CIA Document - We're in a Matrix!

[High Priest Zevios Metathronos]

Unfortunately links directly to this info cannot be shared, because for obvious reasons.

I will comment on this on an elaborate sermon as I have seen similar things before. It is a very interesting subject.

 

[FancyMancy]

I saw a bit of something that "they admit that we are in a simulation". (I am sure it said "admit", as opposed to "claim", so that word - admit - in and of itself is very interesting and argue-worthy.) Also about 2 or 3 years ago, someone who seemed to be awake, who I think has returned to being 'woke' now (because it got too much for him, he said, plus he also does drugs..., so he might have just been 'woke' and not really quite awake anyway...) told me or suggested that we are in a simulation.

It is stupid. What I think, in my limited understanding of it, what is meant and misunderstood (or understood but then en-stupified-with-bullshit for the masses, so that it can be more an influence and imposed acceptance and subduing into the microchip and Futurama-like episodes of VR) is that on the small-small-small-scale level of things (think Planck length), there is no defined edge. Take your finger or hand and trace it across the edge of your phone or laptop or monitor or table, from the top surface down to the front or side surface. You can feel - and just see - where the edge is. On the Planck-length scale or level, there is not as clear a boundary as this; things are so, so small, so tiny, that it is like there is not an edge anymore between the molecules and the bits and pieces... sort of like trying to find the exact boundary or edge of our Galaxy with all of the stars at the inexact edge.

Seeing the title of that article... it might have said "confirms", that an article said. To me, "confirms" is closer to "admits" than "claims". If we are in a Star Trek holodeck, then we don't have a law of attraction, because the programme is programmed to certain parameters in which we cannot possibly escape - consider an accident, in Star Trek TNG, where Geordi La Forge told the computer to programme a simulation which could defeat Data (a main character), as opposed to Data's holodeck character of Sherlock Holmes. Examples of holodeck simulation parameters include Torres (ST VOY) skydiving inside a holodeck with the safety protocols off (meaning if she crashed, she would die; if the safety protocols were on, she'd be safe, even when falling from a mile high), or as I said a simulation of about the late 1880s smoggy London as a detective, or a beach or an asteroid, etc. The parameters are different for each programme, so "the law of attraction", in this sense, is limited to the programme's parameters. This is the Yehubor's dream.

Many members and staff, if any paid enough attention, must surely be annoyed with my seemingly-fanboy-love of Star Trek and Futurama, but if truth be told - I properly haven't seen one in over a year and the other only 1 episode in ages, as well, if that makes any difference! Needless to say, both Star Trek and Futurama, and of course the media as a nearly-whole, are Yehuborim, so...

In a Spiritual context - as I have said before, Technology is like a Physical version, or you might say manifestation, of Magick and Spirituality. We don't need phones to communicate - we should have telepathic abilities; we don't need to fly planes and helicopters - we should be able to either levitate and/or perform Astral projection; we don't need to build lorries and locomotives - we should be able to either perform telekinesis, if we are so lazy, or better yet, with a less-populated World, grow our own crops and do our own farming and husbandry on a more personal scale; we don't need to go to work for little pennies - we should be able to have the 'currency', in a sense, of Energy - which we can raise ourselves for our needs and wants, etc., etc. etc.

Technology, with qubits and Quantum Computers, is more and better than binary 1s and 0s and much closer to Physical "Spirituality", if you will. What could take thousands of years could take days, hours or seconds with Quantum Computers. That could be both exciting and extremely fucking scary, if one is ignorant and powerless. What took 2000 years for the Yehubor's shit, has been dismantled in about 20 years of evil Goyim repairman-and-woman work...

When you say "UFOs", please specify and clarify that you mean alien/ET craft. "UFO", as I know you know, means Unidentified Flying Object; not alien/ET craft, necessarily. (Yes, I'm being nit-picky!)

 

[luis]

I saw a bit of something that "they admit that we are in a simulation". (I am sure it said "admit", as opposed to "claim", so that word - admit - in and of itself is very interesting and argue-worthy.) Also about 2 or 3 years ago, someone who seemed to be awake, who I think has returned to being 'woke' now (because it got too much for him, he said, plus he also does drugs..., so he might have just been 'woke' and not really quite awake anyway...) told me or suggested that we are in a simulation.

It is stupid. What I think, in my limited understanding of it, what is meant and misunderstood (or understood but then en-stupified-with-bullshit for the masses, so that it can be more an influence and imposed acceptance and subduing into the microchip and Futurama-like episodes of VR) is that on the small-small-small-scale level of things (think Planck length), there is no defined edge. Take your finger or hand and trace it across the edge of your phone or laptop or monitor or table, from the top surface down to the front or side surface. You can feel - and just see - where the edge is. On the Planck-length scale or level, there is not as clear a boundary as this; things are so, so small, so tiny, that it is like there is not an edge anymore between the molecules and the bits and pieces... sort of like trying to find the exact boundary or edge of our Galaxy with all of the stars at the inexact edge.

