FancyMancy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2017
- Messages
- 7,288
Regarding the adverts that keep "getting through", it is obvious that that is done on purpose. Problem, reaction, solution - YouTube/Google knows about it and ignores it, but uses it to make controls tighter with less and less breathing room. If those adverts didn't "get through" i.e. were not blocked from appearing by the screening that YouTube pretends and lies about doing, then it would make it harder for them to come up with reasons to tighten the controls and squeeze more life out of things.
The one saying about a mandate might be ignorant. I suspect that jewtube is used by the "authourities" and the "govern"ments. People claim TikTok is dangerous! PMSFL! China isn't the only "govern"ment in the World, people! Wake up!
I wonder if that RamTheStick is a bot account posting comments...
Here is the video he mentioned, in case anyone might search this forum for "1984" and maybe want this video -
1984
I am not commenting on this "1984 Tried to Warn You" video. I haven't watched it yet.
Being forced, i.e. not "allowed" to keep choice in a supposedly, allegedly "democratic" society, sounds like a violation of GDPR. It might not be, technically, because one has the choice to use the website and give personal ID to be stored on GDPR-unregulated and unsecured/insecure servers, or not use the website at all. If any other sites manage to be made, to fight back, then the ((("authourities" and "govern"ments))) could demand and undemocratically force them to comply, or shut it down! undemocratically, which... is not a choice... So people have no options, no choices, no freedoms - no democracy. You don't have the option to own anything - including not having the option to own your own choices; you will own nothing... and be happy?! blinks blankly
If that one country refuses to demand age verifications, then I bet they will still collect data which will somehow, magically, "break" the Internet as the ((("authourities" and "govern"ments))) want anyway. Both good coppers and bad coppers work together, don't forget. Regarding Apple and WhatsApp, cynical me thinks similarly - they will collect much information and change policies (which the intention is there now but they are playing the long game) or Apple/WhatsApp will be cracked and broken-into, or things will happen "accidentally" (read: deliberately, but they will tell the media it was unintentional) that will give ((("authourities" and "govern"ments))) all of the information. I'd be surprised if this scenario I presented here doesn't happen.
When he said "when you've got Meta, of all companies, fighting for data protection against your own government", did he say "you know you're cooked" or did he say "you know you're cucked"? Hmmm...
Speaking about Nigel Farage - when the UK "govern"ment's decision to ignore Brexit and do a "one-in, one-out" piece-of-shit practice, regarding immigration, was announced on the news a few weeks ago, I decided that it is all happening on purpose. Some of you here know I have said things are on purpose, orchestrated, scripted numerous times already, but with this specific thing, I decided it is orchestrated, scripted, done on purpose, to make sure Farage/Reform wins. I asked a question a few years ago regarding Alex Salmond, and I realised the answer but then I think it was HPHC who confirmed it - as long as a jew is in charge, then a jew is in charge. It doesn't matter what the jew is in charge of, as long as it is in charge of something - one example being the Church of Satan/LaVeyan Satanism; a Human Soul in a jew body doing Satan/Zeus's work; the jew thought it was in control of all of that, but it was a Human Soul behind enemy lines. As long as ((("authourities" and "govern"ment))) heads and leads Reform, then it can and will happen, so that - as I keep saying - the jew can redirect things back to its own "way", against Humans.
Opposing a (not the, but an) online "safety" piece of nonsense so-called "law" does not promote Jimmy Saville nor does it keep Children safe online. What keeps Children safe online is Parents keeping Children safe online.
