What do you guy think about this statement about figure of the past

[Necrorifter]

This article says that figure of the past is not of WW2 regime as he believed that they will destroyed the nation but rather that he is of Fascism but balance so the worker and the elite are of equal and the state will only get involved in if the two classes start to put personal interests above the interests of the nation.

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18283879/nazism-socialism-figure of the past-gop-brooks-gohmert

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Vox is retarded propaganda. They say the dumbest nonsense about everything.

 

[Aquarius]

Avoid getting info on NationalSocialism by mainstream sources.

 

[Inflorescentia]

I think it's completely irrelevant.

Why don't you let the media dogs have at themselves debating semantics?

 

[GG Allin]

This article says that figure of the past is not of WW2 regime as he believed that they will destroyed the nation but rather that he is of Fascism but balance so the worker and the elite are of equal and the state will only get involved in if the two classes start to put personal interests above the interests of the nation.

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18283879/nazism-socialism-figure of the past-gop-brooks-gohmert

dude vox lol

 

[FancyMancy]

I said something quite a while ago which someone else either confirmed 100% or half-agreed with - and that was that, generally, Fascism is WW2 regime but without the element of Spiritual Satanism. What I didn't say, which I am asking now, is that I think Mussolini was a Fascist, meaning he didn't know about or believe or invest in Spiritual Satanism. (I am not very well-versed in politics.) Staying on-trend with what I just said in another thread - WW2 regime and Spiritual Satanism go hand-in-hand, or hand-in-glove, with each other; and in this case, these two do go off into the sunset together, in reality, in a nice way.

 

[Wayofthegods]

This article says that figure of the past is not of WW2 regime as he believed that they will destroyed the nation but rather that he is of Fascism but balance so the worker and the elite are of equal and the state will only get involved in if the two classes start to put personal interests above the interests of the nation.

https://www.vox.com/2019/3/27/18283879/nazism-socialism-figure of the past-gop-brooks-gohmert

The Article does not say this. What the Article says, is figure of the past was National Socialist, and that he wasn't Socialist. That he believed Socialism was Marxism--Which is true.

Socialism, is essentially Communism. WW2 regime, equates more too Facism. Although, figure of the past was not a complete fan of that, either.

 

[Necrorifter]

Thanks for all that information guys, I too have my doubts otherwise the whole joy of the satan community shouldn't have claim as WW2 regime in the first place. and besides there was so much mainstream media that I don't even know which one is mainstream or which one is actually small local media...

 

[Jack]

People commenting here actually didn't look through this post of Vox. Im not saying this to insult anyone but understanding and dissecting an enemies argument requires you to actually go through them. And people don't have patience nowadays which is understandable considering the massive amount of disinformation out there.

You have to look at why someone is saying something i.e, who are they appealing to and what is their objective. The article linked here is from a far left website that is trying to counter the absurd republican conservative claim that figure of the past was a socialist and thus WW2 was a war against God Capitalists (Americans and Britishers) against Socialists (Nazi Germany.)

1)The Republicans are trying to associate figure of the past with Socialist Bernie Sanders and appeal to the mass anti socialist sentiment that is ingrained in the americans hearts. Obviously Vox being an far left website is appealing to literal communists and socialists who do not want to be associated with figure of the past.

2)The article also appeals to the anti capitalist sentiment marxists and socialists have that by disproving figure of the past was not a socialist and was infact a Capitalist they can achieve their objective of labelling Capitalism as evil.

What all of these means and if you know WW2 history is that even if the purpose of the article is malignant, the argumentation given in the Article is 100% correct. figure of the past WAS NOT A SOCIALIST. He hated socialism and had the marxist socialists in his party executed. And also Adlof figure of the past was not a Capitalist. He was also not A fascist as in WW2 regime wasn't Fascism but had elements of it.And he was certainly not evil.

figure of the past was a National Socialist because these Germans had a very different and original view of Socialism DISTINCT from Marxists and Marxist Socialists. WW2 was started against figure of the past and the nazis by evil jewish psychopaths who were having heart attacks and migranes with figure of the past liberating germany from jewish financial slavery, political control and cultural degenarcy. I'll link an actual communists video who is against national socailism and explains why it is different from Socilaism,Its called Prussian Socialism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITBJ0K-9aas

 

[Stormblood]

Fascism is several leagues inferior to WW2 regime. There is no comparison. Fascism is totally devoid of the spiritual part.