Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

If Satan is good why does everything to do with him looks intimidating?

You did not have to respond. I already went back to that post the other day so that I would I know what I’m talking about.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Because humans and grizzly bears are totally the same thing and have the exact same hormone levels.
No need to try and reason with these great philosophers mr. OAL. They have no idea what nuance is and believe everything is a zero sum game. This how someone that has spent their entire life splashing in the swamp thinks.
 
jrvan said:
The point was that he should go get clawed by a grizzly bear.
Well as long as all of this is for a good reason...

:lol:
 
SouthernWhiteGentile said:

Leave these people alone. I don't care if they aren't perfect, I don't care if they make a mistake. Because I've seen you and Jrvan both make the same kind of mistakes. Neither of you like the way the other one talks to you, but you both keep talking to each other in the same way. You're being a clown, just like the situation with you and that other person a couple weeks ago.

These seem like good people. And they are new here. You should be treating them like guests, not pushing them away because you disagree with them about some small thing. And you did start it.
 
tabby said:
Ol argedco luciftias said:
jrvan said:
Try telling that to sumo wrestlers or grizzly bears. I'd love to hear the result.


Whatever, you're never going to get it. I don't care about you anymore. Eat shit and die, Yehubor. (After all, you literally affirmed that you're going to die alone rather than strive for immortality. Dipshit).
Because humans and grizzly bears are totally the same thing and have the exact same hormone levels.

I don’t understand the sarcasm.
No one has the exact same hormone levels even within the species of animals or race of humans. Two people of the same weight and gender won’t have the same hormone levels. Same as animals.

He’s making the connection that mass and size doesn’t always determine the levels of hormones. A grizzly bear isn’t necessarily going to have lowered testosterone just because it’s “fat”. Same with Sumo wrestlers, they are huge with no shortage of testosterone.

Diet plays a huge role and many other factors, not just weight, in the levels of hormones. A person can be obese and not suffer testosterone problems because of the ratio of fat to muscle.
I don't know what's going on with this discussion about whatever, but I'll just jump in to comment on the fact that obesity does lower Testosterone and there is at this point undeniable and extant evidence of that.

Fat cells metabolize testosterone to estrogen, lowering testosterone levels. Also, obesity reduces levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), a protein that carries testosterone in the blood. Less SHBG means less free testosterone. Losing weight through exercise can increase testosterone levels.
https://www.webmd.com/men/what-low-testosterone-can-mean-your-health#:~:text=Fat%20cells%20metabolize%20testosterone%20to,exercise%20can%20increase%20testosterone%20levels.

Obesity lowers testosterone levels. For example, a 2007 study of 1,667 men ages 40 and above found that each one-point increase in BMI was associated with a 2% decrease in testosterone. In addition, a 2008 study of 1,862 men ages 30 and above found that waist circumference was an even stronger predictor of low testosterone levels than BMI. A four-inch increase in waist size increased a man's odds of having a low testosterone level by 75%; for comparison, 10 years of aging increased the odds by only 36%. All in all, waist circumference was the strongest single predictor of developing symptoms of testosterone deficiency. And if you doubt these two American studies, just consider Australian research that found almost one in every seven obese men could benefit from testosterone replacement, a rate more than four times higher than in nonobese men.

Erectile dysfunction
Although men with erectile dysfunction (ED) often blame testosterone, hormonal disorders account for only 3% of ED. But even with normal testosterone levels, men who are obese have an increased risk of ED. For example, a Harvard study found that a man with a 42-inch waist is twice as likely to develop the problem as a gent with a 32-inch waist. Brazilian research also linked abdominal obesity to ED, but only in men older than 60. And a California study reported that having a BMI of 28 (overweight but not obese) increased a man's odds of developing ED by over 90%.

Establishing a link is one thing; finding a way to improve erectile function, another. But a Massachusetts study found that weight loss can indeed improve things for overweight men with ED. Similar results were reported by Italian scientists who randomly assigned 110 obese men with ED to a diet and exercise program or to simply continue their usual care. After two years, more than 30% of the men in the diet and exercise group had corrected their ED without medication, compared with less than 6% in the group that received their usual level of medical care. Men who lost the most weight enjoyed the greatest benefit.

