Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Genuine v Artificial LGB Things Thread

FancyMancy

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
6,837
This thread is for sharing information, in whichever form and formats they come in, that is in regards to Lesbian, Gay and Bi people, individuals, the movement, the identity, the culture/subculture, etc., that is - as the title suggests - good and real versus bad and fake.

The following is not a quote. I put it in quote tags so as to collapse it. You can expand it and read it if you wish. I decided to use the quote tags instead of the spoiler tags because you can start to read what I say in the not-quote like a preview or a teaser, wheras in spoilers it's all either hidden fully or blurred.
I see G things especially, and in my opinion a lot of it is so fake. There may be stereotypes in all sorts of things, including in LGB relationships and events and related matters, but a lot of it is stupid and fake and pretentious. Of course, some people actually are flamboyant and eccentric, and I also realise that people are trying to be free and happy and hopefully be themselves, after centuries of jewish, christian, muslim oppression and hatred of Nature and Sexuality, etc.; but a lot of what is shown, what I have seen - not everything, but a lot - is so fake and tacky. I know only 2 Males who are of LGB, and they both don't behave in the stereotypically-camp and gay "way" - you wouldn't know they are of LGB if you didn't know - and no, neither of these 2 Males are L, of course. They are not T; they are Male fully and always have been and always will be.

Except for in the title of this thread - "LGB Things" (which I suppose is like the Universe making a joke!) - I don't put LGB and T together. I don't put T in with LGB. T is separate and - as far as I am concerned - a mental illness. In my own opinion, dressing-up as the opposite sex might be OK in context, perhaps. Of course, some dressing-up as the opposite sex is having fun, etc., etc., etc. Maybe there is a party or someone's favourite queen of pop or princess of pop singer is on and they dress-up and sing like her for teh l0lz... It's a grey area and maybe that has been orchestrated to be confusing and not clear-cut deliberately; but as a way of making a point about calling Boys Girls and pretending and lying that they are, "you go, sister!", and brainwashing it and reinforcing it and peer-pressuring it - no. That would lead inevitably on to a Boy trying to "become" a Girl and a Girl trying to "become" a Boy.

This also extends to the 6 million "genders" AKA identities. They used to be called personalities previously. Gender fluidity, non-binary, blah-blah-blah-aly. Even in the community, members don't know all of the overflow of misinformation and nonsense labels - and the flags. I don't care about learning them. As I said before, drag queens are supposed to be British humour, but I am not into it. It's all show and no substance, for entertainment and maybe hidden agendas. I know of "gay music" - and we can name any "gay icons" and singers/groups - but a couple of decades ago the music, the lyrics, the singers/writers had to pretend to be about loving a Girl, until we learnt that they were gay after they came-out. "Now we understand what the song actually meant!", some might exclaim. In my experience, hearing some music, the main singer has the stereotypically-camp voice in the "gay music". Some Males are like this genuinely, but in the "gay community" it seems like everyone is. I don't think I know of any gay love songs like we hear in "straight music". If there exists any, I'd love to hear it. Maybe I just forgot.

In G things, it seems as if, that being G, one has to be camp and flamboyant and fabyooluuussss! and putting it on, having to act and try to be eccentric. I don't want to sound like a boring old fart about these things, but like I said it's a grey area, and arguments would include "it's just a bit of harmless fun" when too much is not harmless nor fun at all. Besides, about 100 or more years ago, blue was supposed to be for Girls and pink was supposed to be for Boys; and some styles of clothing in history included frilly pieces, what we'd consider Girly now, which were worn by Males. Scottish Men wear kilts traditionally, which some people call skirts; muslim Males wear thawbs or jubbas to mosques. Maybe if "the battle of the sexes" didn't exist, we'd wear whatever and not care about it. Maybe it's just my perspective of these things based on what I have experienced.

Those two above, who you wouldn't know are LGB if you didn't know, are more "meh" about Eurovision. Eurovision is supposed to be a gay thing (as well as not gay, of course), that gay Males love and probably use as a reason and excuse to be gay (lol), but these two don't care about it. Other than these two, I met another who is gay who gave-off some "gay vibes" slightly. Some or most people might not be able to tell. I'm not certain about "out and proud". It seems fake. It's as if they have to act and behave in certain ways, which is not exactly pride-inducing. There are jokes about straight people 'coming-out'. One day, people will just be, and the over-the-top-ness won't exist. I'm B in LGB, by the way, but I prefer Males than Females.



