My conversation with an AI chatbot - jesus's agony in the garden

[FancyMancy]

As always, part of the point I make with sharing these 'conversations' is to show how well or badly AI chatbot replies are and the types of replies and language it gives. I couldn't really be bothered with this one. It's long only because of ChatGPT's replies. Maybe skim over them to get the main points.




Someone mentioned jesus agony in the garden.

The Agony in the Garden refers to an event in the New Testament where Jesus, after the Last Supper, went to the Garden of Gethsemane to pray. It's a significant moment in Christian theology and art, depicting Jesus grappling with the impending crucifixion and the weight of human sin. He prays to God, asking if it is possible to let the cup of suffering pass from him, but ultimately accepts God's will, saying, "Not my will, but yours, be done." It's a poignant reflection on Jesus' humanity and his obedience to divine purpose despite immense emotional and physical turmoil.

As known, jesus is god, so jesus was praying to itself. As being god, it is not a Human; therefore, doesn't have Humanity.

In Christian theology, Jesus is understood as the incarnation of God, meaning that he is fully divine and fully human. This concept is known as the hypostatic union, where Jesus is both God and man simultaneously. This duality allows Jesus to experience human emotions, including agony, while also maintaining his divine nature.

When Jesus prayed in the Garden of Gethsemane, he was indeed communicating with God the Father, not with himself in the same sense. The prayer reflects Jesus' human nature experiencing anguish and seeking guidance and strength from the Father, while also submitting to the divine plan for his crucifixion and resurrection.

So, while Jesus is God incarnate and not merely human, he did experience genuine human emotions and challenges during his earthly life, including in the Agony in the Garden. This aspect of Jesus' nature is central to Christian understanding of his role in humanity's redemption.

You said,

"This duality allows Jesus to experience human emotions, including agony, while also maintaining his divine nature."

So god is without morals, emotions, compassion. No wonder it is evil, and admits creating evil.

It sounds like you're exploring theological concepts about the nature of God, particularly from a perspective that emphasizes transcendence and immanence, or the idea of God's divine attributes versus human emotions and morality. In traditional Christian theology, God is considered to be omnipotent (all-powerful), omniscient (all-knowing), and omnibenevolent (all-good). However, discussions around how these attributes relate to human experiences, suffering, and the nature of evil can be complex and varied.

Regarding the concept of evil, it's important to note that traditional Christian theology teaches that God is not the author of evil. Evil is often seen as a consequence of human free will, moral choices, and the brokenness of creation. The idea of God's goodness, justice, and love are central to Christian faith, even amid the complexities of suffering and evil in the world.

Different theological perspectives offer various interpretations on these matters, and discussions about the nature of God and the problem of evil have been ongoing throughout religious and philosophical history. Each perspective offers insights into understanding the divine and the human experience in different ways.

You said,

"In traditional Christian theology, God is considered to be omnipotent (all-powerful), omniscient (all-knowing), and omnibenevolent (all-good). However, discussions around how these attributes relate to human experiences, suffering, and the nature of evil can be complex and varied."

If it had never "become Human" before, then it never had Human emotions nor understandings - nor mere inklings - of them. That means it could not have given us them; therefore, the question of where morals come from is evident - not from god.

Your reasoning touches on philosophical and theological questions about the nature of God and the origins of human emotions and morality. Here are a few points to consider based on these complex topics:

1. Divine Nature and Human Experience: According to traditional Christian theology, God is understood as transcendent and beyond human experience, yet through the incarnation of Jesus Christ, Christians believe that God became fully human while remaining fully divine. This allows for a unique perspective where God, in the person of Jesus, experienced human emotions and understood human suffering firsthand.
2. Origin of Human Emotions and Morality: The question of where human emotions and morality originate from is a subject of philosophical and scientific inquiry. From a religious perspective, different faith traditions offer various explanations. In Christianity, the belief is that God created humanity in His image, imbuing humans with capacities for reason, emotion, and moral discernment. This does not imply that God necessarily possesses human emotions prior to the incarnation, but rather that human emotions and moral capacities reflect aspects of God's creative intent.
3. Morality and Divine Command: In theological discourse, there are different views on the relationship between God and morality. Some philosophies propose that morality is based on divine command—what God commands is morally right by definition. Others suggest that God's nature itself is the standard of goodness, and God commands what is good because it aligns with His nature.
4. Complexity of Divine Attributes: The attributes of God—omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence—are central to theological discussions. These attributes are understood in various ways within different theological traditions and philosophical frameworks, often acknowledging the complexities and mysteries inherent in the concept of a transcendent deity.