Reproductive function
Obesity takes a toll on sexuality, and it may also impair fertility. American research has linked obesity to low sperm counts and reduced sperm motility; German scientists reported similar findings in men between 20 and 30.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/obesity-unhealthy-and-unmanly

Low testosterone levels are frequently encountered in obese men who do not otherwise have a recognizable hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular (HPT) axis pathology. Moderate obesity predominantly decreases total testosterone due to insulin resistance-associated reductions in sex hormone binding globulin. More severe obesity is additionally associated with reductions in free testosterone levels due to suppression of the HPT axis. Low testosterone by itself leads to increasing adiposity, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of metabolic complications. Obesity-associated hypotestosteronemia is a functional, non-permanent state, which can be reversible, but this requires substantial weight loss.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955331/

It goes on and on and on and on,

https://www.everlywell.com/blog/testosterone/testosterone-weight-loss/

https://www.nebido.com/low-testosterone/research-news/obesity-is-strongly-linked-to-low-testosterone-levels-in-men

https://www.nature.com/articles/ijir200842

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-05-weight-loss-obesity-surgery-rapidly.amp

https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/34/7/1669

This is just endless. Its just from the first page. If I start posting it all, the entire forum will be filled there is so much to be said about this.

But one thing is certain - there is an undeniable link between Obesity and Testosterone and Cardiovascular Health and all diseases. In essence, stop being fat .
I implore anyone suffering from Obesity to take on HIIT to lose fat quickly and get in shape.

Just search HIIT for fat loss on YouTube and you'll see endless routines you can do.

As for Sumo Wrestlers, they store Fat in a different
way in the Clinical sense, Which is why they are safe from the adverse reactions,
Normally, people with obesity store a portion of their extra fat deep inside the abdomen, where it wraps around the pancreas, liver, and other vital organs. We call this visceral fat. It pollutes the blood with molecules that can cause inflammation, and this is why obesity can lead to health issues like high blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes, and heart attacks.
But sumo wrestlers don't usually suffer from these symptoms. So what's their trick? CT scans reveal that sumo wrestlers don't have much visceral fat at all. Instead, they store most of their fat right underneath the skin. That's why scientists think sumo wrestlers are healthy. They have normal levels of triglycerides, a type of fat in their blood, and unexpectedly low levels of cholesterol, both of which lower their risk of heart disease, heart attack, and stroke.

So how did they hit the jackpot on fat? The secret's in their name: sumo wrestler. Studies show that intense exercise may prevent the buildup of visceral fat. Basically, it has to do with how exercise increases a hormone called adiponectin. Adiponectin guides glucose and fat molecules out of our blood stream, where they could build up as visceral fat, and instead puts them underneath the skin.

Mind you, sumo wrestlers get a lot of exercise. At a sumo stable, or heya, in Japan, training starts as early as 5 a.m. and can last for up to five hours straight, and it's nothing like what you'd expect to find at your typical group fitness class. For example, during an exercise called butsukari-geiko, wrestlers take turns repeatedly hitting and pushing each other until they collapse to the floor from exhaustion. And then, of course, there's the match, where wrestlers try to shove their opponent out of the ring or force them to touch the ground with any body part other than the soles of their feet.

But as soon as the exercise stops, so does its benefits. When sumo wrestlers retire, they have to seriously cut calories or they become at risk for cardiovascular disease. That might explain why retired wrestlers reportedly die an estimated 10 years younger than the average Japanese citizen. So while the thought of eating 7,000 calories a day might be appealing, you probably shouldn't. Unless you're spending most of your day trying to topple a 400-pound man.

https://www.businessinsider.in/science/sumo-wrestlers-eat-up-to-7000-calories-a-day-yet-dont-typically-suffer-from-symptoms-of-obesity/articleshow/68473061.cms

Just wanted to point that out.