To any haters - being gay is Natural. Homosexuality has existed for thousands and thousands of years and exists in thousands and thousands of species of Animal. If you are e.g. a christian or a muslim, then your god should stop making gay Babies. It should also stop making gay Animals. The bibles, in the first book - Genesis - which is thought and alleged to be thousands of years old, mention Sodom, what I consider to be a gay city. Homosexuality exists, and has existed, throughout time and "god" is powerless - it could not prevent homosexuality, cannot prevent homosexuality, and will not prevent homosexuality, no matter what "god" pretends to do.

It can be argued that "the serpent" in the Old Testament might not be Satan, that Satan was mentioned in the Old Testament more as a title or role, rather than a proper name, and is more a concept of representing the embodiment of evil and the adversary of divine forces, than a literal being; so Satan, the person, the being, is not mentioned until the New Testament - but in the NT it could be that jesus was just drunk on wine and high from the fumes of the burning bush, so the idea of "Satan" was just in "god"'s drunken stupor and "god" thought it'd be funny to make a story out of it for something to look back at and laugh about in the future with the 12 disciples. So if any try to argue that Satan is causing "god" to make gay Babies, or trying to make "god"'s "perfect" "creation" be gay, then Genesis (which means "beginnings" and includes homosexuality) admits homosexuality has existed for many millennia, regardless, since before the being, the person Satan existed which would have just been the idea of evil back then, rather a person tempting and damning people. A moment ago I called Sodom a gay city. I call it such, because of the obvious "sodomy" referring to anal sex, and there was a preacher who was gay but was then "cured" (no, not Ted Haggard, who is completely heterosexual!), I think Glen (or Glenn) White (I can't find if this is the correct name or not, though, because it was from years ago), who said christians used to bully him - "Glenn White, Sodomite!", to which he retorted he is not from Sodom.

Homosexuality is Natural and has existed forever and will exist forever. Regardless of that, you should visit these for the truth about, and exposing, christianity and islam, and more truth about very important things -

Exposing Christianity
Exposing the Lie of Islam
Satan is God

I also want to make a point about any interracial LGB content. Even in non-pregnancy relationships, interactiality is not healthy in terms of Spirituality and the Soul and Energies, and very much obviously in Mentality and Psychology... and Physicality. One might be a cultural appropriator, which may be contentious, but this is not the thread for discussing Race and cultural appropriation. I am not moderating this thread, but I think it might be fair to have interracial things in a separate thread or threads dedicated to that. Of course, if it does fit in with the intention of this thread - which I hope I have explained proprly - then perhaps add it. It might be that interracial LGB is bad LGB, which would fit here, for example. This could potentially blow-up and alienate and cause arguments... and have new users here become offended because of various reasons. "Love is love" is... well, I don't want to get into that...

Anyhoo - feel free to add your own good and bad, real and fake LGB things to this thread. Of course, if it includes T or T is related, then that's also fine to add here. I expect that I'll be focussing on G mainly. A lot of you surely know by now that I like compiling things into threads, so... That's because I think it's a good idea, and a good way, to collect things together and to have them close-by so as to make them easier to find and reference, etc. I'll start with a video clip from a TV dating programme.


This one is not 18+ exactly but it does contain strong and saucy language and is not suitable for younger viewers, so it is flagged as NSfW.

Genuine v Artificial LGB - Channel 4 First Dates
dPuoCaE.png

https://www.bitchute.com/video/A4sxPm1JU6vj


See also -
I can't see yet, but after I submit this post, there should be other similar/related threads on this page, as well.
 
There is literally no point in creating an identity on being gay, you're not special or anything like that.

Or even creating a post just for gays, makes no sense to me and just looks like a "hey, we're different and special!".
 
There is literally no point in creating an identity on being gay, you're not special or anything like that.

