Half of the Warriors Were Female

[lcf_antares]

Better Identification of Viking Corpses Reveals: Half of the Warriors Were Female

Shield maidens are not a myth! A recent archaeological discovery has shattered the stereotype of exclusively male Viking warriors sailing out to war while their long-suffering wives wait at home with baby Vikings. (We knew it! We always knew it.) Plus, some other findings are challenging that whole “rape and pillage” thing, too.Researchers at the University of Western Australia decided to revamp the way they studied Viking remains. Previously, researchers had misidentified skeletons as male simply because they were buried with their swords and shields. (Female remains were identified by their oval brooches, and not much else.) By studying osteological signs of gender within the bones themselves, researchers discovered that approximately half of the remains were actually female warriors, given a proper burial with their weapons.It’s been so difficult for people to envision women’s historical contributions as solely getting married and dying in childbirth, but you can’t argue with numbers—and fifty/fifty is pretty damn good. The presence of female warriors also has researchers now wondering just how accurate the stereotypes of raping and pillaging actually are:Women may have accompanied male Vikings in those early invasions of England, in much greater numbers than scholars earlier supposed, (Researcher) McLeod concludes. Rather than the ravaging rovers of legend, the Vikings arrived as marriage-minded colonists.In many ways, this discovery is well-timed with the recent uproar over Thor becoming a title for both sexes instead of an exclusively male name. Fingers crossed this means that pop culture could start including more female warriors than just Sif and Lagertha (from The History Channel’s Vikings, above). Just so long as they’re not wearing boob plate armor.Because, as we’re always re-learning, women have always fought.

• TAGS</li>
• VIKINGS</li>
• https://www.thevintagenews.com/tag/warrioers/  </li>

 

[fake name]

As I recall viking children were taught to fight by their mothers first. Their mother was always their first combat instructor before the Vikings grew up to fight for their people and culture.
If half of their warriors were female that means they were ALL warriors, men, women and children.That's excellent! THAT'S how a society should raise their children!I always said that the best thing you can do to raise your kids is to teach them how to fight and train them as warriors!
The Vikings had the same idea!



On Saturday, October 24, 2015 10:12 AM, "lcf_antares@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Better Identification of Viking Corpses Reveals: Half of the Warriors Were Female

Shield maidens are not a myth! A recent archaeological discovery has shattered the stereotype of exclusively male Viking warriors sailing out to war while their long-suffering wives wait at home with baby Vikings. (We knew it! We always knew it.) Plus, some other findings are challenging that whole “rape and pillage” thing, too.Researchers at the University of Western Australia decided to revamp the way they studied Viking remains. Previously, researchers had misidentified skeletons as male simply because they were buried with their swords and shields. (Female remains were identified by their oval brooches, and not much else.) By studying osteological signs of gender within the bones themselves, researchers discovered that approximately half of the remains were actually female warriors, given a proper burial with their weapons.It’s been so difficult for people to envision women’s historical contributions as solely getting married and dying in childbirth, but you can’t argue with numbers—and fifty/fifty is pretty damn good. The presence of female warriors also has researchers now wondering just how accurate the stereotypes of raping and pillaging actually are:Women may have accompanied male Vikings in those early invasions of England, in much greater numbers than scholars earlier supposed, (Researcher) McLeod concludes. Rather than the ravaging rovers of legend, the Vikings arrived as marriage-minded colonists.In many ways, this discovery is well-timed with the recent uproar over Thor becoming a title for both sexes instead of an exclusively male name. Fingers crossed this means that pop culture could start including more female warriors than just Sif and Lagertha (from The History Channel’s Vikings, above). Just so long as they’re not wearing boob plate armor.Because, as we’re always re-learning, women have always fought.

• TAGS</li>
• VIKINGS</li>
• https://www.thevintagenews.com/tag/warrioers/  </li>
  
  

 

[light_algur]

Right, because females have the same physical strength as males... Get real. 50/50 to me means equality bullshit. Anyways...I'd love to check out this study. 

---In [email protected], <lcf_antares@... wrote :

Better Identification of Viking Corpses Reveals: Half of the Warriors Were Female

Shield maidens are not a myth! A recent archaeological discovery has shattered the stereotype of exclusively male Viking warriors sailing out to war while their long-suffering wives wait at home with baby Vikings. (We knew it! We always knew it.) Plus, some other findings are challenging that whole “rape and pillage” thing, too.Researchers at the University of Western Australia decided to revamp the way they studied Viking remains. Previously, researchers had misidentified skeletons as male simply because they were buried with their swords and shields. (Female remains were identified by their oval brooches, and not much else.) By studying osteological signs of gender within the bones themselves, researchers discovered that approximately half of the remains were actually female warriors, given a proper burial with their weapons.It’s been so difficult for people to envision women’s historical contributions as solely getting married and dying in childbirth, but you can’t argue with numbers—and fifty/fifty is pretty damn good. The presence of female warriors also has researchers now wondering just how accurate the stereotypes of raping and pillaging actually are:Women may have accompanied male Vikings in those early invasions of England, in much greater numbers than scholars earlier supposed, (Researcher) McLeod concludes. Rather than the ravaging rovers of legend, the Vikings arrived as marriage-minded colonists.In many ways, this discovery is well-timed with the recent uproar over Thor becoming a title for both sexes instead of an exclusively male name. Fingers crossed this means that pop culture could start including more female warriors than just Sif and Lagertha (from The History Channel’s Vikings, above). Just so long as they’re not wearing boob plate armor.Because, as we’re always re-learning, women have always fought.

• TAGS</li>
• VIKINGS</li>
• https://www.thevintagenews.com/tag/warrioers/  </li>

 

[light_algur]

Okay you recall from where? A jewlywood movie? A book? An article? A study? I am going to have to look in to this. 


---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

As I recall viking children were taught to fight by their mothers first. Their mother was always their first combat instructor before the Vikings grew up to fight for their people and culture.
If half of their warriors were female that means they were ALL warriors, men, women and children.That's excellent! THAT'S how a society should raise their children!I always said that the best thing you can do to raise your kids is to teach them how to fight and train them as warriors!
The Vikings had the same idea!



