Varg is an intresting fellow but he has a lot of contradictions and non-well thought things about himself. Many of his theories are influenced a lot by the mainstream.
Alpha male, if this even exists, is definitely not what is "Alpha" and "Ruling" in todays mainstream world. In the same mindset, sickly frail jews are alpha, simply because they steal better. Any politician who destroys their race is also a categorized alpha, and the list goes.
Alpha in this case of reality would be people like Hitler or National Socialists or others who did caretake, improve, and helped or lead their Race to survival. Not steroid junkies specifically.
Varg doesn't get some things because he is not spiritually advanced, but otherwise, he shows many great and masterfyl qualities of a good specimen of Whites nonetheless.
--------------------------------------------
Στις Σάβ., 25/02/17, ο/η
funnyfred1932@... [666BlackSun] <
[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url] έγραψε:
Θέμα: [666BlackSun] Re: MGTOW and Feminism are useful
Προς:
[url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Ημερομηνία: Σάββατο, 25 Φεβρουάριος 2017, 1:29
Interesting videos,
thanks for posting these. But about what Varg said-
Isn't the argument that only "alpha
males" reproduce an argument for a solitary lifestyle,
rather than against it? I have realized that I am not an
"alpha male", I have no desire to participate in
the myopic dick-measuring contest that is modern
"masculinity." So what should I do? Spend all of
my time in the gym, use steroids to get big, buy leg lifts
to seem taller, work a ton to get richer, and devote all of
my free time and energy to become "good enough" to
get one woman to go out with me? (Personally, I think that
ordering one's life and deciding one's worth based
on whether women accept you is one of the most
"beta" things that there is.)
Or should I go my own
way, pursue my spiritual goals, and try to accomplish
something useful for my Gods and my Race?
People who employ shaming
tactics when arguing with men often say something to
insinuate that the man isn't good enough for women, an
insult which many men find very painful. For example, many
people will consider an adult virgin male a
"loser" even if he is very well-educated,
hardworking, and confident in who he is. But if people
evaluate worth based on an ability to get laid, what good
are their value judgments?
Also, PLENTY of dysgenic
losers reproduce. You can look up Richard Lynn's
research on dysgenic fertility if you doubt this, I believe
that J Phillipe Rushton and Marian Van Court also did
studies on this. If anything, in modern society (at least in
America), there is a negative correlation between
intelligence and number of children people have. Yes, women
today play a large role in mate selection, but this does NOT
mean that they select for only positive traits.
"Survival of the fittest" refers to those fittest
for an environment, not necessarily those who possess what
could be termed "general philosophical worth."