Or even creating a post just for gays, makes no sense to me and just looks like a "hey, we're different and special!".
I may not be special, but maybe you are. The thread is not about me. When I make threads, if they are about me, then I'll make that clear. It is along the lines of in my siggie -

(WiP threads) The Joy of Satan Ministries is against these things and is also against these things

and noticing and realising how fake the World is. Maybe that in my siggie is also pointless. Ignoring it, putting our head in the sand I disagree with. I don't know if any exist but say a gay Man made a gay venue and tried to promote non-trans things in it, instead of being a sheep and going along with having "a sex change" and encouraging it. I think there is very much a point in making the thread. I thank you for your input and encouragement.
 
There is literally no point in creating an identity on being gay, you're not special or anything like that.

Or even creating a post just for gays, makes no sense to me and just looks like a "hey, we're different and special!".
Eh, actually homosexuality is quite a special trait since not many genuinely are homosexuals.

What is with this gatekeeping anyway?
 
Reminds me of the old "third sex" drama. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I don't see a need for a thread for gay people.
What drama? OP is trying to have a discussion about a certain sexual topic and you come here trying to shut it down because you prefer not to talk about it. Stay away then!
 
What drama? OP is trying to have a discussion about a certain sexual topic and you come here trying to shut it down because you prefer not to talk about it. Stay away then!
I'll come back to this later, maybe I wasn't too rational minded when I wrote that.
 
What drama? OP is trying to have a discussion about a certain sexual topic and you come here trying to shut it down because you prefer not to talk about it. Stay away then!
I think Aquarius is rightfully cautious considering the amount of garbage Mageson had written on that blasphemous "third sex"website of his. He had such a big inferiority complex that he would tie everything to homosexuality. He will write bullshit about our Gods and preach about how homosexuality makes someone superior and how they were revered in the past just for existing. Two men having sex was pure holiness in his sick mind.( By the way let's not forget he was a jew. It is entirely possible that he didn't believed a word of what he wrote and all this was simply a pathetic attempt to defame the JoS)

However there was also a "high priest" (his name was Jake carlson or smth) who if I am not mistaken was a gentile, and also had sermons in this website in which he said similar things to Mageson and some things that sounded more like his sexual fantasies than anything else. I can't forget reading a sermon of his that he posted in the Jos announcements ( I think Aquarius might remember this too) where he talked about something called "Childe" which he described as a thought form child that occured when a man had sex with another man and he was trying to convince people that this was a real thing or it that it was treated like a real child in his imaginary ancient world. Thankfully the entire topic was removed in a matter of some hours if not less . Soon after both these two lunatics were demoted and kicked and the situation was explained by Hp HoodedCobra.

Now, imagine a 13 year old or even an older person that discovers Satanism and the forums for the first time and instead of seeing a serious place with sacred knowledge, sees a place with schizophrenic/narcissistic things like that...

I believe that's the reason why Aquarius and maybe other members ( I will include myself there) think a thread like that would probably end badly!
 
I think Aquarius is rightfully cautious considering the amount of garbage Mageson had written on that blasphemous "third sex"website of his. He had such a big inferiority complex that he would tie everything to homosexuality. He will write bullshit about our Gods and preach about how homosexuality makes someone superior and how they were revered in the past just for existing. Two men having sex was pure holiness in his sick mind.( By the way let's not forget he was a jew. It is entirely possible that he didn't believed a word of what he wrote and all this was simply a pathetic attempt to defame the JoS)

However there was also a "high priest" (his name was Jake carlson or smth) who if I am not mistaken was a gentile, and also had sermons in this website in which he said similar things to Mageson and some things that sounded more like his sexual fantasies than anything else. I can't forget reading a sermon of his that he posted in the Jos announcements ( I think Aquarius might remember this too) where he talked about something called "Childe" which he described as a thought form child that occured when a man had sex with another man and he was trying to convince people that this was a real thing or it that it was treated like a real child in his imaginary ancient world. Thankfully the entire topic was removed in a matter of some hours if not less . Soon after both these two lunatics were demoted and kicked and the situation was explained by Hp HoodedCobra.

Now, imagine a 13 year old or even an older person that discovers Satanism and the forums for the first time and instead of seeing a serious place with sacred knowledge, sees a place with schizophrenic/narcissistic things like that...

I believe that's the reason why Aquarius and maybe other members ( I will include myself there) think a thread like that would probably end badly!
I am aware of the past. However, I would like to point out that let bygones be bygones. Especially when it hinders our discussion. We can not let jews and subhumans have that effect on our group.
 
