This is from a small questionable yet accurate in most cases book.
"In the 1960s, neuropsychologist Robert Sperry embarked on a research program that eventually won him the nobel prize. Soerry's work with split brain patients-epileptics whose doctors removed the connections between the right and left brain hemispheres to treat their seizures-concluded that a specific half of the brain was more involved in reading, writing, and arithmetic than the other. These findings filtered out into the popular press, and pop psychologists ran with it.
Somehow, Sperry's findings on the "lateralization" of the brain morphed into a belief the creative imagination is controlled by the "right brain" while logical analysis is controlled by the "left brain" and that the people are generally right ir left brained. This belief has since informed everything from self-help books to occupational apptitude tests. The simplicity of the theory combined with its scientific undertones explains why it has stuck around so long-despite the fact it's wrong.
Not that there isn't significant evidence for lateralization of the brain. However, this lateralization tends to be more nuanced. While the right hemisphere visualizes shapes and the left hemisphere visualizes details, both are required for interpreting visual information. While the right side is predominant in processing linguistic meaning and the left side is largely responsible for processing grammar, both are necessary for interpreting language. Recent studies of middle school students as they analyzed mathematical problems indicate that the most successful ones were those whose left and right brain hemispheres communicated the most-not students that showed any particular dominance in one or the other.
The verdict is that while brain lateralization and localization of mental processing are a real thing, these findings do not-and never did-support the idea that creativity and analysis are two ends of a spectrum representing the lateral orientation of the brain. Besides, even those buy into left- and right-brain theory now believe that success is a combination of both analytical strength and creativity. In other words, you benefit most by using more than half if your brain."
So what conclusion(s) do you draw from this? I see it as a revelation uprooting the exaggeration of old time assumptions and nowadays presumptions which obscure the optimal application to evolving through meditation.
"In the 1960s, neuropsychologist Robert Sperry embarked on a research program that eventually won him the nobel prize. Soerry's work with split brain patients-epileptics whose doctors removed the connections between the right and left brain hemispheres to treat their seizures-concluded that a specific half of the brain was more involved in reading, writing, and arithmetic than the other. These findings filtered out into the popular press, and pop psychologists ran with it.
Somehow, Sperry's findings on the "lateralization" of the brain morphed into a belief the creative imagination is controlled by the "right brain" while logical analysis is controlled by the "left brain" and that the people are generally right ir left brained. This belief has since informed everything from self-help books to occupational apptitude tests. The simplicity of the theory combined with its scientific undertones explains why it has stuck around so long-despite the fact it's wrong.
Not that there isn't significant evidence for lateralization of the brain. However, this lateralization tends to be more nuanced. While the right hemisphere visualizes shapes and the left hemisphere visualizes details, both are required for interpreting visual information. While the right side is predominant in processing linguistic meaning and the left side is largely responsible for processing grammar, both are necessary for interpreting language. Recent studies of middle school students as they analyzed mathematical problems indicate that the most successful ones were those whose left and right brain hemispheres communicated the most-not students that showed any particular dominance in one or the other.
The verdict is that while brain lateralization and localization of mental processing are a real thing, these findings do not-and never did-support the idea that creativity and analysis are two ends of a spectrum representing the lateral orientation of the brain. Besides, even those buy into left- and right-brain theory now believe that success is a combination of both analytical strength and creativity. In other words, you benefit most by using more than half if your brain."
So what conclusion(s) do you draw from this? I see it as a revelation uprooting the exaggeration of old time assumptions and nowadays presumptions which obscure the optimal application to evolving through meditation.