Mentorship & Knowing To Teach

This is very true, because the Gods made understand that the understanding of something is in the living and being of that thing not just what you have in your head.

For people who wish to talk and teach others, this should be transmuted into a role of directing others to the proper sources. Here we can give introductions and summaries to topics, but we cannot pretend to be the profession or expert himself. Maybe the expert entrusts us to carry his word for him, but in any case this still maintains proper boundaries and a close relation with the source material.

Also, there is nothing wrong with sharing your own experiences, but this should be tied either with merit, or at least just a simple observation of the result, without some sort of insistence or implication of this method being the only option.

Taking the two ideas above together, someone can bridge the two worlds. As an "average" person, you may not be Clergy, nor are you an auto mechanic, but maybe you have a personal story where your magic created a situation with your car. Even though you cannot comment on exactly how to service a car, nor create a God ritual, you can still rightfully share this experience from your own position, which is valuable to others who can relate.

On the same note, try to avoid unnecessary exaggerations, where possible. Sometimes this is done on accident or under duress, but when done wrongly can create negative impressions for no good reason. For example, I exclaim to you "Honda cars are dogshit!". I may have only said this because I was upset, or because I read one article. What I really meant to say was "I am upset with my experience", or "I didn't like this car model under this circumstance [fuel efficiency]".

Yet, by not saying the above, I left your mind to fill in the blank for a conclusion that should have not been made in the first place. This projection is then amplified if I am a famous Youtuber or something, simply by weight of authority, not evidence. Later, this can subconsciously alter decisions made by people in situations where it was actually uncalled for. Maybe the Honda car was my best option, but I decided I don't really like them anymore, for some "unknown reason".

Very cogent and truthful analysis of all these matters. A huge problem with some members is that they think due to the status, we must know everything.

There are many things I never invested in prolifically in any lifetime. Cooking was one of those because I was never in the social position (ever) to be a cook, so I had to learn how to do it. I lacked many of the natural intuitions and 'touch' of a real cook. Even now years and years in I am learning dramatic nuances and techniques that make all the difference. Other people, even pretty low IQ people to be honest, know many of these by instinct, sight and feel alone.

While I know a lot about healing, I've had medical questions directed my way that I would not know how to answer. I know a fair amount about anatomy and disease, but I am not a doctor. What a doctor does is not a joke. These people are walking encyclopedias on a single subject that they reinforce through their work constantly.

Then we have those who haven't had sex or any type of relationship, let alone experimenting with any form of Magick in this area, 'informing' people how love works, how to date, what women or men are like, how love spells work, how everything in this area works and usually telling people not to bother doing anything ever as it 'won't work' and one has to be ultimately an 8 foot tall 40k character with the moral compass of Socrates to just be with anyone.

Life is far more complicated than 'just be confident' and all these maxims, but dismissing everything off the mark and speaking of endless doom prematurely leads to nothing. It's one thing to tell people to do something wisely and know the facts beforehand, it's another thing to tell them to never bother doing anything. HPS Pythia's elaborations on how intent (this includes attraction to the Aura) and spells work should make it obvious as to why you are pushing a groundhog day scenario on people when dwelling on the negative.

All types of technical educational institutions, including academic educational institutions, driving institution , learning Spoken English Academy etc. have become business oriented. In my country Bangladesh, teaching sector has become corrupted and the teachers are very disgusting. I curse these type of bad mentor/teachers who do this job only for money.

The more I learn the less I know, I'm a fan of left hand Suzuki metodh.

I see great difference between my teachers who are motivated, enthusiastic, and like to teach, versus my teachers who are exhausted, bored, and got to hate teaching, and only teaching because they are stuck in this job.

If you have the required knowledge, and you are the firs type, you will be a great teacher.

this is why i don't speak much on this site. I don't know much about a subject I keep my mouth shut. It's a lot easier that way. It's a shame that one must remind others to use so much common sense.
Thank you HP Zevios Metathronos.

