if you were fuhrer,what would be your policies?

[High Priestess Lydia]

To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.

 

[High Priest Zevios Metathronos]

Most people envision their own worlds but the real "Fuhrers" the Gods would ever appoint, are those who would accept the world and have an ear for it. Most people even in these forums don't really understand what "must" be done, they are a series of hang-ups and just want power like Klaus Schwab.

I come to this Forum often and I read similar rants bordering to the ideas of Klaus Schwab. Maybe not as much but often-times similar. Most of these come because both the writer and Klaus Schwab are primarily on the same level of consciousness while not understanding it, but Klaus Schwab is just on the unfortunate state for humanity to have power to carry these through.

This comes from misunderstanding life on a very deep level and major denial of life and existence, and what happens in it.

If you want the help of the Gods in that task, you must start removing yourself from the Samsaric level of consciousness to become someone who can lead others, because leading is done primarily for others and not for one's self needs of domination.

As everyone writes their real "desires" on this, you will see it has nothing to do with the Aryan Gita or Rita way of leadership, it just has to do with how open or closed your sacral chakra is, if you love makeup, or if you want to fuck girls or something.

______________________________________

 

[Aquarius]

Most people envision their own worlds but the real "Fuhrers" the Gods would ever appoint, are those who would accept the world and have an ear for it. Most people even in these forums don't really understand what "must" be done, they are a series of hang-ups and just want power like Klaus Schwab.

I come to this Forum often and I read similar rants bordering to the ideas of Klaus Schwab. Maybe not as much but often-times similar. Most of these come because both the writer and Klaus Schwab are primarily on the same level of consciousness while not understanding it, but Klaus Schwab is just on the unfortunate state for humanity to have power to carry these through.

This comes from misunderstanding life on a very deep level and major denial of life and existence, and what happens in it.

If you want the help of the Gods in that task, you must start removing yourself from the Samsaric level of consciousness to become someone who can lead others, because leading is done primarily for others and not for one's self needs of domination.

As everyone writes their real "desires" on this, you will see it has nothing to do with the Aryan Gita or Rita way of leadership, it just has to do with how open or closed your sacral chakra is, if you love makeup, or if you want to fuck girls or something.
...

Many don't understand. You want to lead others? In that case you put your ego aside and you bend yourself for others tirelessly, leading is the most excruciating and also satisfying of the tasks, but it does not involve you making parades about how superior you are, but it means you're gonna sacrifice many parts of your life for others. Look at HP HoodedCobra, he's like on task 24/7, this soul is in a constant state of struggle, that is the life of a leader, not for any kind of desire of grandiosity or something like that.

 

[pacharica]

" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.

once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever.

if she does oral,it travels to her brain and becomes one,forever.

and her children with her future husband.

makeup is deception and false advertising,and those that consider made up women to be superior to natural ones,are simply conditioned that way by it's ubiquity.

 

[Priest - Alexandros Iowno]

" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.

once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever.

if she does oral,it travels to her brain and becomes one,forever.

and her children with her future husband.

makeup is deception and false advertising,and those that consider made up women to be superior to natural ones,are simply conditioned that way by it's ubiquity.

Your sperm isn't a parasite seeking host in a woman's DNA or brain.

If you are a seasoned man and go with a virgin woman, you'd be a little bit uncomfortable.

Women and men need a period of maturing in their sexual lives, in their own natural specificity. This is healthy.

I'm sorry but most virgins, while instinctually suit a sexual intercourse, they are about to undergo a sexual maturing. There is an awakening since a young age, a manifestation, a maturing.

While some people are exclusive in certain aspects, this doesn't prove something of a natural order for all or a healthy path.

Have sex people, what the fuck. What are you holding back? The armageddon horse? The bleeding orange? Like fools you miss out how awesome is to be alive and get to know love prospects and actually make kids.

Or we are busy masturbating at screens?

Sex is also not logical so why all this doctorate level logic on basic nature of man and woman? Do you drink water? Do you eat? Does your thing get aroused? So?

 

[Novice Priest Karnonnos]

OP aren't you tri-racial, as you said before? You said about race-mixing women being deported but you yourself said you are tri-racial and go with White women so...? :? This is not hostile I'm just confused.

Think on what is good, healthy and ideal for Central/South America and those of your race. Other than that I agree with NakedPluto as usual, all these technicalities and words being put onto sex like a microscope, it can be too much.

 

[SapphireDragon]

I say this with good intentions, how can you say you want women to be treated equally but at the same time claim they can't wear makeup? You said you wanted to ban xianity and it's related ilk. But shaming people for wearing makeup or not being virgins is exactly what they do. Spirtual Satanism is about free will. No one's saying women have to wear makeup to be beautiful, but why should someone have the right to tell a woman what she can and can't wear? This isn't xianity and isn't Islam. Women and men have been restricted enough, ideas like this belong with the enemy. These aren't our ways. No one in power should enforce someone else to conform to anything of that nature. The Gods don't enforce things over us, they empower us with the knowledge of what we can do to be better, and this is how we should be to our people as well.

