision as it got incorporated into culture and religion.”

“The authors explain that circumcision started as a dehumanizing practice by Egyptians on slaves they got captured from other areas. This was also used to identify their status in society.”

“Others believe that circumcision arose as a mark of defilement or slavery. In ancient Egypt captured warriors were always mutilated before being condemned to slavery.”

But take what you find to be factual.

Slavery is also an exclusively jewish custom. You have to always remember that slavery is not a Gentile thing. Our Pagan ancestors didn't do that. Just try to imagine spiritual Pagans led by brothers of the Serpent schools putting chains around each other's necks - or anything like that even entering their wildest imaginations. Try to imagine a pure of heart, uncorrupted Gentile soul doing it. Try to imagine yourself doing it.

It just didn't happen. We aren't like that. It's not in our souls, it's not how we're made. Gentiles who enslave other Gentiles are seriously corrupted.

Good point there.

 

[NinRick]

Looking further into it, he is right. Genital Mutilation was done at that time

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/
“ The earliest Egyptian mummies (1300 BCE) were circumcised and wall paintings in Egypt show that it was customary several thousand years earlier than that”

https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/94448
“‘The Origin of Circumcision’ by W.D. Dunsmuir and E.M. Gordon, gives a broader exploration of circumcision as it got incorporated into culture and religion.”

“The authors explain that circumcision started as a dehumanizing practice by Egyptians on slaves they got captured from other areas. This was also used to identify their status in society.”

“Others believe that circumcision arose as a mark of defilement or slavery. In ancient Egypt captured warriors were always mutilated before being condemned to slavery.”

But take what you find to be factual.

Slavery is also an exclusively jewish custom. You have to always remember that slavery is not a Gentile thing. Our Pagan ancestors didn't do that. Just try to imagine spiritual Pagans led by brothers of the Serpent schools putting chains around each other's necks - or anything like that even entering their wildest imaginations. Try to imagine a pure of heart, uncorrupted Gentile soul doing it. Try to imagine yourself doing it.

It just didn't happen. We aren't like that. It's not in our souls, it's not how we're made. Gentiles who enslave other Gentiles are seriously corrupted.

In ancient Rome they had slaves.

 

[NinRick]

Slavery is also an exclusively jewish custom. You have to always remember that slavery is not a Gentile thing. Our Pagan ancestors didn't do that. Just try to imagine spiritual Pagans led by brothers of the Serpent schools putting chains around each other's necks - or anything like that even entering their wildest imaginations. Try to imagine a pure of heart, uncorrupted Gentile soul doing it. Try to imagine yourself doing it.

It just didn't happen. We aren't like that. It's not in our souls, it's not how we're made. Gentiles who enslave other Gentiles are seriously corrupted.

In ancient Rome they had slaves.

Which period do you consider ancient? There were different eras of Rome. There was the Holy Roman Empire hundreds of years after the fall of Pagan Rome. There was the Flavian Dynasty which could potentially match up with what you're thinking of. I don't think the Imperial Cult of Rome condoned slavery under the rulership of the Caesars. It was actually very similar to America today, and the jews hated everything about it just like they hate everything about America today. That probably means slavery was outlawed if the jews hated it so much.

If you're talking about the thing with the Phrygian Cap, I have reason to believe that it was allegorical. It may have even been a sort of baptism into the energetic state of freedom, kind of like wrapping yourself in an American flag so to say. Americans are born and raised with the idea and belief ingrained into them that they are free so I think it could be similar to this. You put on the hat, and you're symbolically a free man. It could have been like an immigrant to America getting a green card.

I don't know if that's true, but I do suspect that the cap was either allegorical or symbolic, or both. In any case, I rarely trust the (((historical))) account of things in history books. Those same history books tell us that our Pagan ancestors practiced human sacrifice. I remember seeing this flattering image of my ancestors in textbooks in class that they had us study in history class:

They said this wicker man structure was a depiction of Pagan human sacrifice.

So I tend to assume a lot of stuff written about Ancient Rome and other Pagan nations is just kosher revision of history. Slavery is and has always been a jewish thing.

With some research, you will find out that the only evidence there is about the wicker man, human sacrifice is one sentence of Julius Ceasars commentary of the Gallic war. It is safe to say that he just lied to make em look bad.

Slavery is not a jewish idea, but jews treat humans like trash. In ancient Rome, 500 Before our era, there were Slaves. Multiple accounts.

https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=80505#p80505

 

[CaspianTheDreamer]

Looking further into it, he is right. Genital Mutilation was done at that time

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/
“ The earliest Egyptian mummies (1300 BCE) were circumcised and wall paintings in Egypt show that it was customary several thousand years earlier than that”

https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/94448
“‘The Origin of Circumcision’ by W.D. Dunsmuir and E.M. Gordon, gives a broader exploration of circumcision as it got incorporated into culture and religion.”

