Re: [HellsArmy666] Xtains Claim "Majority of Historians Believe Jesu

[Yog Sothoth]

Here is one for you. There is no evidence AT ALL that jesus existed.


On Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:07 AM, "Lord Kayle lord.kayle2@... [HellsArmy666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  I have recently come across some Xtians that claim;
"the majority of historians believe there is evidence for Jesus Christ's existence"

Some have referenced the Wikipedia Article "The Historicity of Jesus" attempting to use it as evidence that this so called "majority of historians" believe Jesus existed.

Does anybody have more information to help refute this?

 

[fake name]

wait? some retard tried to base their argument on wikipedia? disqualified argument right there. everyone knows any idiot can edit wikipedia and most people know it's run by jews.



On Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:58 PM, "Yog Sothoth yogsothoth666999@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Here is one for you. There is no evidence AT ALL that jesus existed.


On Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:07 AM, "Lord Kayle lord.kayle2@... [HellsArmy666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  I have recently come across some Xtians that claim;
"the majority of historians believe there is evidence for Jesus Christ's existence"

Some have referenced the Wikipedia Article "The Historicity of Jesus" attempting to use it as evidence that this so called "majority of historians" believe Jesus existed.

Does anybody have more information to help refute this?

 

[Lord Kayle]

I know that, and that's what I explained to them.  They failed to recognize the validity of it.  So I was wondering if there was more or something else.  So far I found out that all of the supposed evidence they have from this is based on 2 Roman Citizens accounts (Tacitus and Josephus).  Somebody said that since they were Roman Citizens they could not be trusted because it was the Romans who started the Roman Catholic Church, so they could not be trusted as being true.
I just came to find out that there is way more information out exposing how Israel did 911.  One of the main websites supporting this is called Wiki-Spooks.  I was expecting it to be run by Jews too, but evidently it must not be.
Hail Satan!

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:38 PM, fake name angryshaman666@... [JoyofSatan666] <[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] wrote:

  wait? some retard tried to base their argument on wikipedia? disqualified argument right there. everyone knows any idiot can edit wikipedia and most people know it's run by jews.



On Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:58 PM, "Yog Sothoth yogsothoth666999@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] wrote:


  Here is one for you. There is no evidence AT ALL that jesus existed.


On Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:07 AM, "Lord Kayle lord.kayle2@... [HellsArmy666]" <[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] wrote:


  I have recently come across some Xtians that claim;
"the majority of historians believe there is evidence for Jesus Christ's existence"

Some have referenced the Wikipedia Article "The Historicity of Jesus" attempting to use it as evidence that this so called "majority of historians" believe Jesus existed.

Does anybody have more information to help refute this?

 

[Lord Kayle]

Correction *WikiSpooks* (without the hyphen)
Hail Satan!

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Lord Kayle <lord.kayle2@... wrote:

I know that, and that's what I explained to them.  They failed to recognize the validity of it.  So I was wondering if there was more or something else.  So far I found out that all of the supposed evidence they have from this is based on 2 Roman Citizens accounts (Tacitus and Josephus).  Somebody said that since they were Roman Citizens they could not be trusted because it was the Romans who started the Roman Catholic Church, so they could not be trusted as being true.
I just came to find out that there is way more information out exposing how Israel did 911.  One of the main websites supporting this is called Wiki-Spooks.  I was expecting it to be run by Jews too, but evidently it must not be.
Hail Satan!
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:38 PM, fake name angryshaman666@... [JoyofSatan666] <[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] wrote:

  wait? some retard tried to base their argument on wikipedia? disqualified argument right there. everyone knows any idiot can edit wikipedia and most people know it's run by jews.



On Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:58 PM, "Yog Sothoth yogsothoth666999@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] wrote:


  Here is one for you. There is no evidence AT ALL that jesus existed.


On Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:07 AM, "Lord Kayle lord.kayle2@... [HellsArmy666]" <[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] wrote:


  I have recently come across some Xtians that claim;
"the majority of historians believe there is evidence for Jesus Christ's existence"

Some have referenced the Wikipedia Article "The Historicity of Jesus" attempting to use it as evidence that this so called "majority of historians" believe Jesus existed.

Does anybody have more information to help refute this?

 

[the_fire_starter666]

The passages inserted in Tacitus and Josephus are later xian forgeries (most likely 3rd-4th century ones) and weren't originally there. It's been explained in the site jesusneverexisted.com. Xians like everything else also created forgeries to support the myth of jewsus.

 

[the_fire_starter666]

Also, see this link proving the passages from Josephus are xian forgeries:
Josephus On the Rocks  

 

[call_me_something_else]

Haha

ACTUAL historians know the nastyrene was never mentioned during the entire first century. As well, they know the "account" of Josephus Flavius was one tiny blurb, when Flavius was known for extensive writing on topics. This is believed to be "pious fraud" on the part of Eusebius.

Hold it. All of xianity is fraud. Haha.

Most claims from the christinsanes are nothing more than regurgitation of baseless lies by their con artist preachers and they're just repeating sound bites, without question, because they're brainwashed.

Challenge them to prove their claim from non-apologist sources. They can't, because they're just lying.

Most likely, they'll try a parting shot of a hysterical emotion-filled rant and an "I'll pray for you," which is nothing but a xian version of "Fuck you." Hahaha!

Hail Father Satan forever!

 

[call_me_something_else]

Oops. Wrong Josephus! Hahaha!

 

[descipleofthegods13]

Sheesh, Josephus an antual kike, was a lying piece of shit and the kike knew it propaganda it's tool. As for the other, I have yet to entirely debunk it. You can actually debunk it with normal intelligent logic, but you can blast it to the moon by studying Satanism which is it entirely ripped off from.

Jews would pretend to be servants to the give my slaves or I'll blow up the world on a stick so Gentiles would be duped into following it, and then the kike would take the lead when no one was looking. Although proving this to a xian their complete slave would be extremely difficult to almost impossible.. It depends on how open outside of the LIE-ble they are. I studied a bit about the kike Josephus(notice Joseph an obvious kike name) he was a jew who tried endlessly to prove that it's own races invention(jewsus) existed at the cost of probably 10's of thousands of lives for it's own amusement. The articles are hard to cut through though as there's a lot of bullshit(I.e typically xians, or kikes trying to defend communism)

The xian says that communism, and genocide is holy but more along the sense of everbody needs to stop being human it's causing problems. The kike, the direct source says that xianity was, and has been a philisophical view for 2,000 years(an obvious lie) and has done no harm that can be proven in a court of law. Their twist of lying, and laughing while doing it.

And guess what, their fictitious if it actually existed would be laughing it's ass off as well. What's the point of this anyway?

 

[the_fire_starter666]

@descipleofthegods13: It's true Josephus was a jew, however he didn't really try to prove jewsus existed. Like I said, in the original Josephus text that passage about jewsus didn't exist. It was inserted later by xians and I gave a link that proves that. The same happened to Tacitus. All these are xian tampering and forgeries.

 

[descipleofthegods13]

@The_Fire_Starter_666.

Oh I see. I have yet to read over it. I read something from another website well over a year ago so I haven't had time to do a comparison heh. I have a lot of things bookmarked to read for later.

Point taken.