On Saturday, October 24, 2015 10:12 AM, "lcf_antares@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Better Identification of Viking Corpses Reveals: Half of the Warriors Were Female

Shield maidens are not a myth! A recent archaeological discovery has shattered the stereotype of exclusively male Viking warriors sailing out to war while their long-suffering wives wait at home with baby Vikings. (We knew it! We always knew it.) Plus, some other findings are challenging that whole “rape and pillage” thing, too.Researchers at the University of Western Australia decided to revamp the way they studied Viking remains. Previously, researchers had misidentified skeletons as male simply because they were buried with their swords and shields. (Female remains were identified by their oval brooches, and not much else.) By studying osteological signs of gender within the bones themselves, researchers discovered that approximately half of the remains were actually female warriors, given a proper burial with their weapons.It’s been so difficult for people to envision women’s historical contributions as solely getting married and dying in childbirth, but you can’t argue with numbers—and fifty/fifty is pretty damn good. The presence of female warriors also has researchers now wondering just how accurate the stereotypes of raping and pillaging actually are:Women may have accompanied male Vikings in those early invasions of England, in much greater numbers than scholars earlier supposed, (Researcher) McLeod concludes. Rather than the ravaging rovers of legend, the Vikings arrived as marriage-minded colonists.In many ways, this discovery is well-timed with the recent uproar over Thor becoming a title for both sexes instead of an exclusively male name. Fingers crossed this means that pop culture could start including more female warriors than just Sif and Lagertha (from The History Channel’s Vikings, above). Just so long as they’re not wearing boob plate armor.Because, as we’re always re-learning, women have always fought.

• TAGS</li>
• VIKINGS</li>
• https://www.thevintagenews.com/tag/warrioers/  </li>
  
  

 

[fake name]

FROM A SERMON WRITTEN BY A HIGH PRIEST. There is a huge difference between that equality bullshit and what the vikings did.

And what exactly is so unbelievable about women being able to fight? I even posted a video yesterday where a 13 year old GIRL benched 240 while arching her back and it was INSANE.
The things you can do with actual training and effort DO go a long way!And let's not forget that inner strength from spiritual power also makes you physically stronger.



On Saturday, October 24, 2015 8:42 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Okay you recall from where? A jewlywood movie? A book? An article? A study? I am going to have to look in to this. 


---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

As I recall viking children were taught to fight by their mothers first. Their mother was always their first combat instructor before the Vikings grew up to fight for their people and culture.
If half of their warriors were female that means they were ALL warriors, men, women and children.That's excellent! THAT'S how a society should raise their children!I always said that the best thing you can do to raise your kids is to teach them how to fight and train them as warriors!
The Vikings had the same idea!



On Saturday, October 24, 2015 10:12 AM, "lcf_antares@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Better Identification of Viking Corpses Reveals: Half of the Warriors Were Female

Shield maidens are not a myth! A recent archaeological discovery has shattered the stereotype of exclusively male Viking warriors sailing out to war while their long-suffering wives wait at home with baby Vikings. (We knew it! We always knew it.) Plus, some other findings are challenging that whole “rape and pillage” thing, too.Researchers at the University of Western Australia decided to revamp the way they studied Viking remains. Previously, researchers had misidentified skeletons as male simply because they were buried with their swords and shields. (Female remains were identified by their oval brooches, and not much else.) By studying osteological signs of gender within the bones themselves, researchers discovered that approximately half of the remains were actually female warriors, given a proper burial with their weapons.It’s been so difficult for people to envision women’s historical contributions as solely getting married and dying in childbirth, but you can’t argue with numbers—and fifty/fifty is pretty damn good. The presence of female warriors also has researchers now wondering just how accurate the stereotypes of raping and pillaging actually are:Women may have accompanied male Vikings in those early invasions of England, in much greater numbers than scholars earlier supposed, (Researcher) McLeod concludes. Rather than the ravaging rovers of legend, the Vikings arrived as marriage-minded colonists.In many ways, this discovery is well-timed with the recent uproar over Thor becoming a title for both sexes instead of an exclusively male name. Fingers crossed this means that pop culture could start including more female warriors than just Sif and Lagertha (from The History Channel’s Vikings, above). Just so long as they’re not wearing boob plate armor.Because, as we’re always re-learning, women have always fought.

• TAGS</li>
• VIKINGS</li>
• https://www.thevintagenews.com/tag/warrioers/  </li>
  
  
  
  

 

[light_algur]

Do you mind posting the name, link, or at least who wrote it so i or other members can know, great warrior? 
Are you saying that all 13 year old girls are like that? Where, in my post, did i write that women are unable to fight? I stated that women don't have the same physical strength as a man. Not in this world. That is why i told the OP to get real. Love the reference to jewish media by the way (The media never got the exact image of pagans or let alone vikings)

Yes, gentile women do fight. I actually agree with that. 

---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

FROM A SERMON WRITTEN BY A HIGH PRIEST. There is a huge difference between that equality bullshit and what the vikings did.

And what exactly is so unbelievable about women being able to fight? I even posted a video yesterday where a 13 year old GIRL benched 240 while arching her back and it was INSANE.
The things you can do with actual training and effort DO go a long way!And let's not forget that inner strength from spiritual power also makes you physically stronger.



On Saturday, October 24, 2015 8:42 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Okay you recall from where? A jewlywood movie? A book? An article? A study? I am going to have to look in to this. 


---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

As I recall viking children were taught to fight by their mothers first. Their mother was always their first combat instructor before the Vikings grew up to fight for their people and culture.
If half of their warriors were female that means they were ALL warriors, men, women and children.That's excellent! THAT'S how a society should raise their children!I always said that the best thing you can do to raise your kids is to teach them how to fight and train them as warriors!
The Vikings had the same idea!



On Saturday, October 24, 2015 10:12 AM, "lcf_antares@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Better Identification of Viking Corpses Reveals: Half of the Warriors Were Female

Shield maidens are not a myth! A recent archaeological discovery has shattered the stereotype of exclusively male Viking warriors sailing out to war while their long-suffering wives wait at home with baby Vikings. (We knew it! We always knew it.) Plus, some other findings are challenging that whole “rape and pillage” thing, too.Researchers at the University of Western Australia decided to revamp the way they studied Viking remains. Previously, researchers had misidentified skeletons as male simply because they were buried with their swords and shields. (Female remains were identified by their oval brooches, and not much else.) By studying osteological signs of gender within the bones themselves, researchers discovered that approximately half of the remains were actually female warriors, given a proper burial with their weapons.It’s been so difficult for people to envision women’s historical contributions as solely getting married and dying in childbirth, but you can’t argue with numbers—and fifty/fifty is pretty damn good. The presence of female warriors also has researchers now wondering just how accurate the stereotypes of raping and pillaging actually are:Women may have accompanied male Vikings in those early invasions of England, in much greater numbers than scholars earlier supposed, (Researcher) McLeod concludes. Rather than the ravaging rovers of legend, the Vikings arrived as marriage-minded colonists.In many ways, this discovery is well-timed with the recent uproar over Thor becoming a title for both sexes instead of an exclusively male name. Fingers crossed this means that pop culture could start including more female warriors than just Sif and Lagertha (from The History Channel’s Vikings, above). Just so long as they’re not wearing boob plate armor.Because, as we’re always re-learning, women have always fought.

