Charlie Kirk was murdered

[StyleCoin]

Was it Mossad that killed him?

 

[Renita]

It was most definitely an inside job by ((someone))

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

Was it Mossad that killed him?

He was a great asset for the Yehuborim so I doubt it. Most likely was a lefty.

 

[nema]

Could be his own "friends".. could be anything. These things are never what they seems. We have to watch the American government and see how they're going to use it (because they will) to understand why it really happened.

 

[FlashOfLight_666]

There are videos circulating on X. Showing In his more recent videos that Charlie was beginning to notice.

He was starting to draw attention to Israel's involvement in America's politics, Epstein, Mossad and Jewish funded NGOs. He was also starting to question the October 7th narrative.

He did mention too that he was fearing for his life and posted a tweet worried Israel might kill him if he says too much.

 

[hailourtruegod]

The Ritual Sacrifice of Charlie Kirk Character

Bitchute

Bitchute is a video service that prioritizes creators and champions users' freedoms and privacy.

www.bitchute.com

I've found this video about the Kirk being a Judeo-Masonic ritual murder.
Despite some minor Christian rambling about "the Beast", it seems VERY revealing.

I think Kirk was murdered by the yehuborim because he started turning his back to Israel and Yehuba. The timing of the act is very suspicious. Of course, he was not "/ourguy/", but he defended free speech, the 2A and finally told the truth about the yehuborim to huge amounts of people. He could be in a very comfy position, and messed with people worse than Mexican cartels. And while having a wife and two children.
Thank you, Charlie Kirk. May the Gods bless you.

But I digress.
Please, can someone give me a review about the video above? It seem very revealing.

Here is an alternative link of the same video:

Thank you.

Why would you post a xian nonsense video on this incident and then ask someone else here to break it down for you even though you're the one that posted it.

I highly doubt anything of value can be taken from such a source even if we ignore the xian nonsense.

Im not doubting the tribe has something to do with this but using their made up xian drivel to explain the spiritual component of this event, or any event, to prove anything is a waste of time.

 

[hailourtruegod]

Candace Owens seems to have gone on the rampage against israel over the last few days and has specifically stated that she has proof they were involved. She claims that Charlie expressed he didn't want to work with the isreali government and refused their offers for some kind of partnership.

She has also stated that he was invited to some secret meeting where they offered him money and huge support in order to start pushing the jewish agenda on their behalf. They wanted him to visit israel for photos, etc and start preaching about the WW2 to his audience. Candace said he turned it down, as he was starting to see the truth regarding their involvement in American politics and other world events. There was also a clip of Charlie speaking about how the ADL was founded to prevent people from speaking up against the yehuborim, which he said was anti freedom of speech.

It seems he may have been waking up to them, and they had him taken out.

Interesting takes from her. I look forward to see her follow thru with this information. These things cant be held under wraps for the sake of humanity and more and more people are waking up to that basic fact.

 

[Rodulf]

He was a great asset for the Yehuborim so I doubt it. Most likely was a lefty.

They kill each other all the time.

 

[Rodulf]

ALL of the reaction to this event, ALL of the left vs right fighting and blame, ALL of this is according to plan. This is a show, on a stage, with actors and directors. The psychopaths at the higher layers over this are neither left nor right. My personal take is that this was engineered to get the White middle class up in arms for a mega-war in the Middle East in support of Israel.

 

[Voice of Enki [SG]]

ALL of the reaction to this event, ALL of the left vs right fighting and blame, ALL of this is according to plan. This is a show, on a stage, with actors and directors. The psychopaths at the higher layers over this are neither left nor right. My personal take is that this was engineered to get the White middle class up in arms for a mega-war in the Middle East in support of Israel.

That will never come from this, since charlie kirk himself had made comments how he was afraid israel might kill him for some of his public commentary. One thing is certain, support for israel will not come from this.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

He didn't deserve to die, but he's just another example that pacifism isn't as effective as supporters make it out to be.

I got a Youtube response citing that I'm wrong and that MLK's nonviolence changed people's hearts. Then there are Youtube comments who claim that he used speech that they hated.

