What satanism

[drakon11]

I awakened the Kundalini and from the followers of joy of satan I want an explanation of Satanic doctrine.
What is the subject of the original religion? Do you mean that spirituality is Satanism ? Or pagans?

 

[Sonne [NG]]

Please first read our website.

Temple of Zeus

 

[drakon11]

Please first read our website.

Temple of Zeus

Don't you see the lens through which you see satanism is the left hand path Just as the Gnostics did, the creator god is evil, and the serpent opened the eyes of mankind, the first .followers of the left-handed path Abrahams

 

[drakon11]

Please first read our website.

Temple of Zeus

I read it, and honestly, I don't like Zeus. Why not the Ursa Major or Sirius? Also, my old belief that Kundalini represents the devil is.There's no academic evidence for that, and science doesn't support godhead. However, there are spiritual experiences through altered states of consciousness, brain waves, and the nervous system.Does this mean that consciousness is a result of matter?

 

[hailourtruegod]

I read it, and honestly, I don't like Zeus. Why not the Ursa Major or Sirius? Also, my old belief that Kundalini represents the devil is.There's no academic evidence for that, and science doesn't support godhead. However, there are spiritual experiences through altered states of consciousness, brain waves, and the nervous system.Does this mean that consciousness is a result of matter?

Just for now I'll stick to one thing from you here and that is me asking, what exactly don't you like about Lord Zeus? Or better yet, what exact parts on the site that you can directly point to that you do not like?

I'll lastly add a logical point and question, modern science fields ignore the spiritual all together. So how can something be "not be supported by" if it has never eveb gotten a chance to begin with?

 

[Anemos Aiteros]

I don't like Zeus.

Then why are you here, in the Temple of Zeus?

 

[616Taysha]

Summary:

1) sets up an account today
2) tells us what he/she THINKS we should be
3) had not studied the page in-depth

However can it POSSIBLY end...

 

[drakon11]

Just for now I'll stick to one thing from you here and that is me asking, what exactly don't you like about Lord Zeus? Or better yet, what exact parts on the site that you can directly point to that you do not like?

I'll lastly add a logical point and question, modern science fields ignore the spiritual all together. So how can something be "not be supported by" if it has never eveb gotten a chance to begin with?

I didn't mention the website; the point is that Zeus's identity isn't convincing to me, or I don't believe it. Understand me, I feel like I'm a pioneers of neo-paganism, unlike my strong affinity for the identity of the so so great shitan Azazel, Samael, and Moloch.
When I think of Zeus, I think of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very good god and a good model for the devil, as he rebelled against the tyrant Cronus, the Demorgh. It also represents fertility, prosperity, and the spirit. Perhaps Baal, the husband of Ishtar, appeals to me, But why not stars more attractive to the Draconian current, like the constellation Ursa Major or Sirius, or a god more suited to the demonic nature, like Hades Pluto, the god of the underworld, who represents sexual obsession and control and death. I very, very much wish to attain the lowest level of Hell.

 

[Voice of Enki [SG]]

I read it, and honestly, I don't like Zeus. Why not the Ursa Major or Sirius? Also, my old belief that Kundalini represents the devil is.There's no academic evidence for that, and science doesn't support godhead. However, there are spiritual experiences through altered states of consciousness, brain waves, and the nervous system.Does this mean that consciousness is a result of matter?

Science doesn't support any existence of Divinity in any form either, neither it supports the existence of Gods, Divine intelligences, and especially not any neo-pagan nonsense.

So this argument of yours falls flat as you apply it selectively, failing to acknowledge whatever beliefs you have are even less supported by any science than what the Temple of Zeus teaches.

Unless Science and academia acknowledges the spiritual and non-material parts of reality, it will fail to acknowledge and support the deeper mysteries taught by Zevism.

Why Zeus you ask? Because Zeus is the name of the Divine Monad as known by the most complete spiritual heritage of mankind. It is however just one of his many names, if you pay attention to what Zevism teaches.

The interpretations from left hand path occultism are reductive, they represent less than 2 out of the total 11 levels of what Zeus and the Gods are.

Even the Roman paganism is very reductive in comparison to the root spiritual knowledge it was derived from, the Ancient Egyptian and Ancient Hellenic spiritual teachings.

There is no such thing as "Devil", if you want to hold those kinds of beliefs, why are you here?

When you enter the Temple of Zeus, prior misconceptions and beliefs must be left behind, at least over time as one studies more.

You cannot understand the mysteries of the Divine and the Gods if you continue to view everything from the perspective which encompasses less than 2 out of the whole.