The idea that makeup is deception so therefore it's wrong and should be outlawed is no different than the Muslim idea that women have to be covered head to toe, it's the same root idea. Is it also deception for a man to shave his beard, gel his hair back, and put on cologne? I understand most men don't like a woman fully made up, but women have the right to do as they please, and a woman dresses up for herself too it's not always to impress a man. Sometimes it's just for her to have a little fun.

Also this...

"once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever"

This is clearly false, I don't know where you learned this from but this is a delusional idea.

we are allowed to have however many, or as few sexual partners we want. Some people are perfectly happy with only one partner, some with many. It has to do with one's nature and chart placements. A woman isn't damaged or tainted for having sex with more than one partner.. that is completely coocoo nonsense. Absolute jewnanigans. Not grounded in reality. It may be a hard pill to swallow for those who have been severely damaged from enemy programming but the truth isn't meant to be sugar coated and sometimes it shakes up your entire belief system. This is necessary for growth. You can't learn and go forward in life very far clinging to superstition and enemy ways of thinking. It's not healthy. You're still supporting the very things you say you want to get rid of, by staying in that frame of mind.

Again I say this with good intentions, not as a personal attack. Just offering my opinion.

 

[pacharica]

I say this with good intentions, how can you say you want women to be treated equally but at the same time claim they can't wear makeup? You said you wanted to ban xianity and it's related ilk. But shaming people for wearing makeup or not being virgins is exactly what they do. Spirtual Satanism is about free will. No one's saying women have to wear makeup to be beautiful, but why should someone have the right to tell a woman what she can and can't wear? This isn't xianity and isn't Islam. Women and men have been restricted enough, ideas like this belong with the enemy. These aren't our ways. No one in power should enforce someone else to conform to anything of that nature. The Gods don't enforce things over us, they empower us with the knowledge of what we can do to be better, and this is how we should be to our people as well.

The idea that makeup is deception so therefore it's wrong and should be outlawed is no different than the Muslim idea that women have to be covered head to toe, it's the same root idea. Is it also deception for a man to shave his beard, gel his hair back, and put on cologne? I understand most men don't like a woman fully made up, but women have the right to do as they please, and a woman dresses up for herself too it's not always to impress a man. Sometimes it's just for her to have a little fun.

Also this...

"once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever"

This is clearly false, I don't know where you learned this from but this is a delusional idea.

we are allowed to have however many, or as few sexual partners we want. Some people are perfectly happy with only one partner, some with many. It has to do with one's nature and chart placements. A woman isn't damaged or tainted for having sex with more than one partner.. that is completely coocoo nonsense. Absolute jewnanigans. Not grounded in reality. It may be a hard pill to swallow for those who have been severely damaged from enemy programming but the truth isn't meant to be sugar coated and sometimes it shakes up your entire belief system. This is necessary for growth. You can't learn and go forward in life very far clinging to superstition and enemy ways of thinking. It's not healthy. You're still supporting the very things you say you want to get rid of, by staying in that frame of mind.

Again I say this with good intentions, not as a personal attack. Just offering my opinion.

they can wear makeup,just that it's production and distribution will be prohibited in my country.

this is a strawman.

women are allowed to do what they want,but virgnity and monogamy would be encouraged,and such women who aren't would be moderately shamed,I never said there would be legal consequences for promiscuity.
men also would be shamed for not being virgins at marriage.

another strawman.

as for your blatant denial,of the fact women are permanently altered genetically from who they sleep with this is refuted here:

Sex cannot only be deadly, DNA from the semen of your past sexual partners can come back to DNA Chimerahaunt you, your children and even generations to come. You may want to think twice about that next one night stand or dude with less than stellar DNA you might secretly shack up with to end your long dry spell.

There is a little known ancient scientific fact I would like to share with you about human sexual relations. That is if you would like to remain in control of your mind, body and the integrity of your divine tree of life. It deals with your DNA, and imposter male gooey semen in the form of DNA of people that can infiltrate your blood through the sacred act of sex when that is often absolutely the last thing you would ever want to happen.

This science gives a new meaning to one night stands being that there really is no such thing as a one night stand when sexual partners swap semen and DNA with one another. They are not just forming a one day sexual union of animalistic fueled passion, but a life long connection in which they may in fact be forever connected through the tree of life that we know of as DNA.
The theory that all the mothers’ sexual partners influence their children’s physical characteristics dates back to ancient Greece and Rome, where it was simply an accepted fact. They did not have the science to back it up, but they definitely knew enough about sexual relations and blood to even have laws at times against adultery, and sodomy.

Many of these laws were punishable by banishment, torture and murder by horrible deaths. Under the laws of the Constantines “Constans and Constantius,” adulterers were burned, or sown in sacks and cast into the sea: under Leo and Marcian the penalty was reduced to perpetual banishment and cutting off the nose. Under Justinian it was again permitted to kill the parties.(1)

I assume these laws were not just done to control their citizens and keep peace, but to control the integrity of their race. Now we have the genetic science to prove these theories. As I mentioned, what I speak of here is a science and it is now being proven as a fact. Scientists have discovered that many women are carrying multiple male Y-chromosome gene sequences in their DNA. Just in case you didn’t know, women are supposed to only carry female Mitochondrial or mtDNA.