Hail Father Satan

Þese ideas tie into þe scientific meþod—þere are no prophets, masters, or ‘chosen ones’ in science. Only mentors who simply teach how to operate þrough þe scientific meþod and arrive at þe truþ yourself: how to þink scientifically. ‘Experience’ is only relevant in þe sense of having repeatedly used þe scientific meþod to form new and accurate models of reality—distinguished scientists—which demonstrates þey have mastered þe process.

Þese mentors direct þeir underlings towards þe existing bodies of scientific knowledge and should encourage healþy skepticism of þe existing models (þis has been killed today in þe judæized Science™ establishment). No scientist can ever claim þey “have” þe truþ, or know everyþing, or “are correct”. We can only claim our models of reality are probably more accurate þan any oþer ones derived þrough non-scientific means. It is an endless evolution towards a more accurate understanding. Question everyþing, including the ones who teach you. Dogma is þe enemy of truþ, and “I don’t know” is þe only way towards knowing.

Thank you for this thread. I have a tendency to want to help/heal other's and this can sometimes manifest as being too eager to teach despite of not having the proper level of experience, which isn't the worst trait to have, but must be tempered by a desire to comprehend fully what I've learned via direct experience rather than "book knowledge" alone and this requires patience. These are one of those rare contexts where eagerness is a ruinous character trait.

The distillation of knowledge itself should be taken completely seriously, as even the ancient philosophers were very careful about spreading misinformation rather than knowledge for knowledge sake. Wrong guidance is worse than no guidance at all, I'll only answer what I know 100% to be true, after research and long and hard pondering/analysis.

Thank you High Priest Zevios Metathronos for the excellent sermon!

That is, they think that because of our status or duty, we should know everything and if we don't, we will be considered “stupid”. Which is not the case.

We don't need to know everything.
We can know less or less. That is okay.
The real and true knowledge will come eventually.

We will ask, we will learn this incomplete and little knowledge. And once we know the correct information, we will teach according to the level of the beginners.

The important thing is not to tell this misinformation or little information to beginners. To guide them to the truth. Directing them to experts.
For example, I can be good at positive magic, I can know a lot, Maybe I specialize in positive magic. But I cannot access the wisdom of a god, for example, or the wisdom of a high priest/priestess.

And But Maybe I know very little about negative magic. Or there may be things I know wrong. We will ask the people who know these things best and we will learn the truth.

Not knowing does not mean that we should be ashamed.
What we should be ashamed of is not asking.

I seen a lot in this life; even "anger management mentors" who beat their wife senseless at home. What can this person teach you about controlling anger? It's all pretense.

That reminds me of someone wo went broke with his business (multiple times) and is now coaching others on "how to save their business". There's no self-awareness at all involved with some people...

Being a good Teacher/Mentor is something that has to be learned as well, I think. As I got into my line of work, my superiors were not good at explaining things or often had not much time. So I had to learn much for myself on how to get things done (Which has it's benefits after all).

Now I'm in the position to teach others in my profession and at first I had to understand to not overload the other person with too much information. I tried to "give them everything (information) I didn't have", which was often difficult to absorb for them. So now I had to learn how to teach the knowledge that I gained in an understandable way.
And of course everyone has their own strenghts/weaknesses so it's never the same process with each person.
Also it is often better to let people try for themselves and be a guide/support only if necessary. I understood that lesson better after I got into Spiritual Satanism and read about how our Gods teach us.

In a beautiful way all this gives a new perspective for the (young/new/still learning to be) Teacher, as it brings one to look at the area of knowledge with new eyes, to understand how to teach it best. And I've learned (and still learn so much) new things through this process, just by answering questions on "how" and "why" we do things.

