About covid

[Stormblood]

Seems like someone is finally asking the right questions about the alleged pandemics.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/10/17/coronavirus-fraud-biggest-crime-against-humanity.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20201017Z2&mid=DM679594&rid=989198095

The main arguments:

1. Lockdowns were imposed at a time when the virus was already in retreat and infection rates were starting to decline
2. Scientific evidence shows a majority of people already have built-in protection against the virus due to cross-reactive T cell immunity from exposure to cold and flu viruses26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35
3. The PCR test — which is being used as a gauge of infection rates and a justification for restrictive measures — "do not give any indication of an infection with any virus let alone an infection with SARS-CoV-2"

through an international lawyers' network, which is growing larger by the day, the German group of attorneys provides to all of their colleagues, in all other countries, free of charge, all relevant information, including expert opinions and testimonies of experts showing that the PCR tests cannot detect infections

An infection, a so-called hot infection, requires that the virus … penetrates into the cells, replicates there and causes symptoms such as headaches or a sore throat. Only then is a person really infected, in the sense of a hot infection; because only then is a person contagious, that is, able to infect others.

Until then it is completely harmless for both the host and all other people that the host comes into contact with … A number of highly respected scientists worldwide assume that there has never been a corona pandemic but only a PCR test pandemic …

There is substantial evidence all over for those who decide to read the full article. Evidence from microbiologists, virologist and other experts, not laymen.

 

[Stormblood]

Argument

Red herring

Have you read the article or even the few quotes I put?

If you haven't, read because it's not the existence of covid that is being disputed there but something else.

 

[High Priest Zevios Metathronos]

Thanks for this article, it was well done.

If you want you can hook it up on the main CoVid megathread. We have been advertising this one.

 

[Fuchs]

Another example: According to the mainstream media narrative, lockdown equals 'saving lives', and going back to normal equals mass death. Yet, in New York, where they have mask mandate since April, compliance is 99.9% (EVERYONE wears them, even outdoors, even when exercising, and people who don’t are treated like leper’s) and there aren't any mass gathering events, still has much more deaths than the states that re-opened, and life has almost returned to normal, where 99% of the people not wearing masks outdoors, restaurants, bars and so on working on full capacity etc. New York, that looks like a post apocalyptic dystopian movie, and there is 99.9 percent compliance somehow still has nearly 14 times higher death rate compared to the states that re-opened months ago and the majority of the population is not following these lockdown rules.

Did read they bribe the doctors to write more covid deads.

 

[Stormblood]

Thanks for this article, it was well done.

If you want you can hook it up on the main CoVid megathread. We have been advertising this one.

Will do, sir. Thank you for your hard work on the restoring the websites. It's very much appreciated.

...

Thank you for confirming you read something. Don't worry about that assertion. The key word is "Assume". Assuming something only gives it credit when the assumption is supported by substantial evidence. There is certainly a swab test pandemic. How much of that is actually covid is yet to be determined, given what you and many other highlighted in regards to manipulation of numbers in all sources.