What do those these pacifists do to fool themselves so thoroughly? Part of the things they believe is half-true, there are witnesses, but what I don't understand is how nonviolence advocates still convince themselves that their movement is effective despite evidence to the contrary.

The pacifist is the type who believes their own (well-meaning) nonsense and still be admired. Having faith aside, just how is that even possible?

 

[hailourtruegod]

Much of this does seem to have a lot of evidence towards the radical "trans" antifa/ American communist movement. From sites wiping their history to them giving clues it was coming.

That's all I can i say sounds themost certain to the truth but we will have to see at the end what or who caused this. Speculative still, but based on what I have seen online.

 

[Mint]

Much of this does seem to have a lot of evidence towards the radical "trans" antifa/ American communist movement. From sites wiping their history to them giving clues it was coming.

That's all I can i say sounds themost certain to the truth but we will have to see at the end what or who caused this. Speculative still, but based on what I have seen online.

From what I've been seeing it appears that he was beginning to speak out against israel and becoming truly more "America first", and since he was the most prominent conservative voice for young people, he was killed.

 

[Rodulf]

That will never come from this, since charlie kirk himself had made comments how he was afraid israel might kill him for some of his public commentary. One thing is certain, support for israel will not come from this.

I don't know, pal. Lots of reverse psychology and behind the scenes herd-management going on here. "By Way Of Deception Make War".

 

[Sakra]

What do those these pacifists do to fool themselves so thoroughly? Part of the things they believe is half-true, there are witnesses, but what I don't understand is how nonviolence advocates still convince themselves that their movement is effective despite evidence to the contrary.

The pacifist is the type who believes their own (well-meaning) nonsense and still be admired. Having faith aside, just how is that even possible?

Pacifism tries to ignore the "inconvenient truths" in favor of the long term picture of it all. I still find it weird why of all people Charlie Kirk was assassinated but seams like a similar fiasco to Trump and is an attack to freedom of speech.

 

[Astralnaut88]

The person who shot Charlie Kirk in the neck from 180 meters away is a professional assassin.



The bullet appears to have severed his artery and spinal cord, and the real killer has not yet been arrested.

[Disturbing video removed. Search and view at your own discretion]

That's not a difficult shot to make even with iron sights and you are assuming he was aiming for the neck. Every soldier going through boot camp can hit a target at 200 meters more often than not, unless they have terrible coordination. I had never even shot a rifle prior to going through basic training and I hit both of my 300 meter targets first shot using iron sights. Robinson had a scope so it would make it even easier.

What does appear to have been done "professionally" is the fake the texts sent between Robinson and his roommate which seems to be AI, and honestly a indirect jab at me if you can believe it considering some of the messages I have made in the past here even if they were deleting for some reason many months after they were posted.

In the 2nd to last line of the transcript, separated by 2 letters(the word "on"), is 666 in 2 different forms. UVU(it's misspelled as uwu in the transcript but both ways is still 666 in Hebrew) and also Fox is 666 when you reduce each letter to a single digit.
F = 6
O = 15, 1 + 5 = 6
X = 24, 2 + 4 = 6

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Pacifism tries to ignore the "inconvenient truths" in favor of the long term picture of it all. I still find it weird why of all people Charlie Kirk was assassinated but seams like a similar fiasco to Trump and is an attack to freedom of speech.

What do you mean by "inconvenient truths?" Is it facts they don't want to hear or ones that subtract from the "impact" they have on other people?

 

[Wisdom_Seeker]

got a Youtube response citing that I'm wrong and that MLK's nonviolence changed people's hearts. Then there are Youtube comments who claim that he used speech that they hated.

What do those these pacifists do to fool themselves so thoroughly? Part of the things they believe is half-true, there are witnesses, but what I don't understand is how nonviolence advocates still convince themselves that their movement is effective despite evidence to the contrary.

The pacifist is the type who believes their own (well-meaning) nonsense and still be admired. Having faith aside, just how is that even possible?