I don't think this is a normal thing. I think it's a symptom of degeneration. Even if it's not, it's not that important. None of the demons are said to be homosexual, nor is there any mention of it on the JOS, besides the fact that it's your own personal business.

Sexuality is made into a political movement in order to divide and control people.
 
I do agree with Aquarius in that it doesn't make an individual extraordinary or anything like that (rare or not), and that creating a thread that "separates" gay people can seem the same as to what the Jews already do in society.

However, at the same time, a thread like this can be useful to actually create distinctions that may be necessary. Same sex relationships have always been a thing, and denying that through cognitive dissonance doesn't change the reality that they exist now and have existed before. This isn't new or anything.
 
I have always said the same thing LGB but the T is mentally illness. Actual lesbians bisexuals and gays are in the minority and I guarantee many "homosexuals" are simply situational gays either pivoting towards the same sex for the wrong reasons such as blanket statements hate for the opposite gender which is delusional, or for Marxist political crap to fit inside the leftist in crowd.

The whole culture about all this is just bunk and for attention. In ancient times there were no labels of sexuality or romantic expressions or "the queer look" (holy shit i hate this they look like circus freaks or are just frumpy and gross) they were just themselves and wanted who they wanted, and did not worry about falling for someone in relation to how it affected some bullshit status some bullshit label gave them like alot of LGB (and mentally ill T's ) do today.
 
I have always said the same thing LGB but the T is mentally illness.

In ancient times there were no labels of sexuality or romantic expressions or "the queer look" (holy shit i hate this they look like circus freaks or are just frumpy and gross) they were just themselves and wanted who they wanted, and did not worry about falling for someone in relation to how it affected some bullshit status some bullshit label gave them like alot of LGB (and mentally ill T's ) do today.

I personally know an individual that identifies as the opposite gender (T), takes testosterone, wrecks their physical well-being and, at worst, would conduct self-genital mutilation whilst being undoubtedly mentally ill the whole time. She even indicates this by displaying attire that read Greys have no gender, constituting a depressing hairstyle, as well as hideous piercings that make them appear like nightmare caricatures. People cannot become men if they are born female, and vice versa. It's tragic that it has come to this point because of Abrahamism.

These folks have varied degrees of delusions, ranging from mild to severe, with those with coloured hair presumably being the craziest. It is very unfortunate how people turned from loving themselves, and presenting beauty as a standard for human society to completely rejecting Venus.
.
 
Acting contrary to personal nature is a matter that I have observed, in which people despite of any sexual orientations and beliefs, act in an incorrect manner that does not define their universal persona.

I believe that behaving in such a way is a degenerate manifestation developed through conflicting with societal problems, and inheriting negative traits because of this. Orientation is not about taking up an identity and defining yourself on it, neither are the wrong stances taken.

As to why this happens, to understand this we have to take in consideration the enemy at large and what they have been doing to humanity since inception, which has been only destruction, a physical manifestation of the artificial soul makeup. They have constantly mutilated people in every way possible, including introducing the TQ+ infection, which is about doing this and more.
 
Ancient Greece Was Gay: A Historical Fake News
(you can turn on auto-translated subtitles, they're decent enough):
It's disgusting how the mainstream media try so hard to potray ancient Greece as a utopia for pedophiles and perverts.
Although it was a quite nice video with pretty decent reasoning,there is a part where I have to disagree. I am talking about the statement that judeo-xianity wasn't what started the prejudice against homosexual people and that it was in fact looked down by the ancient greeks way before xianity and the enemy trash came.

We know ancient greeks have been following the teachings of the gods and that they were pretty consistently communicating with them. This is pretty obvious , considering Greece was home to many geniuses and spiritual masters (Socrates,Euclid, Aristotle to name a few) some of who even completed the Magnum Opus (like Apollonius).

It is very clearly stated ,multiple times in the JoS, that the use of sexual energies is extremely important for the advancement of the soul and that it can be extremely destructive for someone's mental, physical and spiritual health to repress and/or neglect their sexuality. Given how advanced the society of ancient Athens was I cannot believe there would be prejudice in reagards to someone's sexuality and as even the guy in the video pointed out there were many other factors that decided the value of a person to the society.
So, although his sources for that statement might seem legitimate, I feel that they definitely contain enemy corruption in them (who we know condemns sexuality in general along with everything else related to the spiritual advancement of the Gentiles).
 