Jack Yeager out -
 
tabby said:
Ol argedco luciftias said:
jrvan said:
Try telling that to sumo wrestlers or grizzly bears. I'd love to hear the result.


Whatever, you're never going to get it. I don't care about you anymore. Eat shit and die, Yehubor. (After all, you literally affirmed that you're going to die alone rather than strive for immortality. Dipshit).
Because humans and grizzly bears are totally the same thing and have the exact same hormone levels.

I don’t understand the sarcasm.
No one has the exact same hormone levels even within the species of animals or race of humans. Two people of the same weight and gender won’t have the same hormone levels. Same as animals.

He’s making the connection that mass and size doesn’t always determine the levels of hormones. A grizzly bear isn’t necessarily going to have lowered testosterone just because it’s “fat”. Same with Sumo wrestlers, they are huge with no shortage of testosterone.

Diet plays a huge role and many other factors, not just weight, in the levels of hormones. A person can be obese and not suffer testosterone problems because of the ratio of fat to muscle.

Idk what you are talking about, I only saw this comment.

But if you are chubby, your testosterone levels are lower. In other words, you go and workout, lose fat, your testosterone levels should increase.

You can not compare sumo wrestlers with normal fat people. Sumos workout each day, and that really really hard. They practise and exercise a lot. They also eat very good and healthy food.

You can not compare it to someone who barley moves and eats burger all day with a sumo.

Of course the sumo has higher Testosterone levels, Sumos are fighters.
 
tabby said:
Ol argedco luciftias said:
jrvan said:
Try telling that to sumo wrestlers or grizzly bears. I'd love to hear the result.


Whatever, you're never going to get it. I don't care about you anymore. Eat shit and die, Yehubor. (After all, you literally affirmed that you're going to die alone rather than strive for immortality. Dipshit).
Because humans and grizzly bears are totally the same thing and have the exact same hormone levels.

I don’t understand the sarcasm.
No one has the exact same hormone levels even within the species of animals or race of humans. Two people of the same weight and gender won’t have the same hormone levels. Same as animals.

He’s making the connection that mass and size doesn’t always determine the levels of hormones. A grizzly bear isn’t necessarily going to have lowered testosterone just because it’s “fat”. Same with Sumo wrestlers, they are huge with no shortage of testosterone.

Diet plays a huge role and many other factors, not just weight, in the levels of hormones. A person can be obese and not suffer testosterone problems because of the ratio of fat to muscle.

Even when I am in my prime shape, a sumo has probably much more testosterone than I have.
 
NinRick said:
NinRick said:
Jack said:

I appreciate both of your comments to me. Though I think I’m being misunderstood so let me try explain.

I am well aware that someone who is obese and has pretty much all fat and little muscle, eating junk all day - is going to have testosterone problems. As you quoted, Jack, fat changes testosterone into oestrogen.

BMI is a very poor and inaccurate way to determine if one is truly “fat”. It takes only into account weight, height, and age, but leaves out a very important factor which is muscle to fat ratio within the body. Muscle weighs more than fat as it is denser so a person with a higher BMI could be labelled obese but have a much higher muscle ratio to fat.

For example, I would be considered overweight according to my BMI score even though I’m muscular and slim.

Someone who is obese may try to lose weight through weight lifting and not understand why they start gaining weight for a while before dropping the pounds. This is because muscle is being built before the fat starts burning off through the exercise.

All I was trying to state is that being obese or large in mass on its own doesn’t straight out equal hormone problems. One can be considered obese but that is only one factor and doesn’t take into account things like diet, muscle ratio, and what-have-you. And as you state, exercise and life style.

To generalise such would be inaccurate as everyone’s bodies and their life habits are different.

I do explain at the end of my last response:

Diet plays a huge role and many other factors, not just weight, in the levels of hormones. A person can be obese and not suffer testosterone problems because of the ratio of fat to muscle.

Sorry for taking things off topic.
 
SouthernWhiteGentile said:
SouthernWhiteGentile said:
Friend ,I feel somewhat nostalgic while reading your posts and I feel I should infact tell you some things about myself and what I learned since the beginning of my Satanic journey here and how my values have changed.

