If one looks at liberalism its the core doctrine of Communism. Communism is just an economy modality to appeal to the conditions of the industrial period built within liberalism. That is why scholars have noted Weishaupt is the father of Communism not Marx. The liberalism of the jewish "illuminati" was the base for the jewish fueled "French" revolution the Jacobin's where the bolsheviks of their day. Liberalism is just another extentsion of political jewism. The jew saw the European's where moving towards a more secular state along with the scientific revolution and a desire for more individual freedoms and rights after chaffing under the yoke of the church and xianity for centuries. So they didn't try and stop the pendulm swing they just jumped aboard and sent their agents into the mix. The power of jewism is its ability to adapt new strains like any virus.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JoSNewsletter/message/290 Liberalism is Christianity without the Christ
William Gayley Simpson's Which Way Western Man?
Revilo Oliver
[My note "liberalism" as mentioned is secular [unconscious] xianity, this
doctrine was phased [jewed]in during the enlightenment period to keep this
program going as Europe was breaking free of xianity on many levels. This
doctrine is what the jews centered their illuminati doctrine around which was
later repackaged into an economic modality to appeal to the resentments of the
industrial era and called "Communism" and later repackaged as cultural marxism
but always the same old program at the core. Just listen to a liberal yak its
the same values as the cultural marxist [or xian] without the giga long
political lingoism. We are seeing the morphing of xianity into pure Communism.ie
Secular xianity. Communism always pushes on a liberal appeal because the core of
Communism is literally the doctrine of liberalism [secular xianity] framed into
a economic model. The police state and slaughter comes once the jews have
centralized power and then the later stage of their formula they drop the mask,
wipe out the Gentile usefool idiots and idealists who have served their purpose
and before they can become jaded and turn on the hand that lead them [and the
jews don't share power]. Leaving only the jews at the top and the Goyium slaves
at the bottom the way it was always planned behind the door.
Communism/liberalism is unconscious xianity and can only work where xianity has
planted the seed. Final proof is America had a full on cultural marxist
revolution in the sixties under xian-liberal rhetoric, American flag in one hand
the bible in the other:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JoSNewsletter/message/243 ]
Quote:
The other apostates I have mentioned, and many that are now forgotten, together
with almost all of the anti-Christians of recent centuries, exemplify the
operation of what may be called the law of cultural residues. In all civilized
societies, when a long-established and generally accepted belief is found to be
incredible, good minds abandon it, but they commonly retain derivative beliefs
that were originally deduced from the creed they have rejected and logically
must depend on it. Thus it happened that modern enemies of Christianity rejected
the mythology, but uncritically retained faith in the social and ethical
superstitions derived from it — a faith which they oddly call rational but hold
with a religious fervor.
They laugh at the silly story about Adam and his spare rib, but they continue to
believe in a "human race" descended from a single pair of ancestors and hence in
a "brotherhood of man." They speak of "all mankind," giving to the term an
unctuous and mystic meaning with which they do not invest corresponding terms,
such as "all marsupials" or "all ungulates." They prate about the "rights of
man," although a moment's thought should suffice to show that, in the absence of
a decree from a supernatural monarch, there can be no rights other than those
which the citizens of a stable and homogeneous society have, by covenant or
established custom, bestowed on themselves; and that while the citizens may show
kindness to aliens, slaves, and dogs, such beings obviously can have no rights.
They do not believe that one-third of a god became incarnate in the most squalid
region on earth to associate with illiterate peasants, harangue the rabble of a
barbarian race, and magically exalt the ignorant and uncouth to "make folly of
the wisdom of this world," so that "the last shall be first" — that they do not
believe, but they cling to the morbid hatred of superiority that makes
Christians dote on whatever is lowly, inferior, irrational, debased, deformed,
and degenerate.
They gabble about the "sanctity of human life" — especially the vilest forms of
it — without reflecting that it takes a god creator to make something sacred.
And they frantically agitate for a universal "equality" that can be attained
only by reducing all human beings to the level of the lowest, evidently unaware
that they are merely echoing the Christians' oft-expressed yearning to become
sheep (the most stupid of all mammals) herded by a good shepherd, which is
implicit in all the tales of the New Testament, although most bluntly expressed
in another gospel, which reports Jesus as promising that after he has tortured
and butchered the more civilized populations of the earth, there will be a
Resurrection, and his ovine pets will pop out of their graves, all of the same
age, all of the same sex, all of the same stature, and all having
indistinguishable features, so that they will be as identical as the bees in a
swarm.[2]
Although the "Liberal" and Marxist cults have doctrinal differences as great as
those that separate Lutherans from Baptists, they are basically the same
superstition, and whether or not we should call them religions depends on
whether we restrict the word to belief in supernatural persons or extend it to
include all forms of blind faith based on emotional excitement instead of
observed facts and reason. When those "atheistic" cults scream out their hatred
of "Fascists" and "Nazis," they obviously must believe that those wicked persons
are possessed of the Devil and should therefore be converted or exterminated to
pro[/IMG]</var>
fact and reason for unthinking faith in approved fairy stories, their lust to
extirpate evil is as great as that of the Christian mob that dragged the fair
and too intelligent Hypatia from her carriage and lovingly used oyster shells to
scrape the flesh from her bones while she was still alive.
With very few exceptions, the anti-Christians, no doubt unwittingly, retained in
their minds a large part of Christian doctrine, and they even revived the most
poisonous elements of the primitive Bolshevism of Antiquity, which had been
attenuated or held in abeyance by the established churches in the great days of
Christendom. And today, professed atheists do not think it odd that, on all
social questions, they are in substantial agreement with the howling dervishes
and evangelical shamans who, subsidized with lavish publicity by the Organized
Jewry who control the boob-tubes and other means of communication, greedily
participate in the current drive to reduce Americans to total imbecility with
every kind of irrational hoax.
--- In [url=mailto:
[email protected]]
[email protected][/url], "the_fire_starter666" <the_fire_starter666@... wrote:
Liberalism is the adaptation of xianity to fit our current society. The jews know that xianity is loosing it's grip, so they try to feed its teachings to people in other ways, such as liberalism, new age, wicca e.t.c. They always have a variant of xianity for each case.
--- In [url=mailto:
[email protected]]
[email protected][/url], "kvnfidler" <kvnfidler@ wrote:
I'm of the mindset that "liberalism" takes the mentality of xianity and feeds it to athiests in a non religious way. Thus these people are never actually free from xianity and ultimately jewry.
--- In [url=mailto:
[email protected]]
[email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:
Atheism is a reaction to the current situation, and as such is in many cases very reactionary in its mentality. And when we enter into ideological atheism, foolish in some areas where it butts heads with xian dogma, but wishes to keep the same dogma just without jewsus. And generally too caught up in wishful thinking of some of its mainstream leaders like Dawkin's who don't seem to understand what he pushes for in his books will lead to down the road, is not the worldview he wishes for. And its generally pointless to build a identity around what you don't believe in. But as mentioned this is the reactionary attitude which forms ideological atheism. And the jews are all over it making sure it stays false opposition to xianity and related programs......