I also want to make a point about any interracial LGB content. Even in non-pregnancy relationships, interactiality
That should be interraciality.
 
I don't think this is a normal thing. I think it's a symptom of degeneration. Even if it's not, it's not that important. None of the demons are said to be homosexual, nor is there any mention of it on the JOS, besides the fact that it's your own personal business.

Sexuality is made into a political movement in order to divide and control people.
Whats abnormal, is how you think like this despite having been here for a rather longer while.

There are homosexual/bisexual Demons, simply because there exist homosexual/bisexual SS. Get over it.
 
I don't think this is a normal thing. I think it's a symptom of degeneration. Even if it's not, it's not that important. None of the demons are said to be homosexual, nor is there any mention of it on the JOS, besides the fact that it's your own personal business.

Sexuality is made into a political movement in order to divide and control people.
No. The division becomes of promotion of unhealthy proportions (ie. taking things to extremes as our enemy consistently does) and practices such as hormonal treatments and mutilation of body parts which stem from ideology pushed by our enemy. Homosexuality is not inherently something degenerate, but innate property for certain individuals.

Maybe sexuality is not important for you. Then still, others might think otherwise, or at least appreciate being open about such subjects.
 
Whats abnormal, is how you think like this despite having been here for a rather longer while.

There are homosexual/bisexual Demons, simply because there exist homosexual/bisexual SS. Get over it.
Seems more like you have something to get over. There's no need to get defensive. Your gayness is your business, I don't care about it.
 
It's disgusting how the mainstream media try so hard to potray ancient Greece as a utopia for pedophiles and perverts.
Although it was a quite nice video with pretty decent reasoning,there is a part where I have to disagree. I am talking about the statement that judeo-xianity wasn't what started the prejudice against homosexual people and that it was in fact looked down by the ancient greeks way before xianity and the enemy trash came.

We know ancient greeks have been following the teachings of the gods and that they were pretty consistently communicating with them. This is pretty obvious , considering Greece was home to many geniuses and spiritual masters (Socrates,Euclid, Aristotle to name a few) some of who even completed the Magnum Opus (like Apollonius).

It is very clearly stated ,multiple times in the JoS, that the use of sexual energies is extremely important for the advancement of the soul and that it can be extremely destructive for someone's mental, physical and spiritual health to repress and/or neglect their sexuality. Given how advanced the society of ancient Athens was I cannot believe there would be prejudice in reagards to someone's sexuality and as even the guy in the video pointed out there were many other factors that decided the value of a person to the society.
So, although his sources for that statement might seem legitimate, I feel that they definitely contain enemy corruption in them (who we know condemns sexuality in general along with everything else related to the spiritual advancement of the Gentiles).
Alot of things in history are white washed to fit an agenda.
What is simply deep friendship & the unique brotherhood between men who grew up together and fight together in war, like Achilles and Patroklos, is made out to be some kind of gay bromance. They would surely say the same about the story of friendship related in Azazel's ethics, as if there cannot be platonic love in friendship and everything must be sexualized.
 
Seems more like you have something to get over. There's no need to get defensive. Your gayness is your business, I don't care about it.
Im not the one insulting an entire percentage of the earths population due to my own biases, so i dont think thats me.

I find it so funny that ppl like you think that just because they are not part of a minority, they can say all kinds of stuff just because they believe they are exercising free speech🤣 and when you call them out on their ignorant behavior, they tell you that YOU'RE the defensive one and that you should "stop pushing it down their throat".

Double standards. If you consider yourself as free as to insult me without others calling you out on it, then I am also free to reply in the most appropriate way i see fit.
 
Im not the one insulting an entire percentage of the earths population due to my own biases, so i dont think thats me.

I find it so funny that ppl like you think that just because they are not part of a minority, they can say all kinds of stuff just because they believe they are exercising free speech🤣 and when you call them out on their ignorant behavior, they tell you that YOU'RE the defensive one and that you should "stop pushing it down their throat".