Seeing the title of that article... it might have said "confirms", that an article said. To me, "confirms" is closer to "admits" than "claims". If we are in a Star Trek holodeck, then we don't have a law of attraction, because the programme is programmed to certain parameters in which we cannot possibly escape - consider an accident, in Star Trek TNG, where Geordi La Forge told the computer to programme a simulation which could defeat Data (a main character), as opposed to Data's holodeck character of Sherlock Holmes. Examples of holodeck simulation parameters include Torres (ST VOY) skydiving inside a holodeck with the safety protocols off (meaning if she crashed, she would die; if the safety protocols were on, she'd be safe, even when falling from a mile high), or as I said a simulation of about the late 1880s smoggy London as a detective, or a beach or an asteroid, etc. The parameters are different for each programme, so "the law of attraction", in this sense, is limited to the programme's parameters. This is the Yehubor's dream.

Many members and staff, if any paid enough attention, must surely be annoyed with my seemingly-fanboy-love of Star Trek and Futurama, but if truth be told - I properly haven't seen one in over a year and the other only 1 episode in ages, as well, if that makes any difference! Needless to say, both Star Trek and Futurama, and of course the media as a nearly-whole, are Yehuborim, so...

In a Spiritual context - as I have said before, Technology is like a Physical version, or you might say manifestation, of Magick and Spirituality. We don't need phones to communicate - we should have telepathic abilities; we don't need to fly planes and helicopters - we should be able to either levitate and/or perform Astral projection; we don't need to build lorries and locomotives - we should be able to either perform telekinesis, if we are so lazy, or better yet, with a less-populated World, grow our own crops and do our own farming and husbandry on a more personal scale; we don't need to go to work for little pennies - we should be able to have the 'currency', in a sense, of Energy - which we can raise ourselves for our needs and wants, etc., etc. etc.

Technology, with qubits and Quantum Computers, is more and better than binary 1s and 0s and much closer to Physical "Spirituality", if you will. What could take thousands of years could take days, hours or seconds with Quantum Computers. That could be both exciting and extremely fucking scary, if one is ignorant and powerless. What took 2000 years for the Yehubor's shit, has been dismantled in about 20 years of evil Goyim repairman-and-woman work...

When you say "UFOs", please specify and clarify that you mean alien/ET craft. "UFO", as I know you know, means Unidentified Flying Object; not alien/ET craft, necessarily. (Yes, I'm being nit-picky!)

I feel like by 'Matrix' what they truly mean is the enemy web of magic that is on this planet. The spells of the enemy cover this planet like a grid and that is the 'matrix'. The simulation could mean that the enemy tries to use their spell to make things happen and control us like in a 'simulation'.

 

[Gearshift]

In a Spiritual context - as I have said before, Technology is like a Physical version, or you might say manifestation, of Magick and Spirituality. We don't need phones to communicate - we should have telepathic abilities; we don't need to fly planes and helicopters - we should be able to either levitate and/or perform Astral projection; we don't need to build lorries and locomotives - we should be able to either perform telekinesis, if we are so lazy, or better yet

See this is something I don't understand. Do the Gods NOT have technologies like computers?

If a computer produces trillions or in the case of the Gods a godly amount of data. And beings cannot. Then a computer becomes necessary.

The way you post things it's like saying the Gods are always naked and the clothing they wear is just a construct of their mental powers and while yeah they are walking around naked other beings see them as having clothing. But clothing is merely mental/astral solidified matter.

Or vimanas how do they navigate space without a computer updating their position.

I don't know what you said sounds very odd. I understand but also don't understand at the same time like the whole lack of phones.

Does Satan himself not have a computer or not have a microscope or not have processors for technologies?

 

[AuraofLove]

I posted about this in Detail before -
https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=19114
[/quote]

Thank you for sharing this Jack! Your post was a treasure trove of information of which I had little knowledge about. The one thing I found it very interesting is that in the Gateway Process they looked at electrons and nuclei and found that they're base component is energy. This means everything in the physical plane is comprised of and affected by energy.
This opens a whole other field of research in science and adds validation that spiritual work can alter our physical world, such as with alchemy for instance.

It's unreal how they knew this and suppressed it so that they have control over it. These people are power hungry maniacs.

 

[FancyMancy]

I want to add - regarding the title, I put matrix there because of the whole metaphysical world we are blind to. We see everything as physical yet I'd recently learned that the physical is birthed and built upon by the metaphysical.

The word matrix is quite broad. ^^
It is interesting however the "matrix grid" someone brought up earlier, where the Yehuborim vastly control electronics and put people under a spell. Music is another one of those weapons. It's getting me a little paranoid, all the info out there. :lol:

Psychology is one of the layers, or one of the lattices, of this mesh of a matrix cage in which we have had to live.