• TAGS</li>
• VIKINGS</li>
• https://www.thevintagenews.com/tag/warrioers/  </li>
  
  
  
  

 

[talonjackman]

This is fantastic!!! Doesn't surprise me at all
HAIL SATAN!!!HAIL THE GODS OF HELL!!

 

[fake name]

You're new here aren't you? Our purpose as SS is to advance ourselves to godhood through daily training and meditation.This leads to far greater power for BOTH men AND women.True, men and women have different roles and different strengths.

But you're bashing me for pointing out that women can be strong too if they actually train. Raw physical strength also comes from inner strength.If you keep bashing anyone who acknowledges that women are capable of many great feat of strength as well as men and then call us all "jew brained libertards" then you've clearly got a lot of mental deprogramming to do still.
And as for the vikings the last time someone mentioned Viking women warriors training their kids it was a post written by a high priest.Do try to save the insults for the enemy.
FUCK THE JEWS!HAIL SATAN!



On Saturday, October 24, 2015 9:42 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Do you mind posting the name, link, or at least who wrote it so i or other members can know, great warrior? 
Are you saying that all 13 year old girls are like that? Where, in my post, did i write that women are unable to fight? I stated that women don't have the same physical strength as a man. Not in this world. That is why i told the OP to get real. Love the reference to jewish media by the way (The media never got the exact image of pagans or let alone vikings)

Yes, gentile women do fight. I actually agree with that. 

---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

FROM A SERMON WRITTEN BY A HIGH PRIEST. There is a huge difference between that equality bullshit and what the vikings did.

And what exactly is so unbelievable about women being able to fight? I even posted a video yesterday where a 13 year old GIRL benched 240 while arching her back and it was INSANE.
The things you can do with actual training and effort DO go a long way!And let's not forget that inner strength from spiritual power also makes you physically stronger.



On Saturday, October 24, 2015 8:42 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Okay you recall from where? A jewlywood movie? A book? An article? A study? I am going to have to look in to this. 


---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

As I recall viking children were taught to fight by their mothers first. Their mother was always their first combat instructor before the Vikings grew up to fight for their people and culture.
If half of their warriors were female that means they were ALL warriors, men, women and children.That's excellent! THAT'S how a society should raise their children!I always said that the best thing you can do to raise your kids is to teach them how to fight and train them as warriors!
The Vikings had the same idea!



On Saturday, October 24, 2015 10:12 AM, "lcf_antares@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Better Identification of Viking Corpses Reveals: Half of the Warriors Were Female

Shield maidens are not a myth! A recent archaeological discovery has shattered the stereotype of exclusively male Viking warriors sailing out to war while their long-suffering wives wait at home with baby Vikings. (We knew it! We always knew it.) Plus, some other findings are challenging that whole “rape and pillage” thing, too.Researchers at the University of Western Australia decided to revamp the way they studied Viking remains. Previously, researchers had misidentified skeletons as male simply because they were buried with their swords and shields. (Female remains were identified by their oval brooches, and not much else.) By studying osteological signs of gender within the bones themselves, researchers discovered that approximately half of the remains were actually female warriors, given a proper burial with their weapons.It’s been so difficult for people to envision women’s historical contributions as solely getting married and dying in childbirth, but you can’t argue with numbers—and fifty/fifty is pretty damn good. The presence of female warriors also has researchers now wondering just how accurate the stereotypes of raping and pillaging actually are:Women may have accompanied male Vikings in those early invasions of England, in much greater numbers than scholars earlier supposed, (Researcher) McLeod concludes. Rather than the ravaging rovers of legend, the Vikings arrived as marriage-minded colonists.In many ways, this discovery is well-timed with the recent uproar over Thor becoming a title for both sexes instead of an exclusively male name. Fingers crossed this means that pop culture could start including more female warriors than just Sif and Lagertha (from The History Channel’s Vikings, above). Just so long as they’re not wearing boob plate armor.Because, as we’re always re-learning, women have always fought.

• TAGS</li>
• VIKINGS</li>
• https://www.thevintagenews.com/tag/warrioers/  </li>
  
  
  
  
  
  

 

[Taol]

YES it is possible for a woman to match a man. They d physicly not be stronger but the spirit can add up in that a lot. 

Sometimes it still is hard for the woman but practice makes perfect.

I bet the vikings were no different. And even for a woman it would be a good idea to become a warrior especially in this era with all the rape going on.

 

[light_algur]

Did I hurt your weak feelings? I was not trying to insult you. I was trying to see where your claim comes from. You may have convinced everyone but me. Males and females are not the same. Stop trying to force your Jewish liberal cap on me.

 

[fake name]

And none of us ever said they were the same. But you still seem to bash anyone who doesnt agree with you when you say that "women are weak" and blah blah blah

and the instant someone disagrees with you even remotely you accuse them of being a jew?I've seen your other posts as well.
You're a very insulting know it all and your behaviour leads me to believe you are an infiltrator trying to pick fights.And for the record we HATE LIBERTARDS.
Seriously where the hell is all this attitude coming from? We are ALL here to better ourselves. This does NOT solely apply to men.




On Sunday, October 25, 2015 4:47 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Did I hurt your weak feelings? I was not trying to insult you. I was trying to see where your claim comes from. You may have convinced everyone but me. Males and females are not the same. Stop trying to force your Jewish liberal cap on me.

 

[light_algur]

And your posts have lead me to believe that you like to spew nonsense with out support. In general women are not as physically strong as men. Why you are trying to convince me otherwise, I don't know why.

 

[fake name]

I'm not trying to convince you of anything. You just flat out attacked the original poster for pointing out that both Viking men and women actually fought.You trying to tell me that women shouldn't learn to fight to fend off rapists?



