The normalization of Genital Mutilation

[Pumpkin671]

But also, anyone who struggles with this fact shouldn’t and shouldn’t try any strange false promises likely sold by yehuborim to “grow it back” or create the false image of a part being there. It’s best to have self acceptance over it and understand that you’re not limited by it and are fully capable of having a just as great relationship and sex life regardless.

My dick is like that as well, and I fucking love it. Idk what issues ppl have with that. It is also more hygienic. (And for me honestly looks better)

I have known those who have struggled with a really tight foreskin where they struggled to get fully erect. It was sad to see and I can understand the move to remove it in those particular situations. I myself am fairly happy the way mine is, self acceptance is important, but sad that it was not up to us to decide on our own. Not sure about being cut making the penis more hygienic, I see the foreskin as a protective barrier and allows the head (glan) to create liquids that make it more sensitive and act as an lubricant during intercourse.

 

[Pumpkin671]

Objectively wrong.

I don’t have the 4skin and I’ve never had it before so I think I’m right. And I prefer guys with 4skin but that’s a bit hard to come by in the JU-SA.

Vert hard to come by, only a few times have I been with one.

 

[SonOfFreya]

The custom of circumcision originated in Ancient Egypt, it is not necessarily that Jewish shit

 

[Pumpkin671]

The custom of circumcision originated in Ancient Egypt, it is not necessarily that Jewish shit

I vaguely remember that.

 

[Pumpkin671]

Looking further into it, he is right. Genital Mutilation was done at that time

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/
“ The earliest Egyptian mummies (1300 BCE) were circumcised and wall paintings in Egypt show that it was customary several thousand years earlier than that”

https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/94448
“‘The Origin of Circumcision’ by W.D. Dunsmuir and E.M. Gordon, gives a broader exploration of circumcision as it got incorporated into culture and religion.”

“The authors explain that circumcision started as a dehumanizing practice by Egyptians on slaves they got captured from other areas. This was also used to identify their status in society.”

“Others believe that circumcision arose as a mark of defilement or slavery. In ancient Egypt captured warriors were always mutilated before being condemned to slavery.”

But take what you find to be factual.

 

[SonOfFreya]

The custom of circumcision originated in Ancient Egypt, it is not necessarily that Jewish shit

The High Priest has explained that the original practice had nothing to do with removing the foreskin. I would have to look for the post, but if I find it later then I'll link it here on this thread. Unless someone else feels inclined to post it first.

It will be fine if you can find the post Jrvan. Thank you

 

[CaspianTheDreamer]

Looking further into it, he is right. Genital Mutilation was done at that time

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/
“ The earliest Egyptian mummies (1300 BCE) were circumcised and wall paintings in Egypt show that it was customary several thousand years earlier than that”

https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/94448
“‘The Origin of Circumcision’ by W.D. Dunsmuir and E.M. Gordon, gives a broader exploration of circumcision as it got incorporated into culture and religion.”

“The authors explain that circumcision started as a dehumanizing practice by Egyptians on slaves they got captured from other areas. This was also used to identify their status in society.”

“Others believe that circumcision arose as a mark of defilement or slavery. In ancient Egypt captured warriors were always mutilated before being condemned to slavery.”

But take what you find to be factual.

From what i have read from other advanced members, Akhenaton was a Jew. Perhaps these practices of slavery and dehumanization was done during HIS rule in Egypt.

 

[Pumpkin671]

Looking further into it, he is right. Genital Mutilation was done at that time

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/
“ The earliest Egyptian mummies (1300 BCE) were circumcised and wall paintings in Egypt show that it was customary several thousand years earlier than that”

https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/94448
“‘The Origin of Circumcision’ by W.D. Dunsmuir and E.M. Gordon, gives a broader exploration of circumcision as it got incorporated into culture and religion.”

“The authors explain that circumcision started as a dehumanizing practice by Egyptians on slaves they got captured from other areas. This was also used to identify their status in society.”

“Others believe that circumcision arose as a mark of defilement or slavery. In ancient Egypt captured warriors were always mutilated before being condemned to slavery.”

But take what you find to be factual.

From what i have read from other advanced members, Akhenaton was a Jew. Perhaps these practices of slavery and dehumanization was done during HIS rule in Egypt.

That is entirely possible, maybe including his offspring.

 

[Hvítr Ormr]

I know it's only somewhat related, but on the subject of Roman slavery, there's been some interesting historical discoveries been made which I don't think have been mentioned so far in this thread. In Pompeii before the eruption, there was a Roman banker by the name of Caecillius Iucundus who lived there, and his life and that of his family has been fairly well documented. Apparently his first duty of the day after breakfast before he was allowed to do anything else was acting in the role of "Patronus", or patron, greeting any visitors that came to his house asking for help or advice, they were called called "Clientes", or clients. Many of these people had been slaves he'd formally owned. He had a legal duty to donate small sums of money to them, and give them as much help and aid they needed, financially or otherwise if they came to visit him with any problems they might have.

Also, it should be said that it was perfectly legal for any slave to buy their own freedom and become a full Roman citizen with property ownership and voting rights, all they had to do was save up enough money to do so, and their master wasn't allowed to prevent them from doing it. I don't think it was legal for Roman slave owners to mistreat their slaves either.

Slaves often had important jobs and were sometimes highly well thought of too. There's a famous stone fresco depicting the Tauroctony (Mithra slaying the bull representing the healthy control of emotions and passions, see HP HC's recent detailed post about Lord Azazel for more info about this: https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?p=287767#p287767) with the following inscription underneath:

"Soli Invicto Deo Atimetus Augustrorum Nostrorum Servus Actuarius Praediorum Romanianorum"

Which translates to "Dedicated to the Unconquerable Sun God, by Atimetus, Slave of our Emperors and Banker on a large Roman Estate". So what we have here is a likely very expensive to produce stone fresco, made for the Roman cult of Mithra and paid for by a slave named Atimetus who looked after the money on a large Roman estate.