Things have been indoctrinated and instilled into people so much, slowly, over time, that now nanny state-police state has to "be" "parent" - it's not "allowed" to smack your own Children. Some Children might need to be smacked, in context. Look at Animals - they don't sit their babies down and give them a piece of unhealthy cake and sit them in front of the ((("authourities."govern"ment-tool of TV and media))) and be a soft wimp; they growl or hiss and maybe nip them into correct behaviour. That's not cruel. If a Child might be hitting others, then they might need it back themselves. It was state-mandated, or at least ignored, that teachers used to throw blackboard - yes, blackboard; StFU "political correctness" retards - rubbers at Children and hit them with canes, rulers, etc. Abuse shouldn't happen, of course, but smacking might be needed in context. We have a generation of wimps now, soft idiots and incels and losers, thanks to how that has been indoctrinated and instilled into people throughout the decades and generations. Other examples include (I had to check to see which are continuous debates that keep happening) -
- sex/relationship education - parents should be teaching this, not strangers even if those strangers are teachers;
- healthy eating - families should be doing this and schools can also go along with it, but Parents are Parents; teachers aren't (of others' Children);
- obesity/crap food;
- taking Children out of school during term can lead to Parents being fined or taken to court, with zero enforcement upon travel agencies to reduce prices during half-term breaks; if Children cannot catch-up from 7 or 14 days off school, then that was made that way on purpose - and where does the fine money go? What is it being spent on?;
- mental health and well-being lessons - schools maybe could help with this but Parents should be the prime helpers for their Children;
- screen-time/social media limits - Parents need to be Parents, not the state/strangers;
- even the now-scrapped Scottish "Named Person" "scheme", giving every single Child a "govern"ment-decided "guardian" from birth to aged 18;
- etc., etc., etc.
People have also been banned from e.g. Facebook incorrectly, as well.
Reddit is not previewed properly, so I have disabled the link. Just copy and paste it if you want to read more.
You know I have said numerous times that we should decentralise? Stop putting all eggs in one basket which we don't own and have no control over? Hm. Yep.
It is AI that they are using to "govern" things. They keep being told - and they know fully - that it doesn't work and that it is shit, but they're continuing with it regardless, on purpose, deliberately. Once it "breaks" the Internet - not literally, but just flooding the Internet and all-used popular and big sites, which other replacement sites would not gain enough traction to fight against them (like bitchute against youtube, etc.) - then people will be stuck with shit things on a not-working Internet, and as I said counter-websites/services would not be big enough to be able to free the Internet again; there may be too many new sites which intend to fight back and people would not bo bothered - they'd be exhausted from trying too many different things.
I said that paragraph above before seeing in the second video where he mentioned the huge fines. Clearly, "democracy" is merely lip service and exists in name only, not in practice nor actuality.
Also as it was mentioned - another Internet, an Internet 2 - the Pirate Bay was going to make another Internet if something happened between Europe or the UK and the USA. Speaking about the many "different" "govern"ments Worldwide all doing this anti-Internet "law" nonsense together, I think it was ACTA, which was secret and overreaching, that TPB was claiming to create a second Internet against.
Since we have rights, the jew hates that. If we had lefts, then the jew wouldn't be fighting against us. I notice also that some parties claim to be Right Wing but seem to be very Left Wing in everything - "eQuAlItY", governments in economics, communist "everyone", nanny/police state... Such authouritarianism. So much for democracy and elected rules and laws. I don't understand politics well, so what I just said might be inaccurate, but I was told Right Wing is for freedom. To me, that means Left Wing is slavery, and... loops back to the beginning of this thread
Who thinks, or perhaps knows, that all of these things are to try and get people to think it is just like the Nazis doing extreme control measures to harm everyone? Who thinks, or knows, that it is to steal your anger and frustration, etc., energies to use in the egregore against you? Who thinks, or knows, that it is like the "Custodian" in an episode of Star Trek where a AI robot and programme decides and designates things and you have to obey?!
With how "israel" is going on relentlessly at murdering thousands upon thousands of Palestinians, including Children, I wonder how many times similar things happened in history. How many times the jew has rampaged and steamrolled over a People into death and destruction while elsewhere People were being distopianised and authouri-terrorised at the exact same time... All of that death energy and anger and sadness used to enforce shit elsewhere...
I'd might as well also mention Bitchute doesn't let me use it if my IP Address is in the UK. Even when using a VPN supposedly set elsewhere, it still doesn't work sometimes.