Your sexual partners DNA can and may in fact not only become incorporated into a female’s DNA, it can also affect a future unborn child. This is called Microchimerism (abbreviated Mc) which is the presence of a small number of cells that originate from another individual and are therefore genetically distinct from the cells of the host individual.

The word microchimerism is derived from the Greek chimera who was a mythological creature composed of parts of various animals like that of the head of a lion, the belly of a goat, and the tail of a dragon or serpent.

THE DNA RESEARCH

Here is some research on this subject: Male microchimerism in women without sons: quantitative assessment and correlation with pregnancy history.

Purpose: Fetal microchimerism, derived from fetal cells that persist after pregnancy, is usually evaluated by tests for male microchimerism in women who gave birth to sons. We investigated male microchimerism in women without sons and examined correlation with prior pregnancy history. Immunologic consequences of microchimerism are unknown. We studied healthy women and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Conclusions: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.

Another recent study shows evidence to support the theory that the semen from a woman’s previous sexual partners may affect the genetics of a future unborn child. Scientists have discovered a new form of non-genetic inheritance, showing for the first time that offspring can resemble a mother’s previous sexual partner — in flies at least.

CONCLUSIONSexual energy

The conclusions of these ancient beliefs and studies shows possible sources of male michrochimerism that are known from pregnancies, miscarriages, vanished male twin, or sexual intercourse. This science proves that through intercourse alone women can obtain the male genes and DNA within their organs and blood for their entire life.

The act of sex is a divine gift between a man and a women for the purpose of human reproduction. It is a sacred covenant, and holy sacrament between a husband and wife. This sacred spiritual act of the union of souls should always be regarded as such.

SOURCES:

1. The doctrine and law of marriage, adultery and divorce, with an …, Volume 1 By Hector Davies Morgan

2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184

3. Science Daily

 

[Voice of Enki [SG]]

" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.

once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever.

if she does oral,it travels to her brain and becomes one,forever.

and her children with her future husband.

makeup is deception and false advertising,and those that consider made up women to be superior to natural ones,are simply conditioned that way by it's ubiquity.

Where did you get these nonsensical ideas from?

This is literally thinking on the level of mental illness. None of this is even remotely true on any level or in any capacity.

Get your head out of your ass and get real.

There is literally 0 mixing of any kind that happens on the DNA or on the body when a woman and men have sex.

All that happens is an exchange of energy between the souls, which creates temporary links between people, and an exchange of energy which can have lasting effects for better or worse depending on the people involved, and this exchange goes both ways equally for men and woman.

That is all.

Hail Satan!

 

[Voice of Enki [SG]]

they can wear makeup,just that it's production and distribution will be prohibited in my country.

this is a strawman.

women are allowed to do what they want,but virgnity and monogamy would be encouraged,and such women who aren't would be moderately shamed,I never said there would be legal consequences for promiscuity.
men also would be shamed for not being virgins at marriage.

another strawman.

as for your blatant denial,of the fact women are permanently altered genetically from who they sleep with this is refuted here:

Sex cannot only be deadly, DNA from the semen of your past sexual partners can come back to DNA Chimerahaunt you, your children and even generations to come. You may want to think twice about that next one night stand or dude with less than stellar DNA you might secretly shack up with to end your long dry spell.

There is a little known ancient scientific fact I would like to share with you about human sexual relations. That is if you would like to remain in control of your mind, body and the integrity of your divine tree of life. It deals with your DNA, and imposter male gooey semen in the form of DNA of people that can infiltrate your blood through the sacred act of sex when that is often absolutely the last thing you would ever want to happen.

This science gives a new meaning to one night stands being that there really is no such thing as a one night stand when sexual partners swap semen and DNA with one another. They are not just forming a one day sexual union of animalistic fueled passion, but a life long connection in which they may in fact be forever connected through the tree of life that we know of as DNA.
The theory that all the mothers’ sexual partners influence their children’s physical characteristics dates back to ancient Greece and Rome, where it was simply an accepted fact. They did not have the science to back it up, but they definitely knew enough about sexual relations and blood to even have laws at times against adultery, and sodomy.

Many of these laws were punishable by banishment, torture and murder by horrible deaths. Under the laws of the Constantines “Constans and Constantius,” adulterers were burned, or sown in sacks and cast into the sea: under Leo and Marcian the penalty was reduced to perpetual banishment and cutting off the nose. Under Justinian it was again permitted to kill the parties.(1)

I assume these laws were not just done to control their citizens and keep peace, but to control the integrity of their race. Now we have the genetic science to prove these theories. As I mentioned, what I speak of here is a science and it is now being proven as a fact. Scientists have discovered that many women are carrying multiple male Y-chromosome gene sequences in their DNA. Just in case you didn’t know, women are supposed to only carry female Mitochondrial or mtDNA.