To be honest, I have always had real visible success in my life when I didn't follow a mentor at all, but took everything into my own hands. I actually realized quite early on that no one could keep me alive for a second. Nor will the other person be able to go to my own death for me. I came into this world alone. I will leave it alone again. But if no one can keep me alive for a second, then they don't have the right to decide over me. When it comes to my life, only my actions count. Anyone close to me, no matter how close, will only give me bad advice. All this well-meant advice from gurus, self-proclaimed success trainers and coaches is largely based on fraud and deception. It is similar with many astrologers, tarot card readers and YouTube occultists. Most of them have achieved nothing in life and have then given themselves self-proclaimed accolades.

At least that was my experience. I also met occultists who boasted about their occult knowledge and wanted 90-100 euros for an hour's conversation with them. I thankfully refused. I spent 3 years visiting hundreds of Freemasons, many of whom were braggarts and thought that just because they belonged to Freemasonry now, they were better and higher quality people. Fuck that. They were all lickspittles and know-it-alls. In reality, many have become freemasons because they hope it will bring them material success and prestige. They are happy to abdicate their responsibilities in return. The main thing is that it improves their lives, especially financially. They are happy to howl with the wolves.

I myself achieved an excellent degree in natural sciences because I developed my own skills and put a lot of effort and diligence into the subject. In doing so, I financed my entire degree myself by taking on any job that was necessary to maintain funding. This allowed me to look into an incredible number of professions and understand a lot of what moves and drives people. There were only a few people who didn't let themselves fall into the system, but instead tried to master their own lives against all odds. Many always blamed others for their problems without looking for viable solutions. I've always lived by Friedrich Schiller's saying: "And if you never risk your life. Life will never be won for you!"

I didn't give in to anyone's advice because I intuitively sensed that the person who was trying to sell me something or sell me something as being right had the least idea themselves. I was always on the lookout for fellow students who didn't mind the effort. I formed a working group with them and we tested each other hard on all subjects. Our motto was: "We don't come together to eat coffee and cake, but to achieve a degree with distinction". We studied hard for hours every day and it was still great fun because we spurred each other on. I remember the director of the Max Planck Institute, where I got a job in research after graduating to do my PhD, asking me what type of person I was. He wanted to know whether I could only do research under supervision or whether I preferred to do research independently so that I could contribute my own ideas.

I opted for the second option. I didn't want to do research with someone who was constantly looking over my shoulder. He was delighted and said: "That's a good idea. I'm going to be at a lot of conferences and have to let you work on your own". He then offered me the opportunity to visit all the other highly decorated professors to find out more about their field of research. I did this extensively and benefited a lot from it, because these highly renowned professors provided me with top-class potential. I got to know professors from Cambridge, Harvard, Princeton and other highly renowned universities and was able to maintain a lively exchange with Nobel Prize winners on the island of Mainau. After a year and a half, my doctoral supervisor, the director of the Max Planck Institute, approached me and wanted to see the results. I presented him with my laboratory journals and the many scientific results. His office went completely silent for a moment. He looked at me with wide open eyes and then said: "My God, you have so many results. You could make three doctoral theses out of them. Write them together". So I wrote together and after two years I was already a doctor of science with top marks in the natural sciences, which normally took 5-6 years to complete.

I have only had bad experiences with esoterics and new age people. Most of them were deluding themselves and thought they had found the philosopher's stone when they kept talking about the greatness of "positive thinking". That's all I want to say.
Hail Satan!
Hail Lucifer!
Hail Wotan!

Some Zevism have a potential to teach and that is a very good thing. But teaching first means that one has at least a good understanding of a topic. We want to make these personalities and make sure they are good and highly capable and ethical people.

The reason for this are for the success of the message and the Gods to be satisfied with this work.

Unlike the external world, which especially nowadays, is rife with false prophets, carriers of false information and many pretenders, one must bear in mind here that teaching others in Spiritual Satanism is not a game. Because the Gods are overseeing this. The Gods are not going to be happy with false teachers and wanna-be's.

Show more...Show less...Show more...

When I was climbing the career ladder, I had to move from a department where mentoring and mentoring were popular, but at the same time there was no free will and narrow career opportunities and at my job I moved to another department and immediately got into the den of snakes (not reptiles, not in this sense).