The Synthesis · Temple of Zeus

 

[drakon11]

Just for now I'll stick to one thing from you here and that is me asking, what exactly don't you like about Lord Zeus? Or better yet, what exact parts on the site that you can directly point to that you do not like?

I'll lastly add a logical point and question, modern science fields ignore the spiritual all together. So how can something be "not be supported by" if it has never eveb gotten a chance to begin with?

Or even his identity as an attractive dragon I was asking you, according to science, consciousness cannot directly connect with reality because perception is linked to the senses, and the senses are limited. Astral travel, as a spiritual experience, was practiced by shamans from the Stone Age, the ancient Egyptians, the Orphic, and Pythagoras. Sensory deprivation through trance and ecstasy is a soulflight, but these are altered states of consciousness linked to parts of the brain, such as the limbic system or the cerebral cortex, known as the reptilian brain. A prominent feature of this is the entropic brain, where unconscious processes reside, or the activity of the parasympathetic nervous system, the trance, or the sympathetic nervous system, with the opening of ecstasy and certain gamma waves above 40, delta, theta, and alpha waves. It's wonderful that it helps me identify the things that trigger these things, but that doesn't mean that as long as consciousness is linked to matter, I will end as soon as I die, even though, because of my involvement in these practices...It gave me a strong belief in reincarnation.

 

[drakon11]

Science doesn't support any existence of Divinity in any form either, neither it supports the existence of Gods, Divine intelligences, and especially not any neo-pagan nonsense.

So this argument of yours falls flat as you apply it selectively, failing to acknowledge whatever beliefs you have are even less supported by any science than what the Temple of Zeus teaches.

Unless Science and academia acknowledges the spiritual and non-material parts of reality, it will fail to acknowledge and support the deeper mysteries taught by Zevism.

Why Zeus you ask? Because Zeus is the name of the Divine Monad as known by the most complete spiritual heritage of mankind. It is however just one of his many names, if you pay attention to what Zevism teaches.

The interpretations from left hand path occultism are reductive, they represent less than 2 out of the total 11 levels of what Zeus and the Gods are.

Even the Roman paganism is very reductive in comparison to the root spiritual knowledge it was derived from, the Ancient Egyptian and Ancient Hellenic spiritual teachings.

There is no such thing as "Devil", if you want to hold those kinds of beliefs, why are you here?

When you enter the Temple of Zeus, prior misconceptions and beliefs must be left behind, at least over time as one studies more.

You cannot understand the mysteries of the Divine and the Gods if you continue to view everything from the perspective which encompasses less than 2 out of the whole.

The Synthesis · Temple of Zeus

almost The term "devil" carries more negative connotations than 'satan' or "Lucifer." It's just that I'm Egyptian and using a literal translation; I don't mean

 

[drakon11]

Science doesn't support any existence of Divinity in any form either, neither it supports the existence of Gods, Divine intelligences, and especially not any neo-pagan nonsense.

So this argument of yours falls flat as you apply it selectively, failing to acknowledge whatever beliefs you have are even less supported by any science than what the Temple of Zeus teaches.

Unless Science and academia acknowledges the spiritual and non-material parts of reality, it will fail to acknowledge and support the deeper mysteries taught by Zevism.

Why Zeus you ask? Because Zeus is the name of the Divine Monad as known by the most complete spiritual heritage of mankind. It is however just one of his many names, if you pay attention to what Zevism teaches.

The interpretations from left hand path occultism are reductive, they represent less than 2 out of the total 11 levels of what Zeus and the Gods are.

Even the Roman paganism is very reductive in comparison to the root spiritual knowledge it was derived from, the Ancient Egyptian and Ancient Hellenic spiritual teachings.

There is no such thing as "Devil", if you want to hold those kinds of beliefs, why are you here?

When you enter the Temple of Zeus, prior misconceptions and beliefs must be left behind, at least over time as one studies more.

You cannot understand the mysteries of the Divine and the Gods if you continue to view everything from the perspective which encompasses less than 2 out of the whole.

The Synthesis · Temple of Zeus

I am writing a book about Satanism and ceremonial magic, and this has made me reconsider my beliefs about Satanism and magic. Certainly, writing a book on this subject will require me to clarify these matters.

 

[Sonne [NG]]

I am writing a book about Satanism and ceremonial magic, and this has made me reconsider my beliefs about Satanism and magic. Certainly, writing a book on this subject will require me to clarify these matters.

We are not Satanists, we are Zevists. We follow the Ancient Gods and have our own beliefs.

If none of our beliefs interest you and you do not agree with them, and you are not interested in our content, then why are you here? Is it to impose your own beliefs?

If so, this is not the right place, as these forums exist primarily for our belief, Zevism.