Your sexual partners DNA can and may in fact not only become incorporated into a female’s DNA, it can also affect a future unborn child. This is called Microchimerism (abbreviated Mc) which is the presence of a small number of cells that originate from another individual and are therefore genetically distinct from the cells of the host individual.

The word microchimerism is derived from the Greek chimera who was a mythological creature composed of parts of various animals like that of the head of a lion, the belly of a goat, and the tail of a dragon or serpent.

THE DNA RESEARCH

Here is some research on this subject: Male microchimerism in women without sons: quantitative assessment and correlation with pregnancy history.

Purpose: Fetal microchimerism, derived from fetal cells that persist after pregnancy, is usually evaluated by tests for male microchimerism in women who gave birth to sons. We investigated male microchimerism in women without sons and examined correlation with prior pregnancy history. Immunologic consequences of microchimerism are unknown. We studied healthy women and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Conclusions: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.

Another recent study shows evidence to support the theory that the semen from a woman’s previous sexual partners may affect the genetics of a future unborn child. Scientists have discovered a new form of non-genetic inheritance, showing for the first time that offspring can resemble a mother’s previous sexual partner — in flies at least.

CONCLUSIONSexual energy

The conclusions of these ancient beliefs and studies shows possible sources of male michrochimerism that are known from pregnancies, miscarriages, vanished male twin, or sexual intercourse. This science proves that through intercourse alone women can obtain the male genes and DNA within their organs and blood for their entire life.

The act of sex is a divine gift between a man and a women for the purpose of human reproduction. It is a sacred covenant, and holy sacrament between a husband and wife. This sacred spiritual act of the union of souls should always be regarded as such.

SOURCES:

1. The doctrine and law of marriage, adultery and divorce, with an …, Volume 1 By Hector Davies Morgan

2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184

3. Science Daily

You need to clean the abrahamic programming of your soul asap, as your thoughts regarding sex and woman's rights and all else are completely infested with abrahamic kosher nonsense.


Also, a study based on flies cannot be extrapolated to a human being. It is quite literally irrelevant and worthless in relation to human beings.

You completely don't understand what micro-chimerism really is, at all. I have to wonder if you misunderstand what you share due to English not being your first language or something.

The DNA doesn't get mixed, but a small number of cells (really small compared to the 30 trillion cells of a human body, like maybe a few tens of thousands), can be exchanged between the fetus and the mother during pregnancy.

These are only autoimmune cells, no other kind of cells, and these cells can remain active in the body of the both the mother and the child for a many years, however they do not in any way affect the DNA of the mother, or the child!

They are foreign bodies which flow through the bloodstream, as autoimmune cells do, along side the autoimmune cells produced by the persons own body, and act also the same way as autoimmune cells do.


What this really is, is a mutually beneficial symbiotic process, where immune cells are exchanged between the mother and the child, which give an added layer of protection against disease and other related things to both the child and the mother.

In some cases, if a woman gets pregnant shortly after giving birth to a child, or after getting an abortion, the autoimmune cells exchanged by the mother and the first child may be present and active in enough quantity that a tiny portion of cells originating from the first child can also be exchanged with the second child and thus be present in the second child.

This is not based on the DNA at all, neither does anything get "incorporated" into the DNA of the woman, or the child, in any way whatsoever.

They are simply groups of autoimmune cells from a previous child that are present in the body of the woman alongside the autoimmune cells made by the woman's own body.

You have completely misunderstood how this works or what this means, likely because you did not read properly about this subject and only see through your tinted lenses what you want to see in a vain attempt to validate your ignorance and delusions.

Hail Satan!

 

[pacharica]

they can wear makeup,just that it's production and distribution will be prohibited in my country.

this is a strawman.

women are allowed to do what they want,but virgnity and monogamy would be encouraged,and such women who aren't would be moderately shamed,I never said there would be legal consequences for promiscuity.
men also would be shamed for not being virgins at marriage.

another strawman.

as for your blatant denial,of the fact women are permanently altered genetically from who they sleep with this is refuted here:

Sex cannot only be deadly, DNA from the semen of your past sexual partners can come back to DNA Chimerahaunt you, your children and even generations to come. You may want to think twice about that next one night stand or dude with less than stellar DNA you might secretly shack up with to end your long dry spell.

There is a little known ancient scientific fact I would like to share with you about human sexual relations. That is if you would like to remain in control of your mind, body and the integrity of your divine tree of life. It deals with your DNA, and imposter male gooey semen in the form of DNA of people that can infiltrate your blood through the sacred act of sex when that is often absolutely the last thing you would ever want to happen.

This science gives a new meaning to one night stands being that there really is no such thing as a one night stand when sexual partners swap semen and DNA with one another. They are not just forming a one day sexual union of animalistic fueled passion, but a life long connection in which they may in fact be forever connected through the tree of life that we know of as DNA.
The theory that all the mothers’ sexual partners influence their children’s physical characteristics dates back to ancient Greece and Rome, where it was simply an accepted fact. They did not have the science to back it up, but they definitely knew enough about sexual relations and blood to even have laws at times against adultery, and sodomy.