 

[AuraofLove]

CIA Document (Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process) : *
[/quote]
I posted about this in Detail before -
https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=19114
[/quote]

For those who want to read, HPS Maxine had recommended to all Clergy to read the book by author Moorehouse, many many years ago. It explains a lot about what the enemy does to psychic people and other forms of governmental involvement in this.
[/quote]

Awesome! Some more interesting research to digest. I will give it a thorough look as well. Thank you HP Hooded Cobra.

Hail Satan!

 

[FancyMancy]

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -Aristotle

I am not going to call myself educated, but I do sometimes present questions which others would dislike. That doesn't mean I am condoning or encouraging or doing such things. Other people or sheeple choose to infer what they want to infer - but at the same time, if they realise enough, they might notice that someone asking about something might, or also might not, be interested in the thing the person is asking. I know people are a bit... not unstable but fickle, so I like to make them uncomfortable with things sometimes! :twisted:

 

[Stormblood]

Greetings my fellow brethren. I came across an article that starkly shows how much "they" actually know. MK-Ultra aside, there was a declassified CIA document that basically explained the true foundation of reality.

They've obviously known this for a long time yet it strikes me as nefarious on how they declassified this information and followed to remove it from their website. I included the article below with a hard copy of the document available on archive.org

I heard talk that the left is going after this website, along with WikiLeaks (which sadly Trump had also spoken against, calling them "criminals"). This to me is silly because they're a third party group redistributing what's already been leaked from someone else. Just another case of suppressing truth from the elites. That's what they've always done and will continue to do - erase and rewrite history.

As much good as Trump has done it's clear his balls are in the vice of the xianist scum pulling the strings from the shadows. He even wanted to disclose intelligence regarding UFOs but (as he's on record for saying) was strongly "advised against it".

To avoid ranting further, I'd like to end on a positive note. Knowing that EVERYTHING is spiritual gives even more reason to continue our RTRs and meditation work. These things have vast implications on how the scale tips and (I believe) are our greatest tool against the enemy. Thanks for reading.

Article: https://shorturl.at/jFJZ6

CIA Document (Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process) : ***

I posted about this in Detail before -
https://ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=19114

For those who want to read, HPS Maxine had recommended to all Clergy to read the book by author Moorehouse, many many years ago. It explains a lot about what the enemy does to psychic people and other forms of governmental involvement in this.

Psychic Warrior?

 

[The Alchemist7 [SG]]

I have learned that the positions of protons, neutrons, nuclei, then atoms in molecules etc. are extremely similar with the positions of planets in solar systems, then solar system in galaxies etc. It might be true that at subatomic levels whole new Universes exist and we ourselves in this Universe might exist at a subatomic level to other Universes. Is just a theory, since the Universe did not start from any bing bang like we are told by those who don't believe it themselves, the possibilities are many.

 

[Henu the Great]

I have learned that the positions of protons, neutrons, nuclei, then atoms in molecules etc. are extremely similar with the positions of planets in solar systems, then solar system in galaxies etc. It might be true that at subatomic levels whole new Universes exist and we ourselves in this Universe might exist at a subatomic level to other Universes. Is just a theory, since the Universe did not start from any bing bang like we are told by those who don't believe it themselves, the possibilities are many.

I've wondered the same. It could apply to dimensions aswell.

Imagine what we are for ants, and then what for Gods... Plausible, but for me it's a speculation at the end of the day.

 

[Gearshift]

Technology, with qubits and Quantum Computers, is more and better than binary 1s and 0s and much closer to Physical "Spirituality", if you will.

I've recently past 4-5 years now have been hunting down as much information as possible on Trinary(Terinary)/Qutrit.

I have no idea why we are expanding ourselves and limiting ourselves to binary into the quantum.

For example I recall a website mentioning Thomas Fowler's trinary calculator. Apparently Fowler a mathematician. He created his own calculator in trinary and used trinary notation to calculate stuff. Some people were witnesses and apparently our modern clone of his machine is somewhat not an original design but based on another person's observation of it.

Apparently one of the advantages were that division problems often the hardest to solve could be done in addition and subtraction and some of it in multiplication not AS much but certainly within certain ranges. Funny enough his Fowler calculator has relative little usage most of the information on how to use it missing. It's possible some people saw this as being too good and decided to re-structure history by eliminating Fowler's information. But enough information came out to kinda build one albeit to use it like Fowler requires Fowler and that guy has been dead for well over 100 years.

I'd like to see humanity expand to balanced trinary; 1 positive, -1 negative, and 0 ground/off. That way every binary voltaic value 1 and -1 has a ground element to it. In other words grounding at the transistor level since 0 is both off and ground.

