Analysis of the latest TOZ video on Jesus

[Priest - Alexandros Iowno]

This academic self masturbation is worthless for me, and I know of all the sides about the "atheists" and full on christianity propaganda defense, which this is, and people accepted it as they are dumb.

Horus, in his form as Heru-sa-Aset, is born of Isis after she reassembles the dismembered body of Osiris and magically conceives him through "necrosexual" union (Divine impregnation - advanced technological insemination) . This mythological conception, via divine will and ritual magic, is a virgin birth by ancient standards. Isis is never impregnated by a living man. Her sexuality is sacred, symbolic, and non-carnal in the conventional sense. Ancient texts describe her as a mother, yet virgin, mirroring precisely what Christianity tried to retrofit into Mary centuries later.

The ancient whole ordeal of virgin birth is all about miraculous, non-ordinary, divine conception, that was later attributed as a purity factor in regards to human women. This dishonesty of semantics or extreme precise details that the hypocritical Christians do in their own texts, they call them allegorical and generalize while on the offending side they argue about specific details and rationales that are blatant fallacies and based on disgusting dishonesty.

The entire metaphysical point is that life emerges from death through divine power, not from human lust. Moreover, the mythic function of Horus as the renewed Osiris, the savior of Egypt, and the one who defeats Set (as mythic evil) to restore divine order, forms the core structure of what was later mapped onto Jesus: a son of a god, born of divine conception, savior of humanity, restorer of balance, and conqueror of evil.

Isis, in the form of a bird, copulates with the deceased Osiris. At either side are Horus, although he is as yet unborn, and Isis in human form.

Virgin birth = woman had no sex (only for monkey IQ) TAKEN from ancient philosophy and metaphysical notions (Divine Conception) , the above is one of them.

 

[xlnt]

Who knows how many potential Zevists never became so because they were already familiar with these false claims and thus remained xians

False claims... well, remaining xian mainly has to do with the false claims of "Jesus" being "Gods son" and also "God", who died 2025 years ago for our "sins", and the low level intelligence it takes to actually belive in that for real.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

This academic self masturbation is worthless for me, and I know of all the sides about the "atheists" and full on christianity propaganda defense, which this is, and people accepted it as they are dumb.

Horus, in his form as Heru-sa-Aset, is born of Isis after she reassembles the dismembered body of Osiris and magically conceives him through "necrosexual" union (Divine impregnation - advanced technological insemination) . This mythological conception, via divine will and ritual magic, is a virgin birth by ancient standards. Isis is never impregnated by a living man. Her sexuality is sacred, symbolic, and non-carnal in the conventional sense. Ancient texts describe her as a mother, yet virgin, mirroring precisely what Christianity tried to retrofit into Mary centuries later.

The ancient whole ordeal of virgin birth is all about miraculous, non-ordinary, divine conception, that was later attributed as a purity factor in regards to human women. This dishonesty of semantics or extreme precise details that the hypocritical Christians do in their own texts, they call them allegorical and generalize while on the offending side they argue about specific details and rationales that are blatant fallacies and based on disgusting dishonesty.

The entire metaphysical point is that life emerges from death through divine power, not from human lust. Moreover, the mythic function of Horus as the renewed Osiris, the savior of Egypt, and the one who defeats Set (as mythic evil) to restore divine order, forms the core structure of what was later mapped onto Jesus: a son of a god, born of divine conception, savior of humanity, restorer of balance, and conqueror of evil.

Isis, in the form of a bird, copulates with the deceased Osiris. At either side are Horus, although he is as yet unborn, and Isis in human form.

Virgin birth = woman had no sex (only for monkey IQ) TAKEN from ancient philosophy and metaphysical notions (Divine Conception) , the above is one of them.

View attachment 7362

You call what I wrote academic self-masturbation then proceed to go into extreme detail on the spiritual truths behind virgin birth and the saviour God archetype, which I do appreciate but don’t you think that’s hypocritical?

I’m simply stating the truth. Besides Innana and Odin, I’m not aware of any other crucified Gods. I agree with and stated at the end that the jesus story is a stolen allegory on Divine alchemy, as you’ve reiterated. But then claiming things that aren’t true like citing the crucified saviors book ruins the whole message. Giving out false examples ruins the whole message even if the message is true.

Making such innacurate claims gives ammo for xians to peddle their propaganda. What I said and cited isn’t xian propaganda, besides the xians peddling their bs alongside their fact-checking of the Zeitgeist examples which all come from the fraudulent crucified saviors book. Accuracy is important, we don’t need to nor should we rely on false claims.

 

[Voice of Enki [SG]]

You call what I wrote academic self-masturbation then proceed to go into extreme detail on the spiritual truths behind virgin birth and the saviour God archetype, which I do appreciate but don’t you think that’s hypocritical?

I’m simply stating the truth. Besides Innana and Odin, I’m not aware of any other crucified Gods. I agree with and stated at the end that the jesus story is a stolen allegory on Divine alchemy, as you’ve reiterated. But then claiming things that aren’t true like citing the crucified saviors book ruins the whole message. Giving out false examples ruins the whole message even if the message is true.