Many of these laws were punishable by banishment, torture and murder by horrible deaths. Under the laws of the Constantines “Constans and Constantius,” adulterers were burned, or sown in sacks and cast into the sea: under Leo and Marcian the penalty was reduced to perpetual banishment and cutting off the nose. Under Justinian it was again permitted to kill the parties.(1)

I assume these laws were not just done to control their citizens and keep peace, but to control the integrity of their race. Now we have the genetic science to prove these theories. As I mentioned, what I speak of here is a science and it is now being proven as a fact. Scientists have discovered that many women are carrying multiple male Y-chromosome gene sequences in their DNA. Just in case you didn’t know, women are supposed to only carry female Mitochondrial or mtDNA.

Your sexual partners DNA can and may in fact not only become incorporated into a female’s DNA, it can also affect a future unborn child. This is called Microchimerism (abbreviated Mc) which is the presence of a small number of cells that originate from another individual and are therefore genetically distinct from the cells of the host individual.

The word microchimerism is derived from the Greek chimera who was a mythological creature composed of parts of various animals like that of the head of a lion, the belly of a goat, and the tail of a dragon or serpent.

THE DNA RESEARCH

Here is some research on this subject: Male microchimerism in women without sons: quantitative assessment and correlation with pregnancy history.

Purpose: Fetal microchimerism, derived from fetal cells that persist after pregnancy, is usually evaluated by tests for male microchimerism in women who gave birth to sons. We investigated male microchimerism in women without sons and examined correlation with prior pregnancy history. Immunologic consequences of microchimerism are unknown. We studied healthy women and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Conclusions: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or sexual intercourse. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women.

Another recent study shows evidence to support the theory that the semen from a woman’s previous sexual partners may affect the genetics of a future unborn child. Scientists have discovered a new form of non-genetic inheritance, showing for the first time that offspring can resemble a mother’s previous sexual partner — in flies at least.

CONCLUSIONSexual energy

The conclusions of these ancient beliefs and studies shows possible sources of male michrochimerism that are known from pregnancies, miscarriages, vanished male twin, or sexual intercourse. This science proves that through intercourse alone women can obtain the male genes and DNA within their organs and blood for their entire life.

The act of sex is a divine gift between a man and a women for the purpose of human reproduction. It is a sacred covenant, and holy sacrament between a husband and wife. This sacred spiritual act of the union of souls should always be regarded as such.

SOURCES:

1. The doctrine and law of marriage, adultery and divorce, with an …, Volume 1 By Hector Davies Morgan

2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184

3. Science Daily

You need to clean the abrahamic programming of your soul asap, as your thoughts regarding sex and woman's rights and all else are completely infested with abrahamic kosher nonsense.


Also, a study based on flies cannot be extrapolated to a human being. It is quite literally irrelevant and worthless in relation to human beings.

You completely don't understand what micro-chimerism really is, at all. I have to wonder if you misunderstand what you share due to English not being your first language or something.

The DNA doesn't get mixed, but a small number of cells (really small compared to the 30 trillion cells of a human body, like maybe a few tens of thousands), can be exchanged between the fetus and the mother during pregnancy.

These are only autoimmune cells, no other kind of cells, and these cells can remain active in the body of the both the mother and the child for a many years, however they do not in any way affect the DNA of the mother, or the child!

They are foreign bodies which flow through the bloodstream, as autoimmune cells do, along side the autoimmune cells produced by the persons own body, and act also the same way as autoimmune cells do.


What this really is, is a mutually beneficial symbiotic process, where immune cells are exchanged between the mother and the child, which give an added layer of protection against disease and other related things to both the child and the mother.

In some cases, if a woman gets pregnant shortly after giving birth to a child, or after getting an abortion, the autoimmune cells exchanged by the mother and the first child may be present and active in enough quantity that a tiny portion of cells originating from the first child can also be exchanged with the second child and thus be present in the second child.

This is not based on the DNA at all, neither does anything get "incorporated" into the DNA of the woman, or the child, in any way whatsoever.

They are simply groups of autoimmune cells from a previous child that are present in the body of the woman alongside the autoimmune cells made by the woman's own body.

You have completely misunderstood how this works or what this means, likely because you did not read properly about this subject and only see through your tinted lenses what you want to see in a vain attempt to validate your ignorance and delusions.

Hail Satan!

I quoted what I could find due to my lack of being able to find the article I was looking for,here is the study in humans:

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592

also,pre-christian roman society and greek society had these same views of women and believed in microchimerism,with harsh punishments for fornicatresses.

many people on here are just simps.

 

[pacharica]

" post_id=430365 time=1678790123 user_id=57]
To be a spiritual leader, you would have to be spiritually advanced, wise, and enlightened. Compare some of the things you have written to what HP HoodedCobra and HPS Maxine have written. HP HoodedCobra has said it is good for women to wear makeup if they want to, and it can be an art form or expression.

