Why Is Incest Wrong?

[luis]

We know that a kid born from incest can have many issues, this has been documented and most people know. 3rd cousin is fine because you're not blood related much but even with 2nd cousin you are taking a risk. We should do anything that doesn't make our bloodline weaker. Same thing with race mixing. You can clearly see with your eyes that it does kill races. If Whites keep race mixing in the end there are not going to be more Whites. The kid is always more Black or more Asian.

With time if race mixing keeps happening every race will disappear. Why should we care? Because our souls are not going to reincarnate in race mixed bodies, you are doing a genocide and the offsprings are going to be way weaker than the original races. We can see this with our own eyes, same thing with incest but a lot of people are to brainwashed to see it.

 

[bsod]

We know that a kid born from incest can have many issues, this has been documented and most people know. 3rd cousin is fine because you're not blood related much but even with 2nd cousin you are taking a risk. We should do anything that doesn't make our bloodline weaker.

Have you heard of pedigree collapse? It concludes that with any finite number of ancestors, inbreeding is inevitable. I will give an example.
Say you have a tribe of 8 people, 4 couples, the first generation of kids to be born from the 4 couples, will be able to copulate un-incestually, as they are unrelated, and lets assume for the sake of simplifying the math, that every couple only has 2 children, so now from the 8 original people we now have 8 extra offspring

Now these 8 offspring, who are the 2nd generation, all have 8 parents, the 1st generation, who are unrelated, so let's keep going and move onto the next generation. Again the 8 offspring un-incestually copulate, and every couple has 2 children, the 3rd generation now consists of another 8 offspring.

The 3rd generation now has a set of 4 grandparents, so they have aunts and uncles now, and therefore cousins. So far there are 3 generations, 8 within each, and within the 3rd generation, half of the people are related as cousins. In the MOST optimal case, we went within 2 generations from having everyone unrelated, to half of the population belonging to the same family tree. Okay, so let's move onto the 4th generation, seeing as they can still copulate one more time without incest.

Now at the 4th generation person has been born, and we draw their family tree and we discover something - this person has the blood of every single original ancestor. Their great grandparents are the 8 people who started the tribe. Subsequently the remaining 7 people who are born also share all of the same great grandparents (though not necessarily parents or grandparents). At this point everyone is related as 2nd cousins. The family tree has collapsed to a single point.

From this point forward, any reproduction would be incestuous. The 5th generation would have to reproduce with their cousins, and the 6th? Their siblings.

 

[luis]

We know that a kid born from incest can have many issues, this has been documented and most people know. 3rd cousin is fine because you're not blood related much but even with 2nd cousin you are taking a risk. We should do anything that doesn't make our bloodline weaker.

Have you heard of pedigree collapse? It concludes that with any finite number of ancestors, inbreeding is inevitable. I will give an example.
Say you have a tribe of 8 people, 4 couples, the first generation of kids to be born from the 4 couples, will be able to copulate un-incestually, as they are unrelated, and lets assume for the sake of simplifying the math, that every couple only has 2 children, so now from the 8 original people we now have 8 extra offspring

Now these 8 offspring, who are the 2nd generation, all have 8 parents, the 1st generation, who are unrelated, so let's keep going and move onto the next generation. Again the 8 offspring un-incestually copulate, and every couple has 2 children, the 3rd generation now consists of another 8 offspring.

The 3rd generation now has a set of 4 grandparents, so they have aunts and uncles now, and therefore cousins. So far there are 3 generations, 8 within each, and within the 3rd generation, half of the people are related as cousins. In the MOST optimal case, we went within 2 generations from having everyone unrelated, to half of the population belonging to the same family tree. Okay, so let's move onto the 4th generation, seeing as they can still copulate one more time without incest.

Now at the 4th generation person has been born, and we draw their family tree and we discover something - this person has the blood of every single original ancestor. Their great grandparents are the 8 people who started the tribe. Subsequently the remaining 7 people who are born also share all of the same great grandparents (though not necessarily parents or grandparents). At this point everyone is related as 2nd cousins. The family tree has collapsed to a single point.

From this point forward, any reproduction would be incestuous. The 5th generation would have to reproduce with their cousins, and the 6th? Their siblings.

Okay but your example is about a tribe of 8 peoples. In real life you have many many people. This may happen even here and this is why there may be people unknowingly affected by this but in a Satanic world this issue can be fully prevented. In any case just by living in huge cities with lots of people helps with this. 2nd cousins while not being the best to have kids with, its still better than 1st cousins.

 

[Hs666]

...

Everyone has their own level of understanding.

This is about "oneself." As I told you before. The answer is there. It answers all your questions, even the one that "obsesses" you about "pedigree collapse."

Don't be too hard on yourself. Give yourself time. Everyone understands the knowledge he is shown with "his time."

This also happens with advancement that is by degrees. GODS communicate with us in stages, when we are ready they will give us the information.

Some information you may understand in the next lifetimes as well. Don't worry about that. Some clergy writings are complex to understand immediately.

Knowledge comes from the gods. You cannot have the same kind of "knowledge" and how things work at their level.

The "pedigree collapse" thing, if you know about it, do you think Gods don't know about it?, if there was a danger regarding the issue of Racial Line Health, you would know about it and they wouldn't? Do you think the gods would leave us in ruins?

You are no match for them. Stick to what is said. Don't try to argue with other "links". NO mixing, NO incest causing racial line damage like Yehuborim do.

If there are any "issues" in the future we will be notified. Relax. your "knowledge" is not the height. This causes "links" to issues that don't make sense, or are already handled.

The answers are in the Jos. Work on your third eye. Anything that is contrary to the knowledge that comes to us from Gods is wrong.