At first I was also rather unpolished, crude and assholish. Although it was primarily based on disagreements where I couldn't take any disagreement and had to come out on the top. I also had this "Might is Right" Beta ,Alpha mindset and this Masculine Feminine conundrum. But I had to let go of those things and move towards accepting the complexities of life. Nowadays when I saw Masculine, I don't mean it the General cultural sense of the word. What I'm trying to say is a person who is in control of and directs his will and doesn't let emotions drive him.

The "Might is Right" thing where you're constantly on the edge trying to one up someone is just an antisocial rationalization ideology created by the Globalists, because they were Psychopaths and they needed to justify their Psychopathy to themselves in the form of an ideology.

And from that flows into common culture all this bullshit parlance that actually doesn't reflect the values of reality. People are Obsessed with Dominance and Submission, but its primarily a Sexual thing and not needed to be extrapolated to the society. Some couples like having variety, some don't. Its just an astrological thing or may be personal.

And it's not even like your trying to Dominate or Submit to your partner. Submissive women will seek out Men who are Dominant and vice versa. It's not done out of compulsion, but out of need. In essence it's a coupling that is natural. For me,I like to choke and slap women and tie them up (Shibakiri), but that's because of my personal astrological makeup and needs. Many different people like different varieties. Some just want to
have normal sex. The woman who wants to be spanked has that need to be spanked ,she's not to be judged. And so we need not judge polyamorous or whatever couples just because it's not common pairing in society. Infact i personally feel the need for Multiple wives but that can't happen with current laws and this feminism bullshit.

People have personal needs and behaviors. What we need is a common ideology for a common good that advances society, and allowing the utmost degree of freedom in the personal lives of the ones who live in a society.

You should know this, that Aryans have the Highest Empathy levels of any other race. Aryans were baited into helping out every other race in the world for their high empathy. And that is because our Societies weren't based on violence but were based around comradeship and coming together to build something. Its not ," I get one up this guy and I'm better. " There was always sacrifice for the Greater good and having that common ideology, we never had this liberal muh choice in things that mattered. Most people pulled their weight in for things that mattered and their personal lives were their own.

Authority is not Dominance. Infact its the opposite. Leaders cannot be leaders if they don't have people who trust in them and forward their cause. Aryanism is primarily based on advancing the common good. And so if you have the virus of Social Darwinism in your brain, throw it out.

Leaders are only leaders because they have the organizational capability and the great desire to help their common man. And then the common man ,who believe in that leaders ability agrees to help him as his subject. That is how Hierarchical Systems work - on merit and empathy, not on Dominance and submission.

And we don't need everyone to have the same behavior. If everyone was a leader fanatic type, then there would be no leadership because everyone would be butting heads. We don't need that kind of personality in everyone.

Some people are more sensitive, some like me are more Yogic and disciplined. Its all okay. Diversity in this way within our own race is beautiful. What we don't need is communism,liberalism, Crony Capitalism and Feminism to exist.

We need to recognize and uphold every member of our family here.

And as a white person you should celebrate the jrVaN and Tabbys marriage in the time at history considering how rare it is that both are Spiritual Satanists and Nationalist Socialists. You should applaud and encourage them collectively and hope they have lots of kids. Having Kids and raising them well is one of the highest values in a White Nationalist sense.

Most certainly this guy is not a Beta Male. He was able to get a wife in such a serious situation in the West where a large portion of Young people are not having sex and relationships. This just asserts that he a capable man who knows how to attract women and he has the allegiance of a wife who is dedicated to him and supports him.

You should look at Lydia's working to remove Emotional problems. There's no shame in admitting shortcomings my friend. I was really stubborn once too but now I actively search out opposing opinions that could disprove me. The conservative and Family oriented values are very hard to disprove and most certainly in a Gentile run country that will be the majority of coupling.

