Dracula

[EasternFireLion666]

Was Vlad Tepes prince of Romania a crypto Yehubor? Legend has it he would dunk his meals in his victims' blood.

I heard somewhere, maybe on the old forum that he was actually a Satanist... idk if everything we her about him is true. He was tough but maybe not a monster. He was 100% against Islam, but he did not look like a christian either

 

[Wotanwarrior]

Vlad Dracula was a hero who prevented the Ottoman Empire from invading Europe, he was also Satanist, Mageson wrote a sermon that spoke about Vlad and the order of the dragon, all that vampirism and blood are just lies and propaganda invented by the enemy.

 

[_Viktor_]

I read that he was a true warrior and wise as a serpent.
Always thought the "Dracula"/blood lust stigma stemmed from him being black-washed and tainted to shine a bad light on him...

Any more ideas/info?

 

[Aquarius]

What other satanic rulers were there besides Hitler? I know there was a thread about this but were Mussolini, Hirihito, and Franco considered Satanic?

Mussolini not Satanic in my opinion, he was a leader, but fascism was completely different and a fail compared to national socialism.

 

[Bravera]

What other satanic rulers were there besides Hitler? I know there was a thread about this but were Mussolini, Hirihito, and Franco considered Satanic?

Role Models

 

[Wotanwarrior]

What other satanic rulers were there besides Hitler? I know there was a thread about this but were Mussolini, Hirihito, and Franco considered Satanic?

Mussolini was not a Satanist, Franco was a xian nationalist and Hirohito was a Shintoist who is similar to Buddhism.

 

[Europe Gladio]

A lot of your questions can be found here:
http://dawn666blacksun.angelfire.com/English666.htm

For example "Understanding National Socialism" article would clear up most questions:
http://web.archive.org/web/20150330200638/http://webzoom.freewebs.com/spiritualwarfare666/Understanding_NS.pdf

The ideea is that most questions can be found in 5 minutes search. If an HP wrote about it, then that is probably JoS stance on it. If you are skeptical you can debate that stance. If the topic is not covered, that's a good question!

I honestly do appreciate your approach to the response. Thank you for clearing it up. I don't want to sound defeatist but I am sorry for my behavior earlier.