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 5:23 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  And your posts have lead me to believe that you like to spew nonsense with out support. In general women are not as physically strong as men. Why you are trying to convince me otherwise, I don't know why.

 

[light_algur]

Stop trying to twist my points and write the link to your claim about the vikings.

The OP is using jewish media; a source I am not choking on.

 

[fake name]

Can you prove it? So far all you've done is insult everyone on this thread



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 5:37 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Stop trying to twist my points and write the link to your claim about the vikings.

The OP is using jewish media; a source I am not choking on.

 

[light_algur]

Prove that you are a nothing but a 12 year old feeling insulted by the writing of some one in the internet? It is evidently clear.
I knew that i should not take your posts seriously. I am still waiting for who wrote what you said about the vikings. Maybe you pulled that out of your ass. 

Now, lets continue this. Shall we? 
---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

Can you prove it? So far all you've done is insult everyone on this thread



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 5:37 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Stop trying to twist my points and write the link to your claim about the vikings.

The OP is using jewish media; a source I am not choking on.

 

[fake name]

Are you always this delightful a person to talk to?
I do have other things to do you know. Like more reverse torah rituals.
And on that note I will just ignore you since you seem to go apeshit any time someone ever says something that your massive ego views as even remotely different from your own opinion.
Have a good day.
HAIL SATAN!



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 8:30 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Prove that you are a nothing but a 12 year old feeling insulted by the writing of some one in the internet? It is evidently clear.
I knew that i should not take your posts seriously. I am still waiting for who wrote what you said about the vikings. Maybe you pulled that out of your ass. 

Now, lets continue this. Shall we? 
---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

Can you prove it? So far all you've done is insult everyone on this thread



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 5:37 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Stop trying to twist my points and write the link to your claim about the vikings.

The OP is using jewish media; a source I am not choking on.

 

[light_algur]

Only to trolls i am delightful to talk to. You are the one reacting apeshit. Just like those typical SJWs on social media.Feeling insulted for disagreeing with the OP and then asking you for some type of source. 

My initial aim was not to insult; though i will be delighted if you want to feel insulted but to learn where your claim about the vikings was from. When i read that you "recalled" from a High Priest, i was even more interested. In the end, you could not provide me with the honest source (not even a name). Proving that you made that up in your mind. 
You know, I don't care what you do in your private life. 

---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

Are you always this delightful a person to talk to?
I do have other things to do you know. Like more reverse torah rituals.
And on that note I will just ignore you since you seem to go apeshit any time someone ever says something that your massive ego views as even remotely different from your own opinion.
Have a good day.
HAIL SATAN!



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 8:30 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Prove that you are a nothing but a 12 year old feeling insulted by the writing of some one in the internet? It is evidently clear.
I knew that i should not take your posts seriously. I am still waiting for who wrote what you said about the vikings. Maybe you pulled that out of your ass. 

Now, lets continue this. Shall we? 
---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

Can you prove it? So far all you've done is insult everyone on this thread



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 5:37 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Stop trying to twist my points and write the link to your claim about the vikings.

The OP is using jewish media; a source I am not choking on.

 

[Yog Sothoth]

Feminism is a jewish created program. Men and women are deeply, spiritually, mentally and physically different, thus different roles in society come out from that. 



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 4:47 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Did I hurt your weak feelings? I was not trying to insult you. I was trying to see where your claim comes from. You may have convinced everyone but me. Males and females are not the same. Stop trying to force your Jewish liberal cap on me.

 

[kyleshand]

Yeah but consider who their enemies were back then, a full blooded viking female would have towered over most men of other European sub races and especially non Whites, such as asiatic/mongoloid men and probably have been just as strong. Today the difference isn't so great because of mixing + all of the inquisitions and lowering of the racial quality over time. But even today there are some examples, a well trained White nordic female could probably handle herself against your average Asian male. I'm not saying that to be insulting to anyone it's just the truth.

 

[james marshall]

He never not even once said that woman were equal to men in terms of physical build. You added that. You added the whole equality point. You are doing the exact same thing maybe jooz do which is take a point to far to an extreme. The physical is a representation of the astral and a body can not exist with out the higher vibrations of the astral. While they may not be able to get the same level of output as a man as fast, over time through hard dedication they can be a force to not underestimate. That is fakes point. You are the one with libtard bs. Undermining and putting words in his mouth based upon how you feel and perceive. Battle Maidens were a fact. We know that Lilith is a powerful warrior and could kick your ass for the rest of existence because she started training before you. Even if you put all you might into fighting her physically you could never hope to best her because she has achieved more physical prowess. At the end of the day the long part of the rode take time. Being male and female don't take into such accounts unless the people started training within an accept time for the male to out do the female.  Meaning yes if a male starts at the same time as a female more then likely the male will be able to get much stronger but if a female starts before them they have the ability to out do simply because true power takes time to gather no matter how much potential you have. Being a god is a lot like training your skills. Time and effort can beat personal potential so long as the time and effort out weight it. In this case that is what battle maidens did. Idk how you missed his point so much. Either that or you wanted to. FYI true equality does exist. We can all get as powerful as we want to plus as much effort we put into it. That is true equality. The jooz can create nothing. Only take and poison. Creativity a power that lies within our soul. Our feminine energies. As such the didn't make the term equal they just fucked with it. Just like they did with time and our sexes themselves. They turned Third sex into 'gay' and 'gave' male and female genders to fuck with sexuality. Logically you can conclude that they fucked with the word equal as well.


On Sunday, October 25, 2015 7:37 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Stop trying to twist my points and write the link to your claim about the vikings.

The OP is using jewish media; a source I am not choking on.