Making such innacurate claims gives ammo for xians to peddle their propaganda. What I said and cited isn’t xian propaganda, besides the xians peddling their bs alongside their fact-checking of the Zeitgeist examples which all come from the fraudulent crucified saviors book. Accuracy is important, we don’t need to nor should we rely on false claims.

I have watched the Temple of Zeus video. There's nothing inaccurate in the video at all, what are you on about? You believe these nonsensical sources are more reputable than our understanding which completely precedes and eclipses what any secular works written by "academics" have to say on the subject?

Even then, everything said in the video is 100% accurate. You've not read this elsewhere so you conclude it is wrong? You must be kidding.

If you don't understand something, don't criticize it, ask questions instead to gain understanding. You keep mentioning inaccuracies, while there are none, and you are defending xianity here by your arguments...

Yes, what you do is academic self-masturbation, as all it amounts to is secular reading without understanding for the sake of ego gratification. There's no knowledge, wisdom or purpose.
What else is it, but academic self-masturbation?

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

I have watched the Temple of Zeus video. There's nothing inaccurate in the video at all, what are you on about? You believe these nonsensical sources are more reputable than our understanding which completely precedes and eclipses what any secular works written by "academics" have to say on the subject?

Even then, everything said in the video is 100% accurate. You've not read this elsewhere so you conclude it is wrong? You must be kidding.

If you don't understand something, don't criticize it, ask questions instead to gain understanding. You keep mentioning inaccuracies, while there are none, and you are defending xianity here by your arguments...

Yes, what you do is academic self-masturbation, as all it amounts to is secular reading without understanding for the sake of ego gratification. There's no knowledge, wisdom or purpose.
What else is it, but academic self-masturbation?

I’m afraid the video is not fully accurate. I wish it was and this is why I wrote all this.

Was Horus crucified? Did He get baptised or purified with water by someone named Anup? Did He have 12 disciples or students? Which myth about Horus says any of this about Him?

 

[Voice of Enki [SG]]

I’m afraid the video is not fully accurate. I wish it was and this is why I wrote all this.

Was Horus crucified? Did He get baptised or purified with water by someone named Anup? Did He have 12 disciples or students? Which myth about Horus says any of this about Him?

Have we watched the same video? I guess you must have watched something else, or maybe you haven't paid attention while watching.

"Furthermore, the very narrative architecture of the "jesus" persona is not an original revelation, but a syncretic patchwork, a brazen act of plagiarism drawing from a multitude of pre-existing Pagan Deities and Saviour figures."

Then follows examples of said Deities from which the Yehubor's leader persona was drafted.

Your issue stems from whether Anup the baptizer was a real persona in Horus Myth's or not, it seems. Which is exactly what many Yehubor's leader sympathizers argue across the internet, that the myth of the fictitious Yehubor's leader cannot be stolen from Horus, because according to xian sources and xian "academics" Anup the baptizer is not a persona that existed in the Myth's of Horus.

Ancient Egyptians did purification by water rituals, this is well documented. Originally this is spiritual allegory, but it was done literally as well, and both can be done simultaneously, physical action to mimic the spiritual purification process by form of ritual to actualize this in a person. Very normal process which was done in Ancient Egypt.

All of these are allegory, names do not matter, whether x was called Anup, Bob or John, whether he was x the baptizer or whatever, is unimportant. yehuborim took this allegory and ascribed this to the fictitious Yehubor's leader persona, which is the point of this portion of the video. What you are arguing is nothing more than semantics, which is worthless in this context.

The name is not important, the fact is, baptizing is allegorical in nature, and certainly happened in the Myth of Horus, which is where the baptizing of Yehubor's leader was stolen from, among other things. Baptizing originally is allegory of purification of the Soul through Divine cleansing ritual, after baptizing, one is pure, anointed by the Divine. As I said, there is nothing inaccurate in the video.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

Have we watched the same video? I guess you must have watched something else, or maybe you haven't paid attention while watching.

"Furthermore, the very narrative architecture of the "jesus" persona is not an original revelation, but a syncretic patchwork, a brazen act of plagiarism drawing from a multitude of pre-existing Pagan Deities and Saviour figures."

Then follows examples of said Deities from which the Yehubor's leader persona was drafted.

Your issue stems from whether Anup the baptizer was a real persona in Horus Myth's or not, it seems. Which is exactly what many Yehubor's leader sympathizers argue across the internet, that the myth of the fictitious Yehubor's leader cannot be stolen from Horus, because according to xian sources and xian "academics" Anup the baptizer is not a persona that existed in the Myth's of Horus.

Ancient Egyptians did purification by water rituals, this is well documented. Originally this is spiritual allegory, but it was done literally as well, and both can be done simultaneously, physical action to mimic the spiritual purification process by form of ritual to actualize this in a person. Very normal process which was done in Ancient Egypt.

All of these are allegory, names do not matter, whether x was called Anup, Bob or John, whether he was x the baptizer or whatever, is unimportant. yehuborim took this allegory and ascribed this to the fictitious Yehubor's leader persona, which is the point of this portion of the video. What you are arguing is nothing more than semantics, which is worthless in this context.

