"Yehuborim are not Hebrew or Israelites" argument

[Nimrod33]

I have seen many people claiming that Yehuborim are not Hebrews or Israelites, saying that their progenitor is not Abraham and that Jesus was not a Yehubor. A similar argument i've also seen is that "Yehuborim are the tribe of Judah, they don't represent the whole Israel". How would you counterattack those claims?

 

[Wayofthegods]

I have seen many people claiming that Yehuborim are not Hebrews or Israelites, saying that their progenitor is not Abraham and that Jesus was not a Yehubor. A similar argument i've also seen is that "Yehuborim are the tribe of Judah, they don't represent the whole Israel". How would you counterattack those claims?

Someone Called someone a Nimrod once. I was like, that's a God. He was like no it's not. I was like umm yeah. He was like there are only three Gods, the father, the son and the holy spirit.

I was like in shock.

I didn't feel like arguing then though. So I just said ok nimrod. Lol

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Thank you for your answers. Unfortunately the Yehuborim have brainwashed in a very heavy way most gentiles that are under their programs to the point that they even tell gentiles to not believe them when they say that they are not Hebrews. As for the Khazhar theory, guess who the main promoter is? (((Shlomo Sand))). I've read on the site of David Duke that the theory was also created by another Yehubor.

David Duke works for the CIA to purposefully spread confusion. Mixes a little bit of truth with a lot of lies. Not a good idea to read his website.

 

[Nimrod33]

Thank you for your answers. Unfortunately the Yehuborim have brainwashed in a very heavy way most gentiles that are under their programs to the point that they even tell gentiles to not believe them when they say that they are not Hebrews. As for the Khazhar theory, guess who the main promoter is? (((Shlomo Sand))). I've read on the site of David Duke that the theory was also created by another Yehubor.

David Duke works for the CIA to purposefully spread confusion. Mixes a little bit of truth with a lot of lies. Not a good idea to read his website.

I knew that David Duke was controlled opposition. In fact i barely checked his website for very few arguments. The article that i quoted was one of the few that i considered "good".