In conclusion, the origin of human emotions and morality is a multifaceted question that intersects theology, philosophy, and psychology. Different perspectives offer insights into these fundamental aspects of human existence, and the dialogue continues to evolve as we seek to understand the nature of God and the human experience more deeply.

You said,

"Regarding the concept of evil, it's important to note that traditional Christian theology teaches that God is not the author of evil. Evil is often seen as a consequence of human free will, moral choices, and the brokenness of creation. The idea of God's goodness, justice, and love are central to Christian faith, even amid the complexities of suffering and evil in the world."

I made a mistake here. I meant to have done 2 more line breaks and continued (which I do below), but I submitted my reply instead, by accident.

Yes, that's correct. Traditional Christian theology posits that God, being omnibenevolent (all-good) and perfectly just, is not the originator or creator of evil. Evil is understood within this framework as arising from the misuse of human free will, moral choices contrary to God's will, and the inherent brokenness or imperfection of the created order. Here are some key points related to this theological understanding:

1. Human Free Will: According to Christian teaching, God endowed human beings with free will, the capacity to make choices. This freedom allows for moral agency but also opens the possibility for humans to choose actions that lead to suffering, injustice, and what is considered evil.
2. Fall and Original Sin: The concept of original sin, originating from the disobedience of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, is foundational in Christian theology. This disobedience introduced sin and its consequences into the world, affecting the entire human race and creation itself.
3. Redemptive Plan: Despite the presence of evil and suffering in the world, Christian theology emphasizes God's redemptive plan through Jesus Christ. Jesus' life, death, and resurrection are seen as God's response to human sin and suffering, offering forgiveness, reconciliation, and the hope of ultimate restoration.
4. The Problem of Evil: The existence of evil in a world created by an all-good and all-powerful God poses a significant theological and philosophical challenge, known as the problem of evil. Various theological perspectives attempt to address this issue, often affirming that God's ways are beyond human understanding and that suffering and evil do not diminish God's goodness or sovereignty.

In summary, within traditional Christian theology, God is viewed as fundamentally good and just, and evil is seen as a consequence of human choices and the imperfect state of creation. The theological exploration of these concepts continues to be a rich and complex area of study and reflection within Christian thought.

Take Isaiah 45:7. In that, god admits creating evil.

Isaiah 45:7 in the Bible (King James Version) reads: "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things."

This verse has been the subject of much discussion and interpretation within theological and scholarly circles. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Contextual Understanding: In its historical and literary context, this verse is part of a passage where God is speaking through the prophet Isaiah, addressing Cyrus, the Persian king who would facilitate the return of the Jewish exiles to Jerusalem.
2. Translation and Interpretation: The term "evil" in this verse is translated from the Hebrew word "ra", which can indeed mean "evil" or "calamity". However, it's important to note that in Hebrew, "ra" can also mean adversity, calamity, or disaster in a broader sense, rather than moral evil.
3. Theological Interpretations: Various theological perspectives offer interpretations of this verse. Some argue that God is asserting his sovereignty over all aspects of creation, including calamities and adversities, without implying that God is the author of moral evil. Others suggest that God allows or permits certain hardships and calamities to occur as part of a broader divine plan, which includes aspects beyond human comprehension.
4. Broader Biblical Context: Throughout the Bible, including in the Old and New Testaments, there is a consistent portrayal of God as just, loving, and good. The concept of evil is often linked to human disobedience, sin, and the brokenness of creation rather than being directly attributed to God's nature.

