Regarding the downed Webpages, etc

[Jack The GOOD guy]

Yeah but I'd be too bad if we were taken down like the daily stormer. Tor is a last resort however its not a very friendly or good environment.Keep up the communication rtrs .

 

[Gerecht Ror]

We experienced any sort of problem also with the Italian JoS, but we are still standing, up and running!

 

[EnkiUK]

I think i have most of Satans Library saved onto my Kindle.

Very vast and detailed epic guys i enjoy reading them and learning that is after all what we are here for

 

[FancyMancy]

Yeah but I'd be too bad if we were taken down like the daily stormer. Tor is a last resort however its not a very friendly or good environment.Keep up the communication rtrs .

You could use Torsites (.onion instead of .com or .org, etc.) but Tor is not impenetrable - for as little as 1 grand (the last I knew), anyone could use some software which could de-anonymise you.

https://threatpost.com/tor-sniffs-out-attacks-trying-to-deanonymize-hidden-services-users/107514/3/
https://www.defcon.org/images/defcon-16/dc16-presentations/defcon-16-evans-grothoff.pdf
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/kb7q9x/tor-attack-could-unmask-new-hidden-sites-in-under-two-weeks
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/07/new-attack-on-tor-can-deanonymize-hidden-services-with-surprising-accuracy/
https://www.deepdotweb.com/2017/09/12/overview-modern-tor-deanonymization-attacks/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)

You could use Freesites on Freenet, but that is very slow - much slower than Tor. Freenet says to make it safer, you should use a mode where you connect with "friends", who need your real IP address; whereas the public mode is supposed to be less secure but your real IP address is not shared with anyone.

A larger task would be to make a new internet, with full safety and security in mind. Why that means less usability is probably a lie; think of all the things 1s and 0s has done since its inception - why must more safety and security = less usability? Besides, I don't mind using a 'basic' webpage. Using jewgle drive, you must have javascript enabled. It limits files to 2 GB and 500 files in a folder; anything bigger and it fails. Why "can't" they make it so you can use checkboxes to check an amount of files in both number and total file size to download, with the total filesize next to it? This so-called "improved" experience is worse. With a 'basic' webpage uploader/downloader, you can see the file size of each file. That's just me, though; I don't get sucked in to the bells and whistles of cool swishy things and twinkly lights.

 

[NaziMan12]

Returning curses archived https://web.archive.org/web/20170208005233/http://dawn666blacksun.angelfire.com/1-2-17.htm