vedic vs tropical astrology

[loki88]

Hello. I scanned the search engine on the site but couldn't find any relevant links for proof of the legitimacy/superiority of the tropical or vedic or their relative usefulness. Any links people could provide would be great. Thanks.

 

[loki88]

Thanks for clearing that up, I'll copy the info and keep it as a 'proof' of the legitimacy of the tropical system.

 

[Phoenix]

Vedic Astrology is a catch up term invented by a new age Astrologers when they needed to compete with market that was getting popular from western countries, especially from USA. True Astrology means the Moon movement through 27 Nakshatras, through constellations in the sky. So people in ancient India believed that Moon position in the sky was most important and wherever the Moon was positioned that was the place your soul was descended from... They sometimes call it a birth star, star seed etc... All of those have their own degrees and is divided in 27 parts. Western Astrology is not that specific and does not recognize constellations in its depth. It follows the Sun movement. For me Nakshatras have deeper explanation, they have their own specific stars, their own "Gods" and can give you more information.

 

[Aim_ain]

Hello. I scanned the search engine on the site but couldn't find any relevant links for proof of the legitimacy/superiority of the tropical or vedic or their relative usefulness. Any links people could provide would be great. Thanks.

Vedic astrology is more scientific and precise. Try both systems instead of worshiping the words of others.

 

[Voice of Enki [SG]]

Vedic astrology is more scientific and precise. Try both systems instead of worshiping the words of others.

What exactly is so much more precise and scientific about it?

If one doesn't know a thing about Astrology, one really shouldn't try to make random baseless statements like this.