Pacifism is the enabler of tyranny and injustice. There was a wonderful sermon by HPHC about the frailness of pacifism, which you prompted by your comment. While peace is enjoyable, it must be defended in the face of tyranny, even if one needs to fight a battle or a war to preserve it. This is where pacifists fail because they simply either deny the dangers all together or think that their lack of willingness to fight for the better will somehow change the society. Modern day Germany is an example of a totally pacified society due to Westerners aiding the (((enemy))) in instilling guilt and shame of being white, which soon came to be used against the same Westerners by the enemy. That is why many people in Germany are engineered to be goody liberals who willingly embrace foreign criminals and refuse to see them as criminals and enemies that do not care about their kindness. Of course, as HPHC mentioned in his latest sermon about the white race awakening, the kikesanity program stripped people of their national spirit and ancestral connections (it is truly a religion of the weak, gullible, dumb, cowardly and the deluded), which is why its secular form (liberalism) is such a trending new "religion". Yes, the enemy promotes pacifism and likes such a society because the chance of him being opposed are much slimmer.

As for MLK, he was obviously a (((marxist))) pawn who latter got assassinated, and I am not sure whether the assassin was random or simply a hitman from the enemy who maybe saw that the former was straying away from the path the enemy set for him. Notice how black leaders and activists who mentioned the enemy and their role in the misfortunes that blacks endured were all silenced or simply not given enough attention in the public. Many times, pacifists are given credit for something that they did not deserve, e.g. Gandhi in India (I mentioned you in detail about him and the appeasement method that benefited the enemies of Hindus).

 

[hailourtruegod]

From what I've been seeing it appears that he was beginning to speak out against israel and becoming truly more "America first", and since he was the most prominent conservative voice for young people, he was killed.

I think it's a stretch to think israel directly had a hand in this besides linking communism/antifa to jewish roots.

Reports now is saying this is directly from the antifa movement which is the modern communist party.

Charlie kirk was only saying he couldn't criticize israel on current things. He wasn't going to be the next WW2 regime leader or even a groyper. He was an asset to the xian agenda even though if the yehuborim no longer had full control of him just like with every useful "tool" they put up front. I speak in general and no disrespect to Charlie Kirk because he does deserve respect for pushing against modern insanity.

Hiding their leadership (antifa/ modern american communist party) and organizers doesn't mean they haven't been trying to psyop people to think they dont have close ties with the second largest political party in America or at the least using them as a shield for their political terror in the lives of the general public. I state with endless evidence in my disposal at the ready.

This movement has poisoned the West and even new members that have come here have their mindset skewed of America thanks to this far left propaganda that is found in every level of person.

It's a shame we have to deal with the same insane political enemy we had to deal with before but since we aren't political we here dont have to worry being tossed in it. We pull people to safety, even the commie retards that just might still be salvageable.

I do believe we will see more extreme acts of violence from this antifa sect even moreso that they're finally officially labeled as a terrorist organization. I just hope we can quickly get thru it all as we blunt this blow that seems very obvious many in the general public. People are too far gone in their beliefs when it comes to leftist ideology.

May the spirit of Justice from our Gods guide noble leaders to deal with this international menace. Maybe then the public will ask more questions into who and what made this ideology in the first place and follow the funding.

 

[Tethys333]

Obviously this is a communist.
I'm not even sure if this is true what I'm going to say but apparently there were phrases like "bella ciao!" and communist things written on the bullets.
According to what the BBC says the perpetrator wrote a note found under his keyboard where it said "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it."
The truth is that now because of this heartless person (and I am only saying this to maintain decorum) two children and a wife have been left fatherless and husbandless. He has ruined these people's lives. I hope the right measures will be taken

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Pacifism is the enabler of tyranny and injustice. There was a wonderful sermon by HPHC about the frailness of pacifism, which you prompted by your comment. While peace is enjoyable, it must be defended in the face of tyranny, even if one needs to fight a battle or a war to preserve it. This is where pacifists fail because they simply either deny the dangers all together or think that their lack of willingness to fight for the better will somehow change the society. Modern day Germany is an example of a totally pacified society due to Westerners aiding the (((enemy))) in instilling guilt and shame of being white, which soon came to be used against the same Westerners by the enemy. That is why many people in Germany are engineered to be goody liberals who willingly embrace foreign criminals and refuse to see them as criminals and enemies that do not care about their kindness. Of course, as HPHC mentioned in his latest sermon about the white race awakening, the kikesanity program stripped people of their national spirit and ancestral connections (it is truly a religion of the weak, gullible, dumb, cowardly and the deluded), which is why its secular form (liberalism) is such a trending new "religion". Yes, the enemy promotes pacifism and likes such a society because the chance of him being opposed are much slimmer.

