Applying theatre terminology in politics

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Just pitching in a sort of concept/theory to make people be more aware than they already are.

Besides the old saying "All the world's a stage," I'm pretty sure most people outside this place would be familiar with terms they see in movie theaters/concerts, and partially why most people believe the Jewish-controlled media. My guess as to why people take the Jew Eltie's word for everything granted (particularly those in the western countries) is that these people only care about what's being seen in the Fore-stage, not having a thought on what's happening in the back-stage (behind the Proscenium). The patsies often make (mistaken) morality plays regarding to how Satan is the destroyer God when he's actually the benevolent one.

What I'm trying to do is use theatre/concert terms as metaphors to apply to world events. Here's a demonstration As people here most likely know, the intentions the Jews have back-stage are very different from whatever they present to the Fore-stage, but the NPC imbeciles do not. They think they'll be the Center of Interest when they're really just disposable people unaware they're adhering to a twisted script written by Jews.

I'll leave this link here as a point of reference: https://aact.org/theatre-terms-view/p?term=&body_value=&page=3

 

[Henu the Great]

What terminology would you use to describe the structures below?

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

What terminology would you use to describe the structures below?

Based on your list, I'll break it down to several parts:

• I'll start with the Public (the policy subjects) -They're the audience (primarily the NPC imbeciles) watching the performance, willing to suspend their disbelief in regards to the twisted events that happen in the business world. Most of the audience will just take anything the stage hand says for granted. These people will only see what's in front of the stage, never asking what is happening behind the stage curtain.

• Next up are the National Governments, the Scientific Authorities, and the Propagandists and the hybrid warfare specialists. (The former two are the Policy Enforcers, the latter the Policy Propagandists). - Given their position of authority, it's easy for a large number of people to assume that these parties are the ones running the operation, but in reality, the corrupt governments, scientists, news anchors, and Fact Checkers are the performers/actors in that they're the ones who "bring the director's films to life" by enforcing the policies of the policy makers. Everything the public sees on television is merely on the fore-stage, where all the spotlight is focused on them.

• Next up are the WHO (World Health Organization), The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), The IMF (International Monetary Fund), World Bank, The UN (United Nations), Philanthropists, and the NGOs (Non-Government Organizations) (all of whom fall under Policy Distributors) - This will seem tricky to describe, so bear with me here: These organizations are obviously an intermediary between the Policy makers and the Policy Enforcers/Propagandists. If anything, I'd consider more to be like Stage Managers; these people coordinate and oversee everything the Government, Scientists, Media reporters, and Fact Checkers try to enforce, Adapting to whatever threads more astute people from the public public can pick up on. I suspect that, should things fail to go according to their script, these organizations will report the details directly to the Production Directors (Policy Makers), similarly to how a Stage Manager Report the details of the failure of the Production Director. They juggle between being the front and back of the stage, making some people think they're the ones running the show. Working backstage, a small number of people will pick up on the schemes of these peoople and suspect them to be masterminds, and while this is true, these organizations are merely doing what their porduction managers to the below party.

• Finally, we have the CFR (Council of Foreign Relations), the WEF (World Economic Forum), the Club of Rome, the Chatham House, The Rockefellers, The Bank of the International Settlements (BIS), and the the Central Banks (controlled by the BIS) (All of these consists of the Policy Makers) - These people are the Production Directors always working backstage, never personally appearing on the scene. They're the ones crafting the ideas that result in the global shithole everyone's in right now. Fewer people would suspect these parties as the real culprits running everything. The BIS in particular can make the decision to have the Central Banks freeze bank accounts that go against the Jewish agenda (particularly the financial slavery kind), so that their critics can be poor and financially broken. Not all of them will be seen.

Note: Initially, I thought the opposite for the last two, that the Production manager had to report to the Stage Manager, untiil I did some research on the subject matter. Turns out that the Stage Director had to report to the Production Director.

If Rabbis were listed on the structure picture you posted, I would've easily put them under production managers since they're the ones who drove the Policy makers into implementing the policies that are in effect today.

I find that using theatre/stage metaphors can be useful in uncovering the Jewish empire.

Were people more gullible before the theatre industry was created, or did it occur afterwards?

 

[Henu the Great]

What terminology would you use to describe the structures below?

Based on your list, I'll break it down to several parts:

• I'll start with the Public (the policy subjects) -They're the audience (primarily the NPC imbeciles) watching the performance, willing to suspend their disbelief in regards to the twisted events that happen in the business world. Most of the audience will just take anything the stage hand says for granted. These people will only see what's in front of the stage, never asking what is happening behind the stage curtain.

• Next up are the National Governments, the Scientific Authorities, and the Propagandists and the hybrid warfare specialists. (The former two are the Policy Enforcers, the latter the Policy Propagandists). - Given their position of authority, it's easy for a large number of people to assume that these parties are the ones running the operation, but in reality, the corrupt governments, scientists, news anchors, and Fact Checkers are the performers/actors in that they're the ones who "bring the director's films to life" by enforcing the policies of the policy makers. Everything the public sees on television is merely on the fore-stage, where all the spotlight is focused on them.