In the new department, they immediately explained to me that no one will explain anything to you and you will do everything yourself, if you fail the project, you will be responsible yourself and no one will help you, at first it was not easy for me, but then I tasted the taste of freedom, because my supervisor allows me to use various strategies to achieve my goals, whereas the previous head in the previous department strictly controlled his employees and chastised them for every wrong step.

The current management at my job is actually engaged in mentoring and mentoring only if my supervisor does not like something, or he sees mistakes in my actions, of course I always defend my point of view and explain why I did it this way and not otherwise. If I am wrong, he will explain to me why it is not right to do it and how to do it.

From the moment of my promotion at my job, the fate of a particular project depends on my approval, if I do not like something from the point of view of legal risks, or some top manager cannot agree with a partner, I can wrap up the project and justify my decision in detail to the CEO, explain to the head of any level (what no matter how high the level is) in my company, in a language that he understands, why it is not worth doing this and what are the real legal risks here, including for this top manager.

My previous boss from the previous department where I worked collects moronic meetings between his employees, where he strictly chastises and gives instructions, while earlier I saw how managers of the lowest levels wiped their feet on this boss.

At my job, my current supervisor does not collect any moronic internal meetings, if I have any question, I dial my supervisor and communicate, and the supervisor can also dial my phone number.

I want to say that mentoring and mentoring is a very subtle thing that depends not only on the teacher, but above all on the student.

When I was put in tougher conditions at work, I was able to adapt and take advantage of the situation.

In fact, now I don't see hopeless situations in my work, because my brain quickly finds a solution.

In also began to understand office politics very well, many top managers are real snakes (not reptiles, not in this sense) and want to set you up when they seriously messed up, but in such situations my supervisor taught me how to act in such cases.

HPS Pythia, with all her wisdom, always said she didn't know if someone asked her something that she did not know. I do the same thing when people ask me about things I have never even read about or tried myself. There is no shame in not knowing something, when there are endless topics one might know instead, to varying levels.

þat what þis þread

These aren't even english letters though. Maybe it looks different on your end, but they look like the letter b but with extended line. (I put them in bold for clarity.)

Some Zevism have a potential to teach and that is a very good thing. But teaching first means that one has at least a good understanding of a topic. We want to make these personalities and make sure they are good and highly capable and ethical people.

The reason for this are for the success of the message and the Gods to be satisfied with this work.

Unlike the external world, which especially nowadays, is rife with false prophets, carriers of false information and many pretenders, one must bear in mind here that teaching others in Spiritual Satanism is not a game. Because the Gods are overseeing this. The Gods are not going to be happy with false teachers and wanna-be's.

Show more...Show less...Show more...

That is way I step back, and let the person or teacher talk about what, needs to be said/ explain what needs to be done or understood. Before I talk and share any ideas or open opinions on the subject. And shut up and move on. And show respect to others on here, the same and take time to look back it and learn.

That reminds me of someone wo went broke with his business (multiple times) and is now coaching others on "how to save their business". There's no self-awareness at all involved with some people...

Being a good Teacher/Mentor is something that has to be learned as well, I think. As I got into my line of work, my superiors were not good at explaining things or often had not much time. So I had to learn much for myself on how to get things done (Which has it's benefits after all).

Now I'm in the position to teach others in my profession and at first I had to understand to not overload the other person with too much information. I tried to "give them everything (information) I didn't have", which was often difficult to absorb for them. So now I had to learn how to teach the knowledge that I gained in an understandable way.
And of course everyone has their own strenghts/weaknesses so it's never the same process with each person.
Also it is often better to let people try for themselves and be a guide/support only if necessary. I understood that lesson better after I got into Spiritual Satanism and read about how our Gods teach us.

Show more...Show less...Show more...

If you build a business and lose it all, then manage to rebuild it bigger than before after this, then albeit take advice from this person.

"A good teacher must be able to put themselves on the place of those who find learning hard".

A good student will find a way to learn, doesn't matter if he have to change the teacher or learn by himself