Unbalanced is the Futurama 0, 1, 2 obviously that doesn't work well and even Bender was like I think I saw a 2 which indeed you do see if you look carefully 2 actually does show up.

It would require us to basically reinvent the computer and everything from the ground up. But like it's been said by one person Trinary has the most radix and most elegant system of usage in certain terms.

https://www.mortati.com/glusker/fowler/index.htm

https://www.tuannguyen.tech/2019/07/technology-review-ternary-computer/

https://laurent-duval.blogspot.com/2012/05/ternary-trinary-logic-bricks-and-trytes.html

There was one more website with quite a bit of information some red banner website but I can't find it. Non-the less it's still an interesting read.

Qubit = 0/1 combined so 4 Qubits make a Qubyte

But...

Qutrit = 0/1/-1 so 3 Qutrits make a Qutryte.

Albeit either we use the smallest space or the largest space. In Binary we arbitrarily used 8-bits for a byte but for trinary it's either we use the smallest 3, middle 6, or high 9.

Again the entire idea of trit/tryte is store data in the smallest but I'd rather see data stored in the highest 9. Non-the less like Binary we could have made higher bit-ranges the byte section.

So again it falls into if everything is a race to the bottom then smallest if we go the opposite and a race to the top along with top end equipment then there might be more.

Unfortunately I don't think humanity is really ready for a race to the top especially with how everything is run to the bottom.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

I am not going to call myself educated, but I do sometimes present questions which others would dislike. That doesn't mean I am condoning or encouraging or doing such things. Other people or sheeple choose to infer what they want to infer - but at the same time, if they realise enough, they might notice that someone asking about something might, or also might not, be interested in the thing the person is asking. I know people are a bit... not unstable but fickle, so I like to make them uncomfortable with things sometimes! :twisted:

I know brother. I don't like when I've seen people get mad at you for asking about some topics. Because I know that you sometimes ask about some bad things just to hear some opinions about some perspectives around the topics, and that you really completely disagree with those bad things. Always good to be more informed.

 

[FancyMancy]

I am not going to call myself educated, but I do sometimes present questions which others would dislike. That doesn't mean I am condoning or encouraging or doing such things. Other people or sheeple choose to infer what they want to infer - but at the same time, if they realise enough, they might notice that someone asking about something might, or also might not, be interested in the thing the person is asking. I know people are a bit... not unstable but fickle, so I like to make them uncomfortable with things sometimes! :twisted:

I know brother. I don't like when I've seen people get mad at you for asking about some topics. Because I know that you sometimes ask about some bad things just to hear some opinions about some perspectives around the topics, and that you really completely disagree with those bad things. Always good to be more informed.

As a non-main reason, I do also try to make a point, as well. Again - it makes some uncomfortable, so I do it deliberately - but I don't do it all the time. People need a while to relax, and just when they think they can put their feet up in front of a nice crackly fire...! Lol.

 

[Stormblood]

[*]the Universe is, or has, a conscience, according to either posts and/or sermons shared previously

There is no sermon about that because the universe does not have a consciousness. What was stated is that the enemy has tried to subvert spirituality by applying a malefic consciousness and personality on the universe, when it has none. The universe is energy. From older sermons, it is shaped like a pyramid.

The spiritual part, as far as we know, is infinite and eternal, but the physical part is not.

 

[FancyMancy]

[*]the Universe is, or has, a conscience, according to either posts and/or sermons shared previously

There is no sermon about that because the universe does not have a consciousness. What was stated is that the enemy has tried to subvert spirituality by applying a malefic consciousness and personality on the universe, when it has none. The universe is energy. From older sermons, it is shaped like a pyramid.

The spiritual part, as far as we know, is infinite and eternal, but the physical part is not.

Thanks for the clarification.

 

[luis]

[*]the Universe is, or has, a conscience, according to either posts and/or sermons shared previously

There is no sermon about that because the universe does not have a consciousness. What was stated is that the enemy has tried to subvert spirituality by applying a malefic consciousness and personality on the universe, when it has none. The universe is energy. From older sermons, it is shaped like a pyramid.

The spiritual part, as far as we know, is infinite and eternal, but the physical part is not.

I think it has said before that the Universe is infinite both in how many years it exist and how big it is. There is not end to it.

 

[FancyMancy]

[*]the Universe is, or has, a conscience, according to either posts and/or sermons shared previously

There is no sermon about that because the universe does not have a consciousness. What was stated is that the enemy has tried to subvert spirituality by applying a malefic consciousness and personality on the universe, when it has none. The universe is energy. From older sermons, it is shaped like a pyramid.

The spiritual part, as far as we know, is infinite and eternal, but the physical part is not.

I think it has said before that the Universe is infinite both in how many years it exist and how big it is. There is not end to it.

Either way - "wHaT wAs ThErE bEfOrE tHe BiG bAnG?" The Universe! I also say "in one form or another".