 

[light_algur]

No, 50/50 doesn't sound equal at all...
---In [email protected], <jamesmarshall237@... wrote :

He never not even once said that woman were equal to men in terms of physical build. You added that. You added the whole equality point. You are doing the exact same thing maybe jooz do which is take a point to far to an extreme. The physical is a representation of the astral and a body can not exist with out the higher vibrations of the astral. While they may not be able to get the same level of output as a man as fast, over time through hard dedication they can be a force to not underestimate. That is fakes point. You are the one with libtard bs. Undermining and putting words in his mouth based upon how you feel and perceive. Battle Maidens were a fact. We know that Lilith is a powerful warrior and could kick your ass for the rest of existence because she started training before you. Even if you put all you might into fighting her physically you could never hope to best her because she has achieved more physical prowess. At the end of the day the long part of the rode take time. Being male and female don't take into such accounts unless the people started training within an accept time for the male to out do the female.  Meaning yes if a male starts at the same time as a female more then likely the male will be able to get much stronger but if a female starts before them they have the ability to out do simply because true power takes time to gather no matter how much potential you have. Being a god is a lot like training your skills. Time and effort can beat personal potential so long as the time and effort out weight it. In this case that is what battle maidens did. Idk how you missed his point so much. Either that or you wanted to. FYI true equality does exist. We can all get as powerful as we want to plus as much effort we put into it. That is true equality. The jooz can create nothing. Only take and poison. Creativity a power that lies within our soul. Our feminine energies. As such the didn't make the term equal they just fucked with it. Just like they did with time and our sexes themselves. They turned Third sex into 'gay' and 'gave' male and female genders to fuck with sexuality. Logically you can conclude that they fucked with the word equal as well.


On Sunday, October 25, 2015 7:37 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Stop trying to twist my points and write the link to your claim about the vikings.

The OP is using jewish media; a source I am not choking on.

 

[Nikola Tesla]

Yc28, I agree with your reaction. Angryshaman you need to calm down okay!? Not everyone agrees that all woman should be trained beasts like us men unless that's your fetish lol! I wouldn't like my girl to be like a man. Algur is just trying to say that woman in general should stay in their feminine role but still be spiritually strong. Some woman can be muscular some don't. It's just natures selection the same with the people that are gay are naturally in the minority of people. And not all Vikings where just brainless savages as the media tells us like the new show Vikings on Fox for example! There is a reason the male produces more testosteron naturally than females. For females estrogen. If a female produces much more testo it wouldn't be a attractive woman anymore, common sense. Plus deeper voice haha.
And don't forget the feminists are the reason for equal rights. We must be careful with this equality bullshit cuz the enemy in most cases uses it in the same way they use it for Communism. Always be on guard for this equality nonsense that comes in all different shapes and forms!!! As Satanists we must go with the flow and use our personal morality at all times instead of plain assumption! As someone said once in the groups; Assumption is the mother of all fuck UPS! And also know who wrote the article is important, as the jooz use clever tactics.


Hail Satan and all Gods and Goddesses of Duat!!! Heil Hitler and upcoming Reich!




------------------------------

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 3:30 AM GMT yc28@... [JoyofSatan666] wrote:


Prove that you are a nothing but a 12 year old feeling insulted by the writing of some one in the internet? It is evidently clear.

I knew that i should not take your posts seriously. I am still waiting for who wrote what you said about the vikings. Maybe you pulled that out of your ass.

Now, lets continue this. Shall we?

---In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

Can you prove it? So far all you've done is insult everyone on this thread





On Sunday, October 25, 2015 5:37 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] wrote:




Stop trying to twist my points and write the link to your claim about the vikings.

The OP is using jewish media; a source I am not choking on.

 

[iorost]

Light Algur is right in that this clearly a kike website. But you forget that women generally have a higher tolerance to pain an by birth are slightly more in touch with the spiritual. Generally, they have a lighted build so a smaller target. Females are arguably more inclined to be more agile then men. Both genders can match the other but there's no denying we both have our inherent advantages. Women could be vicious weapons when used tactically along with any other unit within warfare. do not underestimate the ancients. They lived in times of constant war, not comfortable enslavement.

 

[talonjackman]

Fake Name, obviously arguing with this person is a complete waste of time. They refuse to listen to reason, and are just being rude, when it has been said SEVERAL times that we should avoid infighting.

 

[light_algur]

An argument is not infighting. Physical and spiritual attacks are infighting. 


---In [email protected], <talonjackman@... wrote :

Fake Name, obviously arguing with this person is a complete waste of time. They refuse to listen to reason, and are just being rude, when it has been said SEVERAL times that we should avoid infighting.

 

[fake name]

I agree. This guy keeps pushing his point to jewish extremes and putting words in my mouth plain for everyone here to see.If you want to know my opinion on where women should stand, I think everyone, man AND woman should be trained to fight and handle themselves from childhood so that crooks and rapists will get a serious ass kicking, especially since Europe is being flooded with muslim rapists right now.
Women are naturally more flexible than men and have an easier time developing agility while men have more muscle mass and raw power.True, in terms of raw strength a woman has to work roughly 7 times harder than a man if we're just talking about raw muscle.But I was NOT referring to just raw muscle and this guy talks like fighting is all about brute strength and brawn and that anyone who can't bench 320 could never beat a big muscle man.I've seen tiny little asian dudes beat the shit out of big ass bodybuilders before.
Remember that dumbass Mr. Utah who kept picking fights with martial arts masters and the judo master who was half his size KICKED HIS ASS.A Karate master ALSO kicked his ass though not nearly as easily.Those 2 fights proves that raw strength means jack shit if you don't know how to use it and whoever lands a clean hit to your vitals first is probably going to win no matter HOW big and strong you are.
Even though I'm one of those big strong powerlifters myself in a fight I'm all about precision and control and aim for weak spots like the eyes, nose, throat, tendons, joints, ligaments and nerves and if my opponent IS way stronger than me I tend to smash the same nerve centers and vital spot over and over again until it breaks.

You think a woman can't fuck you up if she hits you in the nose 20 times while you're still stunned from the first punch if she trained as a boxer?The martial arts were invented for the SPECIFIC REASON of giving weaker men and women the ability to fight back against much stronger opponents!
Tae Kwon Do was invented to help Korean farmers defend themselves against armed soldiers since civilians couldn't own weapons and this was the similar origin for nearly ALL martial arts.
So yes we ALL have our unique strengths but it seems this guy accuses anyone who has a remotely different opinion of being a jew when his own viewpoints are so extreme that they come off as SUPER jewish.
Also I don't like manly women but I don't like weak, lazy super girly women who can't fend for themselves and make no effort to do any real work or better themselves either.In the end everyone is unique and has their own strengths and weaknesses. As SS our goal is to evolve beyond our limits and become gods!
FUCK THE JEWS!HAIL SATAN!



On Monday, October 26, 2015 1:33 AM, "talonjackman@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Fake Name, obviously arguing with this person is a complete waste of time. They refuse to listen to reason, and are just being rude, when it has been said SEVERAL times that we should avoid infighting.

 

[light_algur]

That is not the point of my argument. You are twisting my words. Stay mad, stay small Social Justice Warrior. 

