It's an ordinary day for us here who know all this but for many people out there who were "waiting for a scientific explanation", they have it too.
After the Congressional hearing on Aliens, that proved basically everything by itself, we now have another "irrefutable proof" about Alien existence on earth. Clearly, the powers that be have decided to let the "masses" know finally.
Yes, greys exist and they have been among us, as both manipulators, "visitors" and even aggressors to us as a species, trying to actively exercise control over us.
The greys in question from these skeletons, are not really the higher order ones, and they are just some ones that still have psychic powers but they are almost like toys compared to the bigger ones.
Better get to meditating and don't say we didn't warn you, everything we said has always been true. Humans that don't try to advance can be fairly easily preyed upon by these and many other species from our rich universe, including other humans. Such as those who have been telling you falsely that aliens don't exist.
In regards to why these are in Mexico, that is because the greys have visited and abused the Mexican people a long time ago, included also trying to guide them to conclude blood sacrifices and other falsehoods.
Of course, certain people will always try to troll around these subjects and ignore them, and the correct payments from the "Men in Black" will get anything "Under the rug", but it's official, we are too far for this anymore. Aliens exist. Humanity has to understand this, comprehend this and to cope with that fact.
'Alien' bodies are complete skeletons, scientists say after X-rays
Experts still sceptical over Jaime Maussan’s claims of ‘non-human beings’, after unusual presentation to country’s congress
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/09/19/mexico-aliens-x-ray-corpses-congress-jaime-maussan-ufo/
The two “extra-terrestrial corpses” which were tested after they were displayed at Mexico’s Congress last week belonged to a single skeleton with no evidence of any "assembly or manipulation of the skulls", Mexican doctors have claimed.
Scientists on Monday conducted a number of tests on the two “non-human” specimens that were previously displayed to Mexican politicians at the Congress.
Journalist Jaime Maussan under oath told the House that the small corpses were retrieved from diatom mines in Cusco, Peru, with almost a third of their DNA remaining “unknown”. Politicians were told the corpses were estimated to be 1,000 years old.
Maussan made similar claims in Peru which were later debunked, including five mummies found in Peru in 2017 which were later shown to be human children.
Last week's alleged alien display was questioned by scientists, academics, and archeologists, who argued the corpses were "way too humanoid" to be genuine.
José Zalce Benitez, the director of the Health Sciences Research Institute, said the studies concluded that the alleged aliens belonged to a single skeleton and were not assembled with human objects.
He said his team found that one “was alive, was intact, was biological and was in gestation” in reference to the alleged large lumps found inside one of the corpses's abdomen, which could be eggs, New York Post reported.
The director had previously claimed that "these bodies have no relation to human beings".
The alleged corpses have a humanoid shape with a small body, elongated head and three fingers on each hand. Maussan claimed the bodies with two arms and two legs had strong, light bones and no teeth, along with implants of cadmium and osmium.
Professor Brian Cox was among the critics who pointed out that it was "very unlikely that an intelligent species that evolved on another planet would look like us".
“Secondly – send a sample off to 23andme (genetic testing firm) – let alone the University down the road – and they’ll tell you within 10 minutes," he wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter.
The National Autonomous University of Mexico in a statement said its researchers had never examined the actual specimens, but had merely carried out carbon testing on skin samples provided by a client back in 2017.
Their carbon-dating was “only intended to determine the age of the sample brought by each user and in no case do we make conclusions about the origin of said samples”, the university said.
