returner said:
What is this? A two man act? You saying the HP I quoted specifically from the JoS page about the Necronomicon is wrong and that you know better? Yeah. Im calling bullshit. I saw for myself how these words fuck people over and have been told about it more than a few times but hey since its an act on your part feel free to keep up the charade. We can call you HPShill lol.
Lol. Twisting my words isnt gonna get you anywhere. You are the one who is discouraging people from even
trying any of the mantras.
You're saying that I'm stating the HPs would be wrong, then what are
you doing when you say all the mantras are corrupted,
despite one of them being officially stated as a method to attract money?
You "saw for yourself" how they fucked people over? Then tell me more. Instead of just spewing bullshit "the sky is falling" type of paranoia you could try perhaps citing references and explaining why you think what you think.
You're just trying to hide behind an ambiguous statement on the Necronomicon as a whole to justify your points, then violently lashing out at anyone who criticizes you because "tHeY arE dOuBtInG the hPs!!1!1!1". No I'm obviously not doubting Maxine or saying that this statement is wrong. I'm just referring to the fact that something is not adding up here, since one source from the JoS would call them "dangerous" (which by the way your beloved reference doesn't even do, it just calls them "corrupted"), while another source lists it as a valid method.
I already pointed out how your logic is flawed based on the money spells pdf, so perhaps instead of calling me a shill you could attempt to actually bring valid points to this discussion.
If you actually look through the necronomicon as a whole you will see there are tons and tons of weird enemy symbols in it that it recommends to meditate upon. I am 99% certain that your quoted statement refers to those symbols.
Looking at the 50 names, it should be quite easy to see that the sigils there are fundamentally different from the other symbols in the book.
Consider also that tons of the mantras actually include JoS-names such as Inanna, Baal and Agni. Yeah I bet it's real dangerous to vibrate stuff like that.
Lastly, just in case you're planning to yet again just reference your quote and call it a day, how about we sit down and analyze it?
"Getting back to the Necronomicon, the Simon copy
has been altered and so have the symbols. This does not mean the book is fiction; it has just been altered and corrupted."
Now, let's define what the term "altered" means.
"To alter something", as defined on https://www.thefreedictionary.com/alter,
means "To change or make different; modify". In other words,
in order for something to be altered, an original version must first exist.
Now, your quote says "
Getting back to the Necronomicon, the Simon copy has been altered". When saying that it has been altered, the quote is strictly referring to the
Necronomicon itself.
Or, to put it simply:
The 50 names are not an original part of the Necronomicon.
They have been added by the author based on old sumerian mantras and sigils,
as a bonus.
Your quote refers to the actual Necronomicon, which in the Simon copy has indeed been altered. By definition, your quote
does not refer to the 50 names.
Naturally this
could be a mere matter of inconcise wording, but at the end of the day this means that you have no quote from the JoS saying anything on the 50 names, whether good or bad.
On the other hand, one of the mantras is used in an official pdf, which only further invalidates your whole point.
Looking back now it was actually a waste of time to even engage into this discussion with you. I doubt anyone would have even taken you seriously anyway, thankfully, since people here know how to use their brain.
Either way I clarified my points. You tried throwing some of your shit against a wall in return. My points still stand and you're smelly now, so good job I guess.
If you're willing to reply to this with some actual substance to your message, then I'm down to discuss this more with you and address all your points. Otherwise, I'll consider this as 'case closed' and I'll have learned a lesson to better distribute my time, instead of wasting it replying to people like you.