Also, people staying virgins until marriage is not best, as they are more likely to cheat or get bored, and are inexperienced and immature with relationships. Research has shown those who have had 3 or so relationships before marriage make the strongest marriages.

What is ideal to one person, does not necessarily reflect what is best for society.

Your people would rise up and revolt against you just for banning makeup.

once a man's seed goes into a woman,his dna intertwines with her's forever.

if she does oral,it travels to her brain and becomes one,forever.

and her children with her future husband.

makeup is deception and false advertising,and those that consider made up women to be superior to natural ones,are simply conditioned that way by it's ubiquity.

Where did you get these nonsensical ideas from?

This is literally thinking on the level of mental illness. None of this is even remotely true on any level or in any capacity.

Get your head out of your ass and get real.

There is literally 0 mixing of any kind that happens on the DNA or on the body when a woman and men have sex.

All that happens is an exchange of energy between the souls, which creates temporary links between people, and an exchange of energy which can have lasting effects for better or worse depending on the people involved, and this exchange goes both ways equally for men and woman.

That is all.

Hail Satan!

https://naturalnews.com/2022-08-07-any-time-women-intercourse-man-retains-dna-brain.html


read all of it.the truth cannot be hidden by simps and cucks anymore.

the simpery and whiteknighting for Sl*ts on here really puts me off.

 

[Lunar Dance 666]

Women are not someones fucking property!!!

We have our own lives, dreams and ambitions to fulfill and yes some of us are also polygamous!

The DNA staying in another persons body is just BS. If that were true we'd all look like vegetables and other animals. We wouldn't even look like humans at all.

Our system is specialized in dealing with the inner/outer world. That includes the airways, the mouth/digestive system and also the vagina / womb. They are THE MOST protected by mucus AND our immune system.

We are NOT snakes either. We do NOT store someone elses sperm to use as fertilization for a clutch of eggs later.

Quit with this nonsense and actually deprogram! These are very cringey lies.

 

[Head Guardian Blitzkreig]

https://naturalnews.com/2022-08-07-any-time-women-intercourse-man-retains-dna-brain.html


read all of it.the truth cannot be hidden by simps and cucks anymore.

the simpery and whiteknighting for Sl*ts on here really puts me off.

We already accept that sex and love are exchanges of energy, so whether this is true or not doesn't matter, although it appears true.

The real question is what do you want to do about it? Keep in mind that this author, Ethan Huff, is a hardcore Christian, so this will skew things in that direction.

If you enter a relationship with a woman, and you believe she is unfairly attached to other men, then you should ask her to detach from them through spiritual means, which would then translate to a change in DNA in the body.

The same should hold true in a situation where a man is still attached to other women besides his girlfriend. The solution has always been the same: Build up the relationship which you want to occur, which may include removing other sexual connections, if those unjustly threaten the agreed-upon monogamy.

To act like this is all the fault of women, and to act like men should control their lives over this, ignores the fact that everyone in society intermingles with one another. If we want to create new relationships, even friendships, this requires us to change where we invest our time or energy.

Your overly defensive or controlling nature either aligns or stems from Abrahamic nonsense that defines women as evil, deceptive, or other negative stereotypes, but this ignores how men can also do evil, and how attacking femininity will only make things worse.

Yes, we should be realistic about how people are interconnected with one another, but we also have to allow the freedom of exchange of energy and let people do what they want. If a woman OR man wants to enter into a new monogamous relationship, then some energy work may be required to quell any threats to this, whether such threats come from synastry, karma, or past relationships.

The above is the extent of any solutions, rather than preemptively attempting to chain a person to the floor, or otherwise shame them for life, or other cruel acts which stem from one-sided fears of an entire gender.

 

[Head Guardian Blitzkreig]

...

Whether this is true or not doesn't change the situation anyway. You can see my other post for more details.
The main point is that even if true, men still get attached. There is no reason to put all of this "blame" on women, when men are also capable of cheating or other bad behavior.

 

[Head Guardian Blitzkreig]

...

You keep damaging your own posts by your way of describing things. Maybe you wrote it to be funny, but it lowers the IQ of the thread. I am saying this for your own benefit, because I hate to see your passion go to waste. You have to accurately translate your dreams with proper wording, or people will fail to see what you see.

I don't think anyone here is against your end goals, which is the total prosperity of gentiles, in all aspects of life. Your method of going about it may cause friction, however.

More importantly, your only mention of spirituality is that which promotes for aesthetics or gender relationships, when it is much more important than that. You never mention having children learn how to meditate or do yoga in schools, but you only seem to care if they will be "Gigachads" or not.

All of this is a great dream, but to achieve it you need spiritual development, otherwise the people within your society will not be able to sustain what you demand of them. This is why JoS focuses first on spiritual development, as this leads to proper social ordering on its own. You yourself came to these ideas by way of your soul's Satanic affiliation and experience, rather than just because you read them.