I can see myself in you. Its because of the lack of fatherhood and a lack of motherhood. I know it's hard but when you're in a very bad place ,unknowingly you attract bad people are events that reinforce your view about the world. There are a lot of good women and men in this world.

You need to let go of your Negative Ego and mature as a man. You need to get in touch with your emotions, feel them fully and choose whether to act on them or not as a matter of will. To become a true Yogi who is unflinching, but at the same time understanding. One who is fanatical in his dedication, who is undoubting about himself and his cause, but also caring and empathetic to his fellow man. One who leads by example and not by intimidation.

You need to let the suffering come out and be done with it. I can see you have a lot of trauma and suffering in you. The more quickly you start to remove it and work on rehabilitation, the better.

I implore you to find some regular female friends and you should become friends with them. Do not try to have sex with them and don't hit on them. Just become friends and try to connect with women that way before looking for an actual relationship. You already know the values of having boundaries and related so I won't go into that. Once you feel the power of female friendship you can appreciate the value of the feminine and become more mature as a man and get more better Male friends as well. Having female friends and becoming acquainted with interacting with the Opposite sex will make you capable of being able to appreciate their way of being.

I'd like to you read some books,
https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=05CA5B6CF10F3883F041458F448904AB

https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=02E7EBBA67BD9FA6C3DAE2B341F9F951

https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=B47FD81465C55C5724E4AD35641F4B8D

But please do the psychological healing working to get rid of the trauma from your parents. Do it multiple times. Its okay. In the future, you will have a loving wife and family who you can raise correctly this time. We're all in this together, against psychopathic Yehuborim hell bent on destroying humanity. Let's bond together after getting over our differences.

Let's all be one happy family after rooting out the undesirable elements who are already going away as we see now. We are all your support system and we will all help you to change as it is natural on the spiritual path. Through little deaths to the ego, you will be free of the inside blockages that are within us all.
 
I find myself comforted this has started to work itself out. I had been observing this thread with some concern, thinking "Aw damnit, this is gonna be a nightmare to sort out. Should I say something? Or would it more just add issues to things?" I'm happy it's not as needed.

Let's let the enemy tear themselves apart, and not do the same to ourselves, yes? Gotta remember we're all on the same side here.
 
Tyliron said:
I find myself comforted this has started to work itself out. I had been observing this thread with some concern, thinking "Aw damnit, this is gonna be a nightmare to sort out. Should I say something? Or would it more just add issues to things?" I'm happy it's not as needed.

Let's let the enemy tear themselves apart, and not do the same to ourselves, yes? Gotta remember we're all on the same side here.

Agreed.

I will say though, I don’t think it was time completely wasted - at least not for me. This conflict has aided me in realising some things on a personal level I didn’t understand or couldn’t see before.

So, however unpleasant and frustrating, I’m grateful for the lessons I can take from this in the end.
 
jrvan said:
SouthernWhiteGentile said:
About this couple I obviously don’t know how they are offline and I would be glad to hear that they had children, but what I said on the other thread was real. If they were to be attacked what would happen? I would want him to be a warrior and beat this attacker until their face is destroyed. But judging from his comments it sounded he’s the type of guy that would just roll over. Like I said IDK them maybe he is a super alpha dude offline but it doesn’t sound like it. He shouldn’t fit the stereotype of a white beta cuck. None of us should.
I'm planning to get her a gun at some point so she can defend herself. If the situation called for it then yes I would protect her. I've already been in bad situations together with her, and I did what I needed to do to get us out of there (including subterfuge, cunning, taking heat for her, swallowing my pride, etc.) Keeping her safe was always my priority.
Maybe a Sig P365? Very small and easy to hide, and holds 10 rounds of 9mm.
 
jrvan said:
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Maybe a Sig P365? Very small and easy to hide, and holds 10 rounds of 9mm.

We're going with Colts when I have money for it. 1911 concealed carry w/ suppressor attachments, .357 open carry. She's already named hers ahead of time, and I'm not likely to change her mind :lol:
I've already had a Glock before that I didn't like, and I'm much looking forward to trying the 1911. Can't go wrong with Browning's classic design, right? We'll see how it feels.
1911s are pretty big to carry, big thick handles that could dig into you when you're carrying it, and would probably be printing. And they are very low capacity for how big they are, I think only 7 or 8 shots. But I heard that 1911s have some of the nicest feeling triggers.

