SATchives said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQlxcsXiYAc
At 3:30 hints at evidence of our universe being either much older than thought or always having been around which imo is it. I do believe it is triangle shaped. With the edges being the end of consciousness, but because its not infinite in size doesn't mean it can't be infinite in age.
Here is a star older than the estimated age of the universe
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_140283
https://astro3d.org.au/and-then-there-was-light-looking-for-the-first-stars-in-the-universe/
Article showing there are mega galaxies 13 billion years ago.
Also with what I said earlier If you watch the video its undoubtably true that we dont know everything about our star. It is without a doubt the sun's surface is condensed matter. Seriously watch the video. There are 40 different papers too I could link if we want a scientific debate. I also I dont see how any of this affects the life or death of a start fancy. Or how nuclear fusion still couldnt be at the core. If you know anything about spectroscopy and physics the video I linked earlier will make a lot of sense. But you actually have to watch it. If I dont reply for a few days it's because time is short. I'm working really hard on a lot of things.
Search for articles about a galaxy being found "300 million light-years from the edge of the Universe". Then realise that this distance and location is in only 1 direction from Earth. Then realise to swing the camera/telescope around 180° to face in the opposite direction. Boom. We just proved the Universe is at least twice as large as they lied to us about.
People think that if the speed of light is the ultimate and absolute speed barrier, then the Universe cannot possibly be expanding, as per le big bang, quicker than that; yet more (((science))) tells us because of other/more muh reasonz, the Universe's age and size can be disproportionate. Maybe it is some forms of energy, but they don't make it clear, so they make us think, make us infer, they themself imply, that it is the Universe as opposed to an aspect of the Universe. So because we're lowly Goyeem, we can accept that the Universe's age is no greater than the speed of light, and the Universe's size is no greater then the speed of light, but then accept that it is and that it is out-of-sync.
Once Methuselah is proven to be older than the age of the Universe and it is either ignored and hushed-up, or if it is proven to not be older than the age of the Universe and it is promoted as such, then most people would just accept that and very little else will happen regarding it, except for a Yehubor in an astronomy documentary lolling and making philosophical jokes about it.
A 12 billion year old signal? Maybe they cannot see the forest for the trees. Like when you hear a noise and you become used to it so you stop hearing it, or smell a smell and stop smelling it because it's there constantly.
I think a lot of things - of information and real or fake discoveries, and shock and awe, etc. - are put out so as to see how the zidiot Goyim react to it, so (((they))) know what to do next and where to go next.