History/Anthropology question

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

So I've been studying things in the past, mainly early history and pre-history. The mainstream historical narrative is that humans stopped hunting and started planting grains and building structures about 10,000 years ago. In the JOS, we hold a different narrative, that the Gods came down and taught us all these things, and that there was the existence of Atlantis and other civilisations(Lemuria?) that were far older than 10,000 years. Now I wouldn't put it past mainstream archaeology to ignore or explain away evidence for the JOS' version of history, I'm sure money is involved in promoting a certain narrative there but I'm not aware of the details or where to start in that research. But if Atlantis was equal or even above our current technology, I think it'd be impossible to hide evidence of such a civilisation unless there was a massive conspiracy to do so(and even then, how would that be possible?). A high-tech civilisation would leave evidence everywhere, right? Unless whoever destroyed Atlantean civilisation also made sure little to no evidence was left of it, on purpose, to wipe its memory even from our minds. But if it's that case, how do we know about Atlantis at all or why would they allow Plato to write about it? Perhaps they didn't mind it being referenced as a mere legend or couldn't wipe it from our memory completely, and were content with 90% erasure. I've heard it was the Gods who destroyed Atlantis due to a rebellion, but apparently, Atlantis also destroyed itself with tech advancement (according to what Azazel told HPHC once regarding AI and development). I guess both could be true. A rogue advanced civilisation gone mad. The Emerald Tablets also mention that Atlantean magicians opened the portals to a realm/dimension that they shouldn't have (the enemy's dimension I assume) which then lead to massive desolation.

Now I'm sure everyone has their opinions on this, but I'd like fact-based answers regarding this. What is the official JOS view on this that isn't classified, and what sources do we get that view from?

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

There was a series of natural disasters which destroyed these locations. Combined with the fact that ocean levels have risen hundreds of feet, and have covered many of these locations that were coastal and not far above what sea level was at that current time.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Currents of shared consciousness. Last night's episode of Midnight Broadcast was about exactly this topic.

 

[SomewhatCoherent]

göbekli tepe proves the mainstream narrative is wrong. There is a lot of fraud in History/Anthropology, most of the bad information is really obsolete information. For decades the fringe has been saying there was civilizations before the ice age and something destroyed them (cataclysms). The oral traditions states this. Today we have dna testing proving this. Its easy to say something, its hard to prove it and nearly impossible to change establishment doctrine because no one wants to recall all the BS books/papers/lectures/etc. that they made. On top of everything there is massive amount of fraud, financial and political incentives to lie and cover up the truth. Even on the alternative history side of things, we can't really prove what exactly happened only to point evidence for the destruction of long lost civilizations with any degree of certainty.