The Colt revolvers made in the last 10 or 20 years have had very bad quality control, and it has gotten worse in the recent years. And they have changed to weaker designs and lighter weaker metals. My dad was talking to people who had some colt revolvers, and they said the barrel came loose on 2 of them. Also I don't like the cylinder release on the colt revolvers, how you have to pull it back.

For a revolver, I would recommend S&W or Ruger. I think a Ruger SP101 is basically the greatest quality revolver you can get for the price. Very similar quality between the Rugers and the S&W, but the Ruger has a cheaper price. S&W and Ruger are very much higher quality than Colt revolvers, and both are a lot less money than the Colt.

Ruger SP101, Ruger Super redhawk, S&W 686. Something like one of these would be nice.
 
It’s a common misconception that the best self defense weapon for a woman is a revolver. I’m planning on getting a 9mm at some point they are all around the best pistols. Glocks are just hype. Like he said can’t go wrong with a Smith and Wesson.
 
jrvan said:
SouthernWhiteGentile said:
It’s a common misconception that the best self defense weapon for a woman is a revolver. I’m planning on getting a 9mm at some point they are all around the best pistols. Glocks are just hype. Like he said can’t go wrong with a Smith and Wesson.

Glocks use 9mm rounds. FBI and police use them, but I agree they are a bit over-hyped. The fanboys are pretty funny when they get riled up about it. It's almost like the old playstation vs. xbox.

Ballistic vests are also on the shopping list. You don't need to worry about my wife's safety; I know what I'm doing.
Glocks use multiple of the most common rounds. 9mm, .40, .45, 357 Sig, .22. Maybe also some others that I'm not thinking of. The g26 is a pretty small 9mm that holds 10 rounds, the g27 is exactly identical except it's a 40 cal. The g30 is a little bit bigger, and it's 10 rounds of 45 cal.
 
jrvan said:
SouthernWhiteGentile said:
It’s a common misconception that the best self defense weapon for a woman is a revolver. I’m planning on getting a 9mm at some point they are all around the best pistols. Glocks are just hype. Like he said can’t go wrong with a Smith and Wesson.

Glocks use 9mm rounds. FBI and police use them, but I agree they are a bit over-hyped. The fanboys are pretty funny when they get riled up about it. It's almost like the old playstation vs. xbox.

Ballistic vests are also on the shopping list. You don't need to worry about my wife's safety; I know what I'm doing.
Glock 45 is also a thing. Have you tried?
 
Henu the Great said:
jrvan said:
SouthernWhiteGentile said:
It’s a common misconception that the best self defense weapon for a woman is a revolver. I’m planning on getting a 9mm at some point they are all around the best pistols. Glocks are just hype. Like he said can’t go wrong with a Smith and Wesson.

Glocks use 9mm rounds. FBI and police use them, but I agree they are a bit over-hyped. The fanboys are pretty funny when they get riled up about it. It's almost like the old playstation vs. xbox.

Ballistic vests are also on the shopping list. You don't need to worry about my wife's safety; I know what I'm doing.
Glock 45 is also a thing. Have you tried?
The g45 is actually a 9mm. The number in the name of a glock model is actually just the number of designs they have patented. It has nothing to do with caliber or anything else.

They made g1, then g2, then g3, then g4. Like this.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
The g45 is actually a 9mm. The number in the name of a glock model is actually just the number of designs they have patented. It has nothing to do with caliber or anything else.

They made g1, then g2, then g3, then g4. Like this.
My bad. That's true. There's like dozens of Glock models. Some of them are chambered .45 ACP.
 
''scary equal to evil'' is nonesense a hospital needle can be scary but it will save your life.So it doesn't mean ''scary=evil'' ;)
 

Official Temple of Zeus Links

Back
Top