re: LA anti-ICE riots

[Rodulf]

I'm so fucking annoyed at humans repeating the same cycles and mistakes. It feels determined at this point that humans will fuck up.

Why didn't the Gods engineer humans to each have 200 IQ or higher, as well as a higher moral/empathetic nature, since genes determine most of these things anyway? Why make 99% of humans retarded or susceptible to degeneration in the first place?

I feel like most of our problems wouldn't exist if humans were just designed better from the start. The human mind has so many holes and weaknesses to it it's a fucking miracle we aren't extinct yet from some monkey with nuclear launch codes going apeshit.

That's what evolution was doing, until we broke away from Nature and began to degenerate. The present human population is the result of a thousand years of urbanization and dysgenic wars, not to mention about two hundred years of industrialization.

 

[Mint]

I was grouping both you and Fancy together when writing that out. It still makes sense what I wrote when taken in this context.


No, this isn't a two things can be true at the same time thing. You are back tracking your words now. Although my point of it not being relevant still stands when your proof is a no context 10 second video.


Yes, people get manipulated by 10 seconds of high intense situations without ever asking for more context. I get it that is normal for people to fall into that trap but that doesn't help you here whatsoever and only makes your argument weak if that's your thing to point to.


In case you are naive to how Antifa and commies work, they love optic warfare. So they cause bad scenarios to get themselves in by their own actions so they can record and send it to the naive and the ones already too far gone so they can fuel more anger even though the situation was completelty avoidable.

Have you checked if that lady was already asked to not walk by there (you know since there's a whole federal situation happening..) and was there public announcements beforehand for her not to walk there?

You have to ask yourself these questions, brother/sister. Don't fall into these fake optic traps by people who have been working hard to manipulate the public thru lies and half-truths.

I'm not sure how I'm back tracking on anything. I feel like I said what I had to say well enough in the beginning.
I don't want to keep reiterating the same thing over and over when I only wanted to put it out there one time. I don't see how you can deny that there is a police force problem in America, unless you're European and only know of cops as people you can actually talk to.
Here, you have to be very careful and understand you're dealing with a possibly unstable person with no accountability that can easily ruin your life. Any interaction with them is a situation where you just say yes sir and keep your mouth shut no matter how unjust you're being treated.


Our supreme courts ruled that their only duty is to charge you with crimes and they have no obligation to ever provide help.
And this thread isn't supposed to be about this topic specifically so I don't have anything else to say about that.

 

[hailourtruegod]

I'm not sure how I'm back tracking on anything. I feel like I said what I had to say well enough in the beginning.
I don't want to keep reiterating the same thing over and over when I only wanted to put it out there one time. I don't see how you can deny that there is a police force problem in America, unless you're European and only know of cops as people you can actually talk to.
Here, you have to be very careful and understand you're dealing with a possibly unstable person with no accountability that can easily ruin your life. Any interaction with them is a situation where you just say yes sir and keep your mouth shut no matter how unjust you're being treated.


Our supreme courts ruled that their only duty is to charge you with crimes and they have no obligation to ever provide help.
And this thread isn't supposed to be about this topic specifically so I don't have anything else to say about that.

I never denied it.

You seem to be misunderstanding me about the point of the riots themselves. Maybe I am not speaking in the most linear way and I'll apologize if I'm not seeing it at the moment but all of this was in regard to the riots themselves and how ridiculous the reason for them.

I'm sorry if you live in a part of America that has bad cops. I have seen both and in between and that;s where I feel I'm coming from at least.

My point being is this narrative being pushed that it's okay to riot and that's what my impression is, that you and a couple others were defending the rioters along with false claims of a person.

It's the meme of, "stop making me defend so and so", in this case trump and regular people who put on the uniform.

I hope all is more clear now.

 

[FancyMancy]

@hailourtruegod I am guessing that you probably don't care anymore, but here's another one -

Trump going to Scotland and Starmer travelling up to meet Trump on British soil, rather than Trump travelling across the pond to meet Starmer. Trump is like, "No, I'm going to my golf courses in your land. If you want to speak to me, I'm not going to meet you; you're going to meet me. You come up here, in your country, to meet me and speak with me, bitch!".

It was mentioned on the news on the 28th of July 2025 -

https://imgur.com/DVkiNXm

but naah, just ignore me. Yeah, it's fake nuuuurwse. They are just acting for the cameras. It's all about power and power plays! According to what the news said, it's very unusual that a sitting president of the USA would do such a thing as that, working for their own business interests, like that.

If you've seen enough of my posts, you probably realise I could go on with more examples! I think I won't, though!

 

[hailourtruegod]

Being a Saturnian man who is just the sympton of today's soft society doesn't equate to being a bad leader.

I thought this was going to be a discussion on policy and actions that affect the average person, not celebrity style gossip between a superficial politician and a superficial celebrity.

Which is fine to talk about how elevated men should act but we aren't in the old times anymore or does that work in 2025, unfortunately. The average person, (mostly young men) is tying in more with Trump's behavior which has made him more popular astime passes(it is a fact that even rival media has admitted).

Just like with Tate, the people with the most influence in today's world are going to be people who act as blunt asshole while being the most honest or perceived as saying being honest by people who can do basic logical thinking. It's an extreme reaction to the extreme fake kindness we have been seeing from leaders or people in power/influence.

The other side of the aisle is victimhood minded people telling you to be superficially nice like some Black Mirror episode.

I don't see any reason to discuss him being an asshole when I agree but our opinions after that fact differ and that's normal and fine and a good place to leave it at. Wouldn't you think?

@hailourtruegod I am guessing that you probably don't care anymore, but here's another one -

Trump going to Scotland and Starmer travelling up to meet Trump on British soil, rather than Trump travelling across the pond to meet Starmer. Trump is like, "No, I'm going to my golf courses in your land. If you want to speak to me, I'm not going to meet you; you're going to meet me. You come up here, in your country, to meet me and speak with me, bitch!".

It was mentioned on the news on the 28th of July 2025 -

https://imgur.com/DVkiNXm

but naah, just ignore me. Yeah, it's fake nuuuurwse. They are just acting for the cameras. It's all about power and power plays! According to what the news said, it's very unusual that a sitting president of the USA would do such a thing as that, working for their own business interests, like that.

If you've seen enough of my posts, you probably realise I could go on with more examples! I think I won't, though!

 

[FancyMancy]

Being a Saturnian man who is just the sympton of today's soft society doesn't equate to being a bad leader.

I thought this was going to be a discussion on policy and actions that affect the average person, not celebrity style gossip between a superficial politician and a superficial celebrity.

Which is fine to talk about how elevated men should act but we aren't in the old times anymore or does that work in 2025, unfortunately. The average person, (mostly young men) is tying in more with Trump's behavior which has made him more popular astime passes(it is a fact that even rival media has admitted).

Just like with Tate, the people with the most influence in today's world are going to be people who act as blunt asshole while being the most honest or perceived as saying being honest by people who can do basic logical thinking. It's an extreme reaction to the extreme fake kindness we have been seeing from leaders or people in power/influence.

The other side of the aisle is victimhood minded people telling you to be superficially nice like some Black Mirror episode.

I don't see any reason to discuss him being an asshole when I agree but our opinions after that fact differ and that's normal and fine and a good place to leave it at. Wouldn't you think?

Perhaps. I except different people to visit the forum from different walks of life and with different inputs. We're not robots, so some might gossip a bit and other stick to pure facts or pure alleged facts. As long as it is not disruptive, which I don't consider it to be, then I think it is OK to post things similarly and related to the OP.