The name is not important, the fact is, baptizing is allegorical in nature, and certainly happened in the Myth of Horus, which is where the baptizing of Yehubor's leader was stolen from, among other things. Baptizing originally is allegory of purification of the Soul through Divine cleansing ritual, after baptizing, one is pure, anointed by the Divine. As I said, there is nothing inaccurate in the video.

9:33

"Horus of Egypt, born of the virgin ISIS, baptized by Anup the Baptizer, was crucified, resurrected and hailed as "the K R S T" performing miracles with 12 disciples"

I'm not disputing that the rite of baptism, or purification by water, was stolen by xians and yehuborim from Egypt. Now, from what I'm reading, Horus was given a rite of purification by water by Anubis, which was likely mistranslated as "Anup". However, I'm not finding anywhere that he or any of the Gods mentioned on the list on the Exposing Christianity page were crucified or hung from trees, or that Horus had 12 disicples or was reffered to as the "K R S T".

I'm not defending xianity. The whole second half of my OP was about dismantling xianity but with the accurate example of Inana's descent into the underworld, ultimately arguing that yes the jesus story is a plagiarised myth about alchemy.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

For anyone wondering why I'm doing this, it's not for pointless semantic reasons. There are hundreds to thousands of xians who are likely reading Exposing Xianity every day, and many of them will end up watching the video on jesus released by TOZ. If they're already familiar with the Zeitgeist nonsense or bother to research it for a few minutes, they'll find the claims made by the video and the page to be false, which could cost us future Zevists and has likely done so already. This is why I'm doing this.

 

[Acolyte Of Pan 666]

This is my last comment on this thread.

Just check the list for yourselves and do some research on the Gods/characters, the myths behind Them, and see how many were actually crucified:

• Tammuz of Syria, 1160 BCE
• Wittoba of the Telingonese, 552 BCE
• Iao of Nepal, 622 BCE Iao is often spelt "Jao" sound familiar? This is the root of the Hebrew god "Jehova."
• Hesus of the Celtic Druids, 834 BCE. Note the similarity of "Hesus" with "Jesus."
• Quetzalcoatl of Mexico 587 BCE
• Quirinus of Rome 506 BCE
• Prometheus 547 BCE "In the account of the crucifixion of Prometheus of Caucasus, as furnished by Seneca, Hesiod and other writers, it is stated that he was nailed to an upright beam of timber to which were affixed extended arms of wood, and that this cross was situated near the Caspian Straits."
• Thulis of Egypt, 1700 BCE
• Indra of Tibet, 725 BCE
• Alcestos of Euripedes, 600 BCE
• Atys of Phrygia, 1170 BCE
• Crite of Chaldea, 1200 BCE
• Bali of Orissa, 725 BCE
• Mithra of Persia, 600 BCE

 

[FancyMancy]

For anyone wondering why I'm doing this, it's not for pointless semantic reasons. There are hundreds to thousands of xians who are likely reading Exposing Xianity every day, and many of them will end up watching the video on jesus released by TOZ. If they're already familiar with the Zeitgeist nonsense or bother to research it for a few minutes, they'll find the claims made by the video and the page to be false, which could cost us future Zevists and has likely done so already. This is why I'm doing this.

I hae this but unfortunately sensationalism and propaganda are tools and weapons to use in wars and fighting. It's dirty, but... dare I say... necessary.

 

[serpentwalker666]

This is my last comment on this thread.

Just check the list for yourselves and do some research on the Gods/characters, the myths behind Them, and see how many were actually crucified:

• Tammuz of Syria, 1160 BCE
• Wittoba of the Telingonese, 552 BCE
• Iao of Nepal, 622 BCE Iao is often spelt "Jao" sound familiar? This is the root of the Hebrew god "Jehova."
• Hesus of the Celtic Druids, 834 BCE. Note the similarity of "Hesus" with "Jesus."
• Quetzalcoatl of Mexico 587 BCE
• Quirinus of Rome 506 BCE
• Prometheus 547 BCE "In the account of the crucifixion of Prometheus of Caucasus, as furnished by Seneca, Hesiod and other writers, it is stated that he was nailed to an upright beam of timber to which were affixed extended arms of wood, and that this cross was situated near the Caspian Straits."
• Thulis of Egypt, 1700 BCE
• Indra of Tibet, 725 BCE
• Alcestos of Euripedes, 600 BCE
• Atys of Phrygia, 1170 BCE
• Crite of Chaldea, 1200 BCE
• Bali of Orissa, 725 BCE
• Mithra of Persia, 600 BCE

I suggest you focus on your meditation program and your advancement as everything displayed and mentioned in the video is blatantly clear to the rest of us.

You are benefiting no one, not even yourself, by sitting here and debating the.. "inaccuracy" of the video. When it's fine as it is, and shares a major truth bomb on these subjects for Xians who come across it.

Seriously. I strongly recommend you ask your guardian daemon to guide you to more information here and put everything together yourself.

There is no issue with the video, just with your interpretation and doubts of it.