Sexuality Disrupting Cosmic Order Through Homosexuality

Homosexuality is as natural as being born left handed. It is not a quality that is chosen or can be altered at will. A woman could be infertile and many men would still be attracted to her, even though having children with her would be impossible. The sexual force is a vital essence of the soul and serves a variety of purposes which aren't exclusive to reproduction. As long as one's partner is a consenting human adult, there doesn't need to be any suppression or vilification of the desire present.

This article down below contains a lot of great info about the power of the sexual force. (Source is 18+)

I'm straight. But, all this homosexuality and whaterer else similar, and that this is bad comes from christianity, and we know christianity is a lie, christianity supresses sexuality because "it's bad do use it", but in reality "they" the yehuborim want to keep people enslaved and on a low level of existence, masturbation and sex empowers the soul, so naturally there is nothing wrong with it, so is it the same if people have other tastes.

Firstly, even though you have stated its acceptability already, I would like to cite the Temple of Zeus itself.

Your consensual adult sexual life is your own. This includes heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, and consensual group relationships, as well as asexuality or choosing to remain sexually inactive. Consent, honesty, and responsibility guide how that freedom is exercised.

Recreational drug use remains an individual decision for which the individual bears responsibility. The Temple strongly discourages it and teaches spiritual development through disciplined practice.

Zevism values the ability to direct your own life. That freedom grows through knowledge, sound judgment, and mastery of your choices.

Firstly, the stigma surrounding these topics are a feature of Abrahamic religions (also much of Buddhism and even fringe cults like Scientology). The Ancients, although they did not perceive homosexuality the same way we do today, did not treat it as the Christians and Muslims both do and did. Some will bring up how homosexual love even had a place in myth, though I will also say that it's important to remember that myth is to be interpreted symbolically.

Secondly, when discussing homosexuality, many people will bring up various appeals to nature. Some will say how it's "not natural" by referring to the fact homosexual relationships do not produce offspring. Others will counter by making note of the fact same-sex interactions exist in nature.

I will say, both these arguments are somewhat irrelevant. As Malpanatwux has noted, humans can be infertile. Do these people simply not have sex? No. Sex in human culture has always existed in more aspects than the creation of offspring. Lust and desire both can and do exist outside of this context. Even animals engage in intercourse for reasons beyond this (though said reasons are not applicable to the human condition; calling an animal "gay" would be anthropomorphizing).

You compare homosexuality to "Injustice, murder, lying". Give this some thought. How is a loving, consenting relationship between two adults comparable to an act of violence that takes someone's life away? It is not. It only is if you have been convinced such an act is inherently sinful.

But think about that for a moment as well. Again, use the example I provided of a consenting, affectionate relationship. Who is being hurt? What harm is being done to society? None. The only "arguments" ever used against homosexuality have been typically rooted in Abrahamic religious dogma.

I will also regard the end result of what happens when one's natural persuasions are oppressed. You cannot "convert" a gay person into a straight one. Some modern religious groups have tried to utterly disastrous and terrible results. If the answer then is to say never have sex and be ashamed of yourself, then this itself causes its own spiritual issues.

With all this said, regarding the matter spiritually, yes, the energy dynamics of a same-sex relationship are distinct from a heterosexual one. The key word here is "distinct". Not negative, distinct. In the example I cited, for comparison, recreational drug use is advised against. The point is, at the baseline, homosexual sex is not spiritually corrosive. Any form of sex, in healthy moderation and pursued hygienically to one's own personal persuasions, is simply part of a good life.

Hello. It is important to notice that homosexuality and bisexuality are also present among most animal species, it is a biological reality and not a human made concept. However it is very rare and limited and definitely not something to "obsess" over in the same way politics and religion have done due to various reasons.

As long as people are free to practice their orientation privately and as long as it doesn't become a tool for social or political controversy it is not really a big deal at all.

Why, then, do you consider homosexuality acceptable? The human body (a man's body, for example) was not designed for penetration and is not anatomically suited for this act.

You are equating anal sex with sexual orientation. These are not the same thing. Two human males can love each other and be attracted to each other, and just have satisfaction in other ways, so technically homosexual men, whereas there are quite a few weirdos, sorry, eccentric heterosexual men who ask that kind of stimulation from their girlfriend or wife.

I have no idea about anatomic possibility of it, but your logic is faulty because the thing you say undesirable is not a requirement of being homosexual, and heterosexual people can do it too. So whatever health related argument, it is against anal sex, not people of same gender having a romantic relationship.

Furthermore, the purpose of lust and sexual desire is supposedly to encourage reproduction, whereas two men or two women can never have children together biologically.

When homosexuality is occurs in nature, in other mammals or human societies from the most primal to most civilized, anthropologists or whatever kind of scientist who observed it noted much more complex relationships than solely reproducing, for example: in some specimen same sex behavior increased when food was scarce and they encountered more predators. This can be interpreted as it served bonding purposes, a social behavior, or nature's dictate that the enviroment is not suitable for producing offspring.

Sex existing just for reproduction is an extreme idea some abrahamic believers adopted and took as far as saying masturbation is a grave sin. Dolphins do it just for fun. In the last update it is advised to not go to extremes and explained in detail how to not waste sexual force.

The point is intimacy serves purpose other than making a baby. From a more Taurean perspective, for earthy sensual pleasure; from a more Scorpion perspective, motivated by the desire to connect, touch, have someone on a level deeper than skin.

The human body (a man's body, for example) was not designed for penetration and is not anatomically suited for this act.

Then why does the prostate gland act as the male equivalent of a g-spot?

As others have said, the purpose of lust and sexual desire is more than just an expression of procreative urges. Ironically, I think the argument is stronger for a homosexual man denying his homosexuality being a microcosm of izfet, as the psychological issues induced by that naturally bleeds over into blockages of the souls development at best, and at worst, who knows what pathological self-destructive behaviors would harm not only themselves but radiate outward unto others. As NG Arcadia quoted, for matters of sexuality, consent between adults is the rule.

Also, when compared to injustice and murder and lying, the thought of the entire cosmos being disrupted due to gay butt sex is a rather funny idea.