• Next up are the WHO (World Health Organization), The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), The IMF (International Monetary Fund), World Bank, The UN (United Nations), Philanthropists, and the NGOs (Non-Government Organizations) (all of whom fall under Policy Distributors) - This will seem tricky to describe, so bear with me here: These organizations are obviously an intermediary between the Policy makers and the Policy Enforcers/Propagandists. If anything, I'd consider more to be like Stage Managers; these people coordinate and oversee everything the Government, Scientists, Media reporters, and Fact Checkers try to enforce, Adapting to whatever threads more astute people from the public public can pick up on. I suspect that, should things fail to go according to their script, these organizations will report the details directly to the Production Directors (Policy Makers), similarly to how a Stage Manager Report the details of the failure of the Production Director. They juggle between being the front and back of the stage, making some people think they're the ones running the show. Working backstage, a small number of people will pick up on the schemes of these peoople and suspect them to be masterminds, and while this is true, these organizations are merely doing what their porduction managers to the below party.

• Finally, we have the CFR (Council of Foreign Relations), the WEF (World Economic Forum), the Club of Rome, the Chatham House, The Rockefellers, The Bank of the International Settlements (BIS), and the the Central Banks (controlled by the BIS) (All of these consists of the Policy Makers) - These people are the Production Directors always working backstage, never personally appearing on the scene. They're the ones crafting the ideas that result in the global shithole everyone's in right now. Fewer people would suspect these parties as the real culprits running everything. The BIS in particular can make the decision to have the Central Banks freeze bank accounts that go against the Jewish agenda (particularly the financial slavery kind), so that their critics can be poor and financially broken. Not all of them will be seen.

Note: Initially, I thought the opposite for the last two, that the Production manager had to report to the Stage Manager, untiil I did some research on the subject matter. Turns out that the Stage Director had to report to the Production Director.

If Rabbis were listed on the structure picture you posted, I would've easily put them under production managers since they're the ones who drove the Policy makers into implementing the policies that are in effect today.

I find that using theatre/stage metaphors can be useful in uncovering the Jewish empire.

Were people more gullible before the theatre industry was created, or did it occur afterwards?

Interesting take that can probably be used in online warfare efforts to an extent.

The gullibility of people has been a gradual process over time as spiritual degradation has occurred.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

What terminology would you use to describe the structures below?

Based on your list, I'll break it down to several parts:

• I'll start with the Public (the policy subjects) -They're the audience (primarily the NPC imbeciles) watching the performance, willing to suspend their disbelief in regards to the twisted events that happen in the business world. Most of the audience will just take anything the stage hand says for granted. These people will only see what's in front of the stage, never asking what is happening behind the stage curtain.

• Next up are the National Governments, the Scientific Authorities, and the Propagandists and the hybrid warfare specialists. (The former two are the Policy Enforcers, the latter the Policy Propagandists). - Given their position of authority, it's easy for a large number of people to assume that these parties are the ones running the operation, but in reality, the corrupt governments, scientists, news anchors, and Fact Checkers are the performers/actors in that they're the ones who "bring the director's films to life" by enforcing the policies of the policy makers. Everything the public sees on television is merely on the fore-stage, where all the spotlight is focused on them.

• Next up are the WHO (World Health Organization), The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), The IMF (International Monetary Fund), World Bank, The UN (United Nations), Philanthropists, and the NGOs (Non-Government Organizations) (all of whom fall under Policy Distributors) - This will seem tricky to describe, so bear with me here: These organizations are obviously an intermediary between the Policy makers and the Policy Enforcers/Propagandists. If anything, I'd consider more to be like Stage Managers; these people coordinate and oversee everything the Government, Scientists, Media reporters, and Fact Checkers try to enforce, Adapting to whatever threads more astute people from the public public can pick up on. I suspect that, should things fail to go according to their script, these organizations will report the details directly to the Production Directors (Policy Makers), similarly to how a Stage Manager Report the details of the failure of the Production Director. They juggle between being the front and back of the stage, making some people think they're the ones running the show. Working backstage, a small number of people will pick up on the schemes of these peoople and suspect them to be masterminds, and while this is true, these organizations are merely doing what their porduction managers to the below party.

• Finally, we have the CFR (Council of Foreign Relations), the WEF (World Economic Forum), the Club of Rome, the Chatham House, The Rockefellers, The Bank of the International Settlements (BIS), and the the Central Banks (controlled by the BIS) (All of these consists of the Policy Makers) - These people are the Production Directors always working backstage, never personally appearing on the scene. They're the ones crafting the ideas that result in the global shithole everyone's in right now. Fewer people would suspect these parties as the real culprits running everything. The BIS in particular can make the decision to have the Central Banks freeze bank accounts that go against the Jewish agenda (particularly the financial slavery kind), so that their critics can be poor and financially broken. Not all of them will be seen.

Note: Initially, I thought the opposite for the last two, that the Production manager had to report to the Stage Manager, untiil I did some research on the subject matter. Turns out that the Stage Director had to report to the Production Director.

If Rabbis were listed on the structure picture you posted, I would've easily put them under production managers since they're the ones who drove the Policy makers into implementing the policies that are in effect today.

I find that using theatre/stage metaphors can be useful in uncovering the Jewish empire.

Were people more gullible before the theatre industry was created, or did it occur afterwards?

Interesting take that can probably be used in online warfare efforts to an extent.

The gullibility of people has been a gradual process over time as spiritual degradation has occurred.

Is my concept really useful or is it just good on paper?

 

[Henu the Great]

Is my concept really useful or is it just good on paper?

It is a usable analogy, in my opinion.