Democracy Origins

[aldric.strickland88]

Aristotle decided to give titles to differnt forms of governments. In particular he found there are three differnt forms of a ruling system, One Ruler, Council Rule and Rule of the People. He created two sets of each of these, one set called proper forms and another set called perverse forms. They are as follows.  Proper Forms:
Monarchy: Mon (One) Archy (Rule)Aristocracy: Aris (Best) Archy (Rule)Polity: Origins of the word Politics
Perverse Forms:
Tyranny: Tyrant RulesOligarchy: (Oli) Rule of the fewDemocracy: The fall of Polity
Monarchs often turned into Tyrants. An Aristocracy would consist of 10-20 Council Rulers, who were less likely to run amuck. However, they are harder to stop then taking down one Tyrant. His Favorite was Polity. However, he was doubtful that this system would ever work. That it would fall into greed, where everyone was out for themselves instead of being a fair and just governing system. So he created a perverse form for it which he called Democracy.
Others later created Democracies off of his findings. Little does everyone know that they are creating the perverse form of Polity. Politics, where all come together and compromise on their ideas. Where fairness is administered for all. The Power is in the people, so no one can ever rule over them. Where all are free and given unalienable rights to live their lives for life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

 

[fake name]

Don't forget Oligopoly, which I assume is derived from Oligarchy
For Customer Service dial 1 800 EAT A DICK

THANKS JEWS


On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 4:51 PM, "aldric.strickland88@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Aristotle decided to give titles to differnt forms of governments. In particular he found there are three differnt forms of a ruling system, One Ruler, Council Rule and Rule of the People. He created two sets of each of these, one set called proper forms and another set called perverse forms. They are as follows.  Proper Forms:
Monarchy: Mon (One) Archy (Rule)Aristocracy: Aris (Best) Archy (Rule)Polity: Origins of the word Politics
Perverse Forms:
Tyranny: Tyrant RulesOligarchy: (Oli) Rule of the fewDemocracy: The fall of Polity
Monarchs often turned into Tyrants. An Aristocracy would consist of 10-20 Council Rulers, who were less likely to run amuck. However, they are harder to stop then taking down one Tyrant. His Favorite was Polity. However, he was doubtful that this system would ever work. That it would fall into greed, where everyone was out for themselves instead of being a fair and just governing system. So he created a perverse form for it which he called Democracy.
Others later created Democracies off of his findings. Little does everyone know that they are creating the perverse form of Polity. Politics, where all come together and compromise on their ideas. Where fairness is administered for all. The Power is in the people, so no one can ever rule over them. Where all are free and given unalienable rights to live their lives for life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

 

[Yog Sothoth]

If i remember correctly the Romans said that democracy works only in city states, whereas anything larger needs a monarchy or what we would call Fuhrertum. I posted a translation of a SS book awhile back that explains this more in depth: Democracy vs. Leadership : JoS Astrology



On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 4:51 PM, "aldric.strickland88@... [JoyofSatan666]" <[email protected] wrote:


  Aristotle decided to give titles to differnt forms of governments. In particular he found there are three differnt forms of a ruling system, One Ruler, Council Rule and Rule of the People. He created two sets of each of these, one set called proper forms and another set called perverse forms. They are as follows.  Proper Forms:
Monarchy: Mon (One) Archy (Rule)Aristocracy: Aris (Best) Archy (Rule)Polity: Origins of the word Politics
Perverse Forms:
Tyranny: Tyrant RulesOligarchy: (Oli) Rule of the fewDemocracy: The fall of Polity
Monarchs often turned into Tyrants. An Aristocracy would consist of 10-20 Council Rulers, who were less likely to run amuck. However, they are harder to stop then taking down one Tyrant. His Favorite was Polity. However, he was doubtful that this system would ever work. That it would fall into greed, where everyone was out for themselves instead of being a fair and just governing system. So he created a perverse form for it which he called Democracy.
Others later created Democracies off of his findings. Little does everyone know that they are creating the perverse form of Polity. Politics, where all come together and compromise on their ideas. Where fairness is administered for all. The Power is in the people, so no one can ever rule over them. Where all are free and given unalienable rights to live their lives for life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

 

[aldric.strickland88]

Most terms I am finding came from philosophers like Plato and Aristotle. Aristotle is the creator of Democracy.
Democracy:
A perverse Government, the fall of polity. The word means Mob Rule. It is simply Anarchy. When Individuals try to rule and it falls into complete and utter Chaos.
Time for those who preach Democracy to do a little Home work. 

 

[aldric.strickland88]

 Communism is defined as a social, political and economical ideology and movement whose ultimate Goal is the establishment of the communist society, which is a socioeconomic order structured upon the common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes, money and the state.
 In other words the destruction of Confederal and Federal form and the return of the Unitary form. However, before this form can be achieved, Democracy must take over. As Democracy holds the ideas of utilitarianism and has the predilection of Egalitarianism. Once the Mob Rule is achieved for the common wealth of the society. It inevitably falls into chaos, as Democracy is by definition chaos. A Unitarianism must then take control of this Chaos. 
 Unitarianism is also known as a Monarchy. Which then if ran by a corrupt leader falls into its perverse form of a Tyrannical Dictatorship as The Progenitor Aristotle has explained. Welcome, Joseph Stalin.