Re: [HellsArmy666] Xtains Claim "Majority of Historians Believe Jesu

[Yog Sothoth]

Here is one for you. There is no evidence AT ALL that jesus existed.


On Thursday, April 23, 2015 5:07 AM, "Lord Kayle lord.kayle2@... [HellsArmy666]" wrote:


  I have recently come across some Xtians that claim;
"the majority of historians believe there is evidence for Jesus Christ's existence"

Some have referenced the Wikipedia Article "The Historicity of Jesus" attempting to use it as evidence that this so called "majority of historians" believe Jesus existed.

Does anybody have more information to help refute this?

 

[the_fire_starter666]

Also, see this link proving the passages from Josephus are xian forgeries:
Josephus On the Rocks  

 

[call_me_something_else]

Haha

ACTUAL historians know the nastyrene was never mentioned during the entire first century. As well, they know the "account" of Josephus Flavius was one tiny blurb, when Flavius was known for extensive writing on topics. This is believed to be "pious fraud" on the part of Eusebius.

Hold it. All of xianity is fraud. Haha.

Most claims from the christinsanes are nothing more than regurgitation of baseless lies by their con artist preachers and they're just repeating sound bites, without question, because they're brainwashed.

Challenge them to prove their claim from non-apologist sources. They can't, because they're just lying.

Most likely, they'll try a parting shot of a hysterical emotion-filled rant and an "I'll pray for you," which is nothing but a xian version of "Fuck you." Hahaha!

Hail Father Satan forever!

 

[call_me_something_else]

Oops. Wrong Josephus! Hahaha!

 

[descipleofthegods13]

@The_Fire_Starter_666.

Oh I see. I have yet to read over it. I read something from another website well over a year ago so I haven't had time to do a comparison heh. I have a lot of things bookmarked to read for later.

Point taken.