Eric13 said:
Interesting sermon. I’m definitely left with some confusion though.
I remember you saying, Hitler created a government that incentivized people having families because they needed to recover the population from WW1. At current times, for example, population troubles aren’t huge problems. Is this still something governments should push in today’s times?
Most European Nations and even Whites in the US are literally beneath the media average needed to literally replicate your very own Nation, ie, they are going to die if this ongoing trend continues, or get to become minorities in their own homelands.
The rate of most European Nations, is around 1.5 per couple. This means that 2 people give birth to 1.5 kid, which means they will not successfully replace their current population. This needs to be at least 2.
That is called impending doom.
This is peacetime, not war time. But Whites have an ongoing cultural war with Yehuborim, and this rate has adjusted itself during this type of strange war of propaganda, brainwashing, financial manipulation etc.
Eric13 said:
I understand people are having children late because they need to set their lives up for financial stability first, but in a way, to me this seems wise, as it gives the individuals time to mature and develop skills for success before having children. Otherwise it can be like children raising children. Cause how many people really know anything at 21?
21 biologically if a person is actually doing something with their life, other than spending 10 to 21 playing 15 hours of video games, is actually a time where people can have at least some personal understanding. Biologically it's the peak of one's personal strength in some cases, all the way down to 30.
So it was generally considered a good time to give birth, especially in previous levels of development, because pain and everything else could be tolerated easier.
Eric13 said:
Another thing that confuses me is some time ago UBI was brought up and then rightfully dismissed as Marxist socialist policy. My understanding of UBI at the time was it was giving everyone a chance. To ease the pressures described in the sermon. But giving people homes, and increase of pay seems almost the same thing. Because many people have children now, without such incentives, but with them, having children would be the most popular thing for most individuals and it’s like the same thing. A basic income and set up to give everyone a chance. Thus UBI.
UBI is universalist, Marxist, indiscriminate, and you provide nothing and therefore you have no say in it. When one has children, this increases their power over the state, and this is called State benefits and Welfare. Welfare goes where it's needed, not everywhere.
The difference here that makes it all different is discrimination, and how people who are given these, are actually doing something. These people are also necessitated to do something to have that.
In UBI, you are just thrown some pieces of bread to just live on, but nobody cares if you live or die, nor you have any rights. Nothing to do really with your life.
In this case, women were given these provisions and help, because having children was perceived as literal work in a sense. One is creating life.
Other incentives like scientific grants and anything else, fall under this category. It's to make people do useful things while attaining money and to increase social development.
Eric13 said:
Probably I’m too brainwashed by the American way. Life, liberty and the PURSUIT of happiness. I guess that’s instilled in me the opinion if people want a family, it’s up to them to figure out the logistics. Because why incentivize specifically family when the population is fine? Why not promote other things that are necessary for the current times. Like environmental things or sustainable technologies or something? Idk. Confusion.
Life. How is life achieved? By you being born.
Liberty. How is this achieved? By having a civilization that guarantees your rights, advancements etc. This needs people to exist.
Pursuit of happiness. There are things that make some people happy and others consider these to be only sadness. But many people don't consider family an unhappy thing. It's actually pleasant and relieving for them to have one. It's natural.
There is no limit to the positive things one can incentivize, the things can go on at the same time. No reason for example to not only give incentives to people to go clean beaches or recreate forests, or anything of the sort.
This applies to all areas of life. This is never done in one area of life. Motherhood is just another area of the broader life.
But anymore it's being rejected and that's why birthrates and other things are sinking. That's all there is to it in the West. And this happens because Yehuborim primarily want to get rid of the Westerners same as they want to get rid of others. Slowing down or putting birthrates beneath the baseline, is a quick way to achieve that end.