“The authors explain that circumcision started as a dehumanizing practice by Egyptians on slaves they got captured from other areas. This was also used to identify their status in society.”

“Others believe that circumcision arose as a mark of defilement or slavery. In ancient Egypt captured warriors were always mutilated before being condemned to slavery.”

But take what you find to be factual.

From what i have read from other advanced members, Akhenaton was a Jew. Perhaps these practices of slavery and dehumanization was done during HIS rule in Egypt.

 

[Pumpkin671]

Looking further into it, he is right. Genital Mutilation was done at that time

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/
“ The earliest Egyptian mummies (1300 BCE) were circumcised and wall paintings in Egypt show that it was customary several thousand years earlier than that”

https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/94448
“‘The Origin of Circumcision’ by W.D. Dunsmuir and E.M. Gordon, gives a broader exploration of circumcision as it got incorporated into culture and religion.”

“The authors explain that circumcision started as a dehumanizing practice by Egyptians on slaves they got captured from other areas. This was also used to identify their status in society.”

“Others believe that circumcision arose as a mark of defilement or slavery. In ancient Egypt captured warriors were always mutilated before being condemned to slavery.”

But take what you find to be factual.

From what i have read from other advanced members, Akhenaton was a Jew. Perhaps these practices of slavery and dehumanization was done during HIS rule in Egypt.

That is entirely possible, maybe including his offspring.

 

[Sunny]

In ancient Rome they had slaves.

Which period do you consider ancient? There were different eras of Rome. There was the Holy Roman Empire hundreds of years after the fall of Pagan Rome. There was the Flavian Dynasty which could potentially match up with what you're thinking of. I don't think the Imperial Cult of Rome condoned slavery under the rulership of the Caesars. It was actually very similar to America today, and the jews hated everything about it just like they hate everything about America today. That probably means slavery was outlawed if the jews hated it so much.

If you're talking about the thing with the Phrygian Cap, I have reason to believe that it was allegorical. It may have even been a sort of baptism into the energetic state of freedom, kind of like wrapping yourself in an American flag so to say. Americans are born and raised with the idea and belief ingrained into them that they are free so I think it could be similar to this. You put on the hat, and you're symbolically a free man. It could have been like an immigrant to America getting a green card.

I don't know if that's true, but I do suspect that the cap was either allegorical or symbolic, or both. In any case, I rarely trust the (((historical))) account of things in history books. Those same history books tell us that our Pagan ancestors practiced human sacrifice. I remember seeing this flattering image of my ancestors in textbooks in class that they had us study in history class:

They said this wicker man structure was a depiction of Pagan human sacrifice.

So I tend to assume a lot of stuff written about Ancient Rome and other Pagan nations is just kosher revision of history. Slavery is and has always been a jewish thing.

With some research, you will find out that the only evidence there is about the wicker man, human sacrifice is one sentence of Julius Ceasars commentary of the Gallic war. It is safe to say that he just lied to make em look bad.

Slavery is not a jewish idea, but jews treat humans like trash. In ancient Rome, 500 Before our era, there were Slaves. Multiple accounts.

https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=80505#p80505

In fact, the jewish idea is the right and correct one as far as slavery is concerned. The problem with the jews is that they want to dominate and rule through slavery. They want to enslave us all.

There is no middle ground between slavery and freedom. No free and superior being likes an donkey status, whether you treat him well or badly. And you can be sure that he will do everything he can to free himself and take his revenge.

 

[NinRick]

Which period do you consider ancient? There were different eras of Rome. There was the Holy Roman Empire hundreds of years after the fall of Pagan Rome. There was the Flavian Dynasty which could potentially match up with what you're thinking of. I don't think the Imperial Cult of Rome condoned slavery under the rulership of the Caesars. It was actually very similar to America today, and the jews hated everything about it just like they hate everything about America today. That probably means slavery was outlawed if the jews hated it so much.

If you're talking about the thing with the Phrygian Cap, I have reason to believe that it was allegorical. It may have even been a sort of baptism into the energetic state of freedom, kind of like wrapping yourself in an American flag so to say. Americans are born and raised with the idea and belief ingrained into them that they are free so I think it could be similar to this. You put on the hat, and you're symbolically a free man. It could have been like an immigrant to America getting a green card.

I don't know if that's true, but I do suspect that the cap was either allegorical or symbolic, or both. In any case, I rarely trust the (((historical))) account of things in history books. Those same history books tell us that our Pagan ancestors practiced human sacrifice. I remember seeing this flattering image of my ancestors in textbooks in class that they had us study in history class:

They said this wicker man structure was a depiction of Pagan human sacrifice.

So I tend to assume a lot of stuff written about Ancient Rome and other Pagan nations is just kosher revision of history. Slavery is and has always been a jewish thing.