Double standards. If you consider yourself as free as to insult me without others calling you out on it, then I am also free to reply in the most appropriate way i see fit.
I know why you're having this reaction, so I won't hold it against you. You mentioned confusion before about your sexuality and it sounded like there were other negative feelings in the mix as well. I think you're misreading things because you feel wounded, there was no intention to insult anybody, but to spark a discussion. If I wanted to insult you I would be very clear about it, but there is no reason for me to do that. The tone I gave is simply the tone I recieved.

I am in the minority by presenting the idea that LGBT 1. Is not that important to be focusing so much time and energy on and 2. is a symptom of sickness in society. A significant percentage of LGBT were abused as children, for example. If molestation tends to turn people LGBT, and SS are likely to have had previous lives, then it stands to reason that unresolved traumas from previous lives can influence one's behaviors in this life in a similar way.
 
Alot of things in history are white washed to fit an agenda.
What is simply deep friendship & the unique brotherhood between men who grew up together and fight together in war, like Achilles and Patroklos, is made out to be some kind of gay bromance. They would surely say the same about the story of friendship related in Azazel's ethics, as if there cannot be platonic love in friendship and everything must be sexualized.
With white washing I hope you don't mean the woke bullshit about the white race stealing everything from Africa and the vikings being black and stuff like that.
As for the second part of your post,yes you are right! This whole thing about labeling men as feminine or gay or whatever for being able properly express their feelings and build platonic relationships with each other is just another jewish attack to humanity which aims to damage the male population both psychologically and spiritually.It blocks the throat and heart (4th) chakra which are related to communication and expression of thoughts and feelings.
However you should keep in mind that just because some (((people))) twist historical facts to fit the lgbt-pedo-zoophilia narrative of today (which does indeed aim to destroy society just like islam and xianity do)that does not make homosexuality or bisexuality a modern day invention or a result of psychological trauma. It occurs naturally in humans and is present in animal kingdom as well. Results of psychological trauma can be what we call paraphilias like pedophilia,necrophilia,zoophilia etc.. The jews try as hard as they possible can to normalize all that just like they do with transgenderism which another example of mental illness. Anyway a society in which its members do follow the circle of life,make families and reproduce, suffers no damage from 1 per 100 or even 1 per 50 of it's members being homosexual while a society where making family is viewed as an "old fashioned habit" and has it's members butcher their genitals and getting vasectomy is bound collapse (which is exactly what the jews want).
 
With white washing I hope you don't mean the woke bullshit about the white race stealing everything from Africa and the vikings being black and stuff like that.
As for the second part of your post,yes you are right! This whole thing about labeling men as feminine or gay or whatever for being able properly express their feelings and build platonic relationships with each other is just another jewish attack to humanity which aims to damage the male population both psychologically and spiritually.It blocks the throat and heart (4th) chakra which are related to communication and expression of thoughts and feelings.
However you should keep in mind that just because some (((people))) twist historical facts to fit the lgbt-pedo-zoophilia narrative of today (which does indeed aim to destroy society just like islam and xianity do)that does not make homosexuality or bisexuality a modern day invention or a result of psychological trauma. It occurs naturally in humans and is present in animal kingdom as well. Results of psychological trauma can be what we call paraphilias like pedophilia,necrophilia,zoophilia etc.. The jews try as hard as they possible can to normalize all that just like they do with transgenderism which another example of mental illness. Anyway a society in which its members do follow the circle of life,make families and reproduce, suffers no damage from 1 per 100 or even 1 per 50 of it's members being homosexual while a society where making family is viewed as an "old fashioned habit" and has it's members butcher their genitals and getting vasectomy is bound collapse (which is exactly what the jews want).
Whitewashing is an old figure of speech that doesn't have any racial connotations, until it was co opted by the anti white we wuz kangz people. Revisionism might have been a better word.
 
I know why you're having this reaction, so I won't hold it against you. You mentioned confusion before about your sexuality and it sounded like there were other negative feelings in the mix as well. I think you're misreading things because you feel wounded, there was no intention to insult anybody, but to spark a discussion. If I wanted to insult you I would be very clear about it, but there is no reason for me to do that. The tone I gave is simply the tone I recieved.