---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

I agree. This guy keeps pushing his point to jewish extremes and putting words in my mouth plain for everyone here to see.If you want to know my opinion on where women should stand, I think everyone, man AND woman should be trained to fight and handle themselves from childhood so that crooks and rapists will get a serious ass kicking, especially since Europe is being flooded with muslim rapists right now.
Women are naturally more flexible than men and have an easier time developing agility while men have more muscle mass and raw power.True, in terms of raw strength a woman has to work roughly 7 times harder than a man if we're just talking about raw muscle.But I was NOT referring to just raw muscle and this guy talks like fighting is all about brute strength and brawn and that anyone who can't bench 320 could never beat a big muscle man.I've seen tiny little asian dudes beat the shit out of big ass bodybuilders before.
Remember that dumbass Mr. Utah who kept picking fights with martial arts masters and the judo master who was half his size KICKED HIS ASS.A Karate master ALSO kicked his ass though not nearly as easily.Those 2 fights proves that raw strength means jack shit if you don't know how to use it and whoever lands a clean hit to your vitals first is probably going to win no matter HOW big and strong you are.
Even though I'm one of those big strong powerlifters myself in a fight I'm all about precision and control and aim for weak spots like the eyes, nose, throat, tendons, joints, ligaments and nerves and if my opponent IS way stronger than me I tend to smash the same nerve centers and vital spot over and over again until it breaks.

You think a woman can't fuck you up if she hits you in the nose 20 times while you're still stunned from the first punch if she trained as a boxer?The martial arts were invented for the SPECIFIC REASON of giving weaker men and women the ability to fight back against much stronger opponents!
Tae Kwon Do was invented to help Korean farmers defend themselves against armed soldiers since civilians couldn't own weapons and this was the similar origin for nearly ALL martial arts.
So yes we ALL have our unique strengths but it seems this guy accuses anyone who has a remotely different opinion of being a jew when his own viewpoints are so extreme that they come off as SUPER jewish.
Also I don't like manly women but I don't like weak, lazy super girly women who can't fend for themselves and make no effort to do any real work or better themselves either.In the end everyone is unique and has their own strengths and weaknesses. As SS our goal is to evolve beyond our limits and become gods!
FUCK THE JEWS!HAIL SATAN!



On Monday, October 26, 2015 1:33 AM, "talonjackman@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Fake Name, obviously arguing with this person is a complete waste of time. They refuse to listen to reason, and are just being rude, when it has been said SEVERAL times that we should avoid infighting.

 

[helionjovesson]

Light_Algur has been here for a while, he shows up a lot on the prophpbb forum. And I think he's right. They're weren't soldiers/warriors of women, though they might have trained the women. Spartan women were trained, but didn't fight. You're getting too butthurt here. Light is a cool guy.

 

[Antares LCF]

<td val[/IMG]Idiot.

From:"fake name angryshaman666@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected]
Dateon, Okt 26, 2015 at 4:58
Subject:Re: [JoyofSatan666] Re: Half of the Warriors Were Female

  Are you always this delightful a person to talk to?
I do have other things to do you know. Like more reverse torah rituals.
And on that note I will just ignore you since you seem to go apeshit any time someone ever says something that your massive ego views as even remotely different from your own opinion.
Have a good day.
HAIL SATAN!



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 8:30 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Prove that you are a nothing but a 12 year old feeling insulted by the writing of some one in the internet? It is evidently clear.
I knew that i should not take your posts seriously. I am still waiting for who wrote what you said about the vikings. Maybe you pulled that out of your ass. 

Now, lets continue this. Shall we? 
---In [[email protected]][email protected][/email], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

Can you prove it? So far all you've done is insult everyone on this thread



On Sunday, October 25, 2015 5:37 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Stop trying to twist my points and write the link to your claim about the vikings.

The OP is using jewish media; a source I am not choking on.



[/TD]

[/TD][/TR][/TABLE]

 

[light_algur]

No need to vouch for me helionjovesson. Let them show their true colors. 


---In [email protected], <helionjovesson@... wrote :

Light_Algur has been here for a while, he shows up a lot on the prophpbb forum. And I think he's right. They're weren't soldiers/warriors of women, though they might have trained the women. Spartan women were trained, but didn't fight. You're getting too butthurt here. Light is a cool guy.

 

[james marshall]

Yes it was. He is not a social justice warrior your just being an ass.


On Monday, October 26, 2015 9:59 AM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 
That is not the point of my argument. You are twisting my words. Stay mad, stay small Social Justice Warrior. 

---In [email protected], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

I agree. This guy keeps pushing his point to jewish extremes and putting words in my mouth plain for everyone here to see.If you want to know my opinion on where women should stand, I think everyone, man AND woman should be trained to fight and handle themselves from childhood so that crooks and rapists will get a serious ass kicking, especially since Europe is being flooded with muslim rapists right now.
Women are naturally more flexible than men and have an easier time developing agility while men have more muscle mass and raw power.True, in terms of raw strength a woman has to work roughly 7 times harder than a man if we're just talking about raw muscle.But I was NOT referring to just raw muscle and this guy talks like fighting is all about brute strength and brawn and that anyone who can't bench 320 could never beat a big muscle man.I've seen tiny little asian dudes beat the shit out of big ass bodybuilders before.
Remember that dumbass Mr. Utah who kept picking fights with martial arts masters and the judo master who was half his size KICKED HIS ASS.A Karate master ALSO kicked his ass though not nearly as easily.Those 2 fights proves that raw strength means jack shit if you don't know how to use it and whoever lands a clean hit to your vitals first is probably going to win no matter HOW big and strong you are.
Even though I'm one of those big strong powerlifters myself in a fight I'm all about precision and control and aim for weak spots like the eyes, nose, throat, tendons, joints, ligaments and nerves and if my opponent IS way stronger than me I tend to smash the same nerve centers and vital spot over and over again until it breaks.

You think a woman can't fuck you up if she hits you in the nose 20 times while you're still stunned from the first punch if she trained as a boxer?The martial arts were invented for the SPECIFIC REASON of giving weaker men and women the ability to fight back against much stronger opponents!
Tae Kwon Do was invented to help Korean farmers defend themselves against armed soldiers since civilians couldn't own weapons and this was the similar origin for nearly ALL martial arts.
So yes we ALL have our unique strengths but it seems this guy accuses anyone who has a remotely different opinion of being a jew when his own viewpoints are so extreme that they come off as SUPER jewish.
Also I don't like manly women but I don't like weak, lazy super girly women who can't fend for themselves and make no effort to do any real work or better themselves either.In the end everyone is unique and has their own strengths and weaknesses. As SS our goal is to evolve beyond our limits and become gods!
FUCK THE JEWS!HAIL SATAN!