In summary, Isaiah 45:7 presents a challenging theological passage that invites deeper reflection and interpretation. It underscores the complexity of understanding divine attributes and the ways in which God interacts with the world, including the existence of suffering and adversity. Different theological traditions and scholars offer varying interpretations of this verse, emphasizing the need for careful study and consideration within its broader biblical context.

Which biblical scriptures state that god had Human emotions

In the Bible, there are several instances where God is depicted as experiencing emotions or exhibiting qualities that resemble human emotions. These instances provide insights into how God relates to humanity and interacts with the world. Here are a few examples:

1. Compassion and Mercy: Throughout the Old Testament, God is frequently described as compassionate and merciful towards His people. For example, in Exodus 34:6-7, God reveals Himself to Moses, saying, "The LORD, the LORD, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin."
2. Grief: In Genesis 6:6-7, it says, "The LORD regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. So the LORD said, 'I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.'"
3. Love: John 3:16 famously states, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." This verse speaks to God's profound love for humanity, demonstrated through the sacrificial gift of Jesus Christ.
4. Jealousy: In Exodus 20:5, God declares, "You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me." Here, God's jealousy is depicted in a protective sense over His relationship with His people.
5. Anger: Numerous passages in the Bible describe God's anger, often in response to human disobedience and sin. For example, Psalm 7:11 states, "God is a righteous judge, a God who displays his wrath every day."

These passages illustrate various emotional characteristics attributed to God in the Bible. They serve to convey the relational aspects of God's interactions with humanity and the depth of His engagement with human affairs. It's important to interpret these passages within their literary, historical, and theological contexts to grasp their intended meanings and implications for understanding God's nature and relationship with humanity.

You mentioned -

Exodus 34:6-7.
That is how an abuser would behave, and the lies it would say.

Genesis 6:6-7
Infallible god made mistakes and wished it didn't.

John 3:16
Sending your "only begotten son" (except that god is actually a virgin) to be tortured to death is not love.

Exodus 20:5
As a Human emotion, Humans do get jealous and envious; however, god says we're not allowed to - no coveting thy neighbour's arse or Animal donkey ass.

Psalm 7:11
The abuser would display such fake love and false claims, and controlling anger as part of the abuse.

It sounds like you're interpreting these biblical passages from a critical perspective, focusing on how certain descriptions of God's attributes or actions might be understood in human terms. Let's address each point:

1. Exodus 34:6-7: This passage describes God's attributes of compassion, grace, patience, and forgiveness. While these qualities are presented positively, interpretations can vary based on individual perspectives. Some may view these attributes as genuinely loving and merciful, while others might see them differently, especially in light of perceived contradictions or theological challenges.
2. Genesis 6:6-7: This passage depicts God's regret over creating humanity due to their wickedness. The concept of God regretting or changing His mind is challenging in theological discussions about divine omniscience (all-knowing) and sovereignty. Different interpretations seek to reconcile these aspects within the broader context of God's plan and relationship with humanity.
3. John 3:16: This verse is central to Christian theology, expressing God's sacrificial love in sending Jesus Christ to redeem humanity. While it's seen as an act of love and salvation by many Christians, interpretations can vary regarding the nature and necessity of such a sacrifice.
4. Exodus 20:5: God's declaration of being a jealous God in this context is understood within the framework of ancient Israelite monotheism and the covenant relationship between God and His people. The prohibition against jealousy among humans contrasts with God's divine authority and His expectation of exclusive worship.
5. Psalm 7:11: This verse speaks of God's righteousness and anger toward the wicked. The portrayal of God's anger is seen as part of divine justice in many theological interpretations, reflecting God's response to sin and injustice rather than as indicative of abusive behavior.

These passages invite diverse interpretations and discussions across theological traditions and perspectives. Different religious and philosophical viewpoints offer various understandings of how these texts convey insights into God's nature, human relationships, and moral teachings. Exploring these perspectives can deepen understanding and dialogue on complex theological and ethical issues.