As for MLK, he was obviously a (((marxist))) pawn who latter got assassinated, and I am not sure whether the assassin was random or simply a hitman from the enemy who maybe saw that the former was straying away from the path the enemy set for him. Notice how black leaders and activists who mentioned the enemy and their role in the misfortunes that blacks endured were all silenced or simply not given enough attention in the public. Many times, pacifists are given credit for something that they did not deserve, e.g. Gandhi in India (I mentioned you in detail about him and the appeasement method that benefited the enemies of Hindus).

So pacifists/non-violence advocates condemn violence against tyranny/injustice because of some social superstition, yes? If this is the case, it doesn't surprise me: Pacifism came from Xianity, and Xians tend to be superstitious of several ridiculous things all the time. The "violence begets violence" quote starts to make sense to me now. Just how many superstitions do Xians even have, anyway?

 

[nema]

I honestly don't believe the media for a second. Why would i though i don't think Charlie Kirk has been assassinated by a commie kid, these things are more complicated than that. Whoever did that, "they" chose a young guy with a family, showing the exact moment a bullet hit is neck..and why would they show us that, if not for emotional manipulation. "They" knew how the world would be influenced by that. Idiots are turning to christianity because in their mind killed=martyr, so in their mind Kirk was right just because he's dead. Wich is obviously false but that's why the government need a martyr sometimes, just to push an agenda. And I know it's an insanely paranoid way of looking at it, but it's also fitting to the INSANE alien regime we are living in...? Israel is run by the smartest intelligence in the world guys, they're not idiots. They know how to influence society, and they don't give a f**k if you speak good about them or not, if they want to kill somebody they just do.

 

[Astralnaut88]

The person who shot Charlie Kirk in the neck from 180 meters away is a professional assassin.



The bullet appears to have severed his artery and spinal cord, and the real killer has not yet been arrested.

[Disturbing video removed. Search and view at your own discretion]

It really does appear he was shot from behind.

 

[Sakra]

What do you mean by "inconvenient truths?" Is it facts they don't want to hear or ones that subtract from the "impact" they have on other people?

I mean the uncomfortable facts that often don't fit the 'narrative of peace' like violence, political repression, or whatever unicorn fallacy. But sure, if one tries to advocate against the ideas of pacifism they often find they're not given a choice.

The enemy knows they cannot completely deny their opposition some leverage, but only to a limited extent, but this goes both ways, which is what I hope a majority never come to understand without a fully matured understanding of the world we live in, figuring out some things they should've never gotten involved in if they had known it was THIS BAD, and that the only thing some know how to do is sit like a fucking cuck and watch while they let the problems thrive like tumors because they larp about the safety of the system they believe in and their audience consists of retards. But yeah, the political game is fucked. Everyone comes to realize they cannot operate as smoothly without a fallacy of leverage, which may be mistaken as pacifism.

Plato understood the importance of militarism, and although he did advocate for conscription in the sense that young people should undergo mandatory training, even possibly serve as soldiers, his view wasn’t a glorification of war or violence. It was an approach to ensuring that the state could protect itself, but also a way to ensure that those who fought were philosophically grounded and not driven by mere aggression or selfishness.

Many believe these things are just something they're either born to do or not which the books Krishna Conscience try to advocate, and then find that in times of war their population is unwilling to fight for the land that mothered them and flee to other countries to bite their helping hand later on. The same is true with the dogma of Ghandi the communist agent, everyone wants to believe in the fallacy of the greater good but the reality is untrue.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

I mean the uncomfortable facts that often don't fit the 'narrative of peace' like violence, political repression, or whatever unicorn fallacy. But sure, if one tries to advocate against the ideas of pacifism they often find they're not given a choice.