That is why the "Who hurt you" statement that you dislike is actually a valid question, as it pertains to the trauma of the soul. Blackpill people don't understand this, only perceiving it as a feminist attack and nothing more. I agree that we should update our words to appeal to blackpill people or any others who will come to Satanism, but I wouldn't stress about this, to the point where you become despondent over the state of JoS.

Focus on the spiritual development, and everything else will come in time. Remember the houses on the zodiac wheel: the 8th house of transformations comes BEFORE the 9th house of philosophy, and before the 11th house of humanity and organizations, suggesting transformative activity is needed as some sort of prerequisite for the others.

 

[Lunar Dance 666]

" post_id=430590 time=1678871549 user_id=21286]

...

Whether this is true or not doesn't change the situation anyway. You can see my other post for more details.
The main point is that even if true, men still get attached. There is no reason to put all of this "blame" on women, when men are also capable of cheating or other bad behavior.

True.
Its just views like this, strike a nerve.

However I must say, quite a few have already posted some well written things and counter arguments.

 

[Head Guardian Blitzkreig]

...

Look at that! His weak mind finally broke. Glad we got that out of the way.

 

[High Priest Zevios Metathronos]

...

I would say that all of this reflects in your posts and mentality. It's starting to now make sense.

Regardless, I think you should be less insistent on the modes that already brought you in this condition, manage the tiredness, stop considering the world dirty [albeit stupid, and filled with mistakes, the world is still generally fine to be in], and numerous other things which lead you to fry and want to become a form of Klaus Schwab mirror from the "Nazi Side" in some sort of reactionary disgust because of what you perceive as a penultimate danger, which it kind of is, but life goes on and will go on.

I hope you also recover from what you have been inflicted on the trust territory, because these can be mortal wounds in the mind of a man, that few people can understand. I can understand you very well there.

Undoubtedly, we have to fight certain monsters that are quite different now, but we are doing this and successfully. I think your overview and how burden you might feel, or senses of urgency, and other things, maybe are pushing you to draw negative conclusions, extreme pressure, and overwhelming deadly seriousness, which mostly just harms you.

I think you need to relax a bit. And I mean this on an actual level not on some random "just chill" nonsense.

The Gods also have the situation under control. As cliche as it might sound, what the human brain cannot comprehend, they can comprehend. Further, many things that people consider wrong now, in the spectrum of life, are actually correct. Now of all times since the past, it's very obvious what soul is for what side, and what souls belong to the gutter, and which will go above.

Currently, we are at peak Kali Yuga, exiting slowly. Souls are being tested now, and severely so. Therefore, circumstances are seemingly insurmountable against us.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

That medical study talking about Male DNA becoming permanently implanted inside of a Woman's body is something that was shared here I think 2 or 3 years ago. And for everybody who was here at the time, there was a lot of debate about it. So it is a little strange that some of the people who were strongly participating in that discussion are also pretending that it doesn't exist, or that they never saw that report. Or arguing only from the perspective of "that is not real, it doesn't exist." But then when shown that it is real, the response is "even if it is real, it isn't important."


Is that really not important that a person's body becomes permanently implanted with the DNA of other people? I see how in situations of marriage, family, or monogamous relationships, this may be considered as something that is not important. The two people may agree with this and it is not a problem.

But when you talk about how promiscuous a very large number of people are now, having sex with a different stranger every day and bragging about a "body count" of hundreds of strangers. And all of the DNA of all of those strangers are becoming stuck inside of the body. If we know that this is something that happens, even if it only happens some of the time and not always, it should at least be thought about if this is a good thing or what the possible effects of it are. And not just flat out ignoring it and refusing to look at what it is doing. Anybody who has pieces of DNA from 100 different people inside of the body, I can't imagine this could be a healthy person. Especially since one of the popular places that this other DNA has often been found inside is the brain.


We already know about the Yehuborim spreading absolutely suicidal advice to all of the young people, for the direct purpose of causing the extinction of our race and the destruction of all of humanity. There is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to use drugs. There is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to race mix. There is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to consume pills and/or surgeries that will make it impossible for them to ever have children. There is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to kill themselves. And there is an extreme amount of propaganda for young people to be extremely promiscuous with no limits, and different people every day. Drug use, race mixing, and promiscuity are the 3 most popular and strongest pieces of propaganda, and they always work together. For everybody of our race to have minds and bodies destroyed by drugs, and to either never have any children or have race mixed children so that within only one generation all of our people will be extinct. Just think, do you know of even one example of one piece of the Yehubor propaganda which is actually a good thing and would help our people?


How much of this propaganda you choose to accept as being okay is your own choice. But none of it was created for any other purpose besides our extinction. And you can talk about things in a hypothetical paradise where society is all 100% racially homogeneous, all people are perfectly healthy, and all people are good with good souls. How in a situation like this, certain actions would not be harmful. But that is not what we have, and I don't know any white country where this situation exists anymore.