I am in the minority by presenting the idea that LGBT 1. Is not that important to be focusing so much time and energy on and 2. is a symptom of sickness in society. A significant percentage of LGBT were abused as children, for example. If molestation tends to turn people LGBT, and SS are likely to have had previous lives, then it stands to reason that unresolved traumas from previous lives can influence one's behaviors in this life in a similar way.
Do not try to paint homosexuals as ill people. I have had enough of this bullshit already. Stop actong wise when you literally said that homosexuality is unnatural....
You know what? Nevermind. I know what I am, and for sure as hell delving deeper into this path made it clear to me what i actually like and what i dont.

Whatever. I dont care. Believe what you want to.

Im tired.
 
I have mentioned before a documentary from a couple of years ago called 'My Gay Dog and Other Animals'. I have seen only a bit which tested a gay dog with a dog and with a bitch, and the gay dog wasn't interested in the bitch but was interested in the other dog. It is graphic - you see... well, it might be classed as porn, let's put it that way. It's a documentary, though. It should be available online, and I want to get it and upload it but because it is quite graphic it might be taken down, or the post I make here might be moderated, so...

The point is that non-heterosexuality is Natural, and understanding homosexuals might help one to open up a stubborn mind with strong opinions, to further understanding. Any arguments of "AIDS/HIV" are null and void - Women can have it and Children can be born with it, namely in unsanitary and presumably christian areas which enforce births and bans contraception. I can understand "there is no mention of non-straight Gods or Goddesses" but that's Their private lives. We don't need to know how big their... or how often they... or where they... or what they...

...


...


or with whom they...

The Kundalini is sexual in Nature, and controlling sex and sexuality is controlling Kundalini stimulation and empowerment, etc. The argument of "past-life trauma makes one gay" sounds like a good argument, but that needs to be demonstrated, not just something to clutch at straws at. What about a homosexual who is in their first life? One who grew-up in a loving, healthy, happy home? One who is in their first life and who grew-up in a loving, healthy, happy - heterosexual - home? I saw a joke or meme, which I interpreted as sarcastic, online applauding heterosexuality, heterosexuals, for making gay Babies. "I hope I have a Boy!" "I hope I have a Girl!" "I hope my son/daughter follows in the family business!" "I hope my son/daughter is gay!" One can hope. "How can my son/daughter be gay?" Opposites attract, but like attracts like. Life and situations are not all black-and-white.

If it turns out later that Satan decides being non-straight is wrong, then that would cause problems. Why would He care, though? If He is not how the jew programmes of christianity and islam, and media, portray Him to be, then...? I have no proof, but undoubtedly throughout the christianised history of the World, homosexuality continued regardless. Neither "god" nor Satan or any other God or Goddess wiped it out. This is just in christianised countries, the same presumably in islamised counties. In other faith countries maybe the same, but there is a "gay church". In presumably atheist countries, there was no 'supernatural being' to perv over them and be angry with what they got up to. Why do people not demonstrate or picket or have civil war very much? Especially when things are getting worse and worse? Probably because (((things))) have got in their heads? Why has homosexuality not been stamped-out, despite ((("law" and "religious law", media, "education", etc.)))? Probably because Nature and Natural inclinations override brainwashing; hence christians who were "saved" and "healed of homosexuality" struggle with it, even when they claim they don't. I searched online for god cured my gayness and the first result, and others are -


I was actually expecting a testimonial of tHe PoWeR oF "gOd". Nope! Why doesn't it take away your gay feelings? Because you're supposed to "bear 'your' cross", that's why, you dope. You're not supposed to be happy nor free. You're supposed to be "burdened" with Natural inclinations! Remember - 666 is Natural - and evil, of course, so sayeth "god". No, I'm not saying 666=gay. The bibles say "woe to those who call "good" evil and "evil" good", hence christians are full of woe.

I allow everyone to follow the dictates of his own nature, but he that opposes me will regret it sorely.
~Satan, The Al Jilwah - the Black Book of Satan

I do also suspect strongly that on such an overpopulated Planet, we need less births, so Nature somehow makes it be that more homosexuals are borne. I would suspect that homosexuals are borne on jewified Planets, but free and Natural Planets might have lower numbers percentage-wise; like when our Plane is freed, there'd be less homosexuals in percentage; on other jewified Planets, depending on the date in the jew's 6000-year plan, there'd be more, or more hidden and secretive - but that's just wild speculation. This helps keep things from going overflow and helps to balance things, I suspect. The problem with that is Whites have been given more difficulty to have less births while non-Whites have more births and move-in to Whites' areas, and then there is the interracial bullshit which I mentioned above. Homosexuality certainly looks wrong, but it has been perverted - and one meaning of "perverted" means basically to be different; in jewification, we all have to be the same and not individual.
 