On Monday, October 26, 2015 1:33 AM, "talonjackman@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Fake Name, obviously arguing with this person is a complete waste of time. They refuse to listen to reason, and are just being rude, when it has been said SEVERAL times that we should avoid infighting.

 

[talonjackman]

*round of applause*
Very nicely put

 

[dark_pagan_666]

Now, that 50/50 were men and women I am uncertain of. Yet I am certain there were many women in viking battles. The Valkyries. Instead of just looking at the obvious, a "I am smart and therefore correct game" has gone too far.

Ever read about the Third Sex people? They are known to be great warriors, both women and men. As they are created as such and are warriors by nature. Let alone, we all are in one way or another.

The Valkyries are known as the greatest female warriors, maybe this is what Fake Name mentions? Though, I do not remember which HP wrote about them, my guess is on Don Danko anyhow.

Instead of doing some simple research here in JoS or other valuable sources, ya'll could have spared precious time. Or use plain logic in this area if you of course have the knowledge too.

Men in general are physically stronger, but ever heard of individual bodies in both sexes? Which have been stated thousands of times. You have women who are more masculine and men who are more feminin. Vica versa. I am a man, but feminin, yet very strong.

You have also different martial arts for differents types of bodies, which are created and customized to be beneficial to our nature.

Now, can someone use enough logic to see what I am addressing?

Male or female, what have you. Can be a great warrior. Both in spritual and physical battle.

Hail Satan!!!

 

[Toni Bifulco]

I'm Italian I do not understand what you say
Il 26/Ott/2015 15:59, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] ha scritto:

 
That is not the point of my argument. You are twisting my words. Stay mad, stay small Social Justice Warrior. 

---In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], <angryshaman666@... wrote :

I agree. This guy keeps pushing his point to jewish extremes and putting words in my mouth plain for everyone here to see.If you want to know my opinion on where women should stand, I think everyone, man AND woman should be trained to fight and handle themselves from childhood so that crooks and rapists will get a serious ass kicking, especially since Europe is being flooded with muslim rapists right now.
Women are naturally more flexible than men and have an easier time developing agility while men have more muscle mass and raw power.True, in terms of raw strength a woman has to work roughly 7 times harder than a man if we're just talking about raw muscle.But I was NOT referring to just raw muscle and this guy talks like fighting is all about brute strength and brawn and that anyone who can't bench 320 could never beat a big muscle man.I've seen tiny little asian dudes beat the shit out of big ass bodybuilders before.
Remember that dumbass Mr. Utah who kept picking fights with martial arts masters and the judo master who was half his size KICKED HIS ASS.A Karate master ALSO kicked his ass though not nearly as easily.Those 2 fights proves that raw strength means jack shit if you don't know how to use it and whoever lands a clean hit to your vitals first is probably going to win no matter HOW big and strong you are.
Even though I'm one of those big strong powerlifters myself in a fight I'm all about precision and control and aim for weak spots like the eyes, nose, throat, tendons, joints, ligaments and nerves and if my opponent IS way stronger than me I tend to smash the same nerve centers and vital spot over and over again until it breaks.

You think a woman can't fuck you up if she hits you in the nose 20 times while you're still stunned from the first punch if she trained as a boxer?The martial arts were invented for the SPECIFIC REASON of giving weaker men and women the ability to fight back against much stronger opponents!
Tae Kwon Do was invented to help Korean farmers defend themselves against armed soldiers since civilians couldn't own weapons and this was the similar origin for nearly ALL martial arts.
So yes we ALL have our unique strengths but it seems this guy accuses anyone who has a remotely different opinion of being a jew when his own viewpoints are so extreme that they come off as SUPER jewish.
Also I don't like manly women but I don't like weak, lazy super girly women who can't fend for themselves and make no effort to do any real work or better themselves either.In the end everyone is unique and has their own strengths and weaknesses. As SS our goal is to evolve beyond our limits and become gods!
FUCK THE JEWS!HAIL SATAN!



On Monday, October 26, 2015 1:33 AM, "talonjackman@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] wrote:


 Fake Name, obviously arguing with this person is a complete waste of time. They refuse to listen to reason, and are just being rude, when it has been said SEVERAL times that we should avoid infighting.

 

[light_algur]

Okay, thank you for showing me a source to look for; a clue about what this SJW is saying. I have long been waiting for it. 


---In [email protected], <dark_pagan_666@... wrote :

Now, that 50/50 were men and women I am uncertain of. Yet I am certain there were many women in viking battles. The Valkyries. Instead of just looking at the obvious, a "I am smart and therefore correct game" has gone too far.

Ever read about the Third Sex people? They are known to be great warriors, both women and men. As they are created as such and are warriors by nature. Let alone, we all are in one way or another.

The Valkyries are known as the greatest female warriors, maybe this is what Fake Name mentions? Though, I do not remember which HP wrote about them, my guess is on Don Danko anyhow.

Instead of doing some simple research here in JoS or other valuable sources, ya'll could have spared precious time. Or use plain logic in this area if you of course have the knowledge too.

Men in general are physically stronger, but ever heard of individual bodies in both sexes? Which have been stated thousands of times. You have women who are more masculine and men who are more feminin. Vica versa. I am a man, but feminin, yet very strong.

You have also different martial arts for differents types of bodies, which are created and customized to be beneficial to our nature.

Now, can someone use enough logic to see what I am addressing?

Male or female, what have you. Can be a great warrior. Both in spritual and physical battle.

Hail Satan!!!

 

[Yog Sothoth]

Women can't fight? Uh... have you ever heard of Ronda Rousey? XDThough i disagree with the OP a bit, IMO the most scared place for a Women is providing the future for our race as a mother. Saying Women cant fight is fucking idiotic.   


On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:53 AM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Okay, thank you for showing me a source to look for; a clue about what this SJW is saying. I have long been waiting for it. 


---In [email protected], <dark_pagan_666@... wrote :

Now, that 50/50 were men and women I am uncertain of. Yet I am certain there were many women in viking battles. The Valkyries. Instead of just looking at the obvious, a "I am smart and therefore correct game" has gone too far.