 

[Shakra]

Humans are not carnivores or herbivores. We are omnivores, like pigs are. Our intestinal tract is obvious proof of this. Tribes aren't carnivores either... 25 percent of their diets tend to be honey. Even Inuit store endless stuff like berries in ice.

I find the idea of "carnivores" and "herbivores" to be vague, nothing can truly be either, though they can prefer to. Sometimes a cow may catch a bug or two, same with a wolf feeding on a grass covered carcass.

 

[Novice Priest Karnonnos]

Also on the claim that white people are the least incestuous, it is genetically wrong because white people are the least genetically diverse, comparing to the black and asian race, yes we have many varying colours and complexions, but these all come from the same genes. When we look at a genetic distance chart, where every ethnic group is charted as an FST value from one another, we discover that the European genetic cluster is several times smaller than that of the African or Asian. To claim that whites are the least incestuous, is to claim that we racemixed the most which is not the case, the other races are much more racially mixed (I say this without any hostility btw!)

Heterogeneity =/= inbreeding. Please understand this. There are highly inbred populations who are genomically heterogeneous. There are non-inbred populations who are genomically homogeneous.

The sample for extreme inbreeding in UK populations is very low, 1 in 3,168. Elsewhere this rises to 1 in 1,000 or even one in 200.

Race-mixing and inbreeding are NOT ANTONYMS. The Arab world should make this blatantly obvious enough to you. If a founding population is mixed and then practices 1st cousin marriage for generations it becomes highly inbred.

 

[bsod]

Some information you may understand in the next lifetimes as well. Don't worry about that. Some clergy writings are complex to understand immediately.

Knowledge comes from the gods. You cannot have the same kind of "knowledge" and how things work at their level.

The "pedigree collapse" thing, if you know about it, do you think Gods don't know about it?, if there was a danger regarding the issue of Racial Line Health, you would know about it and they wouldn't? Do you think the gods would leave us in ruins?

If there are any "issues" in the future we will be notified. Relax. your "knowledge" is not the height. This causes "links" to issues that don't make sense, or are already handled.

As I understand it, you don't know the answer to my question but you (rightfully) trust in the Gods to address this issue when it comes in due time, which is completely fine. But what if that answer which you don't know, but the Gods do, is simply that the alleged biological issues with inbreeding are all but a modern day hoax?
I say that because this was an actual "problem" in the past, some of the oldest reconstructed family trees in Europe (such as one made from a kurgan burial mound), almost always show cousin marriages. If incest from pedigree collapse were a problem back then, then surely the Gods would have dealt with it, but it doesn't seem to have been a problem after all.

Heterogeneity =/= inbreeding. Please understand this. There are highly inbred populations who are genomically heterogeneous. There are non-inbred populations who are genomically homogeneous.

The sample for extreme inbreeding in UK populations is very low, 1 in 3,168. Elsewhere this rises to 1 in 1,000 or even one in 200.

Race-mixing and inbreeding are NOT ANTONYMS. The Arab world should make this blatantly obvious enough to you. If a founding population is mixed and then practices 1st cousin marriage for generations it becomes highly inbred.

You are correct in that inbreeding is not the same as homogeneity, as you correctly stated there are mixed race couples who inbreed and same race couples who don't.

... however the risks of inbreeding stem from homogenity, not the actual act of inbreeding as defined as cousin/sister relationships.

For example, suppose there are two half siblings, one purely white and the other half black. Genetically any random person in Europe, hell even an Arab, is more related to the white sibling than their half sibling. In fact there would be no risk of inbreeding here because of how genetically separate they are. So while they are inbreeding, it is not homogeneity.

Yet at the same time, two random European people, are far more genetically similar than those two siblings. There is more supposed genetic risk here than there is between two actual family members who are racially mixed, because there are more alternative genes to choose from for the child to avoid diseases or disorders.

In other words, while commonly genetic issues are identified with inbreeding, it should actually be identified with homogeneity, because that is the real cause of the supposed problems of children inheriting diseases or other genetic disorders (due to a lack of genetic diversity to allow the picking of healthier alternative genes from a genetically distant parent).

You are right that racemixing and inbreeding are not directly antonyms, but homogeneity and heterogeneity are, and seeing as heterogeneity is promoted by the elites, I question whether there are any problems involved with homogeneity (what is called inbreeding) to begin with.

 

[Head Guardian Blitzkreig]

...

Do you see any manifestations of your concerns within the populace of Europe, which as existed for thousands of years now?
I think you basically resolved this, by realizing that is it not actually an issue to begin with. Instead of following along the logical train that was producing this conclusion, sometimes it helps to step back and judge from a more realistic standpoint.

We can see problems with those who inbreed, and we have yet to see any problems with those who do not. Therefore, where arises the desire to open this investigation? There are more pressing problems in which you could apply your intellect.

 

[bsod]

" post_id=436902 time=1681693969 user_id=21286]

...

Do you see any manifestations of your concerns within the populace of Europe, which as existed for thousands of years now?
I think you basically resolved this, by realizing that is it not actually an issue to begin with. Instead of following along the logical train that was producing this conclusion, sometimes it helps to step back and judge from a more realistic standpoint.

We can see problems with those who inbreed, and we have yet to see any problems with those who do not. Therefore, where arises the desire to open this investigation? There are more pressing problems in which you could apply your intellect.

Today? No. Especially considering it is very easy to date someone from another country because of ease of travel and communication via internet.

But in the past, this was an issue and it was simply ignored. There is an ancient family tree reconstructed from people buried in a kurgan mound which shows incestuous relationships in Europe's past.

As for the future, is there is ever another cataclysm as there has been in the past, leading to isolation and reduced populations, this will be a problem.