It's disgusting how the mainstream media try so hard to potray ancient Greece as a utopia for pedophiles and perverts.
Although it was a quite nice video with pretty decent reasoning,there is a part where I have to disagree. I am talking about the statement that judeo-xianity wasn't what started the prejudice against homosexual people and that it was in fact looked down by the ancient greeks way before xianity and the enemy trash came.

We know ancient greeks have been following the teachings of the gods and that they were pretty consistently communicating with them. This is pretty obvious , considering Greece was home to many geniuses and spiritual masters (Socrates,Euclid, Aristotle to name a few) some of who even completed the Magnum Opus (like Apollonius).

It is very clearly stated ,multiple times in the JoS, that the use of sexual energies is extremely important for the advancement of the soul and that it can be extremely destructive for someone's mental, physical and spiritual health to repress and/or neglect their sexuality. Given how advanced the society of ancient Athens was I cannot believe there would be prejudice in reagards to someone's sexuality and as even the guy in the video pointed out there were many other factors that decided the value of a person to the society.
So, although his sources for that statement might seem legitimate, I feel that they definitely contain enemy corruption in them (who we know condemns sexuality in general along with everything else related to the spiritual advancement of the Gentiles).
I don't know if you're right about ancient Greeks' views on homosexuality. In the end, let's not forget that despite how "close" ancient Greeks were to the Gods/Goddesses, women hardly held any rights, destined only to bear children and raise them.
I'm not talking about going to politics or the army-- but if your life's purpose was defined only by giving birth and raising children, then that would be a pretty limited existence.

How many ancient Greek women became known for their philosophies or other such achievements? I know their role was bigger on religion, but was it just it?
 
I don't think this is a normal thing. I think it's a symptom of degeneration. Even if it's not, it's not that important. None of the demons are said to be homosexual, nor is there any mention of it on the JOS, besides the fact that it's your own personal business.

Sexuality is made into a political movement in order to divide and control people.
I am very surprised to read a comment like that by you, since you've been a long-time member.

Traumas can certainly affect a person's sexuality, but not all gays/lesbians/bi had a trauma. Of course, we can't know about their previous lives, but this is a very far-fetched assumption.

I'm not going to call any homosexual people "unnatural" just because they can't birth children. Homosexuality has also been found in nature with animals. What do you think of that?
 
I am very surprised to read a comment like that by you, since you've been a long-time member.

Traumas can certainly affect a person's sexuality, but not all gays/lesbians/bi had a trauma. Of course, we can't know about their previous lives, but this is a very far-fetched assumption.

I'm not going to call any homosexual people "unnatural" just because they can't birth children. Homosexuality has also been found in nature with animals. What do you think of that?
I never said it was natural or unnatural, these are words being put in my mouth.
 
I don't know if you're right about ancient Greeks' views on homosexuality. In the end, let's not forget that despite how "close" ancient Greeks were to the Gods/Goddesses, women hardly held any rights, destined only to bear children and raise them.
I'm not talking about going to politics or the army-- but if your life's purpose was defined only by giving birth and raising children, then that would be a pretty limited existence.

How many ancient Greek women became known for their philosophies or other such achievements? I know their role was bigger on religion, but was it just it?
This is an interesting topic. I think alot has been lost to history after the abrahamic takeover.

In rome there were spiritual societies that were exclusive to women. Very little is known about them, supposedly they were very discrete and secretive. I get the sense that they were devotees of Lilith, because she is rather private and only interacts with those she chooses. Who knows how deep the abrahamic narrative goes, about treatment of women.
 
I never said it was natural or unnatural, these are words being put in my mouth.
You used words such as degeneration and trauma and implied that homosexuality is the result of trauma so it is no wonder that it can be seen that your view of it was taking a stance for it to be unnatural.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top