The enemy knows they cannot completely deny their opposition some leverage, but only to a limited extent, but this goes both ways, which is what I hope a majority never come to understand without a fully matured understanding of the world we live in, figuring out some things they should've never gotten involved in if they had known it was THIS BAD, and that the only thing some know how to do is sit like a fucking cuck and watch while they let the problems thrive like tumors because they larp about the safety of the system they believe in and their audience consists of retards. But yeah, the political game is fucked. Everyone comes to realize they cannot operate as smoothly without a fallacy of leverage, which may be mistaken as pacifism.

Plato understood the importance of militarism, and although he did advocate for conscription in the sense that young people should undergo mandatory training, even possibly serve as soldiers, his view wasn’t a glorification of war or violence. It was an approach to ensuring that the state could protect itself, but also a way to ensure that those who fought were philosophically grounded and not driven by mere aggression or selfishness.

Many believe these things are just something they're either born to do or not which the books Krishna Conscience try to advocate, and then find that in times of war their population is unwilling to fight for the land that mothered them and flee to other countries to bite their helping hand later on. The same is true with the dogma of Ghandi the communist agent, everyone wants to believe in the fallacy of the greater good but the reality is untrue.

What is the Unicorn fallacy and the Fallacy of Leverage?

These fallacies may be the key to understanding the flawed beliefs the NPC pacifists have in our societies.

 

[hailourtruegod]

It really does appear he was shot from behind.

No, it does not. I have to personally 100% disagree. Grainy videos, in my opinion, should not be used to push opinions.

Let's not entertain weak, and this is one of the most weakest, conspiracies around this. It only pushes confusion.

If that's the video that shows a bush and allegedly a person in it with a gun then the person who first mentions this conspiracy contradicts himself since the bush in question is in front of Charlie even though the video in the first says it was behind him.




Just talking is fine but we should do our best to investigate before posting conspiracies.

Im a little annoyed with myself I let myself get caught up by Candace Owens and it's pathetic watching her walk back her original stance now thats it's a fact it was done by someone who has basic Democrat party values and she is too stubborn to let it go. I like her stubbornness but it can obviously be detrimental at points.




This is the bigger problem:

The psy op of Americans to HATE Maga and Trump to the point of killing moderate influencers and calling for more. These are doctors and teachers saying this. Not a few of the fringe Left.

The main thing here is we are in the beginning of a civil war, or at least civil strife has began, caused by decades of Marxist brainwashing.

Ex-KGB agent Yuri Bezmonov does a great job explaining the process back in the 80s in an interview. The interview is ll over video sharing platforms.

Thats what we should be focused on and how to fix it.

I believe ToZ has the only answer and thats a radical cultural change to bring people back to peace and prosperity in a realistic manner. It'll be bumpy but our cause is Just and we carry the best goal for humanity and the world. A goal that never ends but only progression to a higher state. A divine mission that never ends because the universe is infinite.

Before all this, Justice needs to reign again in all civilized nations and we are on the brink of the world seeing the highest form of Justice being implemented by men who are either consciously or subconsciously by the Gods especially Zeus.

We know it'll get worse for those without because of their own ignorance and actions but our mission becomes more clear to the people as we go thru this transition.

Lastly, I do wonder if these antifa animals will try their best to psy op here. Itll be fun destroying their false narratives in this Divine corner of the world. They might have the marketing and mass mind psychology data at their fingertips but all those here really dedicated to this Path surpass these tactics thanks to divine wisdom.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

I honestly don't believe the media for a second. Why would i though i don't think Charlie Kirk has been assassinated by a commie kid, these things are more complicated than that. Whoever did that, "they" chose a young guy with a family, showing the exact moment a bullet hit is neck..and why would they show us that, if not for emotional manipulation. "They" knew how the world would be influenced by that. Idiots are turning to christianity because in their mind killed=martyr, so in their mind Kirk was right just because he's dead. Wich is obviously false but that's why the government need a martyr sometimes, just to push an agenda. And I know it's an insanely paranoid way of looking at it, but it's also fitting to the INSANE alien regime we are living in...? Israel is run by the smartest intelligence in the world guys, they're not idiots. They know how to influence society, and they don't give a f**k if you speak good about them or not, if they want to kill somebody they just do.

...And good for you, you're right.

Kirk wrote a letter to Netanyahu about Israel's dwindling support among the American youth, and stressed in his letter that Israel needs a "communications intervention" in regards to social media, and if recent posts on X are anything, it seems they've bought TikTok.


