Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

(((Scientist))) Wants to End ‘Conservative’ Taboo Against Cannibalism to Fight Climate Change

There is a cannibal disease, called Kuru Kuru = Translated shaked death. I once did read a artikel about it. everyone is free to give this information this supporter of cannibalism

found it :

https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/creutzfeldt-jakob-krankheit-kannibalismus-fuehrt-nach-jahrzehnten-zum-tod-a-423553.html

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease Cannibalism leads to death after decades

Eating human meat has been banned in Papua New Guinea for over 50 years. Nevertheless, 2700 people died of Kuru disease, which is transmitted by cannibalism. Because it resembles the human variant of mad cow disease, English researchers warn against a CJD epidemic. Researchers are taking a detour to the epidemic warning for Europe, and their subject of investigation sounds macabre: a ritual in which the cannibalism of earlier times survives still costs people their lives in Southeast Asia - although it has not been allowed to be practised since the middle of the last century. In Papua New Guinea, the people of the Fore tribe ritually ate the meat of their deceased. This was banned in the fifties. Nevertheless, Kuru disease is still rampant there, although it is considered probable that no one has contracted Kuru again since 1960. Between 1957 and 2004 more than 2700 Kuru cases occurred, as John Collinge from University College London counted.

In an investigation of the disease, the scientist even found eleven Kuru cases that occurred between July 1996 and June 2004 - all of them in people born before the end of the cannibalism rites. "The minimum incubation period ranges from 34 to 41 years," Collinge and his colleagues conclude. A maximum period of 56 years or more from infection to outbreak of the disease is likely. Parallels to the human variant of mad cow disease

The essay published by British researchers in The Lancet is not just relevant to people who cannibalised in their youth. Kuru is caused by pathologically altered prions - as is the new variant of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (nvCJK). This is triggered by the consumption of BSE-infested beef.

This would also leave the extent of Creutzfeldt-Jakob "uncertain" and would probably still be underestimated. The belief that the number of new cases "has peaked and we have the worst of this frightening disease behind us must now be viewed with extreme skepticism," the researchers write. They warn of an uncertain number of nvCJD deaths in the coming decades. A veritable epidemic is conceivable.

There have been 161 cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the UK to date, in which the brain is gradually perforated like a sponge. Only five of the patients were still alive at the beginning of June. Worldwide, the number of nvCJD victims is 187."
 
hailourtruegod said:
:|

If possible make sure to anonymously tell all those christards before they saying this is somehow "Satanic" that this all derives from their xian program. Reading up on http://www.exposingchristianity.com will help you out.


https://pluralist.com/magnus-soderlund-swedish-scientist-cannibalism-climate-change/


aoc-1.jpg

...
I think it is a good idea to grow meat in the laboratory. Obviously I'm not talking about human meat, I'm talking about pork, cows, etc. It is better to replicate living cells in the laboratory to get meat instead of slaughtering living creatures. As for eating human flesh it is wrong and is the opposite of advancing technologically and generally as life forms. Animals do it because they have no other choice to survive in extreme conditions. We need to advance more on manipulation and genetic engineering. An interesting idea that came to my mind is the modification of plants so that their fruits are flesh. The point is that we are not very advanced. What disgusting enemies.
 
Master Darkness said:
I think it is a good idea to grow meat in the laboratory. Obviously I'm not talking about human meat, I'm talking about pork, cows, etc. It is better to replicate living cells in the laboratory to get meat instead of slaughtering living creatures. As for eating human flesh it is wrong and is the opposite of advancing technologically and generally as life forms. Animals do it because they have no other choice to survive in extreme conditions. We need to advance more on manipulation and genetic engineering. An interesting idea that came to my mind is the modification of plants so that their fruits are flesh. The point is that we are not very advanced. What disgusting enemies.

W

T

F

?

Do you even know anything about biology? There is a reason animal cells are different than plant cells. They'll never be compatible.

Not to mention that all those 'strange geneticly engineerd foods' are incompatible with our bodies. Meaning. We can't digest them. They are poison to us.

Please read a bit on the topic before posting nonsense..
 
Lunar Dance 666 said:
Master Darkness said:
I think it is a good idea to grow meat in the laboratory. Obviously I'm not talking about human meat, I'm talking about pork, cows, etc. It is better to replicate living cells in the laboratory to get meat instead of slaughtering living creatures. As for eating human flesh it is wrong and is the opposite of advancing technologically and generally as life forms. Animals do it because they have no other choice to survive in extreme conditions. We need to advance more on manipulation and genetic engineering. An interesting idea that came to my mind is the modification of plants so that their fruits are flesh. The point is that we are not very advanced. What disgusting enemies.

W

T

F

?

Do you even know anything about biology? There is a reason animal cells are different than plant cells. They'll never be compatible.

Not to mention that all those 'strange geneticly engineerd foods' are incompatible with our bodies. Meaning. We can't digest them. They are poison to us.

Please read a bit on the topic before posting nonsense..
Genetically modified organisms can be risky if poorly constructed and with toxic particles. Laboratory-grown meat is a good thing. In Holland they did an experiment with pig muscle cells ... feeding the cells with proteins to replicate themselves. And it has been successful.
 
