http://www.lightstalking.com/what-is-ki ... -revealed/They explain it as the electrolysis dynamic between the neighboring atmosphere of the objects being examined is the real cause of the halo being seen. Now, in their overly left brain overbearing approach, Im aware of the dismissal of what they call "spiritual" due to their inherent externalized viewpoint on everything. As such it is expected they would mismatch what we adapt our concept of spiritual relation with the forces of nature. However, Its my aim to have someone give a credible argument for or against kirlian if possible, because at this point it only seems to be an abysmal convolution of real Satanic science. My nature in bringing this to light is to initiate a seed for a new era where more realistic proportions balancing critical thinking of volition (i.e. the will and intellect), and the feeling of intuition (i.e. psyche of the inner nature of observation) can produce a more intense and pure result. If I may reiterate my point, it is that, while I agree to the explanation they use to dismiss kirlian photography as being representative of a fundamentally psionic phenomenon of radiation, I disagree with their notion of "spiritual". Its an obvious contradiction to the primal philosophy of what subtle intricacies lay within the foundation of our union with what is a sacred balance between activity and passivity. I would argue in favor of the hermetic alchemical viewpoint that the truly ultimate and unreachable entity of spirituality (by traditional mechanical science) is the mind i.e. the true idea and ethereal foundation, which as HP Mageson had explained in his research upon the logos (word of god, omnipresent vibration, ether field etc.). Now that that is elaborated properly (if you understand), I hope this can turn into a thread where by a realistic symmetry of the practical and theoretical can merge on the sacred sciences, from the highest plane to the lowest plane. As above, So Below - Hermes Trismegistus | Thoth