You said,

"It sounds like you're interpreting these biblical passages from a critical perspective, focusing on how certain descriptions of God's attributes or actions might be understood in human terms."

Of course. I'm a Human; "god" "made me" a Human, so obviously and of course I interpret things understood in Human terms.

Absolutely, interpreting religious texts through human understanding is natural and essential for individuals seeking to comprehend and engage with theological concepts. Human interpretation of divine attributes and actions in religious scriptures often reflects personal beliefs, cultural influences, and philosophical perspectives.

Religious texts, including the Bible, contain complex narratives, teachings, and portrayals of divine beings that invite diverse interpretations. These interpretations can vary widely based on theological frameworks, historical contexts, and individual experiences.

Critically examining religious texts through human lenses allows individuals to explore and question their faith, ethics, and beliefs. It fosters dialogue and deeper understanding within religious communities and among scholars of theology and philosophy.

Ultimately, how one interprets and understands religious texts is deeply personal and influenced by various factors. Engaging in thoughtful discussion and exploration of these interpretations can lead to enriched perspectives and insights into one's faith and worldview.


END

John 3:16

Sending your "only begotten son" (except that god is actually a virgin) to be tortured to death is not love.

Unless jesus never existed until the point god raped poor underaged Mary and cuckolded poor old (meant in the usual "poor old..." way, but age unknown, actually) Joe... The jew really likes to troll us and take the piss - and look at the "jokes" comedians make! (Which reminds me - I had a video of a stand-up comedian being punished for a "joke" that I wanted to upload...)

Joseph might have been 18-20, 36-42, or 80s or 90s when marrying underaged or possibly maybe-just-legal-acceptable-aged Mary. [1 and 2] (What age is acceptable? 3 years and 1 day?!) That fits in with biblicality and abrahamism and jewism!

The term "evil" in this verse is translated from the Hebrew word "ra", which can indeed mean "evil" or "calamity". However, it's important to note that in Hebrew, "ra" can also mean adversity, calamity, or disaster in a broader sense, rather than moral evil.

Whether it is evil and immoral or it is calamity or adversity or disaster, it is still evil. Gradation (talk about shades of grey...) is irrelevant; it is all still evil, not good. In jewbrew, the word "Satan" means "adversary", and "god" creates adversity. "god" itself is admitting that it is the enemy, the adverse one, the opposer, the antagoniser! Stories must have an antagonist... and some stories (or their authours) like to confuse you, keep you guessing. Can you guess who the protagonist-cum-antagonist is in this story?!

Once - How can it be more obvious?! "god" "formed us in the womb" (deformed and sick and stillborn Babies hate "god"), and decided that we should be as it created us, but then the "same yesterday, today and forever" "god" changed its mind and decided that you can't be as you were born and must change (oh, my - christians must love "sEx ChAnGeS"!) and be different than what you were born as! "god" is adverse, the antagonist, the actual devil. Twice - How can it be more obvious?... Satan "murdered" only 10 - and only with "god"'s permission and those 10 became zombies - were un-deadified. Yep, Satan not-murdered 10 and "god" murdered millions, and Satan is evil and "god" is good. The holey bibles are just that - holey, with so many holes, like Tom, from Tom and Jerry, when (if I remember correctly) Jerry fires a machine gun at him and he drinks water, all the water comes out of the many holes. Not only do they not hold water (as the saying goes), the holey bibles can't hold water. Thrice - Seriously - how can it be more friggin' obvious?!

Good is as good does; "god" is -

• immoral,
• unethical,
• void (where Earth "was" "in the beginning" - void and without form! "god" created it void and formless!),
• unknowing,
• inexperienced,
• inept,
• impotent
• ...

Good is as good does; "god" is evil.

Amen-Ra! Shiii! I'm so-mote-it-be-ing evil. christ Cripes! When christians say "amen", are they dedicating their prayers to a Pagan God, or are they encouraging jewish evil?!