Master Darkness said:
Lunar Dance 666 said:
Master Darkness said:
I think it is a good idea to grow meat in the laboratory. Obviously I'm not talking about human meat, I'm talking about pork, cows, etc. It is better to replicate living cells in the laboratory to get meat instead of slaughtering living creatures. As for eating human flesh it is wrong and is the opposite of advancing technologically and generally as life forms. Animals do it because they have no other choice to survive in extreme conditions. We need to advance more on manipulation and genetic engineering. An interesting idea that came to my mind is the modification of plants so that their fruits are flesh. The point is that we are not very advanced. What disgusting enemies.

W

T

F

?

Do you even know anything about biology? There is a reason animal cells are different than plant cells. They'll never be compatible.

Not to mention that all those 'strange geneticly engineerd foods' are incompatible with our bodies. Meaning. We can't digest them. They are poison to us.

Please read a bit on the topic before posting nonsense..
Genetically modified organisms can be risky if poorly constructed and with toxic particles. Laboratory-grown meat is a good thing. In Holland they did an experiment with pig muscle cells ... feeding the cells with proteins to replicate themselves. And it has been successful.
Be careful so that you don't need to learn a lesson from Dr Frankenstein.
 
Master Darkness said:
Lunar Dance 666 said:
Master Darkness said:
I think it is a good idea to grow meat in the laboratory. Obviously I'm not talking about human meat, I'm talking about pork, cows, etc. It is better to replicate living cells in the laboratory to get meat instead of slaughtering living creatures. As for eating human flesh it is wrong and is the opposite of advancing technologically and generally as life forms. Animals do it because they have no other choice to survive in extreme conditions. We need to advance more on manipulation and genetic engineering. An interesting idea that came to my mind is the modification of plants so that their fruits are flesh. The point is that we are not very advanced. What disgusting enemies.

W

T

F

?

Do you even know anything about biology? There is a reason animal cells are different than plant cells. They'll never be compatible.

Not to mention that all those 'strange geneticly engineerd foods' are incompatible with our bodies. Meaning. We can't digest them. They are poison to us.

Please read a bit on the topic before posting nonsense..
Genetically modified organisms can be risky if poorly constructed and with toxic particles. Laboratory-grown meat is a good thing. In Holland they did an experiment with pig muscle cells ... feeding the cells with proteins to replicate themselves. And it has been successful.

I explained to you what is so bad about geneticly modified stuff. It shouldn't excist in the first place.
You know how they make 'butter' but then use chemical adding and extracting and electrolysis etc to make those changes happen? ... you'll only end up with transfats, of which part of the chain is twisted and then is not recognized anymore by the body that it could be used to break down.

It's been known for years that people are 'eating' all the while still technically 'starving' not only due to low nutrients in the food, but due to gentechniques as well.
If you were to take food from an etheric point of view, you could call natural grown foods as wholesome and nourishing, however, if you were to take artificial foods, the vibration or contents of it wouldn't be the same.

As for the mention of the pig cell. If it is an actual cell from an actual pig which has not been subjected to gentech and changing genetics or otherwise modifying the dna; that is then triggered to grow, I am not against such methods of producing foods.
But it should not be ignored, that the right quantities needed for a healthy cell are not known. And even the trace elements could easily be passed up on.
Also not every body is the same so not everyone needs the exact same amounts of certain foods and minerals.
They'll probably mostly be looking at the macronutrients, and not the micronutrients..
 
Lunar Dance 666 said:
Master Darkness said:
Lunar Dance 666 said:
W

T

F

?

Do you even know anything about biology? There is a reason animal cells are different than plant cells. They'll never be compatible.

Not to mention that all those 'strange geneticly engineerd foods' are incompatible with our bodies. Meaning. We can't digest them. They are poison to us.

Please read a bit on the topic before posting nonsense..
Genetically modified organisms can be risky if poorly constructed and with toxic particles. Laboratory-grown meat is a good thing. In Holland they did an experiment with pig muscle cells ... feeding the cells with proteins to replicate themselves. And it has been successful.

I explained to you what is so bad about geneticly modified stuff. It shouldn't excist in the first place.
You know how they make 'butter' but then use chemical adding and extracting and electrolysis etc to make those changes happen? ... you'll only end up with transfats, of which part of the chain is twisted and then is not recognized anymore by the body that it could be used to break down.

It's been known for years that people are 'eating' all the while still technically 'starving' not only due to low nutrients in the food, but due to gentechniques as well.
If you were to take food from an etheric point of view, you could call natural grown foods as wholesome and nourishing, however, if you were to take artificial foods, the vibration or contents of it wouldn't be the same.

As for the mention of the pig cell. If it is an actual cell from an actual pig which has not been subjected to gentech and changing genetics or otherwise modifying the dna; that is then triggered to grow, I am not against such methods of producing foods.
But it should not be ignored, that the right quantities needed for a healthy cell are not known. And even the trace elements could easily be passed up on.
Also not every body is the same so not everyone needs the exact same amounts of certain foods and minerals.
They'll probably mostly be looking at the macronutrients, and not the micronutrients..
You are right. I thank you for the explanation.
 

Official Temple of Zeus Links

Back
Top