Ever read about the Third Sex people? They are known to be great warriors, both women and men. As they are created as such and are warriors by nature. Let alone, we all are in one way or another.

The Valkyries are known as the greatest female warriors, maybe this is what Fake Name mentions? Though, I do not remember which HP wrote about them, my guess is on Don Danko anyhow.

Instead of doing some simple research here in JoS or other valuable sources, ya'll could have spared precious time. Or use plain logic in this area if you of course have the knowledge too.

Men in general are physically stronger, but ever heard of individual bodies in both sexes? Which have been stated thousands of times. You have women who are more masculine and men who are more feminin. Vica versa. I am a man, but feminin, yet very strong.

You have also different martial arts for differents types of bodies, which are created and customized to be beneficial to our nature.

Now, can someone use enough logic to see what I am addressing?

Male or female, what have you. Can be a great warrior. Both in spritual and physical battle.

Hail Satan!!!

 

[light_algur]

YogSothoth, i will quote my self since the beginning of this debate i wrote "Yes, gentile women do fight. I actually agree with that."

---In [email protected], <yogsothoth666999@... wrote :

Women can't fight? Uh... have you ever heard of Ronda Rousey? XDThough i disagree with the OP a bit, IMO the most scared place for a Women is providing the future for our race as a mother. Saying Women cant fight is fucking idiotic.   


On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:53 AM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Okay, thank you for showing me a source to look for; a clue about what this SJW is saying. I have long been waiting for it. 


---In [email protected], <dark_pagan_666@... wrote :

Now, that 50/50 were men and women I am uncertain of. Yet I am certain there were many women in viking battles. The Valkyries. Instead of just looking at the obvious, a "I am smart and therefore correct game" has gone too far.

Ever read about the Third Sex people? They are known to be great warriors, both women and men. As they are created as such and are warriors by nature. Let alone, we all are in one way or another.

The Valkyries are known as the greatest female warriors, maybe this is what Fake Name mentions? Though, I do not remember which HP wrote about them, my guess is on Don Danko anyhow.

Instead of doing some simple research here in JoS or other valuable sources, ya'll could have spared precious time. Or use plain logic in this area if you of course have the knowledge too.

Men in general are physically stronger, but ever heard of individual bodies in both sexes? Which have been stated thousands of times. You have women who are more masculine and men who are more feminin. Vica versa. I am a man, but feminin, yet very strong.

You have also different martial arts for differents types of bodies, which are created and customized to be beneficial to our nature.

Now, can someone use enough logic to see what I am addressing?

Male or female, what have you. Can be a great warrior. Both in spritual and physical battle.

Hail Satan!!!

 

[fake name]

guys.guys. Don't feed the troll. yc28 is an infiltrator. He's already insulted all our most respected members and even the high priests.
just let this hideous cave troll jew creature tire itself out in it's mother's basement in PISSrael until it withers up and dies from lack of attention. LOL



On Monday, October 26, 2015 8:36 PM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  YogSothoth, i will quote my self since the beginning of this debate i wrote "Yes, gentile women do fight. I actually agree with that."

---In [email protected], <yogsothoth666999@... wrote :

Women can't fight? Uh... have you ever heard of Ronda Rousey? XDThough i disagree with the OP a bit, IMO the most scared place for a Women is providing the future for our race as a mother. Saying Women cant fight is fucking idiotic.   


On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:53 AM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


 Okay, thank you for showing me a source to look for; a clue about what this SJW is saying. I have long been waiting for it. 


---In [email protected], <dark_pagan_666@... wrote :

Now, that 50/50 were men and women I am uncertain of. Yet I am certain there were many women in viking battles. The Valkyries. Instead of just looking at the obvious, a "I am smart and therefore correct game" has gone too far.

Ever read about the Third Sex people? They are known to be great warriors, both women and men. As they are created as such and are warriors by nature. Let alone, we all are in one way or another.

The Valkyries are known as the greatest female warriors, maybe this is what Fake Name mentions? Though, I do not remember which HP wrote about them, my guess is on Don Danko anyhow.

Instead of doing some simple research here in JoS or other valuable sources, ya'll could have spared precious time. Or use plain logic in this area if you of course have the knowledge too.

Men in general are physically stronger, but ever heard of individual bodies in both sexes? Which have been stated thousands of times. You have women who are more masculine and men who are more feminin. Vica versa. I am a man, but feminin, yet very strong.

You have also different martial arts for differents types of bodies, which are created and customized to be beneficial to our nature.

Now, can someone use enough logic to see what I am addressing?

Male or female, what have you. Can be a great warrior. Both in spritual and physical battle.

Hail Satan!!!

 

[Yog Sothoth]

The Valkyries are mythological female warriors (daughters of Odin) who would chose the worthy slain warriors and bring them to Valhalla.  


On Monday, October 26, 2015 4:41 PM, Yog Sothoth <yogsothoth666999@... wrote:


Women can't fight? Uh... have you ever heard of Ronda Rousey? XDThough i disagree with the OP a bit, IMO the most scared place for a Women is providing the future for our race as a mother. Saying Women cant fight is fucking idiotic.   


On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:53 AM, "yc28@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Okay, thank you for showing me a source to look for; a clue about what this SJW is saying. I have long been waiting for it. 


---In [email protected], <dark_pagan_666@... wrote :

Now, that 50/50 were men and women I am uncertain of. Yet I am certain there were many women in viking battles. The Valkyries. Instead of just looking at the obvious, a "I am smart and therefore correct game" has gone too far.

Ever read about the Third Sex people? They are known to be great warriors, both women and men. As they are created as such and are warriors by nature. Let alone, we all are in one way or another.

The Valkyries are known as the greatest female warriors, maybe this is what Fake Name mentions? Though, I do not remember which HP wrote about them, my guess is on Don Danko anyhow.

Instead of doing some simple research here in JoS or other valuable sources, ya'll could have spared precious time. Or use plain logic in this area if you of course have the knowledge too.

Men in general are physically stronger, but ever heard of individual bodies in both sexes? Which have been stated thousands of times. You have women who are more masculine and men who are more feminin. Vica versa. I am a man, but feminin, yet very strong.

You have also different martial arts for differents types of bodies, which are created and customized to be beneficial to our nature.

Now, can someone use enough logic to see what I am addressing?

Male or female, what have you. Can be a great warrior. Both in spritual and physical battle.

Hail Satan!!!