This letter (posted in five parts) not only confirms what you suspected, but Charlie Kirk was a Christian who supported Israel; another sacrificial pawn to not distract from Israel's warcrimes against Palestinians, but also other agendas, like the war on Ukraine. Just proves yet again that, without Christianity and its weak martyrs fulfilling everything, The yehuborim and Israel would've fallen apart more quickly.

 

[nema]

...And good for you, you're right.

Kirk wrote a letter to Netanyahu about Israel's dwindling support among the American youth, and stressed in his letter that Israel needs a "communications intervention" in regards to social media, and if recent posts on X are anything, it seems they've bought TikTok.


This letter (posted in five parts) not only confirms what you suspected, but Charlie Kirk was a Christian who supported Israel; another sacrificial pawn to not distract from Israel's warcrimes against Palestinians, but also other agendas, like the war on Ukraine. Just proves yet again that, without Christianity and its weak martyrs fulfilling everything, The yehuborim and Israel would've fallen apart more quickly.

Thanks, this is interesting.. it's easy to forget what kind of empty shells we are talking about here. People with 0 values, who just live to serve their masters...

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

There were also a handful lies and delusions that were promoted by him and believed by his followers, such as the big lie of America being founded as a Christian nation, and the fictional yehuborim Moses (there is also a big push by the Christards in Texas and the Buy Bull Belt in general to push a lie that this character in particular inspired the constitution via the commandments) and Yehubor's leader somehow being the inspiration for the constitution, which once again gives glory and credit to the yehuborim, while downplaying or emitting the contributions of the gentile thinkers and philosophers who truly inspired the founding fathers.

He also equated abortion with the WW2, which just pushes forward the WW2 narrative that yehuborim love hearing being promoted, and did not show much emphaty the possible victims of rape that might have ended up with pregnancy from such a situation.

His complaints about Marxism were valid, but he failed to see the paralel between that and the Xtian religion he so remained devoted to.

Equating Abortion with the WW2? Really, now?

Martyrdom is a weak concept; being killed for your beliefs doesn't automatically vindicate you or your narrative. One can be vindicated and still be alive and unharmed.

 

[Wisdom_Seeker]

Equating Abortion with the WW2? Really, now?

There is a video of him arguing with some random woman who brought up the comparison between abortion and the WW2 as a parallel, and he actually said that abortion is worse. It is true that many things are worse than the WW2, but constant yapping about the WW2 narrative when comparing everything bad in life shows the NPC behavior. To be fair, she baited him with that question.

 

[Mint]

Did anyone see this yet?

It looks so blatant that the alleged hitman was holding something in his palm, sticking out between his fingers, that he squeezes right as Charlie is shot.
Not sure what to think, but it appears to be exactly what the narrator is claiming.

 

[Henu the Great]

Did anyone see this yet?

It looks so blatant that the alleged hitman was holding something in his palm, sticking out between his fingers, that he squeezes right as Charlie is shot.
Not sure what to think, but it appears to be exactly what the narrator is claiming.

What is the narrator claiming?

 

[Mint]

What is the narrator claiming?

He got shot with a palm gun.

 

[Henu the Great]

He got shot with a palm gun.

figure of the past, I see. Could be, could be not.

 

[Mint]

figure of the past, I see. Could be, could be not.

The way the guy squeezes his hand at the moment of the gunshot is so uncanny to me. Look how his bottom two fingers move, there's a zoom in shot at 23 seconds.

 

[hailourtruegod]

I have to correct my stance on Candace.

First I let myself get jerked around by her words and conviction on who she is blaming so its my fault for just believing her right away. She can be very brash and thus she can jump ahead when its not time to say certain things. I too do this from time to time and working on articulating my points more level headed.

I undertand her frustration, as well.

My point is, her claim is starting hold legit concern. To the point there was an obvious push to discredit her immediately in other peoples youtube channels who are reporting on this. Its obvious their online agents came to the comment sections of certain youtubers who have been on the side of truth, logic and facts.

Im sure some of those here who watch the people I do have started to see this as well.

So the above makes it more concerning about this whole situation.

All in due time.