This type of propaganda has been done for longer than one generation now, so we can see people who were victims of this and how it has affected their lives. And they are starting to regret it, and creating warnings to younger people to warn them not to do the same thing. Women who spent years only focusing on "having fun" with a hundred different partners, and now they want to be a family with children and a husband. But they are getting too old to be able to have children, and men don't want to be their husbands after she has had so many past partners. A woman with that many past partners, this is something that nearly all men are discusted by and are not interested in. This is a trending thing on the internet that heartbroken women this age are talking about, and people are saying about it "The wall is undefeated." The wall of time that nothing is able to defeat. And they missed their chance to ever have a family.


 Www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2PgCAwelaI


 Www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpTjdP5x7zE



Everything I said, I am not putting a limit on anybody. Anybody will do whatever they want. If you want to do something that may hurt yourself, that is your choice and nobody can stop you. All I'm saying is some things are harmful, and nobody is helped by ignoring these harmful effects. Nobody is helped by pretending that a harmful situation is perfectly safe, or thinking that it will lead to a good result in the end. And people should look realistically about the risks and harm that come with anything and not just refuse to examine it. Because one day, it will be too late to go back and make a different choice. So you better make the decisions for your life that you actually want to make, and that will lead you to the future that you want to have.

 

[Head Guardian Blitzkreig]

....

I agree that it is a big deal, but I believe that the way out is the same solutions which we already employ, which is to detach from karma, clean, yoga, etc. Of course, this cannot be truly studied or measured until the future.

We are trying to balance these ideas without falling prey to Abrahamic solutions. In this case, we were fighting a guy who has gone crazy (now deleted post) who was using that fact of DNA transference to promote an Abrahamic solution.

Ultimately, I believe this DNA transfer to be representative of the natural energy exchange which occurs in sex, so I don't think it would make someone unhealthy, zombified, or whatever gruesome images people think of. However, it would clearly show the person has been influenced by their partners, for better or worse.

We are going to have to deal with all of these problems, and the solution cannot be to just throw people away, yet I do believe it will require extra spiritual effort and healing. To find a Satanic middle ground, we have to balance out the Islamic solutions, which are overly controlling and outright attack sexual activity, even masturbation.

A lot of these studies were focused on the DNA that transfers through pregnancy, not sex itself. Even then, a condom would mitigate this DNA transfer. So, there is some hope. We also see within Islam that the enemy is using sexual suppression, rather than promiscuity, as their weapon of choice.

I think the focal point of this should be to continue to encourage people to find safe and healthy partners, although keeping in mind that people will have to deal with the results of their past action. This is different from the usual beliefs which arise from the DNA study, which is to act like a women is permanently tainted and should be basically avoided.

This is a very similar dilemma to drug use and its physical changes. Even people who "don't use drugs" may still drink heavily. What about the Covid shot and other toxic elements which may change DNA? In these situations, we are more accepting of people if we learn that they are now clean and have done 3 years of Satanic activity. I think the same can be said about dangerous promiscuity.

 

[Onbael_]

I recently heard from an acquaintance who said several times that he wanted to be a supreme leader, and I spoke to him and asked him to explain his ideas to me with questions.
All he said were just crazy thoughts full of delusions, totally inapplicable to reality, they were not divine plans for the world, but just a useless and weak fart.

Most people out there would like to be the ruler of the world, and they would only want that to satisfy their low-level desires, none of them would be able to run the world.
The level would be the same as above.

There is a category of people who would reject complete power over the world, and only because they are programmed with "muh, power is bad".

A very low percentage would reject it because they recognise that they do not have the right qualities.

Most people envision their own worlds but the real "Fuhrers" the Gods would ever appoint, are those who would accept the world and have an ear for it. Most people even in these forums don't really understand what "must" be done, they are a series of hang-ups and just want power like Klaus Schwab.

I come to this Forum often and I read similar rants bordering to the ideas of Klaus Schwab. Maybe not as much but often-times similar. Most of these come because both the writer and Klaus Schwab are primarily on the same level of consciousness while not understanding it, but Klaus Schwab is just on the unfortunate state for humanity to have power to carry these through.

This comes from misunderstanding life on a very deep level and major denial of life and existence, and what happens in it.

If you want the help of the Gods in that task, you must start removing yourself from the Samsaric level of consciousness to become someone who can lead others, because leading is done primarily for others and not for one's self needs of domination.

As everyone writes their real "desires" on this, you will see it has nothing to do with the Aryan Gita or Rita way of leadership, it just has to do with how open or closed your sacral chakra is, if you love makeup, or if you want to fuck girls or something.

Sometimes I don't know if I belong to that category.
Is being in the service of divine justice and serving the gods supposed to be the right mindset?
I can see the greatness and nobility of Gods, but sometimes I miss something.
I try to think of an ironclad system and try to adapt it in a way that is in harmony with people and our nature.
Sometimes I feel like schwab, but with the difference that I aim in a positive direction for humanity.

Perhaps trying to satisfy my thirst for perfection is my mistake or even the thirst to suppress any harmful errors.
If you read any of my posts and have time, correct me if I am wrong.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

.....

Okay, I believe you. Thank you for telling me it isn't as bad as it looks. I don't live in Europe so I can't see for myself.