What about Jupiter's satellites?

[Onbael_]

I was wondering something, in astrology we consider Pluto, but why then don't we also consider the satellites of Jupiter, they have a slightly higher volume and density than Pluto but less than Mercury.

Given their shorter distance to Earth than Pluto, should we consider them?

Perhaps we should also consider the Satellites of Mars, they are very small, but their 'short' distance from Earth may compensate for their size.

This is physics, they are larger and closer than Pluto (Jupiter's satellites), so they have a greater influence than Pluto.

If we consider Pluto then we should also consider these satellites.

What do you think?

 

[Henu the Great]

It's not just about mass, but more importantly the trajectories and properties of the planets that matter.

 

[Onbael_]

It's not just about mass, but more importantly the trajectories and properties of the planets that matter.

What creates the influence of a planet? Why does a planet govern certain things?

A planet is just a huge cluster of certain substances, the right percentage of these substances can generate an object with a particular influence? Or is it the balance of the naturalness of a planet that creates the energy that governs something?

 

[Epiphany]

I was wondering something, in astrology we consider Pluto, but why then don't we also consider the satellites of Jupiter, they have a slightly higher volume and density than Pluto but less than Mercury.

Given their shorter distance to Earth than Pluto, should we consider them?

Perhaps we should also consider the Satellites of Mars, they are very small, but their 'short' distance from Earth may compensate for their size.

This is physics, they are larger and closer than Pluto (Jupiter's satellites), so they have a greater influence than Pluto.

If we consider Pluto then we should also consider these satellites.

What do you think?

The moons of other planets are close enough to their hosts that their effects, if any, may as well be considered part of their mother world.

 

[Henu the Great]

A planet is just a huge cluster of certain substances

That's like saying that the human body is just a huge cluster of cells. It is if viewed like that, but it is much more than that as well.

the right percentage of these substances can generate an object with a particular influence? Or is it the balance of the naturalness of a planet that creates the energy that governs something?

Not sure. It could be something more than that.

 

[AFODO]

The moons of other planets are close enough to their hosts that their effects, if any, may as well be considered part of their mother world.

This is probably the most reasonable answer.

 

[Onbael_]

That's like saying that the human body is just a huge cluster of cells. It is if viewed like that, but it is much more than that as well.

Human beings have souls and are sentient beings, whereas a planet can only be considered alive because it has a natural system that keeps things going.

For example, on Earth, if I give a plant a drink, I can feel some positivity because I am making a micro-contribution to the Earth's natural system, but if I spoil it, that positivity is absent.

This system can cause the Earth to transmit a certain type of energy into our solar system (including the reactions of the Earth's core).

But a planet is not exactly a living being that can make choices, it is just a collection of elements in a certain order.

My theory is that each atom radiates an energy, but this taken alone is insignificant, but in huge proportions like that of a planet, it can influence it in a certain way, this would only be one aspect.
The other aspects would be the planet's position in relation to the other planets and the planet's natural system (reactions, etc.).

I'm just hypothesising.

 

[Korpi]

I don't know the answer, but this may be relevant: Orbital Resonance