With some research, you will find out that the only evidence there is about the wicker man, human sacrifice is one sentence of Julius Ceasars commentary of the Gallic war. It is safe to say that he just lied to make em look bad.

Slavery is not a jewish idea, but jews treat humans like trash. In ancient Rome, 500 Before our era, there were Slaves. Multiple accounts.

https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=80505#p80505

In fact, the jewish idea is the right and correct one as far as slavery is concerned. The problem with the jews is that they want to dominate and rule through slavery. They want to enslave us all.

There is no middle ground between slavery and freedom. No free and superior being likes an donkey status, whether you treat him well or badly. And you can be sure that he will do everything he can to free himself and take his revenge.

So when you give someone shelter, food, and the possibility to live at certain standards, you would try to take revenge?

Jews treat Humans like trash. Gentiles generally are not like them whatsoever, altho exceptions do exist.

 

[Sunny]

With some research, you will find out that the only evidence there is about the wicker man, human sacrifice is one sentence of Julius Ceasars commentary of the Gallic war. It is safe to say that he just lied to make em look bad.

Slavery is not a jewish idea, but jews treat humans like trash. In ancient Rome, 500 Before our era, there were Slaves. Multiple accounts.

https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=80505#p80505

In fact, the jewish idea is the right and correct one as far as slavery is concerned. The problem with the jews is that they want to dominate and rule through slavery. They want to enslave us all.

There is no middle ground between slavery and freedom. No free and superior being likes an donkey status, whether you treat him well or badly. And you can be sure that he will do everything he can to free himself and take his revenge.

So when you give someone shelter, food, and the possibility to live at certain standards, you would try to take revenge?

Jews treat Humans like trash. Gentiles generally are not like them whatsoever, altho exceptions do exist.

It is still a humiliating and hateful thing. This is an oppressive and offensive condition.

This is an unacceptable and intolerable level for Humanity. The idea of slaves is primitive. If we want to have servants, we have to create borgs or robots.

 

[Crystallized Mushroom]

With some research, you will find out that the only evidence there is about the wicker man, human sacrifice is one sentence of Julius Ceasars commentary of the Gallic war. It is safe to say that he just lied to make em look bad.

Slavery is not a jewish idea, but jews treat humans like trash. In ancient Rome, 500 Before our era, there were Slaves. Multiple accounts.

https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=80505#p80505

In fact, the jewish idea is the right and correct one as far as slavery is concerned. The problem with the jews is that they want to dominate and rule through slavery. They want to enslave us all.

There is no middle ground between slavery and freedom. No free and superior being likes an donkey status, whether you treat him well or badly. And you can be sure that he will do everything he can to free himself and take his revenge.

So when you give someone shelter, food, and the possibility to live at certain standards, you would try to take revenge?

Jews treat Humans like trash. Gentiles generally are not like them whatsoever, altho exceptions do exist.

this is an old post though what your saying sounds like a theme used in Stockholm Syndrome

after there are slave drivers and other monsters who do use shelter, food, water and gifts and high life standards etc. to get away with harming someone and make their victims feel guilty

 

[Hvítr Ormr]

I know it's only somewhat related, but on the subject of Roman slavery, there's been some interesting historical discoveries been made which I don't think have been mentioned so far in this thread. In Pompeii before the eruption, there was a Roman banker by the name of Caecillius Iucundus who lived there, and his life and that of his family has been fairly well documented. Apparently his first duty of the day after breakfast before he was allowed to do anything else was acting in the role of "Patronus", or patron, greeting any visitors that came to his house asking for help or advice, they were called called "Clientes", or clients. Many of these people had been slaves he'd formally owned. He had a legal duty to donate small sums of money to them, and give them as much help and aid they needed, financially or otherwise if they came to visit him with any problems they might have.

Also, it should be said that it was perfectly legal for any slave to buy their own freedom and become a full Roman citizen with property ownership and voting rights, all they had to do was save up enough money to do so, and their master wasn't allowed to prevent them from doing it. I don't think it was legal for Roman slave owners to mistreat their slaves either.

Slaves often had important jobs and were sometimes highly well thought of too. There's a famous stone fresco depicting the Tauroctony (Mithra slaying the bull representing the healthy control of emotions and passions, see HP HC's recent detailed post about Lord Azazel for more info about this: https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=287767#p287767) with the following inscription underneath:

"Soli Invicto Deo Atimetus Augustrorum Nostrorum Servus Actuarius Praediorum Romanianorum"

Which translates to "Dedicated to the Unconquerable Sun God, by Atimetus, Slave of our Emperors and Banker on a large Roman Estate". So what we have here is a likely very expensive to produce stone fresco, made for the Roman cult of Mithra and paid for by a slave named Atimetus who looked after the money on a large Roman estate.